Search Results

Search found 20931 results on 838 pages for 'mysql insert'.

Page 384/838 | < Previous Page | 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391  | Next Page >

  • Fetch posts with attachments in a certain category?

    - by TiuTalk
    I need to retreive a list of posts that have (at least) one attachment that belongs to a category in WordPress. The relation between attachments and categories I made by myself using the WordPress default method. Here's the query that i'm running right now: SELECT p.* FROM `wp_posts` AS p # The post INNER JOIN `wp_posts` AS a # The attachment ON p.`ID` = a.`post_parent` AND a.`post_type` = 'attachment' INNER JOIN `wp_term_relationships` AS ra ON a.`ID` = ra.`object_id` AND ra.`term_taxonomy_id` IN (3) # The category ID list WHERE p.`post_type` = 'post' ORDER BY p.`post_date` DESC LIMIT 15 The problem here is that the query only use the first found attachment, and if it doesn't belongs to the category, the result isn't returned.

    Read the article

  • How can I replace/speed up a text search query which uses LIKE ?

    - by Jules
    I'm trying to speed up my query... select PadID from Pads WHERE (keywords like '%$search%' or ProgramName like '%$search%' or English45 like '%$search%') AND RemovemeDate = '2001-01-01 00:00:00' ORDER BY VersionAddDate DESC I've done some work already, I have a keywords table so I can add ... PadID IN (SELECT PadID FROM Keywords WHERE word = '$search') ... However its going to be a nightmare to split up the words from English45 and ProgramName into a word table. Any ideas ? EDIT : (also provided actual table names)

    Read the article

  • please help me in this query

    - by testkhan
    I have three tables (user, friends, posts) and two users (user1 and user2). When user1 adds user2 as friend then user1 can see the posts of user2 just like on Facebook. But only the posts after the date when user1 added user2 as friend. My query is like this: $sql = mysql_query("SELECT * FROM posts p JOIN friends f ON p.currentuserid = f.friendid AND p.time >= f.friend_since OR p.currentuserid='user1id' WHERE f.myid='user1id' ORDER BY p.postid DESC LIMIT 20"); it is working all the way fine but with a little problem.....!! it displays user2, user3 (all the users as friends of user1) posts for single time but shows user1 posts multiple.......i.e user2. hi user1. userssfsfsfsfsdf user1. userssfsfsfsfsdf user3. dddddddd user1. sdfsdsdfsdsfsf user1. sdfsdsdfsdsfsf but i in database it is single entry/post why it is happening........!! How can I fix it?

    Read the article

  • how to get latest entry from a table for an item and do arithmatic operation on it?

    - by I Like PHP
    i have below tables tbl_rcv_items st_id | item_id |stock_opening_qnty |stock_received_qnty |stock_rcvd_date 14 1 0 70 2010-05-18 15 16 0 100 2010-05-06 16 10 0 59 2010-05-20 17 14 0 34 2010-05-20 20 1 70 5 2010-05-12 tbl_issu_items issue_id refer_issue_id item_id item_qntt item_updated 51 1 1 5 2010-05-18 19:34:29 52 1 16 6 2010-05-18 19:34:29 53 1 10 7 2010-05-18 19:34:29 54 1 14 8 2010-05-18 19:34:29 75 7 1 12 2010-05-18 19:40:52 76 7 16 1 2010-05-18 19:40:52 77 7 10 1 2010-05-18 19:40:52 78 7 14 1 2010-05-18 19:40:52 79 8 1 3 2010-05-19 11:28:50 80 8 16 5 2010-05-19 11:28:50 81 8 10 6 2010-05-19 11:28:50 82 8 14 7 2010-05-19 11:28:51 87 10 1 2 2010-05-19 12:51:03 88 10 16 0 2010-05-19 12:51:03 89 10 10 0 2010-05-19 12:51:03 90 10 14 0 2010-05-19 12:51:03 91 14 1 1 2010-05-19 18:43:58 92 14 14 3 2010-05-19 18:43:58 tbl_item_detail item_id item_name 1 shirt 2 belt 10 ball pen 14 vim powder 16 pant NOW if i want total available quantity for each item till today using both table total available quantity for an item =stock_opening_qnty+stock_received_qnty(LATEST ENTRY FROM (tbl_rcv_item) for that item id according to stock_rcvd_date) - SUM(item_qntt) for eg: if i want to know the available quantity for item_id=1 till today(25-05-2010) then it shoud be 70+5(latest entry for item_id till 25/5/2010)-23( issued till 25/5/2010)=52 i write below query , SELECT tri.item_id, tid.item_name, (tri.stock_opening_qnty + tri.stock_received_qnty) AS totalRcvQntt, SUM( tii.item_qntt ) AS totalIsudQntt FROM tbl_rcv_items tri JOIN tbl_issu_items tii ON tii.item_id = tri.item_id JOIN tbl_item_detail tid ON tid.item_id=tri.item_id WHERE tri.stock_rcvd_date <= CURDATE() GROUP BY (tri.item_id) which results Array ( [0] => Array ( [item_id] => 1 [item_name] => shirt [totalRcvQntt] => 70 [totalIsudQntt] => 46 ) [1] => Array ( [item_id] => 10 [item_name] => ball pen [totalRcvQntt] => 59 [totalIsudQntt] => 16 ) [2] => Array ( [item_id] => 14 [item_name] => vim powder [totalRcvQntt] => 34 [totalIsudQntt] => 20 ) [3] => Array ( [item_id] => 16 [item_name] => pant [totalRcvQntt] => 100 [totalIsudQntt] => 17 ) ) in above result total isuse quantity for shirt(item_id=1) shoube be 23 whereas results reflects 46 bcoz there are two row regrading item_id=1 in tbl_rcv_items, i only need the latest one(means which stock_rcvd_date is less than tommorow) please tell me where i doing mistake?? or rewrite the best query. thanks a lot!

    Read the article

  • Using * in SELECT Query

    - by libregeek
    I am currently porting an application written in MySQL3 and PHP4 to MySQL5 and PHP5. On analysis I found several SQL queries which uses "select * from tablename" even if only one column(field) is processed in PHP. The table has almost 60 columns and it has a primary key. In most cases, the only column used is id which is the primary key. Will there be any performance boost if I use queries in which the column names are explicitly mentioned instead of * ? (In this application there is only one method which we need all the columns and all other methods return only a subset of the columns)

    Read the article

  • LAMP stack on home computer as a public web server

    - by Scott
    So I'm using this website: http://www.howtoforge.com/ubuntu_debian_lamp_server to setup LAMP on my Ubuntu Virtual Machine. Here is my question though, This will enable me to program and test through localhost. How can I set this up so anyone on the web can access my .php pages from any Internet capable device, and they will still interact with my local database, etc?

    Read the article

  • atk4 advanced crud?

    - by thindery
    I have the following tables: -- ----------------------------------------------------- -- Table `product` -- ----------------------------------------------------- CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `product` ( `id` INT NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT , `productName` VARCHAR(255) NULL , `s7location` VARCHAR(255) NULL , PRIMARY KEY (`id`) ) ENGINE = InnoDB; -- ----------------------------------------------------- -- Table `pages` -- ----------------------------------------------------- CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `pages` ( `id` INT NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT , `productID` INT NULL , `pageName` VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL , `isBlank` TINYINT(1) NULL , `pageOrder` INT(11) NULL , `s7page` INT(11) NULL , PRIMARY KEY (`id`) , INDEX `productID` (`productID` ASC) , CONSTRAINT `productID` FOREIGN KEY (`productID` ) REFERENCES `product` (`id` ) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION) ENGINE = InnoDB; -- ----------------------------------------------------- -- Table `field` -- ----------------------------------------------------- CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `field` ( `id` INT NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT , `pagesID` INT NULL , `fieldName` VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL , `fieldType` VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL , `fieldDefaultValue` VARCHAR(255) NULL , PRIMARY KEY (`id`) , INDEX `id` (`pagesID` ASC) , CONSTRAINT `pagesID` FOREIGN KEY (`pagesID` ) REFERENCES `pages` (`id` ) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION) ENGINE = InnoDB; I have gotten CRUD to work on the 'product' table. //addproduct.php class page_addproduct extends Page { function init(){ parent::init(); $crud=$this->add('CRUD')->setModel('Product'); } } This works. but I need to get it so that when a new product is created it basically allows me to add new rows into the pages and field tables. For example, the products in the tables are a print product(like a greeting card) that has multiple pages to render. Page 1 may have 2 text fields that can be customized, page 2 may have 3 text fields, a slider to define text size, and a drop down list to pick a color, and page 3 may have five text fields that can all be customized. All three pages (and all form elements, 12 in this example) are associated with 1 product. So when I create the product, could i add a button to create a page for that product, then within the page i can add a button to add a new form element field? I'm still somewhat new to this, so my db structure may not be ideal. i'd appreciate any suggestions and feedback! Could someone point me toward some information, tutorials, documentation, ideas, suggestions, on how I can implement this?

    Read the article

  • SELECT a list of elements and 5 tags for each one

    - by Vittorio Vittori
    Hi, I'm trying to query a set of buldings listed on a table, these buildings are linked with tags. I'm able to do it, but my problem is how limit the number of tags to see: table buildings id building_name style 1 Pompidou bla 2 Alcatraz bla 3 etc. etc. table tags // they can be 50 or more per building id tag_name 1 minimal 2 gothic 3 classical 4 modern 5 etc. table buildings_tags id building_id tag_id I though to do something like this to retrieve the list, but this isn't compplete: SELECT DISTINCT(tag), bulding_name FROM buldings INNER JOIN buildings_tags ON buildings.id = buildings_tags.building_id INNER JOIN tags ON tags.id = buildings_tags.tag_id LIMIT 0, 20 // result building tag Pompidou great Pompidou france Pompidou paris Pompidou industrial Pompidou renzo piano <= How to stop at the 5th result? Pompidou hi-tech Pompidou famous place Pompidou wtf etc.. etc... this query loads the buildings, but this query loads all the tags linked for the building, and not only 5 of them?

    Read the article

  • Basic join query understanding

    - by OM The Eternity
    I know this very silly, but can anybody help me in understanding what does this join query is doing in elabortive description? SELECT j1.* FROM jos_audittrail j1 LEFT OUTER JOIN jos_audittrail j2 ON (j1.trackid = j2.trackid AND j1.field = j2.field AND j1.changedone < j2.changedone) WHERE j1.operation = 'UPDATE' AND j1.trackid=$t_ids[$n] AND j2.id IS NULL I know its very silly, but i need to go ahead with my further need... Pls do help me...

    Read the article

  • PHP is not called properly in IE using set interval function in Javascript

    - by Hemant
    Hi all, I am trying to show the message updated in DB using the following code var showtime = setInterval('redirect()',5000); ////Redirecting to DB Status ///// function redirect() { xmlhttp = GetXmlHttpObject(); if (xmlhttp==null) { alert ("Browser does not support HTTP Request"); return; } var url="isResultexist.php" xmlhttp.onreadystatechange=stateChanged; xmlhttp.open("GET",url,true); xmlhttp.send(null); } I am collecting the response from PHP here and using it to update the Messages on UI Problem here is it works fine 1st time when it called after 5sec but there after return the Same result even DB is updated, This works fine with Mozilla and google chrome browser regards hemant

    Read the article

  • PHP replace string help...

    - by MILESMIBALERR
    i am designing a site with a comment system and i would like a twitter like reply system. The if the user puts @a_registered_username i would like it to become a link to the user's profile. i think preg_replace is the function needed for this. $ALL_USERS_ROW *['USERNAME'] is the database query array for all the users and ['USERNAME'] is the username row. $content is the comment containing the @username i think this should not be very hard to solve for someone who is good at php. Does anybody have any idea how to do it?

    Read the article

  • Shopping Cart Database Structure

    - by Paul Atkins
    Hi, I have been studying the database structure for shopping carts and notice that when storing order details the product information is repeated and stored again in the table. I was wondering what the reasoning behind this would be? Here is a small example of what i mean: Product Table product_id name desc price 1 product 1 This is product 1 27.00 Order Table order_id customer id order_total 1 3 34.99 Order Details Table order_details_id product_id product name price qty 1 1 product 1 27.00 1 So as you can see the product name and price are stored again in the order details table. Why is this? The only reason i can think of is because the product details may change after the order has been placed which may cause confusion. Is this correct? Thanks Paul

    Read the article

  • Checking inherited attributes in an 'ancestry' based SQL table

    - by Brendon Muir
    I'm using the ancestry gem to help organise my app's tree structure in the database. It basically writes a childs ancestor information to a special column called 'ancestry'. The ancestry column for a particular child might look like '1/34/87' where the parent of this child is 87, and then 87's parent is 34 and 34's is 1. It seems possible that we could select rows from this table each with a subquery that checks all the ancestors to see if a certain attribute it set. E.g. in my app you can hide an item and its children just by setting the parent element's visibility column to 0. I want to be able to find all the items where none of their ancestors are hidden. I tried converting the slashes to comma's with the REPLACE command but IN required a set of comma separated integers rather than one string with comma separated string numbers. It's funny, because I can do this query in two steps, e.g. retrieve the row, then take its ancestry column, split out the id's and make another query that checks that the id is IN that set of id's and that visibility isn't ever 0 and whala! But joining these into one query seems to be quite a task. Much searching has shown a few answers but none really do what I want. SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE id = 99; 99's ancestry column reads '1/34/87' SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE visibility = 0 AND id IN (1,34,87); kind of backwards, but if this returns no rows then the item is visible. Has anyone come across this before and come up with a solution. I don't really want to go the stored procedure route. It's for a rails app.

    Read the article

  • Altering constraint delete action

    - by Hobhouse
    I did this: ALTER TABLE `db`.`my_table` ADD CONSTRAINT FOREIGN KEY (`my_second_table_id`) REFERENCES `my_second_table` (`id`); I should have done this: ALTER TABLE `db`.`my_table` ADD CONSTRAINT FOREIGN KEY (`my_second_table_id`) REFERENCES `my_second_table` (`id`) ON DELETE SET NULL; Is it possible to ALTER this, or do I have to drop the constraint and add again?

    Read the article

  • Using memtables in sql. When is it reasonable and is it safe?

    - by Spiros
    I was just reading an update from a friend's project, mentioning the use of memtables to store data temporatily and then flush to a table on disk. Up to now, I have never faced a situation where I would use a memtable, or a situation where I would think the use of a mem table would be beneficial; so I wonder, when would someone use mem tables? what makes a memtable (appart from access speed) a reasonable choice? and how safe is it, even for temp data? there is always the limitation of available physical memory.

    Read the article

  • SQL How to join multiplue columns with same name to one column

    - by Choi Shun Chi
    There is a super class account {User, TYPE} and subclasses saving{User, ID, balance,TYPE,interest,curency_TYPE} time{User,ID,balance,TYPE,interest,curency_TYPE,start_date,due_date,period} fore{User,ID,balance,interest,curency_TYPE} User and TYPE is the primary key of account and foreign key of three subclasses ID is primary key of three subclasses how to make a list of showing all IDs in one column?Also the same as balance and TYPE meet the problem I considered a.ID as saving, b.ID as time but it showing them separately

    Read the article

  • Debug irrelevant Wordpress search results

    - by konzepz
    On Wordpress, I keep getting irrelevant search results. Some search strings that do not exist on the DB yield All Posts as results. Some search strings that DO exist, works great. What could be the cause of that behavior? I've uninstalled all related plugins. Is there a way to debug the search? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Search & Replace SQL

    - by Shonna
    I am messing around with one of my databases.. is there away for me to search for a string in ALL the tables.. and replace it with another everywhere it occurs? I am looking for SQL

    Read the article

  • Sql query - selecting top 5 rows and further selecting rows only if User is present

    - by Gublooo
    Hello, I kind of stuck on how to implement this query - this is pretty similar to the query I posted earlier but I'm not able to crack it. I have a shopping table where everytime a user buys anything, a record is inserted. Some of the fields are * shopping_id (primary key) * store_id * user_id Now what I need is to pull only the list of those stores where he's among the top 5 visitors: When I break it down - this is what I want to accomplish: * Find all stores where this UserA has visited * For each of these stores - see who the top 5 visitors are. * Select the store only if UserA is among the top 5 visitors. The corresponding queries would be: select store_id from shopping where user_id = xxx select user_id,count(*) as 'visits' from shopping where store_id in (select store_id from shopping where user_id = xxx) group by user_id order by visits desc limit 5 Now I need to check in this resultset if UserA is present and select that store only if he's present. For example if he has visited a store 5 times - but if there are 5 or more people who have visited that store more than 5 times - then that store should not be selected. So I'm kind of lost here. Thanks for your help

    Read the article

  • SQL select statement

    - by kwokwai
    Hi all, I got a Table which has two fields: Point, and Level, with some sample data as follows: ----------------------- Point | Level ----------------------- 10 | Level 1 20 | Level 2 30 | Level 3 40 | Level 4 Suppose that there is a user who has 25 points, to find the Level in which this user is in, the Select statement I used was: Select Level from Table where Point < 30 AND Point > 20; But the Select SQL ststament is a hard-copy one where you can see the ponts 30 and 20 are fixed. I want to alter the Select statement so that the new SQL Select statement can be applied to all users with different points, but I don't know how to do it.

    Read the article

  • How to access stdClass variables stdClass Object([max(id)])=>64)

    - by Theopile
    I need the very last valid entry in a database table which would be the row with the greatest primary key. So using mysqli, my query is "SELECT MAX(id) FROM table LIMIT 1". This query returns the correct number(using print_r()) but I cannot figure out how to access it. Here is the main code. Note that the $this-link refers to class with a mysqli connection. $q="select max(id) from stones limit 1"; $qed=$this->link->query($q) or die(mysqli_error()); if($qed){ $row=$qed->fetch_object(); print_r($row); echo $lastid=$row;//here is the problem } The valid line print_r($row) echos out "stdClass Object ( [max(id)] = 68 )"

    Read the article

  • How to determine the difference among dates in the same column?

    - by Vera
    How to determine the difference among dates of birth? +----------+----------+------------+ | id | name | birth | +----------+----------+------------+ | 00001 | Claws | 2010-04-17 | | 00002 | Claws | 2010-01-31 | | 00003 | Claws | 2009-11-31 | | 00004 | Claws | 2009-09-31 | | 00005 | Claws | 2009-07-31 | | 00006 | Claws | 2008-10-31 | +----------+----------+------------+ I would like to obtain this: +----------+----------+------------+------------------------------------------+ | id | name | birth | diff | +----------+----------+------------+------------------------------------------+ | 00001 | Claws | 2010-04-17 | diff (id1-id2) = 2010-01-31 - 2010-04-17 | | 00002 | Claws | 2010-01-31 | diff (id2-id3) = 2010-01-31 - 2009-11-31 | | 00003 | Claws | 2009-11-31 | diff (id3-id4) = 2010-01-31 - 2009-09-31 | If possible, ORDER BY diff DESC Thank you for helping Vera

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391  | Next Page >