Search Results

Search found 33438 results on 1338 pages for 'html tags'.

Page 316/1338 | < Previous Page | 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323  | Next Page >

  • jquery issue if checked change bg color

    - by user3058067
    Hello i made a script that is supposed to change background when radio is selected. It works but when another radio is selected the previous still remains with the selected color. It works for checkboxes but not for radio. <script type="text/javascript"> $(".table").change(function(){ var c = this.checked ? "#18b9e7" : "#b6bf34"; $(this).parent().css("background-color", c); }); </script> Here is a jsfiddle

    Read the article

  • Error in Decompression?

    - by user595606
    I am writing a crawler for a website. Its response is gzip encoded. I am not able to parse correctly a particular field, though the decompression is successful. I am also using htmlagilitypack to parse it, the parsed value of the field is only a part of the original value as an example : I am getting only /wEWAwKc04vTCQKb86mzBwKln/PuCg== whereas the firebug shows the actual value as much longer: /wEWBgKj7IuJCgKb86mzBwKln/PuCgLT250qAtC0+8cMAvimiNYD what does the '==' at the end means? I am assuming it that its a error on decompressors behalf?

    Read the article

  • CSS: How to affect OTHER elements when a div is hovered

    - by Trufa
    I think this is a very basic question but I not sure how/if it can be done. What I want to do is to is a certain div is hovered, affect the properties of another div. For example, in this simple example when you hover over #cube it changes the background-color but what I that when I hover over #container, #cubeis affected. I don't want to explain further cause I think it might be confusing, but please ask the the question is no clear enough!! Thanks in advance!! jQueriers: abstain yourselves!! only CSS answers :)

    Read the article

  • URL tracking functionality

    - by Mika H.
    I want my webpage to have two parts. The top part has a textbox. When the user types a URL into the textbox, the bottom part browses to the content of that URL. When the user clicks a link within the bottom part, the bottom part navigates to the new URL, and the textbox in the top part changes to the new URL. How can I do it? NOTE: This behavior is the same as in Google Translate (e.g. here), but without any translation.

    Read the article

  • Force jQuery ajax

    - by Mick
    Hi I noticed that jquery ajax request sometimes take about 1-2 seconds before the responce comes is this normal and is there any way to short that time to minimal? The responce type is jquery and it's small. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Table-cell property ignores width

    - by user1251698
    I have set a CSS propery table-cell for a div. I have also specified the width for the div and set overflow hidden. But because of the table-cell property the div does not care about the width. If I place any large image, it goes out of the width. How can i use the table-cell and use the fixed width for the div? .right{ display: table-cell; overflow: hidden !important; vertical-align: top; width: 400px; }

    Read the article

  • Apply a specific class to the first item in a series with PHP

    - by Thomas
    I have a php script that echoes a series of uploaded images and I need to apply a class to the first image echoed in the series. Is this possible? For example, if I want to display 10 images and apply a class to only the first image, how would I go about it? Here is the code, I am working with: <div id="gallery"> <?php query_posts('cat=7'); while(have_posts()) { the_post(); $image_tag = wp_get_post_image('return_html=true'); $resized_img = getphpthumburl($image_tag,'h=387&w=587&zc=1'); $url = get_permalink(); $Price ='Price'; $Location = 'Location'; $title = $post->post_title; echo "<a href='$url'><img src='$resized_img' width='587' height='387' "; echo "rel=\"<div class='gallery_title'><h2>"; echo $title; echo "</h2></div>"; echo "<div class='pre_box'>Rate:</div><div class='entry'>\$"; echo get_post_meta($post->ID, $Price, true); echo "</div><div class='pre_box'>Location:</div><div class='entry'>"; echo get_post_meta($post->ID, $Location, true); echo "</div>\""; echo "'/></a>"; echo ""; } ?> On line 13, the code looks like this: echo "<a href='$url'><img src='$resized_img' width='587' height='387' "; For the first item only, I need it to look like this: echo "<a href='$url' class='show'><img src='$resized_img' width='587' height='387' ";

    Read the article

  • How to bring a modal to the front of the page using bootstrap?

    - by sharataka
    I am trying to implement a modal using bootstrap. When I click on the button the screen fades and the modal appears, but it appears behind the images in and is unreadable for the user. How do I bring the modal forward? <div class ="container-fluid"> <div class = "row-fluid"> <div class = "span2"> <!-- Modal --> <div class="modal hide fade" id="myModal"> <div class="modal-header"> <a class="close" data-dismiss="modal">×</a> <h3>Modal header</h3> </div> <div class="modal-body"> <p>One fine body…</p> </div> <div class="modal-footer"> <a href="#" class="btn">Close</a> <a href="#" class="btn btn-primary">Save changes</a> </div> </div> <a data-toggle="modal" href="#myModal" class="btn btn-primary">Launch demo modal</a> </div> <div class = "span8"> #a lot of images in this div </div> </div> </div>

    Read the article

  • Make fully visible one element from overflow:hidden element

    - by Oleksandr Khavdiy
    Please check http://jsfiddle.net/mtN6R/5/ .tooltip{ color:red; } .wrapper { overflow:hidden; height:50px; border:1px solid black; width:50px; } <div class="wrapper"> <div class='tooltip'>A big tooltip which should be visible fully</div> A lot of text<br> A lot of text<br> </div> I need .tooltip make fully visible but I can't take it outside wrapper. Can we stylize that example so .tooltip will be shown above wrapper and the rest content will stay as is?

    Read the article

  • Javascript/jQuery: programmatically follow a link

    - by Dan
    In Javascript code, I would like to programmatically cause the browser to follow a link that's on my page. Simple case: <a id="foo" href="mailto:[email protected]">something</a> function goToBar() { $('#foo').trigger('follow'); } This is hypothetical as it doesn't actually work. And no, triggering click doesn't do it. I am aware of window.location and window.open but these differ from native link-following in some ways that matter to me: a) in the presence of a <base /> element, and b) in the case of mailto URLs. The latter in particular is significant. In Firefox at least, calling window.location.href = "mailto:[email protected]" causes the window's unload handlers to fire, whereas simply clicking a mailto link does not, as far as I can tell. I'm looking for a way to trigger the browser's default handling of links, from Javascript code. Does such a mechanism exist? Toolkit-specific answers also welcome (especially for Gecko).

    Read the article

  • In the following list, how do I prevent jQuery from interacting with part of it.

    - by kylex
    I have the following list structure: <ul> <li>One</li> <li class="topActive">Two <ul> <li class="active">Two-1 <ul> <li>Two-1-1</li> </ul> </li> <li>Two-2</li> </ul> </li> <li>Three <ul> <li>Three-1</li> </ul> </li> </ul> with the following jQuery: $("ul>li>ul").hide(); $("ul>li>ul>li>ul").hide(); $("ul>li>ul>li>ul>ul>li").hide(); $('.active').parents().show();????????? $("ul>li").hoverIntent( function(){ $(this).children('ul').slideDown('fast'); }, function(){ $(this).children('ul').slideUp('fast'); } ); $("ul>li>ul>li").hoverIntent( function(){ $(this).children('ul').slideDown('fast'); }, function(){ $(this).children('ul').slideUp('fast'); } ); What I would like is this: When an li class is topActive, everything within that class down to the current class can not be affected by the jQuery that causes the list to slide up and down. so in the case provided the following would show, along with the top level: One Two Two-1 Two-2 Three And when I mouse over either, Two, or Two-1 or Two-2 nothing happens, but if I mouse over Three, the jQuery will cause it to slide up or slide down. In this example: <ul> <li>One</li> <li class="topActive">Two <ul> <li class="active">Two-1 <ul> <li>Two-1-1</li> </ul> </li> <li>Two-2</li> </ul> </li> <li>Three <ul> <li>Three-1</li> </ul> </li> </ul> When I mouseover Two-1, it will slide down, but when I mouse out Two-1 will remain. One Two Two-1 Two-2 Three Any suggestsions for either a CSS or jQuery implementation (or mixture of the two)?

    Read the article

  • How to code a 'Next in Results' within search results in PHP

    - by thebluefox
    Right, bit of a head scratcher, although I've got a feeling there's an obvious answer and I'm just not seeing the wood for the trees. Baiscally, using Solr as a search engine for my site, bringing back 15 results per page. When you click on a result, you get a detail page, that has a "Next in Results" link on it, which obviously forwards you on to the next result. Whats the best way of doing this? I've come up with a few solutions but they're either too inpractical or just don't work. I could store all the ids in a session array, then grab the one after the current one and put that in the link. But with possibly hundreds/thousands of results, the memory that array would need, and the performance hit of dealing with it isn't practical. I could take the same approach and put it into the db, but I'll still have to deal with a potentially huge array when I grab them out of the db. Or; I could do the search again, only returning the id's, and grab the one after the one we're currently looking at. I think this could be the best option? Although it does seem kind of messy, namely because of when I have to select the id thats on a different 'page' (ie the 16th, 31st etc result). Unless I pass through where it was in the results, and select from there, but that still doesn't seem like the right way to do it. I'm really sorry if this is just complete nonsense, any help is massively appreciated as always, Cheers guys!

    Read the article

  • blank space on google home page

    - by topgun_ivard
    2 questions, i was doing nothing productive, and tried selecting the google home page (a left click drag and select whole page) on google.com i see that beside the search box, on the left side, there is an empty space &nbsp; i looked up the source code and there indeed was a <td width=25%>&nbsp;</td> stupid as it may sound, but i was still curious to know why the blank space is out there..or is it just a simple typo?? :) also, any idea what window.lol&&lol() does? curious yet again, google search didnt get me any result and i thought i would turn to stackoverflow to enlighten me... thanks, ivar

    Read the article

  • SPAN inside A inside H1 display in Chrome 5

    - by devils-avacado
    <h1> <a>Lorem ipsum <span>dolor</span> </a> </h1> In Chrome the contents of the SPAN have a line break in front of them, "dolor" is displayed on the line below, even with display:inline explicitly set. Expected it to display on same line as "Lorem ipsum". Displays fine in IE8 and FF3.5. Any fixes? Chrome 5.0.375.38 on Win7 x64

    Read the article

  • input in table > td, But yet extra bottom spacing between rows! Internet Explorer

    - by phpExe
    Im using meyer css reset. But I have problem with input in a table. There in extra space between rows: <table class="table" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0"> <tr> <td>&nbsp;</td> <td>1</td> <td>2</td> <td>3</td> <td>4</td> <td>5</td> <td>6</td> <td>7</td> <td>8</td> <td>9</td> <td>10</td> </tr> <tr> <td>1</td> <td><input type="text"/></td> <td><input type="text"/></td> <td><input type="text"/></td> <td><input type="text"/></td> <td><input type="text"/></td> <td><input type="text"/></td> <td><input type="text" class="black"/></td> <td><input type="text"/></td> <td><input type="text"/></td> <td><input type="text"/></td> </tr> <tr> <td>2</td> <td><input type="text" /></td> <td><input type="text"/></td> <td><input type="text"/></td> <td><input type="text"/></td> <td><input type="text"/></td> <td><input type="text"/></td> <td><input type="text"/></td> <td><input type="text" class="black"/></td> <td><input type="text"/></td> <td><input type="text"/></td> </tr> </table> and css: .table { border-collapse: collapse; border-spacing: 0px; } .table tr { margin-bottom:0; overflow:hidden; height:25px; width: 100%; padding:0; } .table input { width:25px; height:25px; border:1px solid #000; text-align:center; } .black { background:#000; } Why there is extra bottom spacing in internet explorer (I hate ie :(()? Thanks alot

    Read the article

  • How to change the number of columns in a table dynamically but still keep the table layout intact?

    - by gurupriyan.e
    I have a 'n' column table , the first column is a drop down box , on selecting the options from the drop down, the other columns change. For eg: first drop down might need to display a text box and a button , the second drop down 3 text boxes and a button and so on. There is only one row in the table. What is the best solution to achieve this. with Sincere thanks,

    Read the article

  • Should I Use Anchor, Button Or Form Submit For "Follow" Feature In Rails

    - by James
    I am developing an application in Rails 3 using a nosql database. I am trying to add a "Follow" feature similar to twitter or github. In terms of markup, I have determined that there are three ways to do this. 1) Use a regular anchor. (Github Uses This Method) <a href="/users/follow?target=Joe">Follow</a> 2) Use a button. (Twitter Uses This Method) <button href="/friendships/create/">Follow</button> 3) Use a form with a submit button. (Has some advantages for me, but I haven't see anyone do it yet.) <form method="post" id="connection_new" class="connection_new" action="/users/follow"> <input type="hidden" value="60d7b563355243796dd8496e17d36329" name="target" id="target"> <input type="submit" value="Follow" name="commit" id="connection_submit"> </form> Since I want to store the user_id in the database and not the username, options 1 and 2 will force me to do a database query to get the actual user_id, whereas option 3 will allow me to store the user_id in a hidden form field so that I don't have to do any database lookups. I can just get the id from the params hash on form submission. I have successfully got each of these methods working, but I would like to know what is the best way to do this. Which way is more semantic, secure, better for spiders, etc...? Is there a reason both twitter and github don't use forms to do this? Any guidance would be appreciated. I am leaning towards using the form method since then I don't have to query the db to get the id of the user, but I am worried that there must be a reason the big guys are just using anchors or buttons for this. I am a newb so go easy on me if I am totally missing something. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Looking for icon shop

    - by citronas
    I'm looking for nice icons for my webapplications. Some of these applications are commercial applications. I want to polish them up by using nice looking icons, but where do I find specific icons/grafics? Does anybody know a icon shop, that allows me to buy single icons for commercial use? Payable via paypal or credit card.

    Read the article

  • Rails: form input type and getting the filename

    - by Shyam
    Hi, As I am using Ruby on Rails to build an application, which only runs locally, I am lost in the woods (a nuby without a compass). I have a simple MVC application and my view is missing one thing I could really use. I want to select a local file just to retrieve it's filename. I know it's relatively easy to use the form tag helpers for uploading: <%= file_field 'upload', 'datafile' %></p> I wonder how I could get the filename from the selected file, without uploading the file.

    Read the article

  • How new is @font-face, and what do I need to know before I add it to a website?

    - by DavidR
    I started getting into reading design blogs a little while ago, and it seemed that @font-face got really popular sometime late last year, or something like that, because I was under the impression that it was a new emerging feature of the web. But then I saw that Internet Explorer has had it since IE4 (with some conversion). So is it common to see @font-face online nowadays? Sould I have anything in mind with respect to accessibility, legality, or rendering before I do something like this? I saw that Hulu.com renders fonts with Canvas and a javascript called "cufon."

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323  | Next Page >