partition wise join - Page 364

PHP PDO fetch null

- by Jacob

How do you check if a columns value is null? Example code: $db = DBCxn::getCxn(); $sql = "SELECT exercise_id, author_id, submission, result, submission_time, total_rating_votes, total_rating_values FROM submissions LEFT OUTER JOIN submission_ratings ON submissions.exercise_id=submission_ratings.exercise_id WHERE id=:id"; $st = $db->prepare($sql); $st->bindParam(":id", $this->id, PDO::PARAM_INT); $st->execute(); $row = $st->fetch(); if($this->total_rating_votes == null) // this doesn't seem to work even though there is no record in submission_ratings???? { ... }

Read the article

Filter by virtual column?

- by user329957

I have the following database structure : [Order] OrderId Total [Payment] OrderId Amount Every Order can have X payment rows. I want to get only the list of orders where the sum of all the payments are < than the order Total. I have the following SQL but I will return all the orders paid and unpaid. SELECT o.OrderId, o.UserId, o.Total, o.DateCreated, COALESCE(SUM(p.Amount),0) AS Paid FROM [Order] o LEFT JOIN Payment p ON p.OrderId = o.OrderId GROUP BY o.OrderId, o.Total, o.UserId, o.DateCreated I have tried to add Where (Paid < o.Total) but it does not work, any idea? BTM I'm using SQL CE 3.5

Read the article

Mysql Performance Question - Essentially about normalizing efficiency

- by freqmode

Hi there. Just a quick question about database performance. I'll outline my site purpose below as background. I'm creating a dictionary site that saves the words users define to a database. What I'm wondering is whether or not to create a words table for each user or to keep one massive words table. This site will be used for entire schools so the single words table would be massive! The database structure is as follows: A user table with: User_ID PRIMARY KEY Username First Last Password Email Country Research Standings SendInfo Donated JoinedOn LastLogin Logins Correct Attempts Admin Active And one word table with: User_ID PRIMARY KEY Word Vocab Spell Defined DefinedAttempted Spelled SpelledAttempted Sentenced SentencedAttempted So what I'm asking is , performance-wise, should I create a new table for each user when they join the site - each user could have hundreds or thousands of words over time? Or is it better to have one massive table with thousands and thousands of records and filter by User_ID. I don't think I'll perform many table joins. My gut feeling is to create a new table for each user, but I thought I'd ask for expert advice! Thanks in advance.

Read the article

Combining 2 Linq queries into 1

- by Mike Fielden

Given the following information, how can I combine these 2 linq queries into 1. Having a bit of trouble with the join statement. 'projectDetails' is just a list of ProjectDetails ProjectDetails (1 to many) PCardAuthorizations ProjectDetails (1 to many) ExpenditureDetails Notice I am grouping by the same information and selecting the same type of information var pCardAccount = from c in PCardAuthorizations where projectDetails.Contains(c.ProjectDetail) && c.RequestStatusId == 2 group c by new { c.ProjectDetail, c.ProgramFund } into g select new { Key = g.Key, Sum = g.Sum(x => x.Amount) }; var expenditures = from d in ExpenditureDetails where projectDetails.Contains(d.ProjectDetails) && d.Expenditures.ExpenditureTypeEnum == 0 group d by new { d.ProjectDetails, d.ProgramFunds } into g select new { Key = g.Key, Sum = g.Sum(y => y.ExpenditureAmounts.FirstOrDefault(a => a.IsCurrent && !a.RequiresAudit).CommittedMonthlyRecords.ProjectedEac) };

Read the article

java socket programming problem

- by mk.persia

Hi, what's wrong with my code? sorry about my bad English package sockettest; import java.io.*; import java.net.*; class sevr implements Runnable{ public void run() { ServerSocket sSkt = null; Socket skt = null; BufferedReader br = null; BufferedWriter bw = null; try{ System.out.println("Server: is about to create socket"); sSkt = new ServerSocket(6666); System.out.println("Server: socket created"); } catch(IOException e){ System.out.println("Server: socket creation failure"); } try{ System.out.println("Server: is listening"); skt = sSkt.accept(); System.out.println("Server: Connection Established"); } catch(IOException e){ System.out.println("Server: listening failed"); } try{ System.out.println("Server: creating streams"); br = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(skt.getInputStream())); bw = new BufferedWriter(new OutputStreamWriter(skt.getOutputStream())); System.out.println("Server: stream done"); } catch(IOException e){ System.out.println("Server: stream failed"); } System.out.println("Server: reading the request"); try{ String line = null; while((line =br.readLine()) != null){ System.out.println("Server: client said- "+ line); } } catch(IOException e){ System.out.println("Server: reading failed"); } System.out.println("Server: reading fished"); System.out.println("Server: responding"); try{ bw.write("Hi! I am server!"); } catch(IOException e){ System.out.println("Server: responding failed"); } System.out.println("Server: responding finished"); System.out.println("Server: is finishing"); try { br.close(); bw.close(); skt.close(); sSkt.close(); } catch (IOException e) { System.out.println("Server: finishing failed"); } System.out.println("Server: done"); } } class clnt implements Runnable{ public void run() { Socket skt = null; BufferedReader br = null; BufferedWriter bw = null; try{ System.out.println("Client: about to create socket"); skt = new Socket(InetAddress.getLocalHost(),6666); System.out.println("Client: socket created"); } catch(IOException e){ System.out.println("Client: socket creation failure"); } try{ System.out.println("Client: creating streams"); br = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(skt.getInputStream())); bw = new BufferedWriter(new OutputStreamWriter(skt.getOutputStream())); System.out.println("Client: stream done"); } catch(IOException e){ System.out.println("Client: stream failed"); } System.out.println("Client: requesting"); try{ bw.write("Hi! I am Client!"); } catch(IOException e){ System.out.println("Client: requesting failed"); } System.out.println("Client: requesting finished"); System.out.println("Client: reading the respond"); try{ String line = null; while((line =br.readLine()) != null){ System.out.println("Client: server said- "+ line); } } catch(IOException e){ System.out.println("Client: reading failed"); } System.out.println("Client: reading fished"); System.out.println("Clientrver: is finishing"); try { br.close(); bw.close(); skt.close(); } catch (IOException e) { System.out.println("Client: finishing failed"); } System.out.println("Client: done"); } } public class Main { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("Main started"); Thread sThread = new Thread(new sevr()); Thread cThread = new Thread(new clnt()); sThread.start(); cThread.start(); try { sThread.join(); cThread.join(); } catch (InterruptedException ex) { System.out.println("joining failed"); } System.out.println("Main done"); } } output: Main started Server: is about to create socket Client: about to create socket Client: socket created Client: creating streams Server: socket created Server: is listening Server: Connection Established Server: creating streams Server: stream done Server: reading the request Client: stream done Client: requesting Client: requesting finished Client: reading the respond and it waits here forever!

Read the article

How to keep Hibernate mapping use under control as requirements grow

- by David Plumpton

I've worked on a number of Java web apps where persistence is via Hibernate, and we start off with some central class (e.g. an insurance application) without any time being spent considering how to break things up into manageable chunks. Over time as features are added we add more mappings (rates, clients, addresses, etc.) and then amount of time spent saving and loading an insurance object and everything it connects to grows. In particular you get close to a go-live date and performance testing with larger amounts of data in each table is starting to demonstrate that it's all too slow. Obviously there are a number of ways that we could attempt to partition things up, e.g. map only the client classes for the client CRUD screens, etc., which would have been better to get in place earlier rather than trying to work it in at the end of the dev cycle. I'm just wondering if there are recommendations about ways to handle/mitigate this.

Read the article

Javascript Prototype Best Practice Event Handlers

- by nahum

Hi this question is more a consulting of best practice, Sometimes when I'm building a complete ajax application I usually add elements dynamically for example. When you'r adding a list of items, I do something like: var template = new Template("<li id='list#{id}'>#{value}</li>"); var arrayTemplate = []; arrayOfItem.each(function(item, index){ arrayTemplate.push(template.evaluate( id : index, value : item)) }); after this two options add the list via "update" or "insert" ----- $("elementToUpdate").update("<ul>" + arrayTemplate.join("") + "</ul">); the question is how can I add the event handler without repeat the process of read the array, this is because if you try add a Event before the update or insert you will get an Error because the element isn't still on the DOM. so what I'm doing by now is after insert or update: arrayOfItem.each(function(item, index){ $("list" + index).observe("click", function(){ alert("I see the world"); }) }); so the question is exist a better way to doing this??????

Read the article

Rails 3: habtm migration, primary key issue

- by Brian Wigginton

I'm trying to setup a migration file for a habtm relationship, however when I run the migration I'm getting the following error: Primary key is not allowed in a has_and_belongs_to_many join table (parts_vehicles). Here is my migration file (20110111035950_create_parts_vehicles.rb): class CreatePartsVehiclesJoinTable < ActiveRecord::Migration def self.up create_table :parts_vehicles, :id => false do |t| t.integer :part_id t.integer :vehicle_id end end def self.down drop_table :parts_vehicles end end The documentation example states to use :id => false to disable a primary key from being generated, but I'm still getting the error.

Read the article

dataset using where condition from another query

- by refer

here's my code. I have a dataset that has its values and then i run an independent query which uses the same tables as dataset. now when i run the dataset, i want it to get a where condition on the query result. here's the code - sql = "SELECT ID, name FROM books WITH(NOLOCK) WHERE id =" & Session("ID") ds = FillDataset(sql) Sql1 = "SELECT n.id as id,a.name as title FROM books n WITH(NOLOCK)" & _ "LEFT JOIN new_books a WITH(NOLOCK) ON a.id = n.book_id " rd = ExecuteReader(SqlCnn, SqlStr) Now after this i make an htmltable and all the cells are loaded with the data from datareader(rd). but 1 dropdown is loaded from the dataset. i want that dropdown to have the selectedvalue which is the value from the datareader(rd). how can i do that?

Read the article

Java Executor: Small tasks or big ones?

- by Arash Shahkar

Consider one big task which could be broken into hundreds of small, independently-runnable tasks. To be more specific, each small task is to send a light network request and decide upon the answer received from the server. These small tasks are not expected to take longer than a second, and involve a few servers in total. I have in mind two approaches to implement this using the Executor framework, and I want to know which one's better and why. Create a few, say 5 to 10 tasks each involving doing a bunch of send and receives. Create a single task (Callable or Runnable) for each send & receive and schedule all of them (hundreds) to be run by the executor. I'm sorry if my question shows that I'm lazy to test these and see for myself what's better (at least performance-wise). My question, while looking after an answer to this specific case, has a more general aspect. In situations like these when you want to use an executor to do all the scheduling and other stuff, is it better to create lots of small tasks or to group those into a less number of bigger tasks?

Read the article

HIbernate query language problem.....

- by mslatf

I have a Project class that has a Set of userstories called userStories12many. I'm having troubles trying to get the project that has a certain userstory in its set getComponent(int userStoryID) I think im on the right track but i dont know what i did wrong public Projects getComponent(int userStoryID) { Session session = SessionFactoryHelper.getSessionFactory() .getCurrentSession(); session.beginTransaction(); List<Projects> compo = session.createQuery("select p " + "from Projects as p inner join fetch p.userStories12many as u " + "where u.storyId='" + userStoryID + "'").list(); session.getTransaction().commit(); return compo.get(0); }

Read the article

Unwanted space between divs - HTML, CSS

- by Nikalas Haufe

Hi, hows it going, I have searched through the forums and good old google and have found many answers but non seem to work on my page. Anyway here is the question, I have 2 divs that are positioned side by side, and I wish to get rid of the whitespace www.blisshair.com.au/test.html :(http://www.blisshair.com.au/test.html) I want to the black from the "link 1" to join to the main content in the center, Any help would be greatly appreciated, Thank you. EDIT: Tried opening in Internet explorer 8 and it seems top exactly how I want it, besides the 2 bottom divs not lining up, Is it possible to do this with an UL and SPAN tags ? I am aiming for a tabbed look, for example, when you click on link 2, the background around link 2 goes black and the black color "flows" into the main content page, sorry if this doesnt make sense, early AM here :D Thanks again

Read the article

Type or namespace name could not be found

- by Pandiya Chendur

I use this: public IQueryable<MaterialsView> FindAllMaterials() { var materials = from m in db.Materials join Mt in db.MeasurementTypes on m.MeasurementTypeId equals Mt.Id select new MaterialsView { MatId = m.Mat_Name, MesName = Mt.Name, MesType = m.Mat_Type }; return materials; } It gives me the following errors: The type or namespace name MaterialsView could not be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?) Cannot implicitly convert type System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<MaterialsView> to System.Linq.IQueryable<MaterialsView>. An explicit conversion exists (are you missing a cast?) The type arguments for method System.Linq.Enumerable.ToList<TSource>(System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<TSource>) cannot be inferred from the usage. Try specifying the type arguments explicitly. I have googled it and found this SO question but it doesn't help. What's wrong?

Read the article

Partitioning requests in code among several servers

- by Jacques René Mesrine

I have several forum servers (what they are is irrelevant) which stores posts from users and I want to be able to partition requests among these servers. I'm currently leaning towards partitioning them by geographic location. To improve the locality of data, users will be separated into regions e.g. North America, South America and so on. Is there any design pattern on how to implement the function that maps the partioning property to the server, so that this piece of code has high availability and would not become a single point of failure ? f( Region ) -> Server IP

Read the article

Sample/Example needed for a table/field setup

- by acctman

Can someone explain the statement below to me with a working sample/example. thanks in advance. You can not create duplicate fields, but simply add a single extra field, "coupleId", which would have a unique id for each couple; and two rows (one for each person) per couple; then JOIN the table against itself with a constraint like a.coupleId = b.coupleId AND a.id < b.id so that you can condense the data into a single result row for a given couple.

Read the article

sql server 2008 multiple inserts over 2 tables

- by Rob

I got the following trigger on my sql server 2008 database CREATE TRIGGER tr_check_stoelen ON Passenger AFTER INSERT, UPDATE AS BEGIN IF EXISTS( SELECT 1 FROM Passenger p INNER JOIN Inserted i on i.flight= p.flight WHERE p.flight= i.flightAND p.seat= i.seat ) BEGIN RAISERROR('Seat taken!',16,1) ROLLBACK TRAN END END The trigger is throwing errors when i try to run the query below. This query i supposed to insert two different passengers in a database on two different flights. I'm sure both seats aren't taken, but i can't figure out why the trigger is giving me the error. Does it have to do something with correlation? INSERT INTO passagier VALUES (13392,5315,3,'Janssen Z','2A','October 30, 2006 10:43','M'), (13333,5316,2,'Janssen Q','2A','October 30, 2006 11:51','V')

Read the article

Cleanest/One-liner way to require all files in directory in Ruby?

- by viatropos

When creating gems, I often have a directory structure like this: |--lib |-- helpers.rb `-- helpers |-- helper_a.rb `-- helper_b.rb Inside the helpers.rb, I'm just require-ing the files in the helpers directory. But I have to do things like this: $:.push(File.dirname(__FILE__) + '/helpers') require 'helper_a' require 'helper_b' Is there a way to make that one line so I never have to add to it? I just came up with this real quick: dir = File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__), "helpers") Dir.entries(dir)[2..-1].each { |file| require "#{dir}/#{file[0..-4]}" } But it's two lines and ugly. What's a slick one liner to solve this problem?

Read the article

designing an ASP.NET MVC partial view - showing user choices within a large set of choices

- by p.campbell

Consider a partial view whose job is to render markup for a pizza order. The desire is to reuse this partial view in the Create, Details, and Update views. It will always be passed an IEnumerable<Topping>, and output a multitude of checkboxes. There are lots... maybe 40 in all (yes, that might smell). A-OK so far. Problem The question is around how to include the user's choices on the Details and Update views. From the datastore, we've got a List<ChosenTopping>. The goal is to have each checkbox set to true for each chosen topping. What's the easiest to read, or most maintainable way to achieve this? Potential Solutions Create a ViewModel with the List and List. Write out the checkboxes as per normal. While writing each, check whether the ToppingID exists in the list of ChosenTopping. Create a new ViewModel that's a hybrid of both. Perhaps call it DisplayTopping or similar. It would have property ID, Name and IsUserChosen. The respective controller methods for Create, Update, and Details would have to create this new collection with respect to the user's choices as they see fit. The Create controller method would basically set all to false so that it appears to be a blank slate. The real application isn't pizza, and the organization is a bit different from the fakeshot, but the concept is the same. Is it wise to reuse the control for the 3 different scenarios? How better can you display the list of options + the user's current choices? Would you use jQuery instead to show the user selections? Any other thoughts on the potential smell of splashing up a whole bunch of checkboxes?

Read the article

Windows 7 Public Documents Folder - how to move it to drive d: [closed]

- by Bazza Formez

Hi, I've just bought a new pc, and it is running Windows 7. I'm wanting to set up all of the documents folders such that they point to folders on a second drive partition (ie. disk D:) so that I have a nice separation of os from docs. I have managed to do this for each user on the machine (by opening up properties for documents folder and changing location). Hwoever, this procedure doesn't seem to work for the public documents folder. I cannot change the location for that one (even though I have administrator privileges). It is greyed out and cannot be changed. Any ideas ? Thanks!!

Read the article

How to manually verify a user against the asp.net memberhip database

- by Ekk

I would like to know how I can verify a user's credential against an existing asp.net membership database. The short story is that we want provide single sign on access. So what I've done is to connect directly to the membership database and tried to run a sql query against the aspnet_Membership table: private bool CanLogin(string userName, string password) { // Check DB to see if the credential is correct try { string passwordHash = FormsAuthentication.HashPasswordForStoringInConfigFile(password, "SHA1"); string sql = string.Format("select 1 from aspnet_Users a inner join aspnet_Membership b on a.UserId = b.UserId and a.applicationid = b.applicationid where a.username = '{0}' and b.password='{1}'", userName.ToLowerInvariant(), passwordHash); using (SqlConnection sqlConn = new SqlConnection(ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["LocalSqlServer"].ConnectionString)) using (SqlCommand sqlCmd = new SqlCommand(sql, sqlConn)) { sqlConn.Open(); int count = sqlCmd.ExecuteNonQuery(); sqlConn.Close(); return count == 1; } } catch (Exception ex) { return false; } } The problem is the password value, does anyone know how the password it is hashed?

Read the article

MySQL select two tables at the same time...

- by Jerry

Hi all I have two tables and want to make a query. I tried to get team AA and team BB's image base on table A. I used: SELECT tableA.team1, tableA.team2, tableB.team, tableB.image, FROM tableA LEFT JOIN tableB ON tableA.team1=tableB.team The result only display imageA on the column. Are there any ways to select imageA and image B without using the second query? I appreciate any helps! Thanks a lot! My table structure are: table A team1 team2 ------------ AA BB table B team image ------------- AA imagaA BB imageB

Read the article

How to always return a set number of records when using find_related_tags with acts-as-taggable-on

- by hadees

I'm using the acts-as-taggable-on gem and I need to use find_related_tags on my survey model to get back 3 surveys every time. In the event there aren't always 3 related I need to pick how ever many are related plus some random ones to get to 3. Additionally I have a method I wrote called completed_survey_ids which return an array of survey_ids that shouldn't be used because the user has already completed them. Also there is a rare case that there won't be enough surveys because the user has completed them all so in that event it is okay to return less surveys then requested. I did write a named_scope to handle getting rid of the completed_survey_ids that I think works named_scope :not, lambda { |survey_ids| {:conditions => "id NOT IN (#{survey_ids.join(',')})" } }

Read the article

Rails Association issue with NoMethodError in event_controller

- by pmanning

Kinda a noob trying to understand I think I need to define rsvps but not sure what to put... I'm trying to add a Join/Unjoin button to user created Events, similar to a Follow/Unfollow button for Users. NoMethodError in Events#show undefined method `model_name' for NilClass:Class in line #1 _unjoin.html.erb 1: <%= form_for(current_user.rsvps.find_by_joined_id(@event), 2: html: { method: :delete }) do |f| %> 3: <%= f.submit "Leave", class: "btn btn-large" %> 4: <% end %> events_controller.rb def show @event = Event.find(params[:id]) @user = current_user end Here's the models rsvp.rb class Rsvp < ActiveRecord::Base attr_accessible :joined_id belongs_to :joiner, class_name: "User" belongs_to :joined, class_name: "User" validates :joiner_id, presence: true validates :joined_id, presence: true end user.rb has_many :rsvps, foreign_key: "joiner_id", dependent: :destroy has_many :joined_events, through: :rsvps, source: :joined has_many :reverse_rsvps, foreign_key: "joined_id", class_name: "Rsvp", dependent: :destroy has_many :joiners, through: :reverse_rsvps, source: :joiner event.rb belongs_to :user has_many :rsvps, foreign_key: "joiner_id", dependent: :destroy has_many :joined_events, through: :rsvps, source: :joined has_many :reverse_rsvps, foreign_key: "joined_id", class_name: "Rsvp", dependent: :destroy has_many :joiners, through: :reverse_rsvps, source: :joiner

Read the article

Reducing a normalized table to one value

- by Dio

Hello, I'm sure this has been asked but I'm not quite sure how to properly search for this question, my apologies. I have two tables, Foo and Bar. For has one row per Food, bar has many rows per food matching descriptors. Foo name id Apple 1 Orange 2 Bar id description 1 Tasty 1 Ripe 2 Sweet etc (sorry for the somewhat contrived example). I'm trying to return a query where if, for each row in Foo, Bar contains a descriptor in ('Tasty', 'Juicy') return true ex: Output Apple True Orange False I had been solving this somewhat trivially with a case when I only had one item to match select Foo.name, case bar.description when 'Tasty' then True else 'False' end from Foo left join Bar on foo.id = bar.id where bar.description = 'Tasty' But with multiple items, I keep ending up with extra rows: Output Apple True Apple False etc etc Can someone point me in the right direction on how to think about this problem or what I should be doing? Thank you.

Read the article

Postgesql select from 2 tables. Joins?

- by Daniel

Search Results

Search found 11543 results on 462 pages for 'partition wise join'.

Page 364/462 | < Previous Page | 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 | Next Page >

- by Jacob

- by user329957

- by freqmode

- by Mike Fielden

- by mk.persia

- by David Plumpton

- by nahum

- by Brian Wigginton

- by refer

- by Arash Shahkar

- by mslatf

- by Nikalas Haufe

- by Pandiya Chendur

- by Jacques René Mesrine

- by acctman

- by Rob

- by viatropos

- by p.campbell

- by Bazza Formez

- by Ekk

- by Jerry

- by hadees

- by pmanning

- by Dio

- by Daniel

< Previous Page | 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 | Next Page >