Search Results

Search found 14348 results on 574 pages for 'planet mysql'.

Page 352/574 | < Previous Page | 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359  | Next Page >

  • sql select with exact outcome

    - by Shiro
    Asking a simple question, just want everyone have fun to solve it. I got 2 tables. 1. Student 2. Course Student +----+--------+ | id | name | +----+--------+ | 1 | User1 | | 2 | User2 | +----+--------+ Course +----+------------+------------+ | id | student_id | course_name| +----+------------+------------+ | 1 | 1 | English | | 2 | 1 | Chinese | | 3 | 2 | English | | 4 | 2 | Japanese | +----+------------+------------+ I would like to get the result all student, who have taken English and Chinese, NOT English or Chinese. Expected result: +----+------------+------------+ | id | student_id | course_name| +----+------------+------------+ | 1 | 1 | English | | 2 | 1 | Chinese | +----+------------+------------+ What we normally do is select * from student join course on (student.id = course.student_id) WHERE course_name = 'English' OR course_name = 'Chinese' but in this result I can get User2 record which is not my expected result. I want the record only display the User take the course English+Chinese only.

    Read the article

  • How to get the answers version and use it in IF loop

    - by sai
    delimiter // DROP PROCEDURE `getData`// CREATE DEFINER=`root`@`localhost` PROCEDURE `getData`(IN templateName VARCHAR(45),IN templateVersion VARCHAR(45),IN userId VARCHAR(45)) BEGIN set @version = CONCAT("SELECT `saveOEMsData_answersVersion` FROM `saveOEMsData` WHERE `saveOEMsData_templateName` = '",templateName,"' AND `saveOEMsData_templateVersion` = ",templateVersion," AND `saveOEMsData_userId`= ",userId); PREPARE s1 from @version; EXECUTE S1; END // delimiter ; I am retreiving saveOEMsData_answersVersion, but I have to use it in an IF loop, as in if the version == 1, then I would use a query, else I would use something else. But I am not able to use the version. Could someone help with this?? I am only able to print but not able to use the version.

    Read the article

  • A good approach to db planing for reporting service

    - by Itay Moav
    The scenario: Big system (~200 tables). 60,000 users. Complex reports that will require me to do multiple queries for each report and even those will be complex queries with inner queries all over the place + some processing in PHP. I have seen an approach, which I am not sure about: Having one centralized, de-normalized, table that registers any activity in the system which is reportable. This table will hold mostly foreign keys, so she should be fairly compact and fast. So, for example (My system is a virtual learning management system), A user enrolls to course, the table stores the user id, date, course id, organization id, activity type (enrollment). Of course I also store this data in a normalized DB, which the actual application uses. Pros I see: easy, maintainable queries and code to process data and fast retrieval. Cons: there is a danger of the de-normalized table to be out of sync with the real DB. Is this approach worth considering, or (preferably from experience) is total $#%#%t?

    Read the article

  • Letting users trial your web app before sign-up: sessions or temp db?

    - by Mat
    I've seen a few instances now where web applications are letting try them out without you having to sign-up (though to save you need to of course). example: trial at http://minutedock.com/ I'm wondering about doing this for my own web app and the fundamental question is whether to store their info into sessions or into a temp user table? The temp user table would allow logging and potentially be less of a hit on the server correct? Is there a best practice here?

    Read the article

  • Wordpress Database SQL query help needed

    - by i-CONICA
    Hi, I've written a PHP script to access the latest item from the wordpress database, which it does. But I need to use it twice, once for the latest item from a specific category, and another from a differerent category... But right now I cannot figure out how to put the query together. The post has a post_parent, which in another table, called wp_term_relationships, is referred to as object_id, and has a term_taxonomy_id, which then relates to a different table, called wp_terms where the term_taxonomy_id is now term_id and then you have the category slug name available to select... I really cannot understand how this query would work though. I've made a really crap mock up of it, to try to "visually" explain what i'm trying to do... SELECT * FROM wp_posts WHERE post_status = 'publish' AND (SELECT term_taxonomy_id FROM wp_term_relationships WHERE object_id = post_parent) AND (SELECT slug FROM wp_terms WHERE term_id = term_taxonomy_id) ORDER BY ID DESC LIMIT 1 Really would appreciate some help... Thanks.

    Read the article

  • how have defined connection within function for pdo communication with DB

    - by Scarface
    hey guys I just started trying to convert my query structure to PDO and I have come across a weird problem. When I call a pdo query connection within a function and the connection is included outside the function, the connection becomes undefined. Anyone know what I am doing wrong here? I was just playing with it, my example is below. include("includes/connection.php"); function query(){ $user='user'; $id='100'; $sql = 'SELECT * FROM users'; $stmt = $conn->prepare($sql); $result=$stmt->execute(array($user, $id)); echo $count=$stmt->rowCount(); if (!$result || $stmt->rowCount()>=1){ echo 'balls'; } // now iterate over the result as if we obtained // the $stmt in a call to PDO::query() while($r = $stmt->fetch(PDO::FETCH_ASSOC)) { echo "$r[username] $r[id] \n"; } } query();

    Read the article

  • status update error (null field)

    - by ejah85
    hai guys... i .ve the problem that i cannot be recovered yet... i have one form where admin need to approve or reject the booking request... i've set the b_status field in table usage IN PROCESS default value... i want to update the b_status value BOOKING APPROVED when user click APPROVE button.. otherwise, the b_status will update the value as BOOKING REJECTED when user click on the REJECT button here's is the form code: <?php $db = mysql_connect('localhost','root') or die ("unable to connect"); mysql_select_db('fyp',$db) or die ("able to select"); $sql="SELECT * FROM vehicle WHERE v_status='READY'"; $result = mysql_query($sql) or die ("Query failed!"); ?> <tr><td>&nbsp;</td></tr> <tr> <tr> <td width="200"><font face="Arial" size="2" font color="#000000">Registration Number </font></td> <td><select name="regno"> <option value="" selected>--Registration No--</option> <?php while($row = mysql_fetch_array($result)){?> <option value="<?php echo $row['regno']; ?>"><?php echo $row['regno']; ?></option> <?php } ?> </select></td> <td><font face="Arial" size="2" font color="#000000">Reason</font></td> <td><textarea name="reason" rows="3" cols="50 "value = ""></textarea></td> </tr> <?php $db = mysql_connect('localhost','root') or die ("unable to connect"); mysql_select_db('fyp',$db) or die ("able to select"); $sql="SELECT * FROM driver WHERE d_status='READY'"; $result = mysql_query($sql) or die ("Query failed!"); ?> <tr> <td><font face="Arial" size="2" font color="#000000">Driver</font></td> <td><select id = "d_name" name="d_name"> <option value="" selected>--Driver Name--</option> <?php while($row = mysql_fetch_array($result)){?> <option value="<?php echo $row['d_name']; ?>"><?php echo $row['d_name']; ?></option> <?php } ?> </select></td> </tr> <tr> <?php mysql_close($db); ?> </table> <p></p> <center><input name="APPROVED" type="submit" id="APPROVED" value="APPROVED"> <input name="REJECT" type="submit" id="REJECT" value="REJECT"> </center> </div> </center> and this is the process page code: <?php $db = mysql_connect('localhost','root') or die ("unable to connect"); mysql_select_db('fyp',$db) or die ("able to select"); $bookingno=mysql_real_escape_string($_POST['bookingno']); $username=mysql_real_escape_string($_POST['username']); $name=mysql_real_escape_string($_POST['name']); $department=mysql_real_escape_string($_POST['department']); $g_date=mysql_real_escape_string($_POST['g_date']); $g_time=mysql_real_escape_string($_POST['g_time']); $r_date=mysql_real_escape_string($_POST['r_date']); $r_time=mysql_real_escape_string($_POST['r_time']); $destination=mysql_real_escape_string($_POST['destination']); $pass_num=mysql_real_escape_string($_POST['pass_num']); $trip_purpose=mysql_real_escape_string($_POST['trip_purpose']); $regno=mysql_real_escape_string($_POST['regno']); $d_name=mysql_real_escape_string($_POST['d_name']); $reason=mysql_real_escape_string($_POST['reason']); $b_status=mysql_real_escape_string($_POST['b_status']); $sql = "INSERT INTO `usage` VALUES('$bookingno','$username','$name','$department','$g_date','$g_time','$r_date','$r_time','$destination', '$pass_num','$trip_purpose','$regno','$d_name','$reason','$b_status')"; $query = "INSERT INTO `usage` VALUES b_status ='BOOKING APPROVED'"; $result = @mysql_query($query); $query1 = "UPDATE driver SET d_status ='OUT' WHERE '$d_name'=d_name"; $result1 = @mysql_query($query1); if(isset($_POST['APPROVED'])) { $query2 = "UPDATE `usage` SET b_status ='BOOKING APPROVED' WHERE '$b_status'='IN PROCESS'"; $result2 = @mysql_query($query2); } if (isset($_POST['REJECT'])) { $query3 = "UPDATE `usage` SET b_status ='BOOKING REJECTED' WHERE '$b_status'='IN PROCESS'"; $result3 = @mysql_query($query3); } //$result = mysql_query($sql) or die ("error!"); $result = mysql_query($sql) or trigger_error (mysql_error().' in '.$sql); i.ve the problem on the b_status field.. plz guys... help me ya :-)

    Read the article

  • Getting the most recent post based on date

    - by camcim
    Hi guys, How do I go about displaying the most recent post when I have two tables, both containing a column called creation_date This would be simple if all I had to do was get the most recent post based on posts created_on value however if a post contains replies I need to factor this into the equation. If a post has a more recent reply I want to get the replies created_on value but also get the posts post_id and subject. The posts table structure: CREATE TABLE `posts` ( `post_id` bigint(20) unsigned NOT NULL auto_increment, `cat_id` bigint(20) NOT NULL, `user_id` bigint(20) NOT NULL, `subject` tinytext NOT NULL, `comments` text NOT NULL, `created_on` datetime NOT NULL, `status` varchar(10) NOT NULL default 'INACTIVE', `private_post` varchar(10) NOT NULL default 'PUBLIC', `db_location` varchar(10) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`post_id`) ) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1 AUTO_INCREMENT=7 ; The replies table structure: CREATE TABLE `replies` ( `reply_id` bigint(20) unsigned NOT NULL auto_increment, `post_id` bigint(20) NOT NULL, `user_id` bigint(20) NOT NULL, `comments` text NOT NULL, `created_on` datetime NOT NULL, `notify` varchar(5) NOT NULL default 'YES', `status` varchar(10) NOT NULL default 'INACTIVE', `db_location` varchar(10) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`reply_id`) ) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1 AUTO_INCREMENT=5 ; Here is my query so far. I've removed my attempt of extracting the dates. $strQuery = "SELECT posts.post_id, posts.created_on, replies.created_on, posts.subject "; $strQuery = $strQuery."FROM posts ,replies "; $strQuery = $strQuery."WHERE posts.post_id = replies.post_id "; $strQuery = $strQuery."AND posts.cat_id = '".$row->cat_id."'";

    Read the article

  • Foreign key pointing to different tables

    - by Álvaro G. Vicario
    I'm implementing a table per subclass design I discussed in a previous question. It's a product database where products can have very different attributes depending on their type, but attributes are fixed for each type and types are not manageable at all. I have a master table that holds common attributes: product_type ============ product_type_id INT product_type_name VARCHAR E.g.: 1 'Magazine' 2 'Web site' product ======= product_id INT product_name VARCHAR product_type_id INT -> Foreign key to product_type.product_type_id valid_since DATETIME valid_to DATETIME E.g. 1 'Foo Magazine' 1 '1998-12-01' NULL 2 'Bar Weekly Review' 1 '2005-01-01' NULL 3 'E-commerce App' 2 '2009-10-15' NULL 4 'CMS' 2 '2010-02-01' NULL ... and one subtable for each product type: item_magazine ============= item_magazine_id INT title VARCHAR product_id INT -> Foreign key to product.product_id issue_number INT pages INT copies INT close_date DATETIME release_date DATETIME E.g. 1 'Foo Magazine Regular Issue' 1 89 52 150000 '2010-06-25' '2010-06-31' 2 'Foo Magazine Summer Special' 1 90 60 175000 '2010-07-25' '2010-07-31' 3 'Bar Weekly Review Regular Issue' 2 12 16 20000 '2010-06-01' '2010-06-02' item_web_site ============= item_web_site_id INT name VARCHAR product_id INT -> Foreign key to product.product_id bandwidth INT hits INT date_from DATETIME date_to DATETIME E.g. 1 'The Carpet Store' 3 10 90000 '2010-06-01' NULL 2 'Penauts R Us' 3 20 180000 '2010-08-01' NULL 3 'Springfield Cattle Fair' 4 15 150000 '2010-05-01' '2010-10-31' Now I want to add some fees that relate to one specific item. Since there are very little subtypes, it's feasible to do this: fee === fee_id INT fee_description VARCHAR item_magazine_id INT -> Foreign key to item_magazine.item_magazine_id item_web_site_id INT -> Foreign key to item_web_site.item_web_site_id net_price DECIMAL E.g.: 1 'Front cover' 2 NULL 1999.99 2 'Half page' 2 NULL 500.00 3 'Square banner' NULL 3 790.50 4 'Animation' NULL 3 2000.00 I have tight foreign keys to handle cascaded editions and I presume I can add a constraint so only one of the IDs is NOT NULL. However, my intuition suggests that it would be cleaner to get rid of the item_WHATEVER_id columns and keep a separate table: fee_to_item =========== fee_id INT -> Foreign key to fee.fee_id product_id INT -> Foreign key to product.product_id item_id INT -> ??? But I can't figure out how to create foreign keys on item_id since the source table varies depending on product_id. Should I stick to my original idea?

    Read the article

  • What is the meanning of 'idx_categories_desc_categories_name' in osCommerce

    - by Sumant
    while working on osCommerce-3 i got the table structure for category & categories_description as CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `osc_categories` ( `categories_id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, `categories_image` varchar(255) DEFAULT NULL, `parent_id` int(10) unsigned DEFAULT NULL, `sort_order` int(11) DEFAULT NULL, `date_added` datetime DEFAULT NULL, `last_modified` datetime DEFAULT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`categories_id`), KEY `idx_categories_parent_id` (`parent_id`) ) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 AUTO_INCREMENT=5 ; CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `osc_categories_description` ( `categories_id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL, `language_id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL, `categories_name` varchar(255) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`categories_id`,`language_id`), KEY `idx_categories_desc_categories_id` (`categories_id`), KEY `idx_categories_desc_language_id` (`language_id`), KEY `idx_categories_desc_categories_name` (`categories_name`) ) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8; here i am not getting the meanning of indexing "idx_categories_desc_categories_id", "idx_categories_desc_language_id", "idx_categories_desc_categories_name" What is the use of this indexing.What does it mean?

    Read the article

  • SQL query problem

    - by Pankaj
    Hello All I have 2 tables Project and ProjectList like this Project ProjectID Name ProjectListID - allow null In ProjectList ProjectListID ProjName Now what i need here, i want only those recoed from ProjectList table which ProjectListID not in Project table. I made a query but it is taking lot of time to execute. select * FROM projectslist pl where pl.ProjectsListID not in (SELECT p.ProjectsListID FROM project p where (p.ProjectsListID is not null and p.ProjectsListID <>0)) Please help me to create optimize query. I am using My SQL.

    Read the article

  • what's wrong with this code?

    - by Piyush
    $child= array(); $i = 0; while($row = mysql_fetch_array($result, MYSQL_ASSOC)) { $child[i] = $row['userId']; $i++; } $i = 0; while($i<=5) { echo $child[i]; $i++; } It is printing same value.

    Read the article

  • White Label Ecommerce app. Shared or Individual dbs

    - by MetaDan
    Currently I'm working with an in house white label cms that we resell to multiple clients and it all runs from the same box/db. I'm just looking at converting this to have an ecommerce version that we'll run alongside it. I'm wondering whether there will be an issue keeping all the products/categories/orders in one db or whether it would be advisory to separate each instance of the site into its own db for this. These white label instances will only be sold to smaller companies that probably wont have masses of traffic/products and are looking for a simple ecommerce site. Anything larger will definitely get its own hosting and db. But for smaller scale stuff do you think a single db will be ok?

    Read the article

  • SQL Filter Multiple Tables Data

    - by Brad
    If it matters, I'm using Firebird 2.1 database. I have three tables, one with keywords, one with negative keywords, and the other with required keywords. I need to be able to filter the data so the output has just the keywords that meat the stipulation of not being in the negative keyword list, and IF there are any required words, then it will require the results to have those keywords in the end result. The tables are very similar, the field in the tables that I would be matching against are all called keyword. I don't know SQL very well at all. I'm guessing it would be something like SELECT keyword from keywordstable where keyword in requiredkeywordstable and where NOT in negativekeywordstable Just a side note, The required keywords table could be empty which would mean there are no required keywords. Any help would be appreciated. -Brad

    Read the article

  • mysql_connect "bool $new_link = true" is very slow

    - by Mikk
    Hi, I'm using latest version of Xampp on 64bit Win7. The problem is that, when I use mysql_connect with "bool $new_link" set to true like so: mysql_connect('localhost', 'root', 'my_password', TRUE); script execution time increases dramatically (about 0,5 seconds per connection, and when I have 4 diffirent objects using different connections, it takes ~2 seconds). Is setting "bool $new_link" to true, generally a bad idea or could it just be some problem with my software configuration. Thank you.

    Read the article

  • [Ruby on Rails] Data Structure

    - by siulamvictor
    I am building a online form, with about 20 multiple choice checkboxes. I can get the nested data with this command. raise params.to_yaml I need to store these data and call them again later. I want to sort out which user chose which specific checkbox, i.e. who chose checkbox no.2? What's the best way to store these data in database?

    Read the article

  • How do I relate two models/tables in Django based on non primary non unique keys?

    - by wizard
    I've got two tables that I need to relate on a single field po_num. The data is imported from another source so while I have a little bit of control over what the tables look like but I can't change them too much. What I want to do is relate these two models so I can look up one from the other based on the po_num fields. What I really need to do is join the two tables so I can do a where on a count of the related table. I would like to do filter for all Order objects that have 0 related EDI856 objects. I tried adding a foreign key to the Order model and specified the db_column and to_fields as po_num but django didn't like that the fact that Edi856.po_num wasn't unique. Here are the important fields of my current models that let me display but not filter for the data that I want. class Edi856(models.Model): po_num = models.CharField(max_length=90, db_index=True ) class Order(models.Model): po_num = models.CharField(max_length=90, db_index=True) def in_edi(self): '''Has the edi been processed?''' return Edi856.objects.filter(po_num = self.po_num).count() Thanks for taking the time to read about my problem. I'm not sure what to do from here.

    Read the article

  • DBA - SQL Server 2005 - Backups

    - by subhash.pant
    I am trying to figure out how SQL Server DBAs are doing their backups and verify in 2005. I use the Idera's free stored procs (which is no longer available to download btw) to backup and verify and have gotten around 65% compression. If there any other free alternative? Thanks in advance, -Subhash

    Read the article

  • hibernate not throwing stale state exception nor it is overwriting data

    - by Reddy
    Our application do the following. 1. Start the transaction. 2. Execute a query using prepared statement 3. Check a condition to see the number of rows updated are equal to the required number. 4. It commits on success of above condition otherwise it will roll back However the problem is that when two threads are simultaneously enter this code. Thread-1 is updating a row in step 2. It checked the condition and committed successfully since the condition is successful. Thread-2 started execution somewhere between steps 1 & 4, and it is failing on at condition checking at step 3 (as it is getting number of updated rows as 0). I expected second thread to throw an exception but it is not. What could be the problem?

    Read the article

  • Contradictory MySqlReader errors

    - by Lazlo
    MySqlCommand command = connection.CreateCommand(); command.CommandText = string.Format("SELECT * FROM characters WHERE account_id = '{0}'", this.ID); MySqlDataReader reader = command.ExecuteReader(); while (filler.Reader.Read()) { ... } I get an error at the last line saying "Invalid attempt to Read when reader is closed." Now, if I add another line before it, as in: MySqlCommand command = connection.CreateCommand(); command.CommandText = string.Format("SELECT * FROM characters WHERE account_id = '{0}'", this.ID); MySqlDataReader reader = command.ExecuteReader(); reader = command.ExecuteReader(); // Here. while (filler.Reader.Read()) { ... } I get an error at that new line saying "There is already an open DataReader associated with this Connection which must be closed first." Alright, I don't want to get picky here, but is my reader open or closed?

    Read the article

  • How to generate a user role grid

    - by Svish
    I have the following tables: users (id, username, ... ) roles (id, name) roles_users (user_id, role_id) I am wondering how I can create a nice sort of user-role-grid from that which an admin can use to administer roles to users in a clear way. What I would like is basically a table full of checkboxes sort of like this: Login Editor Admin Alice ¦ ¦ ¦ Bob ¦ ? ? Carol ¦ ¦ ? [Apply] Generating the table isn't too much of a deal, but I am very unsure how to handle it when it comes to how to name all the checkboxes and especially how to read and update the database in a not too clumsy way. Does anyone have any good advice or pointers on how to do this in a mostly clean way? I'm using the Kohana 3 framework, if there is anything there that can make this even easier, but I of course welcome any answer.

    Read the article

  • PHP mysql_fetch_array

    - by rag
    $n=mysql_num_rows($rs); $i=0; while($n>0) { while(($row=mysql_fetch_array($rs))&&$i<=5) { echo $row['room_name']; $i=$i+1; //echo $n."<br>"; } echo "<br>"; //echo "n1=".$n; $n=$n-5; // $i=0; } Output:101102103104105106 108109110 The row for roomname 107 is missing.... anybody please tell me what is the problem while reentering the loop again...

    Read the article

  • multi-shop orders table and sequential order numbers based on shop

    - by imanc
    Hey, I am looking at building a shop solution that needs to be scalable. Currently it retrieves 1-2000 orders on average per day across multiple country based shops (e.g. uk, us, de, dk, es etc.) but this order could be 10x this amount in two years. I am looking at either using separate country-shop databases to store the orders tables, or looking to combine all into one order table. If all orders exist in one table with a global ID (auto num) and country ID (e.g uk,de,dk etc.), each countries orders would also need to have sequential ordering. So in essence, we'd have to have a global ID and a country order ID, with the country order ID being sequential for countries only, e.g. global ID = 1000, country = UK, country order ID = 1000 global ID = 1001, country = DE, country order ID = 1000 global ID = 1002, country = DE, country order ID = 1001 global ID = 1003, country = DE, country order ID = 1002 global ID = 1004, country = UK, country order ID = 1001 THe global ID would be DB generated and not something I would need to worry about. But I am thinking that I'd have to do a query to get the current country order based ID+1 to find the next sequential number. Two things concern me about this: 1) query times when the table has potentially millions of rows of data and I'm doing a read before a write, 2) the potential for ID number clashes due to simultaneous writes/reads. With a MyISAM table the entire table could be locked whilst the last country order + 1 is retrieved, to prevent ID number clashes. I am wondering if anyone knows of a more elegant solution? Cheers, imanc

    Read the article

  • Do i need to dispose of MySqlCommand?

    - by acidzombie24
    I find it incredibly annoying to write a using statement on every one of my queries (which require its own command or write parameters.clear()) which sometimes require declaring variables outside of the using block. Its so incredibly annoying and looks much dirtier compared to the version without disposing the object. Do i need to dispose of it? what happens if i dont? I do know its good practice to dispose of an object when it has that interface.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359  | Next Page >