Search Results

Search found 61651 results on 2467 pages for 'function object'.

Page 386/2467 | < Previous Page | 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393  | Next Page >

  • Should i use a C function or Obj-C Method?

    - by Daniel Granger
    I'm about to create a function which adds to NSDateComponents together is there any advantage to putting this in a C style function or should it go in a Obj-C method? Is there ever a reason to use one rather then the other or should I always stick to Obj-C? BTW: Not that it makes any difference I'm sure but this is for an app on the iPhone Many thanks

    Read the article

  • Entlib validation to syntax to accept only numeric month numbers?

    - by ElHaix
    I've got an enum defined as such: Private Enum AllowedMonthNumbers _1 _2 _3 _4 _5 _6 _7 _8 _9 _10 _11 _12 End Enum Then a property validator defined as: <TypeConversionValidator(GetType(Int32), MessageTemplate:="Card expiry month must be numeric.", Ruleset:="CreditCard")> _ <EnumConversionValidator(GetType(AllowedMonthNumbers), MessageTemplate:="Card expiry month must be between 1 and 12.", Ruleset:="CreditCard")> _ The validation expects "_#", as when I remove the TypeConversionValidator, it passes with setting the value to "_3" or any other number in the enum. What I need is for this to only accept b/t 1-12, and simply having numeric values in the enum won't work. Any tips? Thanks. UPDATE I replaced the EnumConversionValidator with a RangeValidator, and attempting to set the parameter to "1", but received the following error: <RangeValidator(1, RangeBoundaryType.Inclusive, 12, RangeBoundaryType.Inclusive, MessageTemplate:="..."> However that's now giving me the following error: System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapException : System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapException: Server was unable to process request. ---> System.ArgumentException: Object must be of type Int32. at System.Int32.CompareTo(Object value) at Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.Validation.Validators.RangeChecker`1.IsInRange(T target) at Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.Validation.Validators.RangeValidator`1.DoValidate(T objectToValidate, Object currentTarget, String key, ValidationResults validationResults) at Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.Validation.Validator`1.DoValidate(Object objectToValidate, Object currentTarget, String key, ValidationResults validationResults) at Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.Validation.Validators.AndCompositeValidator.DoValidate(Object objectToValidate, Object currentTarget, String key, ValidationResults validationResults) at Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.Validation.Validators.ValueAccessValidator.DoValidate(Object objectToValidate, Object currentTarget, String key, ValidationResults validationResults) at Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.Validation.Validators.AndCompositeValidator.DoValidate(Object objectToValidate, Object currentTarget, String key, ValidationResults validationResults) at Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.Validation.Validators.GenericValidatorWrapper`1.DoValidate(T objectToValidate, Object currentTarget, String key, ValidationResults validationResults) at Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.Validation.Validator`1.Validate(T target, ValidationResults validationResults) at Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.Validation.Validation.Validate[T](T target, String[] rulesets) at ....

    Read the article

  • vimscript: calling dictionary functions with call()

    - by intuited
    I'm hoping to call a "static" dictionary function using call(). By "static" I mean that the keyword 'dict' is not used in the function's definition. I use this nomenclature in the hopes that the effect of this keyword is to declare a static member function as is possible in java/C++/etc, ie to put the function name in the class namespace but allow it to be called without referencing an object. However this doesn't seem to work. For example: " Setup: let testdict = { } funct! testdict.funct() echo "called" endfunct " Tests: " Following each line is an indented comment " containing its output in message land, ie what was echoed. call testdict.funct() " called echo testdict.funct " 667 echo string(testdict.funct) " function('667') echo function('667') " E475: Invalid argument: 667 echo function('testdict.funct') " testdict.funct call call(testdict.funct, [ ]) " E725: Calling dict function without Dictionary: 667 " Same deal if there's an intermediate variable involved. let TestdictDotFunct = testdict.funct echo TestdictDotFunct " 667 echo string(TestdictDotFunct) " function('667') call TestdictDotFunct() " E725: Calling dict function without Dictionary: 667 From the help topic E725: It is also possible to add a function without the "dict" attribute as a Funcref to a Dictionary, but the "self" variable is not available then. So logic would seem to indicate that if "self" is not available, then it should be possible to call the function referenced by the Funcref without a Dictionary. However this doesn't seem to be the case. Am I missing something? Vim version info: $ aptitude show vim-gnome Package: vim-gnome State: installed Automatically installed: no Version: 2:7.2.245-2ubuntu2

    Read the article

  • Using LINQ in generic collections

    - by Hugo S Ferreira
    Hi, Please consider the following snippet from an implementation of the Interpreter pattern: public override object Execute(Interpreter interpreter, object ctx) { var list = ctx as IEnumerable<string>; return (list != null) ? list.FirstOrDefault() : null; } What about if I want to use the same function for integers? public override object Execute(Interpreter interpreter, object ctx) { var list = ctx as IEnumerable<string>; if (list != null) return list.FirstOrDefault(); var list = ctx as IEnumerable<int>; return (list != null) ? list.FirstOrDefault() : null; } What I wanted was something like: public override object Execute(Interpreter interpreter, object ctx) { var list = ctx as IEnumerable; return (list != null) ? list.FirstOrDefault() : null; } But Linq doesn't act on IEnumerables. Instead, to get to this solution, I would be forced to write something like: public override object Execute(Interpreter interpreter, object ctx) { var list = ctx as IEnumerable; if (list != null) foreach(var i in list) { yield return i; return; } return null; } Or use a generic method: public override T Execute<T>(Interpreter interpreter, object ctx) { var list = ctx as IEnumerable<T>; return (list != null) ? list.FirstOrDefault() : null; } Which would break the Interpreter pattern (as it was implemented in this system). Covariance would also fail (at least in C#3), though would it work, it would be the exact behavior I wanted: public override object Execute(Interpreter interpreter, object ctx) { var list = ctx as IEnumerable<object>; return (list != null) ? list.FirstOrDefault() : null; } So, my question is: what's the best way to achieve the intended behavior? Thanks :-)

    Read the article

  • d3.js force layout increase linkDistance

    - by user1159833
    How to increase linkDistance without affecting the node alignment, example: http://mbostock.github.com/d3/talk/20110921/force.html when I try to increase the circle radius and linkDistance the it collapse <script type="text/javascript"> var w = 1280, h = 800, z = d3.scale.category20c(); var force = d3.layout.force() .size([w, h]); var svg = d3.select("#chart").append("svg:svg") .attr("width", w) .attr("height", h); svg.append("svg:rect") .attr("width", w) .attr("height", h); d3.json("flare.json", function(root) { var nodes = flatten(root), links = d3.layout.tree().links(nodes); force .nodes(nodes) .links(links) .start(); var link = svg.selectAll("line") .data(links) .enter().insert("svg:line") .style("stroke", "#999") .style("stroke-width", "1px"); var node = svg.selectAll("circle.node") .data(nodes) .enter().append("svg:circle") .attr("r", 4.5) .style("fill", function(d) { return z(d.parent && d.parent.name); }) .style("stroke", "#000") .call(force.drag); force.on("tick", function(e) { link.attr("x1", function(d) { return d.source.x; }) .attr("y1", function(d) { return d.source.y; }) .attr("x2", function(d) { return d.target.x; }) .attr("y2", function(d) { return d.target.y; }); node.attr("cx", function(d) { return d.x; }) .attr("cy", function(d) { return d.y; }); }); }); function flatten(root) { var nodes = []; function recurse(node, depth) { if (node.children) { node.children.forEach(function(child) { child.parent = node; recurse(child, depth + 1); }); } node.depth = depth; nodes.push(node); } recurse(root, 1); return nodes; } </script>

    Read the article

  • What is the best practice for using lock within inherited classes

    - by JDMX
    I want to know if one class is inheriting from another, is it better to have the classes share a lock object that is defined at the base class or to have a lock object defined at each inheritance level. A very simple example of a lock object on each level of the class public class Foo { private object thisLock = new object(); private int ivalue; public int Value { get { lock( thisLock ) { return ivalue; } } set { lock( thisLock ) { ivalue= value; } } } } public class Foo2: Foo { private object thisLock2 = new object(); public int DoubleValue { get { lock( thisLock2 ) { return base.Value * 2; } } set { lock( thisLock2 ) { base.Value = value / 2; } } } } public class Foo6: Foo2 { private object thisLock6 = new object(); public int TripleDoubleValue { get { lock( thisLock6 ) { return base.DoubleValue * 3; } } set { lock( thisLock6 ) { base.DoubleValue = value / 3; } } } } A very simple example of a shared lock object public class Foo { protected object thisLock = new object(); private int ivalue; public int Value { get { lock( thisLock ) { return ivalue; } } set { lock( thisLock ) { ivalue= value; } } } } public class Foo2: Foo { public int DoubleValue { get { lock( thisLock ) { return base.Value * 2; } } set { lock( thisLock ) { base.Value = value / 2; } } } } public class Foo6: Foo2 { public int TripleDoubleValue { get { lock( thisLock ) { return base.DoubleValue * 3; } } set { lock( thisLock ) { base.DoubleValue = value / 3; } } } } Which example is the preferred way to manage locking within an inherited class?

    Read the article

  • jQuery simplifying code (beginner)

    - by Jonny Wood
    I'm getting to grips with jQuery but find myself repeating code over and over again... Surely there's a simpler way to write this: $('#more-mcr, #more-hilton, #more-lpool').hide(); $('#mcr-hatters').hoverIntent(function() { $('#mcr-hilton').stop().animate({opacity: 0.4}); $('#more-mcr').fadeIn({duration:200}); }, function() { $('#mcr-hilton').stop().animate({opacity: 1}); $('#more-mcr').fadeOut({duration:200}); }); $('#mcr-hilton').hoverIntent(function() { $('#mcr-hatters').stop().animate({opacity: 0.4}); $('#more-hilton').fadeIn({duration:200}); }, function() { $('#mcr-hatters').stop().animate({opacity: 1}); $('#more-hilton').fadeOut({duration:200}); }); $('#lpool-hostel').hoverIntent(function() { $('#more-lpool').fadeIn({duration:200}); }, function() { $('#more-lpool').fadeOut({duration:200}); }); $('#offers-mcr').hoverIntent(function() { $('#offers-lpool').stop().animate({opacity: 0.4}); $('#offers-bham').stop().animate({opacity: 0.4}); }, function() { $('#offers-lpool').stop().animate({opacity: 1}); $('#offers-bham').stop().animate({opacity: 1}); }); $('#offers-lpool').hoverIntent(function() { $('#offers-mcr').stop().animate({opacity: 0.4}); $('#offers-bham').stop().animate({opacity: 0.4}); }, function() { $('#offers-mcr').stop().animate({opacity: 1}); $('#offers-bham').stop().animate({opacity: 1}); }); $('#offers-bham').hoverIntent(function() { $('#offers-lpool').stop().animate({opacity: 0.4}); $('#offers-mcr').stop().animate({opacity: 0.4}); }, function() { $('#offers-lpool').stop().animate({opacity: 1}); $('#offers-mcr').stop().animate({opacity: 1}); }); I'd also like to set the delay for hoverIntent but I don't think this is possible with the way I've written the code currently...?

    Read the article

  • .post inside jQuery.validator.addMethod always returns false :(

    - by abdullah kahraman
    Hello! I am very new to jQuery and javascript programming. I have a program below that checks whether username is taken or not. For now, the PHP script always returns if(isset($_POST["username"]) )//&& isset($_POST["checking"])) { $xml="<register><message>Available</message></register>"; echo $xml; } Login function works, but username checking doesn't. Any ideas? Here is all of my code: $(document).ready(function() { jQuery.validator.addMethod("checkAvailability",function(value,element){ $.post( "login.php" , {username:"test", checking:"yes"}, function(xml){ if($("message", xml).text() == "Available") return true; else return false; }); },"Sorry, this user name is not available"); $("#loginForm").validate({ rules: { username: { required: true, minlength: 4, checkAvailability: true }, password:{ required: true, minlength: 5 } }, messages: { username:{ required: "You need to enter a username." , minlength: jQuery.format("Your username should be at least {0} characters long.") } }, highlight: function(element, errorClass) { $(element).fadeOut("fast",function() { $(element).fadeIn("slow"); }) }, success: function(x){ x.text("OK!") }, submitHandler: function(form){send()} }); function send(){ $("#message").hide("fast"); $.post( "login.php" , {username:$("#username").val(), password:$("#password").val()}, function(xml){ $("#message").html( $("message", xml).text() ); if($("message", xml).text() == "You are successfully logged in.") { $("#message").css({ "color": "green" }); $("#message").fadeIn("slow", function(){location.reload(true);}); } else { $("#message").css({ "color": "red" }); $("#message").fadeIn("slow"); } }); } $("#newUser").click(function(){ return false; }); });

    Read the article

  • calling .ajax() from an eventHandler c# asp.ent

    - by ibininja
    Good day...! In the code behind (upload.aspx) I have an event that returns the number of bytes being streamed; and as I debug it, it works fine. I wanted to reflect the numbers returned from the eventHandler on a progress bar and this is where I got lost. I tried using jQuery's .ajax() function. this is how I implemented it: In the EventHandler in my code behind I added this code to call the .ajax() function: Page.ClientScript.RegisterStartupScript(this.GetType(), "UpdateProgress", "<script type='text/javascript'>updateProgress();</script>"); My plan is whenever the eventHandler function changes the values of bytes being streamed it calls the javascript function "updateProgress()" The .ajax() function "UpdateProgress()" is as: function updateProgress() { $.ajax({ type: "POST", url: "upload.aspx/GetData", data: "{}", contentType: "application/json; charset=utf-8", dataType: "json", async: true, success: function (msg) { $("#progressbar").progressbar("option", "value", msg.d); } }); } I made sure that the function GetData() is [System.Web.Services.WebMethod] and that it is static as well. so the workflow of what I am trying to implement is as: - Click On Upload button - The Behind code starts executing and EventHandler triggers - The EventHandler calls .ajax() function - The .ajax() function retrieves the bytes being streamed and updates progress bar. When I ran the code; all runs well except that the .ajax() is only executed when upload is finished (and progress bar also updates only when finished upload); even though I call .ajax() function every time in the eventHandler function as reflected above... What am I doing wrong? Am I thinking of this right? is there anything else I should add maybe an updatePanel or something? thank you

    Read the article

  • Synchronizing Access to a member of the ASP.NET session

    - by Sam
    I'm building a Javascript application and eash user has an individual UserSession. The application makes a bunch of Ajax calls. Each Ajax call needs access to a single UserSession object for the user. Each Ajax call needs a UserSession object. Data in the UserSession object is unique to each user. Originally, during each Ajax call I would create a new UserSession object and it's data members were stored in the ASP.NET Session. However, I found that the UserSession object was being instantiated a lot. To minimize the construction of the UserSession object, I wrapped it in a Singleton pattern and sychronized access to it. I believe that the synchronization is happening application wide, however I only need it to happen per user. I saw a post here that says the ASP.NET cache is synchronized, however the time between creating the object and inserting it into the cache another Thread could start construction it's another object and insert it into the cache. Here is the way I'm currently synchronizing access to the object. Is there a better way than using "lock"... should be be locking on the HttpContext.Session object? private static object SessionLock = new object(); public static WebSession GetSession { get { lock (SessionLock) { try { var context = HttpContext.Current; WebSession result = null; if (context.Session["MySession"] == null) { result = new WebSession(context); context.Session["MySession"] = result; } else { result = (WebSession)context.Session["MySession"]; } return result; } catch (Exception ex) { ex.Handle(); return null; } } } }

    Read the article

  • topic-comment naming of functions/methods

    - by Daniel
    I was looking at American Sign Language the other day... and I noticed that the construction of the language was topic-comment. As in "Weather is good". That got me to thinking about why we name methods/functions in the manner of: function getName() { ... } function setName(v) { ... } If we think about naming in a topic-comment function, the function names would be function nameGet() { ... } function nameSet() { ... } This might be better for a class had multiple purposes. IE: class events { function ListAdd(); function ListDelete(); function ListGet(); function EventAdd(); function EventDelete(); function EventGet(); } This way the functions are grouped by "topic". Where as the former naming, functions are grouped Action-Noun, but are sorted by Noun. I thought this was an interesting POV, what do other people think about naming functions/methods Topic-Comment? Obviously, mixing naming conventions up in the same project would be weird, but overall? -daniel

    Read the article

  • Silverlight WinDg Memory Release Issue

    - by Chris Newton
    Hi, I have used WinDbg succesfully on a number of occasions to track down and fix memory leaks (or more accurately the CLRs inability to garbage collect a released object), but am stuck with one particular control. The control is displayed within a child window and when the window is closed a reference to the control remains and cannot be garbage collected. I have resolved what I believe to be the majority of the issues that could have caused the leak, but the !gcroot of the affected object is not clear (to me at least) as to what is still holding on to this object. The ouput is always the same regardless of the content being presented in the child window: DOMAIN(03FB7238):HANDLE(Pinned):79b12f8:Root: 06704260(System.Object[])- 05719f00(System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary2[[System.IntPtr, mscorlib],[System.Object, mscorlib]])-> 067c1310(System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary2+Entry[[System.IntPtr, mscorlib],[System.Object, mscorlib]][])- 064d42b0(System.Windows.Controls.Grid)- 064d4314(System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary2[[MS.Internal.IManagedPeerBase, System.Windows],[System.Object, mscorlib]])-> 064d4360(System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary2+Entry[[MS.Internal.IManagedPeerBase, System.Windows],[System.Object, mscorlib]][])- 064d3860(System.Windows.Controls.Border)- 064d4218(System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary2[[MS.Internal.IManagedPeerBase, System.Windows],[System.Object, mscorlib]])-> 064d4264(System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary2+Entry[[MS.Internal.IManagedPeerBase, System.Windows],[System.Object, mscorlib]][])- 064d3bfc(System.Windows.Controls.ContentPresenter)- 064d3d64(System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary2[[MS.Internal.IManagedPeerBase, System.Windows],[System.Object, mscorlib]])-> 064d3db0(System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary2+Entry[[MS.Internal.IManagedPeerBase, System.Windows],[System.Object, mscorlib]][])- 064d3dec(System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary2[[System.UInt32, mscorlib],[System.Windows.DependencyObject, System.Windows]])-> 064d3e38(System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary2+Entry[[System.UInt32, mscorlib],[System.Windows.DependencyObject, System.Windows]][])- 06490b04(Insurer.Analytics.SharedResources.Controls.HistoricalKPIViewerControl) If anyone has any ideas about what could potentially be the problem, or if you require more information, please let me know. Kind Regards, Chris

    Read the article

  • Intro Bar like stack overflow

    - by Dasa
    I have a simple top bar using jquery like the one on stackoverflow, but i want it to only appear on the first time a person visits the website. below is the HTML followed by the "bxSlider.js" file <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html> <head> <script src="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.3.2/jquery.min.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="bxSlider.js"></script> <title>topbar</title> <style type="text/css" media="screen"> #message { font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; position:fixed; top:0px; left:0px; width:100%; z-index:105; text-align:center; color:white; padding:2px 0px 2px 0px; background-color:#8E1609; } #example1 { text-align: center; width: 80%; } .close-notify { white-space: nowrap; float:right; margin-right:10px; color:#fff; text-decoration:none; padding-left:3px; padding-right:3px } .close-notify a { color: #fff; } h4, p { margin:0px; padding:0px; } </style> </head> <body> <DIV ID='message' style="display: none;"> <DIV ID="example1"> <DIV CLASS="item"> <h4>Head 1</h4> <p>Text 1</p> </div><!-- end item --> <DIV CLASS="item"> <h4>Head 2</h4> <p>Text 2</p> </div><!-- end item --> </div><!-- end example1 --> <a href="#" CLASS="close-notify" onclick="closeNotice()">X</a> </div> <script type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function() { $("#message").fadeIn("slow"); $('#example1').bxSlider({ mode: 'slide', speed: 250, wrapper_CLASS: 'example1_container' }); }); function closeNotice() { $("#message").fadeOut("slow"); } </script> </body> </html> /** * * * bxSlider: Content slider / fade / ticker using the jQuery javascript library. * * Author: Steven Wanderski * Email: [email protected] * URL: http://bxslider.com * * **/ jQuery.fn.bxSlider = function(options){ ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // Declare variables and functions ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// var defaults = { mode: 'slide', speed: 500, auto: false, auto_direction: 'left', pause: 2500, controls: true, prev_text: 'prev', next_text: 'next', width: $(this).children().width(), prev_img: '', next_img: '', ticker_direction: 'left', wrapper_class: 'container' }; options = $.extend(defaults, options); if(options.mode == 'ticker'){ options.auto = true; } var $this = $(this); var $parent_width = options.width; var current = 0; var is_working = false; var child_count = $this.children().size(); var i = 0; var j = 0; var k = 0; function animate_next(){ is_working = true; $this.animate({'left':'-' + $parent_width * 2 + 'px'}, options.speed, function(){ $this.css({'left':'-' + $parent_width + 'px'}).children(':first').appendTo($this); is_working = false; }); } function animate_prev(){ is_working = true; $this.animate({'left': 0}, options.speed, function(){ $this.css({'left':'-' + $parent_width + 'px'}).children(':last').insertBefore($this.children(':first')); is_working = false; }); } function fade(direction){ if(direction == 'next'){ var last_before_switch = child_count - 1; var start_over = 0; var incr = k + 1; }else if(direction == 'prev'){ var last_before_switch = 0; var start_over = child_count -1; var incr = k - 1; } is_working = true; if(k == last_before_switch){ $this.children().eq(k).fadeTo(options.speed, 0); $this.children().eq(start_over).fadeTo(options.speed, 1, function(){ is_working = false; k = start_over; }); }else{ $this.children().eq(k).fadeTo(options.speed, 0); $this.children().eq(incr).fadeTo(options.speed, 1, function(){ is_working = false; k = incr; }); } } function add_controls(){ ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // Check if user selected images to use for next / prev ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// if(options.prev_img != '' || options.next_img != ''){ $this.parent().append('<a class="slider_prev" href=""><img src="' + options.prev_img + '" alt=""/></a><a class="slider_next" href=""><img src="' + options.next_img + '" alt="" /></a>'); }else{ $this.parent().append('<a class="slider_prev" href="">' + options.prev_text + '</a><a class="slider_next" href="">' + options.next_text + '</a>'); } $this.parent().find('.slider_prev').css({'float':'left', 'outline':'0', 'color':'yellow'}); $this.parent().find('.slider_next').css({'float':'right', 'outline':'0', 'color':'yellow'}); ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // Accomodate padding-top for controls when elements are absolutely positioned (only in fade mode) ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// if(options.mode == 'fade'){ $this.parent().find('.slider_prev').css({'paddingTop' : $this.children().height()}) $this.parent().find('.slider_next').css({'paddingTop' : $this.children().height()}) } ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // Actions when user clicks next / prev buttons ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// $this.parent().find('.slider_next').click(function(){ if(!is_working){ if(options.mode == 'slide'){ animate_next(); if(options.auto){ clearInterval($.t); $.t = setInterval(function(){animate_next();}, options.pause); } }else if(options.mode == 'fade'){ fade('next'); if(options.auto){ clearInterval($.t); $.t = setInterval(function(){fade('next');}, options.pause); } } } return false; }); $this.parent().find('.slider_prev').click(function(){ if(!is_working){ if(options.mode == 'slide'){ animate_prev(); if(options.auto){ clearInterval($.t); $.t = setInterval(function(){animate_prev();}, options.pause); } }else if(options.mode == 'fade'){ fade('prev'); if(options.auto){ clearInterval($.t); $.t = setInterval(function(){fade('prev');}, options.pause); } } } return false; }); } function ticker() { if(options.ticker_direction == 'left'){ $this.animate({'left':'-' + $parent_width * 2 + 'px'}, options.speed, 'linear', function(){ $this.css({'left':'-' + $parent_width + 'px'}).children(':first').appendTo($this); ticker(); }); }else if(options.ticker_direction == 'right'){ $this.animate({'left': 0}, options.speed, 'linear', function(){ $this.css({'left':'-' + $parent_width + 'px'}).children(':last').insertBefore($this.children(':first')); ticker(); }); } } ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // Create content wrapper and set CSS ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// $this.wrap('<div class="' + options.wrapper_class + '"></div>'); //console.log($this.parent().css('paddingTop')); if(options.mode == 'slide' || options.mode == 'ticker'){ $this.parent().css({ 'overflow' : 'hidden', 'position' : 'relative', 'margin' : '0 auto', 'width' : options.width + 'px' }); $this.css({ 'width' : '999999px', 'position' : 'relative', 'left' : '-' + $parent_width + 'px' }); $this.children().css({ 'float' : 'left', 'width' : $parent_width }); $this.children(':last').insertBefore($this.children(':first')); }else if(options.mode == 'fade'){ $this.parent().css({ 'overflow' : 'hidden', 'position' : 'relative', 'width' : options.width + 'px' //'height' : $this.children().height() }); if(!options.controls){ $this.parent().css({'height' : $this.children().height()}); } $this.children().css({ 'position' : 'absolute', 'width' : $parent_width, 'listStyle' : 'none', 'opacity' : 0 }); $this.children(':first').css({ 'opacity' : 1 }); } ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // Check if user selected "auto" ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// if(!options.auto){ add_controls(); }else{ if(options.mode == 'ticker'){ ticker(); }else{ ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // Set a timed interval ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// if(options.mode == 'slide'){ if(options.auto_direction == 'left'){ $.t = setInterval(function(){animate_next();}, options.pause); }else if(options.auto_direction == 'right'){ $.t = setInterval(function(){animate_prev();}, options.pause); } }else if(options.mode == 'fade'){ if(options.auto_direction == 'left'){ $.t = setInterval(function(){fade('next');}, options.pause); }else if(options.auto_direction == 'right'){ $.t = setInterval(function(){fade('prev');}, options.pause); } } if(options.controls){ add_controls(); } } } }

    Read the article

  • Javascript - event listener toggle button

    - by user2546157
    I'm trying to create a button which can toggle "double click" to "single click" and in the opposite. For some reason, once it toggles to single click and it cannot toggle back. Can anyone please help! function init() { normal_listeners(); } function addListener(){ var image1 = document.getElementById('image_1'); var image2 = document.getElementById('image_2'); var image3 = document.getElementById('image_3'); if(document.getElementById('listener_1').value == "Listener"){ document.getElementById('listener_1').style.backgroundColor = "red"; alert("Normal"); image1.addEventListener("dblclick", function(){userChoice(1);}, false); image2.addEventListener("dblclick", function(){userChoice(2);}, false); image3.addEventListener("dblclick", function(){userChoice(3);}, false); document.getElementById('listener_1').value = "Normal"; } else if(document.getElementById('listener_1').value == "Normal") { document.getElementById('listener_1').style.backgroundColor = "green"; alert("Listener"); image1.addEventListener("click", function(){userChoice(1);}, false); image2.addEventListener("click", function(){userChoice(2);}, false); image3.addEventListener("click", function(){userChoice(3);}, false); document.getElementById('listener_1').value = "Listener"; } } function normal_listeners(){ var image1 = document.getElementById('image_1'); var image2 = document.getElementById('image_2'); var image3 = document.getElementById('image_3'); var listener1 = document.getElementById('listener_1'); listener1.addEventListener("click", addListener, false); image1.addEventListener("dblclick", function(){userChoice(1);}, false); image2.addEventListener("dblclick", function(){userChoice(2);}, false); image3.addEventListener("dblclick", function(){userChoice(3);}, false); } window.onload = init; <img id="image_1" src="rock.jpg" alt="ROCK" width="100" height="100"> <img id="image_2" src="paper.jpg" alt="PAPER" width="100" height="100"> <img id="image_3" src="scissors.jpg" alt="SCISSORS" width="100" height="100"> <input type="button" id="listener_1" value="Normal" style="background-color:red">

    Read the article

  • Why null reference exception in SetMolePublicInstance?

    - by OldGrantonian
    I get a "null reference" exception in the following line: MoleRuntime.SetMolePublicInstance(stub, receiverType, objReceiver, name, null); The program builds and compiles correctly. There are no complaints about any of the parameters to the method. Here's the specification of SetMolePublicInstance, from the object browser: SetMolePublicInstance(System.Delegate _stub, System.Type receiverType, object _receiver, string name, params System.Type[] parameterTypes) Here are the parameter values for "Locals": + stub {Method = {System.String <StaticMethodUnitTestWithDeq>b__0()}} System.Func<string> + receiverType {Name = "OrigValue" FullName = "OrigValueP.OrigValue"} System.Type {System.RuntimeType} objReceiver {OrigValueP.OrigValue} object {OrigValueP.OrigValue} name "TestString" string parameterTypes null object[] I know that TestString() takes no parameters and returns string, so as a starter to try to get things working, I specified "null" for the final parameter to SetMolePublicInstance. As already mentioned, this compiles OK. Here's the stack trace: Unhandled Exception: System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object. at Microsoft.ExtendedReflection.Collections.Indexable.ConvertAllToArray[TInput,TOutput](TInput[] array, Converter`2 converter) at Microsoft.Moles.Framework.Moles.MoleRuntime.SetMole(Delegate _stub, Type receiverType, Object _receiver, String name, MoleBindingFlags flags, Type[] parameterTypes) at Microsoft.Moles.Framework.Moles.MoleRuntime.SetMolePublicInstance(Delegate _stub, Type receiverType, Object _receiver, String name, Type[] parameterTypes) at DeqP.Deq.Replace[T](Func`1 stub, Type receiverType, Object objReceiver, String name) in C:\0VisProjects\DecP_04\DecP\DeqC.cs:line 38 at DeqPTest.DecCTest.StaticMethodUnitTestWithDeq() in C:\0VisProjects\DecP_04\DecPTest\DeqCTest.cs:line 28 at Starter.Start.Main(String[] args) in C:\0VisProjects\DecP_04\Starter\Starter.cs:line 14 Press any key to continue . . . To avoid the null parameter, I changed the final "null" to "parameterTypes" as in the following line: MoleRuntime.SetMolePublicInstance(stub, receiverType, objReceiver, name, parameterTypes); I then tried each of the following (before the line): int[] parameterTypes = null; // if this is null, I don't think the type will matter int[] parameterTypes = new int[0]; object[] parameterTypes = new object[0]; // this would allow for various parameter types All three attempts produce a red squiggly line under the entire line for SetMolePublicInstance Mouseover showed the following message: The best overloaded method match for 'Microsoft.Moles.Framework.Moles.MoleRuntime.SetMolePublicInstance(System.Delegate, System.Type, object, string, params System.Type[])' has some invalid arguments. I'm assuming that the first four arguments are OK, and that the problem is with the params array.

    Read the article

  • Trying to condense javascript into for loop

    - by rod
    I've got the following code that I am trying to condense to a for loop but am having no luck: $("#motion1-sub1-1").hover( function () { $("#motion1-sub1-1 div").show(); }, function () { $("#motion1-sub1-1 div").hide(); } ); $("#motion1-sub1-2").hover( function () { $("#motion1-sub1-2 div").show(); }, function () { $("#motion1-sub1-2 div").hide(); } ); $("#motion1-sub1-3").hover( function () { $("#motion1-sub1-3 div").show(); }, function () { $("#motion1-sub1-3 div").hide(); } ); $("#motion1-sub1-4").hover( function () { $("#motion1-sub1-4 div").show(); }, function () { $("#motion1-sub1-4 div").hide(); } ); $("#motion1-sub1-5").hover( function () { $("#motion1-sub1-5 div").show(); }, function () { $("#motion1-sub1-5 div").hide(); } ); Here's the for loop code that have to condense the above code: for (var i = 1; i <= 5; i++) { $("motion1-sub1-" + i).hover( function () { $("motion1-sub1-" + i + "div").show(); }, function () { $("motion1-sub1-" + i + "div").hide(); } ); }

    Read the article

  • jQuery plugin Private functions inside Vs. Outside the each loop

    - by Pablo
    What is the difference between including private functions in a jQuery plugin in the examples below: Outside the loop: (function( $ ){ var defaults = {}; $.fn.cmFlex = function(opts) { this.each(function() { var $this = $(this); //Element specific options var o = $.extend({}, defaults, opts); //Code here }); function f1(){.... function f3(){.... function f2(){.... }; })( jQuery ); Inside the loop: (function( $ ){ var defaults = {}; $.fn.cmFlex = function(opts) { this.each(function() { var $this = $(this); //Element specific options var o = $.extend({}, defaults, opts); function f1(){.... function f3(){.... function f2(){.... }); }; })( jQuery ); The advantage of including the functions in the loop is that i will be able to access the $this variable as well as the Element specific options from f1() f2() f3(), are there any disadvantages to this?

    Read the article

  • Project Naming Convention Feedback Please

    - by Sam Striano
    I am creating a ASP.NET MVC 3 application using Entity Framework 4. I am using the Repository/Service Pattern and was looking for feedback. I currently have the following: MVC Application (GTG.dll) GTG GTG.Controllers GTG.ViewModels Business POCO's (GTG.Business.dll) This contains all business objects (Customer, Order, Invoice, etc...) EF Model/Repositories (GTG.Data.dll) GTG.Business (GTG.Context.tt) I used the Entity POCO Generator Templates. GTG.Data.Repositories Service Layer (GTG.Data.Services.dll) GTG.Data.Services - Contains all of the service objects, one per aggregate root. The following is a little sample code: Controller Namespace Controllers Public Class HomeController Inherits System.Web.Mvc.Controller Function Index() As ActionResult Return View(New Models.HomeViewModel) End Function End Class End Namespace Model Namespace Models Public Class HomeViewModel Private _Service As CustomerService Public Property Customers As List(Of Customer) Public Sub New() _Service = New CustomerService _Customers = _Service.GetCustomersByBusinessName("Striano") End Sub End Class End Namespace Service Public Class CustomerService Private _Repository As ICustomerRepository Public Sub New() _Repository = New CustomerRepository End Sub Function GetCustomerByID(ByVal ID As Integer) As Customer Return _Repository.GetByID(ID) End Function Function GetCustomersByBusinessName(ByVal Name As String) As List(Of Customer) Return _Repository.Query(Function(x) x.CompanyName.StartsWith(Name)).ToList End Function End Class Repository Namespace Data.Repositories Public Class CustomerRepository Implements ICustomerRepository Public Sub Add(ByVal Entity As Business.Customer) Implements IRepository(Of Business.Customer).Add End Sub Public Sub Delete(ByVal Entity As Business.Customer) Implements IRepository(Of Business.Customer).Delete End Sub Public Function GetByID(ByVal ID As Integer) As Business.Customer Implements IRepository(Of Business.Customer).GetByID Using db As New GTGContainer Return db.Customers.FirstOrDefault(Function(x) x.ID = ID) End Using End Function Public Function Query(ByVal Predicate As System.Linq.Expressions.Expression(Of System.Func(Of Business.Customer, Boolean))) As System.Linq.IQueryable(Of Business.Customer) Implements IRepository(Of Business.Customer).Query Using db As New GTGContainer Return db.Customers.Where(Predicate) End Using End Function Public Sub Save(ByVal Entity As Business.Customer) Implements IRepository(Of Business.Customer).Save End Sub End Class End Namespace

    Read the article

  • Bind event to AJAX populated list items

    - by AnPel
    I have an unordered list with no list items. I get some information from the user, I run it through my database using AJAX and the servers sends back a JSON object response. Then I append each list item I want to display to the list using something like $('blabla').append('<li>information</li>') My question is, since the li elements were not there at the time the DOM was ready, how can I bind a click event to them? Here is my full code: $(function(){ var timer; $('#f').keyup(function(){ clearTimeout(timer); timer = setTimeout(getSuggestions, 400); }); }) function getSuggestions(){ var a = $('#f')[0].value.length; if( a < 3){ if(a == 0){ $('#ajaxerror').hide(300,function(){ $('#loading').hide(300,function(){ $('#suggest').hide(300) }) }) } return; } $('#loading').slideDown(200,function(){ $.ajax({ url: '/models/AJAX/suggest.php', dataType: 'json', data: {'data' : $('#f')[0].value }, success: function(response){ $('#ajaxerror').hide(0,function(){ $('#loading').hide(100,function(){ $('#suggest ul li').remove(); for(var b = 0; b < ( response.rows * 3); b = b + 3){ $('#suggest ul').append('<li>'+response[b]+' '+response[b+1]+' '+response[b+2]+'</li>') // MISSING SOME CODE HERE TO BIND CLICK EVENT TO NEWLY CREATED LI } $('#suggest').show(300) }) }) }, error: function(){ $('#suggest').hide(0,function(){ $('#loading').slideUp(100,function(){ $('#ajaxerror').show(300) }) }) } }) }) }

    Read the article

  • Async run for javascript by using listeners

    - by CharlieShi
    I have two functions, the names are Function3, Function4, Function3 will send request to server side to get jsondata by using ajax, which, however, will take about 3 seconds to complete. Function4 is a common function which will wait for Function3's result and then action. My code puts below: function ajaxRequest(container) { $.ajax({ url: "Home/GetResult", type: "post", success: function (data) { container.append(data.message); } }); } var eventable = { on: function (event, cb) { $(this).on(event, cb); }, trigger: function (event) { $(this).trigger(event); } } var Function3 = { run: function () { var self = this; setTimeout(function () { ajaxRequest($(".container1")); self.trigger('done'); }, 500); } } var Function4 = { run: function () { var self = this; setTimeout(function () { $(".container1").append("Function4 complete"); self.trigger('done'); },500); } } $.extend(Function3, eventable); $.extend(Function4, eventable); Function3.on('done', function (event) { Function4.run(); }); Function4.on('done', function () { $(".container1").append("All done"); }); Function3.run(); but now the problem is, when I start the code , it always show me the result as : first will appear "Function4 complete", then "All done" follows, 3 seconds later, "Function3 complete" will appear. That's out of my expection because my expection is "Function3 complete" comes first, "Function4 complete" comes second and "All done" is expected as the last one. Anyone can help me on this? thx in advice. EDIT: I have included all the functions above now. Also, you can check the js script in JSFIDDER: http://jsfiddle.net/sporto/FYBjc/light/ I have replaced the function in JSFIDDER from a common array push action to ajax request.

    Read the article

  • jQuery UI Tabs Plugin Broke

    - by Warren J Thompson
    We are using the jquery ui tabs arrow plugin from this fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/dECtZ/282/, but like many plugins, it breaks with the latest version of jQuery. We were able to get the csscur to work, but still get the following error in the jquery core (line 353): Uncaught TypeError: Cannot assign to read only property 'length' of function (e,t){if(!this._createWidget)return new o(e,t);arguments.length&&this._createWidget(e,t)} Code is as follows: (function($, undefined) { if (!$.xui) { $.xui = {}; } var tabs = $.extend({}, $.ui.tabs.prototype), _super = { _create: tabs._create, _destroy: tabs._destroy, _update: tabs._update }; $.xui.tabs = $.extend(tabs, { options: $.extend({}, tabs.options, { scrollable: false, changeOnScroll: false, closable: false, resizable: false, resizeHandles: "e,s,se" }), _create: function() { var self = this, o = self.options; _super._create.apply(self); if (o.scrollable) { self.element.addClass("ui-tabs-scrollable"); var scrollContainer = $('<div class="ui-tabs-scroll-container"></div>').prependTo(this.element); self.header = $('<div class="ui-tabs-nav-scrollable ui-widget-header ui-corner-all"></div>').prependTo(scrollContainer); var nav = self.element.find(".ui-tabs-nav:first").removeClass("ui-widget-header ui-corner-all").appendTo(this.header); var arrowsNav = $('<ol class="ui-helper-reset ui-helper-clearfix ui-tabs-nav-arrows"></ol>').prependTo(self.element); var navPrev = $('<li class="ui-tabs-arrow-previous ui-state-default ui-corner-bl ui-corner-tl" title="Previous"><a href="#"><span class="ui-icon ui-icon-carat-1-w">Previous tab</span></a></li>').prependTo(arrowsNav).hide(), navNext = $('<li class="ui-tabs-arrow-next ui-state-default ui-corner-tr ui-corner-br" title="Next"><a href="#"><span class="ui-icon ui-icon-carat-1-e">Next tab</span></a></li>').appendTo(arrowsNav).hide(); var scrollTo = function(to, delay) { var navWidth = 0, arrowWidth = navPrev.outerWidth(), marginLeft = -(parseInt(nav.css("marginLeft"), 10)), hwidth = self.header.width(), newMargin = 0; nav.find("li").each(function() { navWidth += $(this).outerWidth(true); }); if (to instanceof $.Event) { } else { newMargin = marginLeft+to; if (newMargin > (navWidth-hwidth)) { newMargin = (navWidth-hwidth); } else if (newMargin < 0) { newMargin = 0; } nav.stop(true).animate({ marginLeft: -(newMargin) }, delay, function(){ $(window).trigger("resize.tabs"); }); } } var holdTimer = false; navPrev.add(navNext).bind({ "click": function(e) { var isNext = this === navNext[0]; e.preventDefault(); if (o.changeOnScroll) { self.select(self.options.selected + (isNext ? 1 : -1)); } else { if (!holdTimer) scrollTo(isNext ? 150 : -150, 250); } }, "mousedown": function(e){ if (!o.changeOnScroll) { var isNext = this === navNext[0], duration = 10, pos = 15, timer; if (holdTimer) clearTimeout(holdTimer); holdTimer = setTimeout(timer = function(){ scrollTo(isNext ? pos : -(pos), duration); holdTimer = setTimeout(arguments.callee, duration); }, 150); } }, "mouseup mouseout": function(e){ if (!o.changeOnScroll) { clearTimeout(holdTimer); holdTimer = false; nav.stop(); } } }); self.header.bind('mousewheel', function(e, d, dX, dY) { e.preventDefault(); if (d === -1) { navNext.click(); } else if (d === 1) { navPrev.click(); } }); $(window).bind("resize.tabs", function(e) { var navWidth = 0; var arrowWidth = navPrev.outerWidth(); nav.find("li").each(function() { navWidth += $(this).outerWidth(true); }); var marginLeft = -(parseInt(nav.css("marginLeft"), 10)), hwidth = self.header.width(); if (navWidth > (hwidth+marginLeft)) { self.header.addClass("ui-tabs-arrow-r"); navNext.show("fade"); if (marginLeft > 0) { self.header.addClass("ui-tabs-arrow-l"); navPrev.show("fade"); } else { self.header.removeClass("ui-tabs-arrow-l"); navPrev.hide("fade"); } } else { self.header.removeClass("ui-tabs-arrows ui-tabs-arrow-l"); navNext.hide("fade"); if (marginLeft > 0) { self.header.addClass("ui-tabs-arrow-l"); navPrev.show("fade"); } else { self.header.removeClass("ui-tabs-arrow-l"); navPrev.hide("fade"); } } }).trigger("resize.tabs"); arrowsNav.find("li").bind({ "mouseenter focus": function(e) { $(this).addClass("ui-state-hover"); }, "mouseleave blur": function(e) { $(this).removeClass("ui-state-hover"); } }); this.anchors.bind("click.tabs", function(){ var li = $(this).parent(), arrowWidth = navPrev.outerWidth(), width = li.outerWidth(true), hwidth = self.header.width(), pos = li.position().left, marginLeft = -(parseInt(nav.stop(true,true).css("marginLeft"),10)), newMargin = -1; if (li.index() === 0) { newMargin = 0; } else if ((pos+width) >= (hwidth+marginLeft)) { newMargin = pos-hwidth+width; if ((li.index()+1) < nav.find("li").length) { newMargin += arrowWidth; } } else if (pos < marginLeft) { newMargin = pos-arrowWidth; } if (newMargin > -1) { nav.animate({ marginLeft: -(newMargin) }, 250, function(){ $(window).trigger("resize.tabs"); }); } }); } return self; }, _update: function(){ console.log(arguments); _super._update.apply(this); } }); $.widget("xui.tabs", $.xui.tabs); })(jQuery); $(function() { $("#tabs").tabs({ scrollable: true, changeOnScroll: false, closable: true }); $("#switcher").themeswitcher(); });

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393  | Next Page >