Search Results

Search found 12783 results on 512 pages for 'ruby beginner'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 367/512 | < Previous Page | 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374  | Next Page >

  • Different values for Time.now when using activerecord

    - by Josué Lima
    I have this weird situation: When I do on rails console Time.now or Time.zone.now I get the same values (suppose they run at the sime time: 2014-06-05 23:38:06 -0300) But when I use Time.now in a query like: Match.where("datetime = ?", Time.now) it returns the time 3 hours ahead! .to_sql output: SELECT `matches`.* FROM `matches` WHERE (datetime = '2014-06-06 02:38:06') any thoughts on that? Rails 4 Mysql 5.5

    Read the article

  • Hpricot: Stop auto fixing HTML

    - by Imran
    Consider the following example (sample data): doc = Hpricot("<a><table><tr><td>LOREM IPSUM</td></tr></table></a>") it converts it to <a></a><table><tr><td>LOREM IPSUM</td></tr></table> What it actually do is, pull out the table from <a> tag. I think Hpricot tries to repair the HTML. How can I stop Hpricot doing this?

    Read the article

  • Watir question regarding table rows and loop

    - by AJ
    Hi, I would like to go through a table and look for a word, if that word appears, i would like to click on a radio button in the same row, but not the same column, then stop the loop. I have something like this at the moment but i dont know where to go on from here. @ie.div(:class, 'tableclass').table(:index, 1).each do | row | row.each do | cell | if (cell.text() == 'text') ##Set radio button break end end end I tried selecting a radio by name and index, but i do not know how to get the row number that it is currently at. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Setting Rails Checkbox from Another Model

    - by Kevin
    I have a checkbox that belongs to "Foo" class. I have another "Preferences" class that sets the default for what that checkbox should be. I tried using f.check_box :email_preference, :value => preferences.email_preference but it doesn't work. I use this page to do new record creation as well as edit, so obviously for new records I would want to take the preferences.email_preference setting as a default, then for editing the record use the foo.email_preference. Any suggestions?

    Read the article

  • Custom accessor for array element

    - by memph1s
    I'm trying to create an accessor for one element from array with specific flag set to true: class EntranceObject < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :subscribers def customer self.subscribers.find(:first, :conditions => {:is_customer => true}) end def customer=(customer_params) self.subscribers << Subscriber.new(:name => customer_params[:name], :apartment => customer_params[:apartment], :phone_number => customer_params[:phone_number], :is_customer => true) end end class Subscriber < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :entrance_object validates_presence_of :name, :apartment end How do i need to validate this accessor in order to hightlight missing fields in a view? P.S. I'm newbie in RoR, maybe there is another approach to such work with one element from a collection? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Rails Application Hosting

    - by deb
    Where do you host your rails applications? I've tried Heroku (shared) and Slicehost (dedicated). I thought I would ask you, the knowledgeable guys here at stack-overflow, for hosting recommendations. Thanks in advance -- Deb

    Read the article

  • Uninstall Rails 3 with dependencies?

    - by Trevor Burnham
    I like that Rails 3 is so easy to install: gem install rails --pre, and all of the dependencies are automatically installed for you. But, what about uninstalling it? If I just do gem uninstall rails, I still have actionmailer (3.0.0.beta3) actionpack (3.0.0.beta3) activemodel (3.0.0.beta3) activerecord (3.0.0.beta3) activeresource (3.0.0.beta3) activesupport (3.0.0.beta3) which I want to get rid of. What's the easiest way to do so?

    Read the article

  • add_without_safety create new DB entry in controller

    - by Karl Entwistle
    Im trying to get a controller to create a new account with the user id filled in, this doesn't work in my controller or in the console, why? Any suggestions on how to implement this would be much appreciated. class PaymentNotification < ActiveRecord::Base after_create :add_account_to_market private def add_account_to_market if status == "Completed" line = LineItem.find(:first, :conditions => { :cart_id => cart.id }) line.quantity.times do Account.new(:user_id => cart.user_id) end end end end

    Read the article

  • Rails Functional Test Failing Due to Association

    - by Koby
    I have an accounts model that holds some basic account info (account name, website, etc). I then have a user model that has the following in the app/models/user.rb belongs_to :account I also have the following in my routes.rb map.resources :account, :has_many => [:users, :othermodel] the problem I'm facing is that the following test is failing: test "should create user" do assert_difference('User.count') do post :create, :user => { } #this is the line it's actually failing on end assert_redirected_to user_path(assigns(:user)) #it doesn't get here yet end The error it gives is "Can't find Account without ID" so I kind of understand WHY it's failing, because of the fact that it doesn't have the account object (or account_id as it were) to know under what account to create the user. I have tried variations of the following but I am completely lost: post :create, :user => { accounts(:one) } #I have the 'fixtures :accounts' syntax at the top of the test class post :create, [accounts(:one), :user] => { } post :create, :user => { accounts(:one), #other params for :user } and like I said, just about every variation I could think of. I can't find much documentation on doing this and this might be why people have moved to Factories for doing test data, but I want to understand things that come standard in Rails before moving onto other things. Can anyone help me get this working?

    Read the article

  • Rails: updating an association

    - by Sam
    I have a Reservation model which belongs_to a Sharedorder and so a Sharedorder has_many reservations. Give you a little background. I sharedorder has many reservations and each reservation can have an amount. A sharedorder has three status: 1) reserved, 2) confirmed, 3) and purchased. Here is my problem. When a reservation gets added to a sharedorder or an existing reservation's amount is updated I need this to affect the associated sharedoder because the status listed latter should only change when 100% of the reservations have been placed and so on. Here are the things I have tried: . class Reservation < ActiveRecord::Base before_save :sharedorder_reserved_status def sharedorder_reserved_status if self.sharedorder.reserved_percent(reservations_to_be_added) >= 100 && !self.sharedorder.reserved self.sharedorder.update_attribute(:reserved, true) self.sharedorder.update_attribute(:reserved_at, Time.now) end end def reservations_to_be_added if self.new_record? self.amount elsif self.amount_changed? self.amount - self.amount_was else 0 end end end And then in the Sharedorder model: class Sharedorder < ActiveRecord::Base def reserved_percent(amount_change) (((reserved_sum + amount_change).to_f / self.product.twenty_hq_size.to_f)*100).to_i end def reserved_sum if !@reserved_sum reserved_sum = 0 reserved_reservations.collect {|x| reserved_sum += x.amount } reserved_sum else @reserved_sum end end def reserved_reservations @reserved_reservations ||= Reservation.find(:all, :conditions => ['canceled = ? AND sharedorder_id = ?', false, self.id ]) end end I have also tried :touch => true on the reservation model to update the sharedorder put for some reason it doesn't seem to include the latest reservation being added or being updated. So what I'm trying to do is update the status of the sharedorder if a certain percent is reached and I have to send the additional amounts the the sharedorder for it to know to include additional reservations or updates on existing ones. How should I do this?

    Read the article

  • Regarding Authlogic and page redirection.

    - by Paddy
    I am using authlogic for authentication in my Rails app. Have named routes for the frequent actions, viz: map.login "login", :controller = "user_sessions", :action = "new" map.logout "logout", :controller = "user_sessions", :action = "destroy" map.register "register", :controller = "users", :action = "new" map.edit 'user/edit/:id', :controller = "users", :action = "edit" But also in my routes.rb i have these automatically created REST routes too: map.resources :user_sessions map.resources :users The problem now is that a user can login from two different routes. Ex: From, http://localhost/login and also from http ://localhost/user_sessions/new. How do i restrict access only from the named route i have defined and not allow from user_sessions/new?

    Read the article

  • rails: undefined method and form_tags

    - by SuperString
    I have this in courses.html.erb under app/views/students <% if @student.courses.count < Course.count then%> <% form_tag(course_add_student_path(@student)) do%> <%= select_tag(:course, options_from_collection_for_select(@student.unenrolled_courses, :id, :name))%> <%= submit_tag 'Enroll'%> <%end%> <%else%> <p><%=h @student.name%> is enrolled in every course. </p> <%end%> I have this in my students_controller.rb under app/controllers: def course_add @student = Student.find(params[:id]) @course = Course.find(params[:course]) unless @student.enrolled_in?(@course) @student.coursess << @course flash[:notice] = 'course added' else flash[:error] = 'course already enrolled' end redirect_to :action => courses, :id => @student end And in my routes.rb, I have: resources :students, :has_many => [:awards], :member => {:courses => :get, :course_add => :post, :course_remove => :post} However, I am getting this error: undefined method `course_add_student_path' for #<#<Class:0x105321d78>:0x1053200e0> What am I missing here? Rake routes output: students GET /students(.:format) {:action=>"index", :controller=>"students"} POST /students(.:format) {:action=>"create", :controller=>"students"} new_student GET /students/new(.:format) {:action=>"new", :controller=>"students"} edit_student GET /students/:id/edit(.:format) {:action=>"edit", :controller=>"students"} student GET /students/:id(.:format) {:action=>"show", :controller=>"students"} PUT /students/:id(.:format) {:action=>"update", :controller=>"students"} DELETE /students/:id(.:format) {:action=>"destroy", :controller=>"students"} courses GET /courses(.:format) {:action=>"index", :controller=>"courses"} POST /courses(.:format) {:action=>"create", :controller=>"courses"} new_course GET /courses/new(.:format) {:action=>"new", :controller=>"courses"} edit_course GET /courses/:id/edit(.:format) {:action=>"edit", :controller=>"courses"} course GET /courses/:id(.:format) {:action=>"show", :controller=>"courses"} PUT /courses/:id(.:format) {:action=>"update", :controller=>"courses"} DELETE /courses/:id(.:format) {:action=>"destroy", :controller=>"courses"} student_awards GET /students/:student_id/awards(.:format) {:action=>"index", :controller=>"awards"} POST /students/:student_id/awards(.:format) {:action=>"create", :controller=>"awards"} new_student_award GET /students/:student_id/awards/new(.:format) {:action=>"new", :controller=>"awards"} edit_student_award GET /students/:student_id/awards/:id/edit(.:format) {:action=>"edit", :controller=>"awards"} student_award GET /students/:student_id/awards/:id(.:format) {:action=>"show", :controller=>"awards"} PUT /students/:student_id/awards/:id(.:format) {:action=>"update", :controller=>"awards"} DELETE /students/:student_id/awards/:id(.:format) {:action=>"destroy", :controller=>"awards"} courses_student GET /students/:id/courses(.:format) {:action=>"courses", :controller=>"students"} GET /students(.:format) {:action=>"index", :controller=>"students"} POST /students(.:format) {:action=>"create", :controller=>"students"} GET /students/new(.:format) {:action=>"new", :controller=>"students"} GET /students/:id/edit(.:format) {:action=>"edit", :controller=>"students"} GET /students/:id(.:format) {:action=>"show", :controller=>"students"} PUT /students/:id(.:format) {:action=>"update", :controller=>"students"} DELETE /students/:id(.:format) {:action=>"destroy", :controller=>"students"}

    Read the article

  • How to efficiently implement a blocking call with Rails, while letting the client wait for the reply

    - by Kyle Heironimus
    We have a web service written in Rails. The API is published and we cannot change it. Our app communicates with a remote web service that sometimes hangs or takes several seconds to reply. Client -> Our Web Service -> Remote Web Service Currently, if the remote web service hangs for 5 seconds, one of our rails processes on our web service also hangs with it, which is what we need to avoid. I've seen things such as mod-x-sendfile, modporter, and delayed jobs, but the best I can tell, they all assume the client is not waiting for an answer. Since the API is already established, we cannot tell the client "I'm attempting to do what you want, check back later for the answer." The best option we have come up with so far is to add a second, non-rails web server running eventmachine to process these particular calls. Is there a better way?

    Read the article

  • How to secure images with Rails?

    - by NotDan
    I have a gallery in my rails app that needs to only allow certain images to be shown to specific, logged in users. I am using Paperclip for image processing now, but it saves all images in a public folder available to anyone. Note that I don't have to use Paperclip if there is a better way, and I already have the login system in place. I just need a way to place the images in a non-public location, but still be able to serve them as needed. Is it possible to only allow these images to be served to authenticated users?

    Read the article

  • All permissions with declarative_authorization

    - by pablorc
    Hi, I have a Rails application using Restful authentication and declarative authorization. I have some roles with an admin. Is there any method to have automatically granted all permissions to this role, instead of hardcode every controller in the authorization_rules? Something like: role :admin do has_permission_on :everything, :to => :manage end Or a uglier approach with introspection, maybe? Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • Changing default REST routes in Rails 3

    - by Vincent
    I need to add one parameter to the default REST route for the show action for SEO purposes: resources :neighborhoods, :only => [:index, :show] neighborhood_url(neighborhood) # => /neighborhoods/lower-east-side I want something like the following: neighborhood_url(city, neighborhood) # => /neighborhoods/manhattan/lower-east-side What would be the easiest way to do this without using nested routes and without breaking Rails REST conventions?

    Read the article

  • rails 3 actionmailer cannot send email

    - by lkahtz
    I am following Ryan Bates's tutorial on Rails 3 ActionMailer. I generate the mailer in terminal and then establish a setup_mail.rb under config/initializers. I keyed in the following code: ActionMailer::Base.smtp_settings={ :address => "smtp.gmail.com", :port => 587, :domail => "gmail.com", :user_name => "my_account_at_gmail", :password => "my_password", :authentication => "plain" , :enable_starttls_auto => true } My user_mailer.rb file goes like: class UserMailer < ActionMailer::Base default :from => "[email protected]" def registration_confirmation(user) mail(:to => user.email,:subject => "registered") end end I tested in rails console: u=User.first UserMailer.registration_confirmation(u).deliver it displays: #<Mail::Message:2194479560, Multipart: false, Headers: <Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 14:42:06 +0800>, <From: [email protected]>, <To: [email protected]>, <Message-ID: <[email protected]>>, <Subject: registered>, <Mime-Version: 1.0>, <Content-Type: text/plain>, <Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit>> BUT I never received the email here... Why? How can I solve this? I guess it is some problem on send_mail.rb file..

    Read the article

  • Assign weight to a integer column for Sphinx search

    - by Daniel
    Hello: I have a note table with columns: title :string content :text rating :integer and a thinking_sphinx configuration: define_index do indexes :title, :sortable => true indexes :content end Then I can search the notes and assign weights to title and content to define the order or the result: Note.search "abc", :match_mode => :extended, :field_weights => { :title => 10, :content => 3 } Now I want to assign a weight to the rating column The type of the rating column is integer. The range of the rating is [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. Can I just add weight at the :field_weights :field_weights => { :title => 10, :content => 3, :rating => 5 } or I need to do something else to make the note which has higer rating display first?

    Read the article

  • Handling JSON and HTML templates in jQuery

    - by Toby Hede
    I have an ajax-enabled site that presents a lot of dynamic content by interpolating JSON values with HTML. This all works fine. BUT it means I have significant amounts of HTML all through my JavaScript. For example: var template = "<div>Foo: {bar}</div><div>Blah: {vtha}</div>"; template.interpolate({bar:"bar",blah:"vtha"}); I have cut this down a fair bit - some of my dynamic elements have quite a lot of HTML and a lot going on. I am using jQuery and I am building on Rails, so if there is something smart in either framework, that would be great. For reference, the String interpolation function used above is: String.prototype.interpolate = function (o) { return this.replace(/{([^{}]*)}/g, function (a, b) { var r = o[b]; return typeof r === 'string' || typeof r === 'number' ? r : a; } ); };

    Read the article

  • Simple rails routing / url question

    - by justinbach
    I'm using Ryan Bates' nifty authentication in my application for user signup and login. Each user has_many :widgets, but I'd like to allow users to browse other users' widgets. I'm thinking that a url scheme like /username/widgets/widget_id would make a lot of sense--it would keep all widget-related code in the same place (the widgets controller). However, I'm not sure how to use this style of URL in my app. Right now my codebase is such that it permits logged-in users to browse only their own widgets, which live at /widgets/widget_id. What changes would I need to make to routes.rb, my models classes, and any place where links to a given widget are needed? I've done Rails work before but am a newb when it comes to more complicated routing, etc, so I'd appreciate any feedback. Thanks for your consideration!

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374  | Next Page >