Search Results

Search found 61651 results on 2467 pages for 'function object'.

Page 4/2467 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • function binding and the clone() function - Jquery

    - by Sam Vloeberghs
    Hi I have problems with my keyup binding when cloning an element. Here's the scenario: I have an html markup like this: <tr class="rijbasis"> <td> <input type="text" class="count" /> </td> <td> <span class="cost">10</span> </td> <td> <span class="total">10</span> </td> </tr> I'm binding an keyup function to the input element of my table row like this: $('.rijbasis input').keyup(function(){ var parent = $(this).parent().parent(); $('.total',parent).text(parseInt($('.cost',parent).text()) * parseInt($('.count',parent).val())); } I designed the function like this so I could clone the table row on a onclick event and append it to the tbody: $('.lineadd').click(function(){ $('.contract tbody').append($('.contract tbody tr:last').clone()); $('.contract tbody tr:last input').val("0"); }); This al works , but the keyup function doesnt work on the input elements of the cloned row.. Can anybody help or advice? I hope I was clear enough and I'll be surely adding details if needed to solve this problem. Greetings

    Read the article

  • using FUNCTION instead of CREATE FUNCTION oracle pl/sql

    - by sqlgrasshopper5
    I see people writing a function with FUNCTION instead "CREATE FUNCTION". When I saw this usage in the web I thought it was a typo or something. But in Oreilly's "Oracle 11g PL/SQL Programming" by Steven Feurenstein, the author had used the same thing. But I get errors when I execute that. Could somebody explain is it legal usage or not?. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Setting Up a Wordpress Function in theme's function.php File

    - by user1609391
    I am trying to create the below function in my theme's function.php file and call it from my taxonomy.php file via query_brands_geo('dealers', 'publish', '1', $taxtype, $geo, $brands); all variables are set in taxonomy.php. The below query works perfect if I put it directly in my taxonomy.php file. What am I missing to make this work as a function? As a function I get this error statement for argument repeated for 2-6: Warning: Missing argument 2 for query_brands_geo() function query_brands_geo($posttype, $poststatus, $paidvalue, $taxtype, $geo, $brands) { /* Custom Query for a brand/geo combination to display dealers with a certain brand and geography */ //Query only for brands/geography combo and paid dealers $wp_query = new WP_Query(); $args = array( 'post_type' => '$posttype', 'post_status' => array($poststatus), 'orderby' => 'rand', 'posts_per_page' => 30, 'meta_query' => array( array( 'key' => 'wpcf-paid', 'value' => array($paidvalue), 'compare' => 'IN', ) ), 'tax_query' => array( 'relation' => 'AND', array( 'taxonomy' => $taxtype, 'field' => 'slug', 'terms' => $geo ), array( 'taxonomy' => 'brands', 'field' => 'slug', 'terms' => $brands ) ) ); $wp_query->query($args); } add_action( 'after_setup_theme', 'query_brands_geo' );

    Read the article

  • javascript function object's inheritFrom method

    - by gawpertron
    I've come across this.inheritFrom that enables you to inherit from a super class. var superClass = function() { this.foo = 'foo'; this.bar = 'bar'; } var subClass = function() { this.inheritFrom = superClass; this.inheritFrom(); this.myFunction = function() { return this.foo; }; } I've looked in Mozilla and MSDN, but I can't seem to find it documented any where. As far as I can see it works in IE6 and Firefox 3. Any reason why it wouldn't be documented?

    Read the article

  • bootstrap: Uncaught TypeError: Object [object Object] has no method 'tooltip', 'typeahead'

    - by DarkKnightFan
    I am trying to use the tooltip, typeahead, datepicker features of bootstrap. But I keep getting these errors in the console! Uncaught TypeError: Object [object Object] has no method 'tooltip' Uncaught TypeError: Object [object Object] has no method 'typeahead' This is how my imports look like: <link href="css/bootstrap.css" rel="stylesheet"> <link href="css/datepicker.css" rel="stylesheet"> <link href="css/bootstrap-responsive.css" rel="stylesheet"> <script type="text/javascript" src="js/jquery-1.8.0.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="js/bootstrap.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="js/bootstrap-datepicker.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="js/bootstrap-typeahead.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="js/highcharts.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="js/exporting.js"></script> <link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" href="css/jquery.dropdown.css" /> <script type="text/javascript" src="js/jquery.dropdown.js"></script> Some sample code: <a class="btn btn-success" data-toggle="modal" href="#payments" rel="tooltip" data-placement="top" title="Record your payments"> <i class="icon-check icon-white"></i> Payments</a> $("#payments").tooltip('show'); Similarly I have code for datepicker and typeahead. any solution?

    Read the article

  • Uncaught TypeError: Property 'dist2' of object [object Object] is not a function

    - by Radu Vlad
    I have this functions that should return me the distance from point p to segment line v-w. The problem i have is after some time i receive the following error: Uncaught TypeError: Property 'dist2' of object [object Object] is not a function. I receive it in distToSegmentSquared directly,not even calling the function dist2().Is it any other dist2() anywhere in jquery?I found none... function sqr(x) { return x * x; } function dist2(v, w) { console.log(v); console.log(w); return sqr(v.x - w.x) + sqr(v.y - w.y); } function distToSegmentSquared(p, v, w) { var l2 = dist2(v, w); if (l2 == 0) return dist2(p, v); var t = ((p.x - v.x) * (w.x - v.x) + (p.y - v.y) * (w.y - v.y)) / l2; if (t < 0) return dist2(p, v); if (t > 1) return dist2(p, w); return dist2(p, {x: v.x + t * (w.x - v.x), y: v.y + t * (w.y - v.y)}); } function distToSegment(p, v, w) { return Math.sqrt(distToSegmentSquared(p, v, w)); } The values that are given in for that error are: p: Object x: 461 y: 333 v: Object x: 80 y: 120 w: Object x: 260 y: 120

    Read the article

  • PHP create_function, function without semicolon?

    - by Ozzy
    hi all, basically, what i want to know is, for the second parameter in the create_function function, is there anyway to pass a string without a semicolon? or will it not work. example: taken from php.net create_function('$a,$b', 'return "CRCs: " . crc32($a) . " , ".crc32(b);'), notice that there is a semicolon in the string. is there any possible way someone can enter a function without a semicolon that will still run/evaluate?

    Read the article

  • PHP Object References in Frameworks

    - by bigstylee
    Before I dive into the disscusion part a quick question; Is there a method to determine if a variable is a reference to another variable/object? For example $foo = 'Hello World'; $bar = &$foo; echo (is_reference($bar) ? 'Is reference' : 'Is orginal'; I have been using PHP5 for a few years now (personal use only) and I would say I am moderately reversed on the topic of Object Orientated implementation. However the concept of Model View Controller Framework is fairly new to me. I have looked a number of tutorials and looked at some of the open source frameworks (mainly CodeIgnitor) to get a better understanding how everything fits together. I am starting to appreciate the real benefits of using this type of structure. I am used to implementing object referencing in the following technique. class Foo{ public $var = 'Hello World!'; } class Bar{ public function __construct(){ global $Foo; echo $Foo->var; } } $Foo = new Foo; $Bar = new Bar; I was surprised to see that CodeIgnitor and Yii pass referencs of objects and can be accessed via the following method: $this->load->view('argument') The immediate advantage I can see is a lot less code and more user friendly. But I do wonder if it is more efficient as these frameworks are presumably optimised? Or simply to make the code more user friendly? This was an interesting article Do not use PHP references.

    Read the article

  • Help with Nicedit - removeFormat function

    - by Franck
    Hello, I'm trying to get around Nicedit, and especially the "removeFormat" function. The problem is I cannot find the "removeFormat" method source code in the code below. The JS syntax looks strange to me. Can someone help me ? /* NicEdit - Micro Inline WYSIWYG * Copyright 2007-2008 Brian Kirchoff * * NicEdit is distributed under the terms of the MIT license * For more information visit http://nicedit.com/ * Do not remove this copyright message */ var bkExtend = function(){ var A = arguments; if (A.length == 1) { A = [this, A[0]] } for (var B in A[1]) { A[0][B] = A[1][B] } return A[0] }; function bkClass(){ } bkClass.prototype.construct = function(){ }; bkClass.extend = function(C){ var A = function(){ if (arguments[0] !== bkClass) { return this.construct.apply(this, arguments) } }; var B = new this(bkClass); bkExtend(B, C); A.prototype = B; A.extend = this.extend; return A }; var bkElement = bkClass.extend({ construct: function(B, A){ if (typeof(B) == "string") { B = (A || document).createElement(B) } B = $BK(B); return B }, appendTo: function(A){ A.appendChild(this); return this }, appendBefore: function(A){ A.parentNode.insertBefore(this, A); return this }, addEvent: function(B, A){ bkLib.addEvent(this, B, A); return this }, setContent: function(A){ this.innerHTML = A; return this }, pos: function(){ var C = curtop = 0; var B = obj = this; if (obj.offsetParent) { do { C += obj.offsetLeft; curtop += obj.offsetTop } while (obj = obj.offsetParent) } var A = (!window.opera) ? parseInt(this.getStyle("border-width") || this.style.border) || 0 : 0; return [C + A, curtop + A + this.offsetHeight] }, noSelect: function(){ bkLib.noSelect(this); return this }, parentTag: function(A){ var B = this; do { if (B && B.nodeName && B.nodeName.toUpperCase() == A) { return B } B = B.parentNode } while (B); return false }, hasClass: function(A){ return this.className.match(new RegExp("(\s|^)nicEdit-" + A + "(\s|$)")) }, addClass: function(A){ if (!this.hasClass(A)) { this.className += " nicEdit-" + A } return this }, removeClass: function(A){ if (this.hasClass(A)) { this.className = this.className.replace(new RegExp("(\s|^)nicEdit-" + A + "(\s|$)"), " ") } return this }, setStyle: function(A){ var B = this.style; for (var C in A) { switch (C) { case "float": B.cssFloat = B.styleFloat = A[C]; break; case "opacity": B.opacity = A[C]; B.filter = "alpha(opacity=" + Math.round(A[C] * 100) + ")"; break; case "className": this.className = A[C]; break; default: B[C] = A[C] } } return this }, getStyle: function(A, C){ var B = (!C) ? document.defaultView : C; if (this.nodeType == 1) { return (B && B.getComputedStyle) ? B.getComputedStyle(this, null).getPropertyValue(A) : this.currentStyle[bkLib.camelize(A)] } }, remove: function(){ this.parentNode.removeChild(this); return this }, setAttributes: function(A){ for (var B in A) { this[B] = A[B] } return this } }); var bkLib = { isMSIE: (navigator.appVersion.indexOf("MSIE") != -1), addEvent: function(C, B, A){ (C.addEventListener) ? C.addEventListener(B, A, false) : C.attachEvent("on" + B, A) }, toArray: function(C){ var B = C.length, A = new Array(B); while (B--) { A[B] = C[B] } return A }, noSelect: function(B){ if (B.setAttribute && B.nodeName.toLowerCase() != "input" && B.nodeName.toLowerCase() != "textarea") { B.setAttribute("unselectable", "on") } for (var A = 0; A < B.childNodes.length; A++) { bkLib.noSelect(B.childNodes[A]) } }, camelize: function(A){ return A.replace(/-(.)/g, function(B, C){ return C.toUpperCase() }) }, inArray: function(A, B){ return (bkLib.search(A, B) != null) }, search: function(A, C){ for (var B = 0; B < A.length; B++) { if (A[B] == C) { return B } } return null }, cancelEvent: function(A){ A = A || window.event; if (A.preventDefault && A.stopPropagation) { A.preventDefault(); A.stopPropagation() } return false }, domLoad: [], domLoaded: function(){ if (arguments.callee.done) { return } arguments.callee.done = true; for (i = 0; i < bkLib.domLoad.length; i++) { bkLib.domLoadi } }, onDomLoaded: function(A){ this.domLoad.push(A); if (document.addEventListener) { document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", bkLib.domLoaded, null) } else { if (bkLib.isMSIE) { document.write(".nicEdit-main p { margin: 0; }<\/script"); $BK("__ie_onload").onreadystatechange = function(){ if (this.readyState == "complete") { bkLib.domLoaded() } } } } window.onload = bkLib.domLoaded } }; function $BK(A){ if (typeof(A) == "string") { A = document.getElementById(A) } return (A && !A.appendTo) ? bkExtend(A, bkElement.prototype) : A } var bkEvent = { addEvent: function(A, B){ if (B) { this.eventList = this.eventList || {}; this.eventList[A] = this.eventList[A] || []; this.eventList[A].push(B) } return this }, fireEvent: function(){ var A = bkLib.toArray(arguments), C = A.shift(); if (this.eventList && this.eventList[C]) { for (var B = 0; B < this.eventList[C].length; B++) { this.eventList[C][B].apply(this, A) } } } }; function __(A){ return A } Function.prototype.closure = function(){ var A = this, B = bkLib.toArray(arguments), C = B.shift(); return function(){ if (typeof(bkLib) != "undefined") { return A.apply(C, B.concat(bkLib.toArray(arguments))) } } }; Function.prototype.closureListener = function(){ var A = this, C = bkLib.toArray(arguments), B = C.shift(); return function(E){ E = E || window.event; if (E.target) { var D = E.target } else { var D = E.srcElement } return A.apply(B, [E, D].concat(C)) } }; var nicEditorConfig = bkClass.extend({ buttons: { 'bold': { name: _('Mettre en gras'), command: 'Bold', tags: ['B', 'STRONG'], css: { 'font-weight': 'bold' }, key: 'b' }, 'italic': { name: _('Mettre en italique'), command: 'Italic', tags: ['EM', 'I'], css: { 'font-style': 'italic' }, key: 'i' }, 'underline': { name: _('Souligner'), command: 'Underline', tags: ['U'], css: { 'text-decoration': 'underline' }, key: 'u' }, 'left': { name: _('Aligné à gauche'), command: 'justifyleft', noActive: true }, 'center': { name: _('Centré'), command: 'justifycenter', noActive: true }, 'right': { name: _('Aligné à droite'), command: 'justifyright', noActive: true }, 'justify': { name: _('Justifié'), command: 'justifyfull', noActive: true }, 'ol': { name: _('Liste non ordonnée'), command: 'insertorderedlist', tags: ['OL'] }, 'ul': { name: _('Liste non ordonnée'), command: 'insertunorderedlist', tags: ['UL'] }, 'subscript': { name: _('Placer en indice'), command: 'subscript', tags: ['SUB'] }, 'superscript': { name: _('Placer en exposant'), command: 'superscript', tags: ['SUP'] }, 'strikethrough': { name: _('Barrer le texte'), command: 'strikeThrough', css: { 'text-decoration': 'line-through' } }, 'removeformat': { name: _('Supprimer la mise en forme'), command: 'removeformat', noActive: true }, 'indent': { name: _('Indenter'), command: 'indent', noActive: true }, 'outdent': { name: _('Remove Indent'), command: 'outdent', noActive: true }, 'hr': { name: _('Ligne horizontale'), command: 'insertHorizontalRule', noActive: true } }, iconsPath: 'http://js.nicedit.com/nicEditIcons-latest.gif', buttonList: ['save', 'bold', 'italic', 'underline', 'left', 'center', 'right', 'justify', 'ol', 'ul', 'fontSize', 'fontFamily', 'fontFormat', 'indent', 'outdent', 'image', 'upload', 'link', 'unlink', 'forecolor', 'bgcolor'], iconList: { "xhtml": 1, "bgcolor": 2, "forecolor": 3, "bold": 4, "center": 5, "hr": 6, "indent": 7, "italic": 8, "justify": 9, "left": 10, "ol": 11, "outdent": 12, "removeformat": 13, "right": 14, "save": 25, "strikethrough": 16, "subscript": 17, "superscript": 18, "ul": 19, "underline": 20, "image": 21, "link": 22, "unlink": 23, "close": 24, "arrow": 26, "upload": 27, "question":2 } }); ; var nicEditors = { nicPlugins: [], editors: [], registerPlugin: function(B, A){ this.nicPlugins.push({ p: B, o: A }) }, allTextAreas: function(C){ var A = document.getElementsByTagName("textarea"); for (var B = 0; B < A.length; B++) { nicEditors.editors.push(new nicEditor(C).panelInstance(A[B])) } return nicEditors.editors }, findEditor: function(C){ var B = nicEditors.editors; for (var A = 0; A < B.length; A++) { if (B[A].instanceById(C)) { return B[A].instanceById(C) } } } }; var nicEditor = bkClass.extend({ construct: function(C){ this.options = new nicEditorConfig(); bkExtend(this.options, C); this.nicInstances = new Array(); this.loadedPlugins = new Array(); var A = nicEditors.nicPlugins; for (var B = 0; B < A.length; B++) { this.loadedPlugins.push(new A[B].p(this, A[B].o)) } nicEditors.editors.push(this); bkLib.addEvent(document.body, "mousedown", this.selectCheck.closureListener(this)) }, panelInstance: function(B, C){ B = this.checkReplace($BK(B)); var A = new bkElement("DIV").setStyle({ width: (parseInt(B.getStyle("width")) || B.clientWidth) + "px" }).appendBefore(B); this.setPanel(A); return this.addInstance(B, C) }, checkReplace: function(B){ var A = nicEditors.findEditor(B); if (A) { A.removeInstance(B); A.removePanel() } return B }, addInstance: function(B, C){ B = this.checkReplace($BK(B)); if (B.contentEditable || !!window.opera) { var A = new nicEditorInstance(B, C, this) } else { var A = new nicEditorIFrameInstance(B, C, this) } this.nicInstances.push(A); return this }, removeInstance: function(C){ C = $BK(C); var B = this.nicInstances; for (var A = 0; A < B.length; A++) { if (B[A].e == C) { B[A].remove(); this.nicInstances.splice(A, 1) } } }, removePanel: function(A){ if (this.nicPanel) { this.nicPanel.remove(); this.nicPanel = null } }, instanceById: function(C){ C = $BK(C); var B = this.nicInstances; for (var A = 0; A < B.length; A++) { if (B[A].e == C) { return B[A] } } }, setPanel: function(A){ this.nicPanel = new nicEditorPanel($BK(A), this.options, this); this.fireEvent("panel", this.nicPanel); return this }, nicCommand: function(B, A){ if (this.selectedInstance) { this.selectedInstance.nicCommand(B, A) } }, getIcon: function(D, A){ var C = this.options.iconList[D]; var B = (A.iconFiles) ? A.iconFiles[D] : ""; return { backgroundImage: "url('" + ((C) ? this.options.iconsPath : B) + "')", backgroundPosition: ((C) ? ((C - 1) * -18) : 0) + "px 0px" } }, selectCheck: function(C, A){ var B = false; do { if (A.className && A.className.indexOf("nicEdit") != -1) { return false } } while (A = A.parentNode); this.fireEvent("blur", this.selectedInstance, A); this.lastSelectedInstance = this.selectedInstance; this.selectedInstance = null; return false } }); nicEditor = nicEditor.extend(bkEvent); var nicEditorInstance = bkClass.extend({ isSelected: false, construct: function(G, D, C){ this.ne = C; this.elm = this.e = G; this.options = D || {}; newX = parseInt(G.getStyle("width")) || G.clientWidth; newY = parseInt(G.getStyle("height")) || G.clientHeight; this.initialHeight = newY - 8; var H = (G.nodeName.toLowerCase() == "textarea"); if (H || this.options.hasPanel) { var B = (bkLib.isMSIE && !((typeof document.body.style.maxHeight != "undefined") && document.compatMode == "CSS1Compat")); var E = { width: newX + "px", border: "1px solid #ccc", borderTop: 0, overflowY: "auto", overflowX: "hidden" }; E[(B) ? "height" : "maxHeight"] = (this.ne.options.maxHeight) ? this.ne.options.maxHeight + "px" : null; this.editorContain = new bkElement("DIV").setStyle(E).appendBefore(G); var A = new bkElement("DIV").setStyle({ width: (newX - 8) + "px", margin: "4px", minHeight: newY + "px" }).addClass("main").appendTo(this.editorContain); G.setStyle({ display: "none" }); A.innerHTML = G.innerHTML; if (H) { A.setContent(G.value); this.copyElm = G; var F = G.parentTag("FORM"); if (F) { bkLib.addEvent(F, "submit", this.saveContent.closure(this)) } } A.setStyle((B) ? { height: newY + "px" } : { overflow: "hidden" }); this.elm = A } this.ne.addEvent("blur", this.blur.closure(this)); this.init(); this.blur() }, init: function(){ this.elm.setAttribute("contentEditable", "true"); if (this.getContent() == "") { this.setContent("") } this.instanceDoc = document.defaultView; this.elm.addEvent("mousedown", this.selected.closureListener(this)).addEvent("keypress", this.keyDown.closureListener(this)).addEvent("focus", this.selected.closure(this)).addEvent("blur", this.blur.closure(this)).addEvent("keyup", this.selected.closure(this)); this.elm.addEvent("resizestart",function(){return false}); this.elm.addEvent("dragstart",function(){return false}); this.ne.fireEvent("add", this); }, remove: function(){ this.saveContent(); if (this.copyElm || this.options.hasPanel) { this.editorContain.remove(); this.e.setStyle({ display: "block" }); this.ne.removePanel() } this.disable(); this.ne.fireEvent("remove", this) }, disable: function(){ this.elm.setAttribute("contentEditable", "false") }, getSel: function(){ return (window.getSelection) ? window.getSelection() : document.selection }, getRng: function(){ var A = this.getSel(); if (!A) { return null } return (A.rangeCount 0) ? A.getRangeAt(0) : A.createRange() }, selRng: function(A, B){ if (window.getSelection) { B.removeAllRanges(); B.addRange(A) } else { A.select() } }, selElm: function(){ var C = this.getRng(); if (C.startContainer) { var D = C.startContainer; if (C.cloneContents().childNodes.length == 1) { for (var B = 0; B < D.childNodes.length; B++) { var A = D.childNodes[B].ownerDocument.createRange(); A.selectNode(D.childNodes[B]); if (C.compareBoundaryPoints(Range.START_TO_START, A) != 1 && C.compareBoundaryPoints(Range.END_TO_END, A) != -1) { return $BK(D.childNodes[B]) } } } return $BK(D) } else { return $BK((this.getSel().type == "Control") ? C.item(0) : C.parentElement()) } }, saveRng: function(){ this.savedRange = this.getRng(); this.savedSel = this.getSel() }, restoreRng: function(){ if (this.savedRange) { this.selRng(this.savedRange, this.savedSel) } }, keyDown: function(B, A){ if (B.ctrlKey) { this.ne.fireEvent("key", this, B) } }, selected: function(C, A){ if (!A) { A = this.selElm() } if (!C.ctrlKey) { var B = this.ne.selectedInstance; if (B != this) { if (B) { this.ne.fireEvent("blur", B, A) } this.ne.selectedInstance = this; this.ne.fireEvent("focus", B, A) } this.ne.fireEvent("selected", B, A); this.isFocused = true; this.elm.addClass("selected") } return false }, blur: function(){ this.isFocused = false; this.elm.removeClass("selected") }, saveContent: function(){ if (this.copyElm || this.options.hasPanel) { this.ne.fireEvent("save", this); (this.copyElm) ? this.copyElm.value = this.getContent() : this.e.innerHTML = this.getContent() } }, getElm: function(){ return this.elm }, getContent: function(){ this.content = this.getElm().innerHTML; this.ne.fireEvent("get", this); return this.content }, setContent: function(A){ this.content = A; this.ne.fireEvent("set", this); this.elm.innerHTML = this.content }, nicCommand: function(B, A){ document.execCommand(B, false, A) } }); var nicEditorIFrameInstance = nicEditorInstance.extend({ savedStyles: [], init: function(){ var B = this.elm.innerHTML.replace(/^\s+|\s+$/g, ""); this.elm.innerHTML = ""; (!B) ? B = "" : B; this.initialContent = B; this.elmFrame = new bkElement("iframe").setAttributes({ src: "javascript:;", frameBorder: 0, allowTransparency: "true", scrolling: "no" }).setStyle({ height: "100px", width: "100%" }).addClass("frame").appendTo(this.elm); if (this.copyElm) { this.elmFrame.setStyle({ width: (this.elm.offsetWidth - 4) + "px" }) } var A = ["font-size", "font-family", "font-weight", "color"]; for (itm in A) { this.savedStyles[bkLib.camelize(itm)] = this.elm.getStyle(itm) } setTimeout(this.initFrame.closure(this), 50) }, disable: function(){ this.elm.innerHTML = this.getContent() }, initFrame: function(){ var B = $BK(this.elmFrame.contentWindow.document); B.designMode = "on"; B.open(); var A = this.ne.options.externalCSS; B.write("" + ((A) ? '' : "") + '' + this.initialContent + ""); B.close(); this.frameDoc = B; this.frameWin = $BK(this.elmFrame.contentWindow); this.frameContent = $BK(this.frameWin.document.body).setStyle(this.savedStyles); this.instanceDoc = this.frameWin.document.defaultView; this.heightUpdate(); this.frameDoc.addEvent("mousedown", this.selected.closureListener(this)).addEvent("keyup", this.heightUpdate.closureListener(this)).addEvent("keydown", this.keyDown.closureListener(this)).addEvent("keyup", this.selected.closure(this)); this.ne.fireEvent("add", this) }, getElm: function(){ return this.frameContent }, setContent: function(A){ this.content = A; this.ne.fireEvent("set", this); this.frameContent.innerHTML = this.content; this.heightUpdate() }, getSel: function(){ return (this.frameWin) ? this.frameWin.getSelection() : this.frameDoc.selection }, heightUpdate: function(){ this.elmFrame.style.height = Math.max(this.frameContent.offsetHeight, this.initialHeight) + "px" }, nicCommand: function(B, A){ this.frameDoc.execCommand(B, false, A); setTimeout(this.heightUpdate.closure(this), 100) } }); var nicEditorPanel = bkClass.extend({ construct: function(E, B, A){ this.elm = E; this.options = B; this.ne = A; this.panelButtons = new Array(); this.buttonList = bkExtend([], this.ne.options.buttonList); this.panelContain = new bkElement("DIV").setStyle({ overflow: "hidden", width: "100%", border: "1px solid #cccccc", backgroundColor: "#efefef" }).addClass("panelContain"); this.panelElm = new bkElement("DIV").setStyle({ margin: "2px", marginTop: "0px", zoom: 1, overflow: "hidden" }).addClass("panel").appendTo(this.panelContain); this.panelContain.appendTo(E); var C = this.ne.options; var D = C.buttons; for (button in D) { this.addButton(button, C, true) } this.reorder(); E.noSelect() }, addButton: function(buttonName, options, noOrder){ var button = options.buttons[buttonName]; var type = (button.type) ? eval("(typeof(" + button.type + ') == "undefined") ? null : ' + button.type + ";") : nicEditorButton; var hasButton = bkLib.inArray(this.buttonList, buttonName); if (type && (hasButton || this.ne.options.fullPanel)) { this.panelButtons.push(new type(this.panelElm, buttonName, options, this.ne)); if (!hasButton) { this.buttonList.push(buttonName) } } }, findButton: function(B){ for (var A = 0; A < this.panelButtons.length; A++) { if (this.panelButtons[A].name == B) { return this.panelButtons[A] } } }, reorder: function(){ var C = this.buttonList; for (var B = 0; B < C.length; B++) { var A = this.findButton(C[B]); if (A) { this.panelElm.appendChild(A.margin) } } }, remove: function(){ this.elm.remove() } }); var nicEditorButton = bkClass.extend({ construct: function(D, A, C, B){ this.options = C.buttons[A]; this.name = A; this.ne = B; this.elm = D; this.margin = new bkElement("DIV").setStyle({ "float": "left", marginTop: "2px" }).appendTo(D); this.contain = new bkElement("DIV").setStyle({ width: "20px", height: "20px" }).addClass("buttonContain").appendTo(this.margin); this.border = new bkElement("DIV").setStyle({ backgroundColor: "#efefef", border: "1px solid #efefef" }).appendTo(this.contain); this.button = new bkElement("DIV").setStyle({ width: "18px", height: "18px", overflow: "hidden", zoom: 1, cursor: "pointer" }).addClass("button").setStyle(this.ne.getIcon(A, C)).appendTo(this.border); this.button.addEvent("mouseover", this.hoverOn.closure(this)).addEvent("mouseout", this.hoverOff.closure(this)).addEvent("mousedown", this.mouseClick.closure(this)).noSelect(); if (!window.opera) { this.button.onmousedown = this.button.onclick = bkLib.cancelEvent } B.addEvent("selected", this.enable.closure(this)).addEvent("blur", this.disable.closure(this)).addEvent("key", this.key.closure(this)); this.disable(); this.init() }, init: function(){ }, hide: function(){ this.contain.setStyle({ display: "none" }) }, updateState: function(){ if (this.isDisabled) { this.setBg() } else { if (this.isHover) { this.setBg("hover") } else { if (this.isActive) { this.setBg("active") } else { this.setBg() } } } }, setBg: function(A){ switch (A) { case "hover": var B = { border: "1px solid #666", backgroundColor: "#ddd" }; break; case "active": var B = { border: "1px solid #666", backgroundColor: "#ccc" }; break; default: var B = { border: "1px solid #efefef", backgroundColor: "#efefef" } } this.border.setStyle(B).addClass("button-" + A) }, checkNodes: function(A){ var B = A; do { if (this.options.tags && bkLib.inArray(this.options.tags, B.nodeName)) { this.activate(); return true } } while (B = B.parentNode && B.className != "nicEdit"); B = $BK(A); while (B.nodeType == 3) { B = $BK(B.parentNode) } if (this.options.css) { for (itm in this.options.css) { if (B.getStyle(itm, this.ne.selectedInstance.instanceDoc) == this.options.css[itm]) { this.activate(); return true } } } this.deactivate(); return false }, activate: function(){ if (!this.isDisabled) { this.isActive = true; this.updateState(); this.ne.fireEvent("buttonActivate", this) } }, deactivate: function(){ this.isActive = false; this.updateState(); if (!this.isDisabled) { th

    Read the article

  • Use a subclass object to modify a protected propety within its superclass object

    - by gadmeer
    Sorry for the crappy title I failed to think of a better version for my Java question. I am right now using Java version: 1.6.0_18 and Netbeans version: 6.8 Now for the question. What I've done is created a class with only one protected int property and next I made a public method to Set the int property to a given value. Then I made an object of that class and used said public method to set the int property to 5. Now I need your help to create another class that will take said object and expose it's protected int property. The way I could think of doing this was to create a sub class to inherit said class and then create a method to Get the int property of the super class. I kind of succeeded to create the code to Get the int property but now I can't figure out how to use this new sub class to reference the object of the super class. Here are the 2 classes I have thus far: public class A { protected int iNumber; public void setNumber ( int aNumber ) { iNumber = aNumber; } } public class B extends A { public int getNumber() { return super.iNumber; } } I created an object of 'A' and used its method to set its property to 5, like this: A objA = new A(); objA.setNumber ( 5 ); Now I want to create an object of 'B' to output the int stored within the property of 'objA'. I've tried to run this code: B objB = (B) objA; String aNumber_String = String.valueOf( objB.getNumber() ); System.out.println( aNumber_String ); but I got the error: "java.lang.ClassCastException" on the first line B objB = (B) objA; Please is there anyway of doing what I am trying to do? P.S. I am hoping to make this idea work because I do not want to edit class A (unless I have no choice) by giving it a getter method. P.P.S Also I know it's a 'bad' idea to expose the property instead of making it private and use public setter / getter methods but I like it this way :). Edit: Added code tags

    Read the article

  • VB.NET - Object reference not set to an instance of an object

    - by Daniel
    I need some help with my program. I get this error when I run my VB.NET program with a custom DayView control. ***** Exception Text ******* System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object. at SeaCow.Main.DayView1_ResolveAppointments(Object sender, ResolveAppointmentsEventArgs args) in C:\Users\Daniel\My Programs\Visual Basic\SeaCow\SeaCow\SeaCow\Main.vb:line 120 at Calendar.DayView.OnResolveAppointments(ResolveAppointmentsEventArgs args) at Calendar.DayView.OnPaint(PaintEventArgs e) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.PaintWithErrorHandling(PaintEventArgs e, Int16 layer) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WmPaint(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WndProc(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.NativeWindow.Callback(IntPtr hWnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wparam, IntPtr lparam) According to the error code, the 'for each' loop below is causing the NullReferenceException error. At default, the 'appointments' list is assigned to nothing and I can't find where the ResolveAppointments function is being called at. Private Sub DayView1_ResolveAppointments(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal args As Calendar.ResolveAppointmentsEventArgs) Handles DayView1.ResolveAppointments Dim m_Apps As New List(Of Calendar.Appointment) For Each m_App As Calendar.Appointment In appointments If (m_App.StartDate >= args.StartDate) AndAlso (m_App.StartDate <= args.EndDate) Then m_Apps.Add(m_App) End If Next args.Appointments = m_Apps End Sub Anyone have any suggestions?

    Read the article

  • how to incorporate a function within a function

    - by bklynM
    I updated my code with string dates created with new Date and added back in the if statement. This isn't disabling the string or range though. I've added the datepicker code too. function unavailableDays(date) { function createDateRange(first, last) { var dates = []; for(var j = first; j < last; j.setDate(j.getDate() + 7)) { dates.push(new Date(j.getTime())); } var alwaysDisabled = [new Date("1963-3-10T00:00:00"), new Date("1963-3-17T00:00:00"), new Date("1963-3-24T00:00:00"), new Date("1963-3-31T00:00:00"), new Date("1965-9-18T00:00:00")]; return dates.concat(alwaysDisabled); } var disabledDays = createDateRange(new Date("1978-8-10T00:00:00"), new Date("1978-11-5T00:00:00")); var yy = date.getFullYear(), mm = date.getMonth(), dd = date.getDate(); for (i = 0; i < disabledDays.length; i++) { if($.inArray(yy + '-' + (mm+1) + '-' + dd,disabledDays) != -1 || new Date() < date) { return [false]; } } return [true]; } $(document).ready(function (){ $('.selector').datepicker({ inline: true, dateFormat: 'yy-mm-dd', constrainInput: true, changeYear: true, changeMonth: true, minDate: new Date(1940, 1-1, 1), maxDate: new Date(2011, 10-1, 24), beforeShowDay: unavailableDays, onSelect: function(dateText, inst) { $("#img").attr("src", "http://www.example.com" + dateText + ".jpg"); var chosenDates = $.datepicker.parseDate('yy-mm-dd', dateText); var backToString = $.datepicker.formatDate('MM dd' + ',' + ' yy', chosenDates); $('.info').html('You are viewing:' + '<br />' + backToString).addClass('background'); } }); });

    Read the article

  • Javascript Reference Outer Object From Inner Object

    - by Akidi
    Okay, I see a few references given for Java, but not javascript ( which hopefully you know is completely different ). So here's the code specific : function Sandbox() { var args = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments) , callback = args.pop() , modules = (args[0] && typeof args[0] === 'string' ? args : args[0]) , i; if (!(this instanceof Sandbox)) { return new Sandbox(modules, callback); } if (!modules || modules[0] === '*') { modules = []; for (i in Sandbox.modules) { if (Sandbox.modules.hasOwnProperty(i)) { modules.push(i); } } } for (i = 0; i < modules.length; i++) { Sandbox.modules[modules[i]](this); } this.core = { 'exp': { 'classParser': function (name) { return (new RegExp("(^| )" + name + "( |$)")); }, 'getParser': /^(#|\.)?([\w\-]+)$/ }, 'typeOf': typeOf, 'hasOwnProperty': function (obj, prop) { return obj.hasOwnProperty(prop); }, 'forEach': function (arr, fn, scope) { scope = scope || config.win; for (var i = 0, j = arr.length; i < j; i++) { fn.call(scope, arr[i], i, arr); } } }; this.config = { 'win' : win, 'doc' : doc }; callback(this); } How do I access this.config.win from within this.core.forEach? Or is this not possible?

    Read the article

  • Function returning dictionary, not seen by calling function

    - by twiga
    Hi There, I have an interesting problem, which is a function that returns a Dictionary<String,HashSet<String>>. The function converts some primitive structs to a Dictionary Class. The function is called as follows: Dictionary<String, HashSet<String>> Myset = new Dictionary<String,HashSet<String>>(); Myset = CacheConverter.MakeDictionary(_myList); Upon execution of the two lines above, Myset is non-existent to the debugger. Adding a watch results in: "The name 'Myset' does not exist in the current context" public Dictionary<String, HashSet<String>> MakeDictionary(LightWeightFetchListCollection _FetchList) { Dictionary<String, HashSet<String>> _temp = new Dictionary<String, HashSet<String>>(); // populate the Dictionary // return return _temp; } The Dictionary _temp is correctly populated by the called function and _temp contains all the expected values. The problem seems to be with the dictionary not being returned at all. Examples I could find on the web of functions returning primitive Dictionary<string,string> work as expected.

    Read the article

  • Callback function and function pointer trouble in C++ for a BST

    - by Brendon C.
    I have to create a binary search tree which is templated and can deal with any data types, including abstract data types like objects. Since it is unknown what types of data an object might have and which data is going to be compared, the client side must create a comparison function and also a print function (because also not sure which data has to be printed). I have edited some C code which I was directed to and tried to template, but I cannot figure out how to configure the client display function. I suspect variable 'tree_node' of class BinarySearchTree has to be passed in, but I am not sure how to do this. For this program I'm creating an integer binary search tree and reading data from a file. Any help on the code or the problem would be greatly appreciated :) Main.cpp #include "BinarySearchTreeTemplated.h" #include <iostream> #include <fstream> #include <string> using namespace std; /*Comparison function*/ int cmp_fn(void *data1, void *data2) { if (*((int*)data1) > *((int*)data2)) return 1; else if (*((int*)data1) < *((int*)data2)) return -1; else return 0; } static void displayNode() //<--------NEED HELP HERE { if (node) cout << " " << *((int)node->data) } int main() { ifstream infile("rinput.txt"); BinarySearchTree<int> tree; while (true) { int tmp1; infile >> tmp1; if (infile.eof()) break; tree.insertRoot(tmp1); } return 0; } BinarySearchTree.h (a bit too big to format here) http://pastebin.com/4kSVrPhm

    Read the article

  • pass value from embedded function into conditional of page the embedded function is included on

    - by Brad
    I have a page that includes/embeds a file that contains a number of functions. One of the functions has a variable I want to pass back onto the page that the file is embedded on. <?php include('functions.php'); userInGroup(); if($user_in_group) { print 'user is in group'; } else { print 'user is not in group'; } ?> function within functions.php <?php function userInGroup() { foreach($group_access as $i => $group) { if($group_session == $group) { $user_in_group = TRUE; break; } else { $user_in_group == FALSE; } } }?> I am unsure as to how I can pass the value from the function userInGroup back to the page it runs the conditional if($user_in_group) on Any help is appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Profile:Object reference not set to an instance of an object

    - by sallalman83
    Hi, i just lunch my web site i used the asp.net routing technology on it, and its work fine in my localhost but when i moved the project to the hosting server(Godaddy.com) its just work fine when there is no virtual sub directories like this(havebreak.com) but when u click on this link (havebreak.com/Registration/) or any other links that contain a virtual sub-directories its give Object reference not set to an instance of an object error on the profile object if (!Profile.IsAnonymous) Line 18: mlvRegistratioin.ActiveViewIndex = 1; i check my IIS settings and found it using the "Integrated pipeline" as recommended (at least at my knowledge), i checked the httpModules and httpHandlers tags under the system.webServer (since my hosting plan use the IIS7) and under the normal tag and every thing is fine then i used the url-rewriting instead of URL-Routing and the same problem exist and i notice that the session also not working in the virtual sub-directories too and by the way the ASP.NET routing work fine with my site its just the profile and session objects that not workin any help will be appreciated

    Read the article

  • Evaluation of jQuery function variable value during definition of that function

    - by thesnail
    I have a large number of rows in a table within which I wish to attach a unique colorpicker (jQuery plugin) to each cell in a particular column identified by unique ids. Given this, I want to automate the generation of instances of the colorpicker as follows: var myrows={"a","b","c",.....} var mycolours={"ffffff","fcdfcd","123123"...} for (var i=0;i<myrows.length;i++) { $("#"+myrows[i]+"colour").ColorPicker({flat: false, color: mycolours[i], onChange: function (hsb, hex, rgb) { $("#"+myrows[i]+"currentcolour").css('backgroundColor', '#' + hex); } }); Now this doesn't work because the evaluation of the $("#"+myrows[i]+"currentcolour") component occurs at the time the function is called, not when it is defined (which is want I need). Given that this plugin javascript appends its code to the level and not to the underlying DOM component that I am accessing above so can't derive what id this pertains to, how can I evaluate the variable during function declaration/definition? Thanks for any help/insight anyone can give. Brian.

    Read the article

  • Objective-C and Cocoa : crash when calling a class function without entering the function

    - by Oliver
    Hello, I have a class function (declared and implemented) in a class MyUtils : + (NSString*) theFunction:(NSString*)param1 param2:(NSString*)param2 param3:(NSString*)param3; When I call this function, with : NSString *item = [MyUtils theFunction:@"abc" param2:aPreviousNSString param3:@"xyz"; my app crashes. In the debugger I have a breakpoint on the first action of the "theFunction" function. And this breakpoint is never reached. If I replace the call by NSString *item = @"youyou"; then everything is ok. Forcing a retain on aPreviousNSString before the call does not change anything. Do you have an idea of what is happening ? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Information Spilling Across Object Boundaries

    - by Winston Ewert
    Many times my business objects tend to have situations where information needs to cross object boundaries too often. When doing OO, we want information to be in one object and as much as possible all code dealing with that information should be in that object. However, business rules do not follow this principle giving me trouble. As an example suppose that we have an Order which has a number of OrderItems which refers to an InventoryItem which has a price. I invoke Order.GetTotal() which sums the result of OrderItem.GetPrice() which multiples a quantity by InventoryItem.GetPrice(). So far so good. But then we find out that some items are sold with a two for one deal. We can handle this by having OrderItem.GetPrice() do something like InventoryItem.GetPrice( quantity ) and letting InventoryItem deal with this. However, then we find out that the two-for-one deal only lasts for a particular time period. This time period needs to be based on the date of the order. Now we change OrderItem.GetPrice() to be InventoryItem.GetPrice( quatity, order.GetDate() ) But then we need to support different prices depending on how long the customer has been in the system: InventoryItem.GetPrice( quantity, order.GetDate(), order.GetCustomer() ) But then it turns out that the two-for-one deals apply not just to buying multiple of the same inventory item but multiple for any item in a InventoryCategory. At this point we throw up our hands and just give the InventoryItem the order item and allow it to travel over the object reference graph via accessors to get the information its needs: InventoryItem.GetPrice( this ) TL;DR I want to have coupling in objects, but business rules often force me to access information from all over the place in order to make particular decisions. Are there good techniques for dealing with this? Do others find the same problem?

    Read the article

  • Creating a dynamic, extensible C# Expando Object

    - by Rick Strahl
    I love dynamic functionality in a strongly typed language because it offers us the best of both worlds. In C# (or any of the main .NET languages) we now have the dynamic type that provides a host of dynamic features for the static C# language. One place where I've found dynamic to be incredibly useful is in building extensible types or types that expose traditionally non-object data (like dictionaries) in easier to use and more readable syntax. I wrote about a couple of these for accessing old school ADO.NET DataRows and DataReaders more easily for example. These classes are dynamic wrappers that provide easier syntax and auto-type conversions which greatly simplifies code clutter and increases clarity in existing code. ExpandoObject in .NET 4.0 Another great use case for dynamic objects is the ability to create extensible objects - objects that start out with a set of static members and then can add additional properties and even methods dynamically. The .NET 4.0 framework actually includes an ExpandoObject class which provides a very dynamic object that allows you to add properties and methods on the fly and then access them again. For example with ExpandoObject you can do stuff like this:dynamic expand = new ExpandoObject(); expand.Name = "Rick"; expand.HelloWorld = (Func<string, string>) ((string name) => { return "Hello " + name; }); Console.WriteLine(expand.Name); Console.WriteLine(expand.HelloWorld("Dufus")); Internally ExpandoObject uses a Dictionary like structure and interface to store properties and methods and then allows you to add and access properties and methods easily. As cool as ExpandoObject is it has a few shortcomings too: It's a sealed type so you can't use it as a base class It only works off 'properties' in the internal Dictionary - you can't expose existing type data It doesn't serialize to XML or with DataContractSerializer/DataContractJsonSerializer Expando - A truly extensible Object ExpandoObject is nice if you just need a dynamic container for a dictionary like structure. However, if you want to build an extensible object that starts out with a set of strongly typed properties and then allows you to extend it, ExpandoObject does not work because it's a sealed class that can't be inherited. I started thinking about this very scenario for one of my applications I'm building for a customer. In this system we are connecting to various different user stores. Each user store has the same basic requirements for username, password, name etc. But then each store also has a number of extended properties that is available to each application. In the real world scenario the data is loaded from the database in a data reader and the known properties are assigned from the known fields in the database. All unknown fields are then 'added' to the expando object dynamically. In the past I've done this very thing with a separate property - Properties - just like I do for this class. But the property and dictionary syntax is not ideal and tedious to work with. I started thinking about how to represent these extra property structures. One way certainly would be to add a Dictionary, or an ExpandoObject to hold all those extra properties. But wouldn't it be nice if the application could actually extend an existing object that looks something like this as you can with the Expando object:public class User : Westwind.Utilities.Dynamic.Expando { public string Email { get; set; } public string Password { get; set; } public string Name { get; set; } public bool Active { get; set; } public DateTime? ExpiresOn { get; set; } } and then simply start extending the properties of this object dynamically? Using the Expando object I describe later you can now do the following:[TestMethod] public void UserExampleTest() { var user = new User(); // Set strongly typed properties user.Email = "[email protected]"; user.Password = "nonya123"; user.Name = "Rickochet"; user.Active = true; // Now add dynamic properties dynamic duser = user; duser.Entered = DateTime.Now; duser.Accesses = 1; // you can also add dynamic props via indexer user["NickName"] = "AntiSocialX"; duser["WebSite"] = "http://www.west-wind.com/weblog"; // Access strong type through dynamic ref Assert.AreEqual(user.Name,duser.Name); // Access strong type through indexer Assert.AreEqual(user.Password,user["Password"]); // access dyanmically added value through indexer Assert.AreEqual(duser.Entered,user["Entered"]); // access index added value through dynamic Assert.AreEqual(user["NickName"],duser.NickName); // loop through all properties dynamic AND strong type properties (true) foreach (var prop in user.GetProperties(true)) { object val = prop.Value; if (val == null) val = "null"; Console.WriteLine(prop.Key + ": " + val.ToString()); } } As you can see this code somewhat blurs the line between a static and dynamic type. You start with a strongly typed object that has a fixed set of properties. You can then cast the object to dynamic (as I discussed in my last post) and add additional properties to the object. You can also use an indexer to add dynamic properties to the object. To access the strongly typed properties you can use either the strongly typed instance, the indexer or the dynamic cast of the object. Personally I think it's kinda cool to have an easy way to access strongly typed properties by string which can make some data scenarios much easier. To access the 'dynamically added' properties you can use either the indexer on the strongly typed object, or property syntax on the dynamic cast. Using the dynamic type allows all three modes to work on both strongly typed and dynamic properties. Finally you can iterate over all properties, both dynamic and strongly typed if you chose. Lots of flexibility. Note also that by default the Expando object works against the (this) instance meaning it extends the current object. You can also pass in a separate instance to the constructor in which case that object will be used to iterate over to find properties rather than this. Using this approach provides some really interesting functionality when use the dynamic type. To use this we have to add an explicit constructor to the Expando subclass:public class User : Westwind.Utilities.Dynamic.Expando { public string Email { get; set; } public string Password { get; set; } public string Name { get; set; } public bool Active { get; set; } public DateTime? ExpiresOn { get; set; } public User() : base() { } // only required if you want to mix in seperate instance public User(object instance) : base(instance) { } } to allow the instance to be passed. When you do you can now do:[TestMethod] public void ExpandoMixinTest() { // have Expando work on Addresses var user = new User( new Address() ); // cast to dynamicAccessToPropertyTest dynamic duser = user; // Set strongly typed properties duser.Email = "[email protected]"; user.Password = "nonya123"; // Set properties on address object duser.Address = "32 Kaiea"; //duser.Phone = "808-123-2131"; // set dynamic properties duser.NonExistantProperty = "This works too"; // shows default value Address.Phone value Console.WriteLine(duser.Phone); } Using the dynamic cast in this case allows you to access *three* different 'objects': The strong type properties, the dynamically added properties in the dictionary and the properties of the instance passed in! Effectively this gives you a way to simulate multiple inheritance (which is scary - so be very careful with this, but you can do it). How Expando works Behind the scenes Expando is a DynamicObject subclass as I discussed in my last post. By implementing a few of DynamicObject's methods you can basically create a type that can trap 'property missing' and 'method missing' operations. When you access a non-existant property a known method is fired that our code can intercept and provide a value for. Internally Expando uses a custom dictionary implementation to hold the dynamic properties you might add to your expandable object. Let's look at code first. The code for the Expando type is straight forward and given what it provides relatively short. Here it is.using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Dynamic; using System.Reflection; namespace Westwind.Utilities.Dynamic { /// <summary> /// Class that provides extensible properties and methods. This /// dynamic object stores 'extra' properties in a dictionary or /// checks the actual properties of the instance. /// /// This means you can subclass this expando and retrieve either /// native properties or properties from values in the dictionary. /// /// This type allows you three ways to access its properties: /// /// Directly: any explicitly declared properties are accessible /// Dynamic: dynamic cast allows access to dictionary and native properties/methods /// Dictionary: Any of the extended properties are accessible via IDictionary interface /// </summary> [Serializable] public class Expando : DynamicObject, IDynamicMetaObjectProvider { /// <summary> /// Instance of object passed in /// </summary> object Instance; /// <summary> /// Cached type of the instance /// </summary> Type InstanceType; PropertyInfo[] InstancePropertyInfo { get { if (_InstancePropertyInfo == null && Instance != null) _InstancePropertyInfo = Instance.GetType().GetProperties(BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.DeclaredOnly); return _InstancePropertyInfo; } } PropertyInfo[] _InstancePropertyInfo; /// <summary> /// String Dictionary that contains the extra dynamic values /// stored on this object/instance /// </summary> /// <remarks>Using PropertyBag to support XML Serialization of the dictionary</remarks> public PropertyBag Properties = new PropertyBag(); //public Dictionary<string,object> Properties = new Dictionary<string, object>(); /// <summary> /// This constructor just works off the internal dictionary and any /// public properties of this object. /// /// Note you can subclass Expando. /// </summary> public Expando() { Initialize(this); } /// <summary> /// Allows passing in an existing instance variable to 'extend'. /// </summary> /// <remarks> /// You can pass in null here if you don't want to /// check native properties and only check the Dictionary! /// </remarks> /// <param name="instance"></param> public Expando(object instance) { Initialize(instance); } protected virtual void Initialize(object instance) { Instance = instance; if (instance != null) InstanceType = instance.GetType(); } /// <summary> /// Try to retrieve a member by name first from instance properties /// followed by the collection entries. /// </summary> /// <param name="binder"></param> /// <param name="result"></param> /// <returns></returns> public override bool TryGetMember(GetMemberBinder binder, out object result) { result = null; // first check the Properties collection for member if (Properties.Keys.Contains(binder.Name)) { result = Properties[binder.Name]; return true; } // Next check for Public properties via Reflection if (Instance != null) { try { return GetProperty(Instance, binder.Name, out result); } catch { } } // failed to retrieve a property result = null; return false; } /// <summary> /// Property setter implementation tries to retrieve value from instance /// first then into this object /// </summary> /// <param name="binder"></param> /// <param name="value"></param> /// <returns></returns> public override bool TrySetMember(SetMemberBinder binder, object value) { // first check to see if there's a native property to set if (Instance != null) { try { bool result = SetProperty(Instance, binder.Name, value); if (result) return true; } catch { } } // no match - set or add to dictionary Properties[binder.Name] = value; return true; } /// <summary> /// Dynamic invocation method. Currently allows only for Reflection based /// operation (no ability to add methods dynamically). /// </summary> /// <param name="binder"></param> /// <param name="args"></param> /// <param name="result"></param> /// <returns></returns> public override bool TryInvokeMember(InvokeMemberBinder binder, object[] args, out object result) { if (Instance != null) { try { // check instance passed in for methods to invoke if (InvokeMethod(Instance, binder.Name, args, out result)) return true; } catch { } } result = null; return false; } /// <summary> /// Reflection Helper method to retrieve a property /// </summary> /// <param name="instance"></param> /// <param name="name"></param> /// <param name="result"></param> /// <returns></returns> protected bool GetProperty(object instance, string name, out object result) { if (instance == null) instance = this; var miArray = InstanceType.GetMember(name, BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.GetProperty | BindingFlags.Instance); if (miArray != null && miArray.Length > 0) { var mi = miArray[0]; if (mi.MemberType == MemberTypes.Property) { result = ((PropertyInfo)mi).GetValue(instance,null); return true; } } result = null; return false; } /// <summary> /// Reflection helper method to set a property value /// </summary> /// <param name="instance"></param> /// <param name="name"></param> /// <param name="value"></param> /// <returns></returns> protected bool SetProperty(object instance, string name, object value) { if (instance == null) instance = this; var miArray = InstanceType.GetMember(name, BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.SetProperty | BindingFlags.Instance); if (miArray != null && miArray.Length > 0) { var mi = miArray[0]; if (mi.MemberType == MemberTypes.Property) { ((PropertyInfo)mi).SetValue(Instance, value, null); return true; } } return false; } /// <summary> /// Reflection helper method to invoke a method /// </summary> /// <param name="instance"></param> /// <param name="name"></param> /// <param name="args"></param> /// <param name="result"></param> /// <returns></returns> protected bool InvokeMethod(object instance, string name, object[] args, out object result) { if (instance == null) instance = this; // Look at the instanceType var miArray = InstanceType.GetMember(name, BindingFlags.InvokeMethod | BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Instance); if (miArray != null && miArray.Length > 0) { var mi = miArray[0] as MethodInfo; result = mi.Invoke(Instance, args); return true; } result = null; return false; } /// <summary> /// Convenience method that provides a string Indexer /// to the Properties collection AND the strongly typed /// properties of the object by name. /// /// // dynamic /// exp["Address"] = "112 nowhere lane"; /// // strong /// var name = exp["StronglyTypedProperty"] as string; /// </summary> /// <remarks> /// The getter checks the Properties dictionary first /// then looks in PropertyInfo for properties. /// The setter checks the instance properties before /// checking the Properties dictionary. /// </remarks> /// <param name="key"></param> /// /// <returns></returns> public object this[string key] { get { try { // try to get from properties collection first return Properties[key]; } catch (KeyNotFoundException ex) { // try reflection on instanceType object result = null; if (GetProperty(Instance, key, out result)) return result; // nope doesn't exist throw; } } set { if (Properties.ContainsKey(key)) { Properties[key] = value; return; } // check instance for existance of type first var miArray = InstanceType.GetMember(key, BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.GetProperty); if (miArray != null && miArray.Length > 0) SetProperty(Instance, key, value); else Properties[key] = value; } } /// <summary> /// Returns and the properties of /// </summary> /// <param name="includeProperties"></param> /// <returns></returns> public IEnumerable<KeyValuePair<string,object>> GetProperties(bool includeInstanceProperties = false) { if (includeInstanceProperties && Instance != null) { foreach (var prop in this.InstancePropertyInfo) yield return new KeyValuePair<string, object>(prop.Name, prop.GetValue(Instance, null)); } foreach (var key in this.Properties.Keys) yield return new KeyValuePair<string, object>(key, this.Properties[key]); } /// <summary> /// Checks whether a property exists in the Property collection /// or as a property on the instance /// </summary> /// <param name="item"></param> /// <returns></returns> public bool Contains(KeyValuePair<string, object> item, bool includeInstanceProperties = false) { bool res = Properties.ContainsKey(item.Key); if (res) return true; if (includeInstanceProperties && Instance != null) { foreach (var prop in this.InstancePropertyInfo) { if (prop.Name == item.Key) return true; } } return false; } } } Although the Expando class supports an indexer, it doesn't actually implement IDictionary or even IEnumerable. It only provides the indexer and Contains() and GetProperties() methods, that work against the Properties dictionary AND the internal instance. The reason for not implementing IDictionary is that a) it doesn't add much value since you can access the Properties dictionary directly and that b) I wanted to keep the interface to class very lean so that it can serve as an entity type if desired. Implementing these IDictionary (or even IEnumerable) causes LINQ extension methods to pop up on the type which obscures the property interface and would only confuse the purpose of the type. IDictionary and IEnumerable are also problematic for XML and JSON Serialization - the XML Serializer doesn't serialize IDictionary<string,object>, nor does the DataContractSerializer. The JavaScriptSerializer does serialize, but it treats the entire object like a dictionary and doesn't serialize the strongly typed properties of the type, only the dictionary values which is also not desirable. Hence the decision to stick with only implementing the indexer to support the user["CustomProperty"] functionality and leaving iteration functions to the publicly exposed Properties dictionary. Note that the Dictionary used here is a custom PropertyBag class I created to allow for serialization to work. One important aspect for my apps is that whatever custom properties get added they have to be accessible to AJAX clients since the particular app I'm working on is a SIngle Page Web app where most of the Web access is through JSON AJAX calls. PropertyBag can serialize to XML and one way serialize to JSON using the JavaScript serializer (not the DCS serializers though). The key components that make Expando work in this code are the Properties Dictionary and the TryGetMember() and TrySetMember() methods. The Properties collection is public so if you choose you can explicitly access the collection to get better performance or to manipulate the members in internal code (like loading up dynamic values form a database). Notice that TryGetMember() and TrySetMember() both work against the dictionary AND the internal instance to retrieve and set properties. This means that user["Name"] works against native properties of the object as does user["Name"] = "RogaDugDog". What's your Use Case? This is still an early prototype but I've plugged it into one of my customer's applications and so far it's working very well. The key features for me were the ability to easily extend the type with values coming from a database and exposing those values in a nice and easy to use manner. I'm also finding that using this type of object for ViewModels works very well to add custom properties to view models. I suspect there will be lots of uses for this - I've been using the extra dictionary approach to extensibility for years - using a dynamic type to make the syntax cleaner is just a bonus here. What can you think of to use this for? Resources Source Code and Tests (GitHub) Also integrated in Westwind.Utilities of the West Wind Web Toolkit West Wind Utilities NuGet© Rick Strahl, West Wind Technologies, 2005-2012Posted in CSharp  .NET  Dynamic Types   Tweet !function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,"script","twitter-wjs"); (function() { var po = document.createElement('script'); po.type = 'text/javascript'; po.async = true; po.src = 'https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(po, s); })();

    Read the article

  • Do unit tests sometimes break encapsulation?

    - by user1288851
    I very often hear the following: "If you want to test private methods, you'd better put that in another class and expose it." While sometimes that's the case and we have a hiding concept inside our class, other times you end up with classes that have the same attributes (or, worst, every attribute of one class become a argument on a method in the other class) and exposes functionality that is, in fact, implementation detail. Specially on TDD, when you refactor a class with public methods out of a previous tested class, that class is now part of your interface, but has no tests to it (since you refactored it, and is a implementation detail). Now, I may be not finding an obvious better answer, but if my answer is the "correct", that means that sometimes writting unit tests can break encapsulation, and divide the same responsibility into different classes. A simple example would be testing a setter method when a getter is not actually needed for anything in the real code. Please when aswering don't provide simple answers to specific cases I may have written. Rather, try to explain more of the generic case and theoretical approach. And this is neither language specific. Thanks in advance. EDIT: The answer given by Matthew Flynn was really insightful, but didn't quite answer the question. Altough he made the fair point that you either don't test private methods or extract them because they really are other concern and responsibility (or at least that was what I could understand from his answer), I think there are situations where unit testing private methods is useful. My primary example is when you have a class that has one responsibility but the output (or input) that it gives (takes) is just to complex. For example, a hashing function. There's no good way to break a hashing function apart and mantain cohesion and encapsulation. However, testing a hashing function can be really tough, since you would need to calculate by hand (you can't use code calculation to test code calculation!) the hashing, and test multiple cases where the hash changes. In that way (and this may be a question worth of its own topic) I think private method testing is the best way to handle it. Now, I'm not sure if I should ask another question, or ask it here, but are there any better way to test such complex output (input)? OBS: Please, if you think I should ask another question on that topic, leave a comment. :)

    Read the article

  • SQL SERVER – Simple Explanation and Puzzle with SOUNDEX Function and DIFFERENCE Function

    - by pinaldave
    Earlier this week I asked a question where I asked how to Swap Values of the column without using CASE Statement. Read here: A Puzzle – Swap Value of Column Without Case Statement,there were more than 50 solutions proposed in the comment. There were many creative solutions. I have mentioned my personal favorite (different ones) here: Solution of Puzzle – Swap Value of Column Without Case Statement. However, I received lots of questions regarding one of the Solution by SIJIN KUMAR V P. He has used the function SOUNDEX in his solution. The request was to explain how SOUNDEX and DIFFERENCE works. Well, there are pretty decent documentations provided over here SOUNDEX function and DIFFERENCE over on MSDN and if I attempt to explain this function I will end up writing the same details which are available on MSDN. Instead of writing theory, we will try to learn this function by using a couple of simple puzzles. You try to solve the puzzles using the MSDN and see if you can learn something very quickly. In simple words - SOUNDEX converts an alphanumeric string to a four-character code to find similar-sounding words or names. The first character of the code is the first character of character_expression and the second through fourth characters of the code are numbers that represent the letters in the expression. Vowels incharacter_expression are ignored unless they are the first letter of the string. DIFFERENCE function returns an integer value. The  integer returned is the number of characters in the SOUNDEX values that are the same. The return value ranges from 0 through 4: 0 indicates weak or no similarity, and 4 indicates strong similarity or the same values. Learning Puzzle 1: Now let us run following four queries and observe its output. SELECT SOUNDEX('SQLAuthority') SdxValue SELECT SOUNDEX('SLTR') SdxValue SELECT SOUNDEX('SaLaTaRa') SdxValue SELECT SOUNDEX('SaLaTaRaM') SdxValue When you look at the result set all the four values are same. The reason for all the values to be same is as for SQL Server SOUNDEX function all the four strings are similarly sounding string. Learning Puzzle 2: Now let us run following five queries and observe its output. SELECT DIFFERENCE (SOUNDEX('SLTR'),SOUNDEX('SQLAuthority')) SELECT DIFFERENCE (SOUNDEX('TH'),SOUNDEX('SQLAuthority')) SELECT DIFFERENCE ('SQLAuthority',SOUNDEX('SQLAuthority')) SELECT DIFFERENCE ('SLTR',SOUNDEX('SQLAuthority')) SELECT DIFFERENCE ('SLTR','SQLAuthority') When you look at the result set you will get the result in the ranges from 1 to 4. Here is how it works if your result is 0 which means absolutely not relevant to each other and if your result is 1 which means the results are relevant to each other. Have you ever used above two functions in your business need or on production server? If yes, would you please leave a comment with use cases. I believe it will be beneficial to everyone. Reference: Pinal Dave (http://blog.SQLAuthority.com) Filed under: PostADay, SQL, SQL Authority, SQL Puzzle, SQL Query, SQL Server, SQL Tips and Tricks, T SQL, Technology

    Read the article

  • How do I prove or disprove "god" objects are wrong?

    - by honestduane
    Problem Summary: Long story short, I inherited a code base and an development team I am not allowed to replace and the use of God Objects is a big issue. Going forward, I want to have us re-factor things but I am getting push-back from the teams who want to do everything with God Objects "because its easier" and this means I would not be allowed to re-factor. I pushed back citing my years of dev experience, that I'm the new boss who was hired to know these things, etc, and so did the third party offshore companies account sales rep, and this is now at the executive level and my meeting is tomorrow and I want to go in with a lot of technical ammo to advocate best practices because I feel it will be cheaper in the long run (And I personally feel that is what the third party is worried about) for the company. My issue is from a technical level, I know its good long term but I'm having trouble with the ultra short term and 6 months term, and while its something I "know" I cant prove it with references and cited resources outside of one person (Robert C. Martin, aka Uncle Bob), as that is what I am being asked to do as I have been told having data from one person and only one person (Robert C Martin) is not good enough of an argument. Question: What are some resources I can cite directly (Title, year published, page number, quote) by well known experts in the field that explicitly say this use of "God" Objects/Classes/Systems is bad (or good, since we are looking for the most technically valid solution)? Research I have already done: I have a number of books here and I have searched their indexes for the use of the words "god object" and "god class". I found that oddly its almost never used and the copy of the GoF book I have for example, never uses it (At least according to the index in front of me) but I have found it in 2 books per the below, but I want more I can use. I checked the Wikipedia page for "God Object" and its currently a stub with little reference links so although I personally agree with that it says, It doesn't have much I can use in an environment where personal experience is not considered valid. The book cited is also considered too old to be valid by the people I am debating these technical points with as the argument they are making is that "it was once thought to be bad but nobody could prove it, and now modern software says "god" objects are good to use". I personally believe that this statement is incorrect, but I want to prove the truth, whatever it is. In Robert C Martin's "Agile Principles, Patterns, and Practices in C#" (ISBN: 0-13-185725-8, hardcover) where on page 266 it states "Everybody knows that god classes are a bad idea. We don't want to concentrate all the intelligence of a system into a single object or a single function. One of the goals of OOD is the partitioning and distribution of behavior into many classes and many function." -- And then goes on to say sometimes its better to use God Classes anyway sometimes (Citing micro-controllers as an example). In Robert C Martin's "Clean Code: A Handbook of Agile Software Craftsmanship" page 136 (And only this page) talks about the "God class" and calls it out as a prime example of a violation of the "classes should be small" rule he uses to promote the Single Responsibility Principle" starting on on page 138. The problem I have is all my references and citations come from the same person (Robert C. Martin), and am from the same single person/source. I am being told that because he is just one guy, my desire to not use "God Classes" is invalid and not accepted as a standard best practice in the software industry. Is this true? Am I doing things wrong from a technical perspective by trying to keep to the teaching of Uncle Bob? God Objects and Object Oriented Programming and Design: The more I think of this the more I think this is more something you learn when you study OOP and its never explicitly called out; Its implicit to good design is my thinking (Feel free to correct me, please, as I want to learn), The problem is I "know" this, but but not everybody does, so in this case its not considered a valid argument because I am effectively calling it out as universal truth when in fact most people are statistically ignorant of it since statistically most people are not programmers. Conclusion: I am at a loss on what to search for to get the best additional results to cite, since they are making a technical claim and I want to know the truth and be able to prove it with citations like a real engineer/scientist, even if I am biased against god objects due to my personal experience with code that used them. Any assistance or citations would be deeply appreciated.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >