Search Results

Search found 20931 results on 838 pages for 'mysql insert'.

Page 405/838 | < Previous Page | 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412  | Next Page >

  • Database design: objects with different attributes

    - by Álvaro G. Vicario
    I'm designing a product database where products can have very different attributes depending on their type, but attributes are fixed for each type and types are not manageable at all. E.g.: magazine: title, issue_number, pages, copies, close_date, release_date web_site: name, bandwidth, hits, date_from, date_to I want to use InnoDB and enforce database integrity as much as the engine allows. What's the recommended way to handle this? I hate those designs where tables have 100 columns and most of the values are NULL so I thought about something like this: product_type ============ product_type_id INT product_type_name VARCHAR product ======= product_id INT product_name VARCHAR product_type_id INT -> Foreign key to product_type.product_type_id valid_since DATETIME valid_to DATETIME magazine ======== magazine_id INT title VARCHAR product_id INT -> Foreign key to product.product_id issue_number INT pages INT copies INT close_date DATETIME release_date DATETIME web_site ======== web_site_id INT name VARCHAR product_id INT -> Foreign key to product.product_id bandwidth INT hits INT date_from DATETIME date_to DATETIME This can handle cascaded product deletion but... Well, I'm not fully convinced...

    Read the article

  • How do large sites accomplish row-level permissions?

    - by JayD3e
    So I am making a small site using cakephp, and my ACL is set up so that every time a piece of content is created, an ACL rule is created to link the owner of the piece of content to the actual content. This allows each owner to edit/delete their own content. This method just seems so inefficient, because there is an equivalent amount of ACL rules as content in the database. I was curious, how do big sites, with millions of pieces of content, solve this problem?

    Read the article

  • Fetch image from folder via datatable does not work after placing image in subdirectory

    - by Arnold Bishkoff
    I am having trouble wrapping my head around the following I have code that fetches an image via smarty in a line img src="getsnap.php?picid={$data[$smarty.section.sec.index].picno|default:$nextpic}&typ=pic&width={$config.disp_snap_width}&height={$config.disp_snap_height}" class="smallpic" alt="" / this works if i pull the image from /temp/userimages/userid/imageNo.ext but because an OS can segfault if you store too many folders or images in a directory i have code that assigns the user image to a subdirectory based upon division of a subdir per 1000 userids. so in thise case i have user id 94 whos images get stored in /siteroot/temp/userimages/000000/94/pic_1.jpg (through 10) or tn_1 (through 10).jpg here is the code for getsnap.php <?php ob_start(); if ( !defined( 'SMARTY_DIR' ) ) { include_once( 'init.php' ); } include('core/snaps_functions.php'); if (isset($_REQUEST['username']) && $_REQUEST['username'] != '') { $userid = $osDB-getOne('select id from ! where username = ?',array(USER_TABLE, $_REQUEST['username']) ); } else { // include ( 'sessioninc.php' ); if( !isset($_GET['id']) || (isset($_GET['id'])&& (int)$_GET['id'] <= 0 ) ) { $userid = $_SESSION['UserId']; } else { $userid = $_GET['id']; } } if (!isset($_GET['picid']) ) { if ((isset($_REQUEST['type']) && $_REQUEST['type'] != 'gallery') || !isset($_REQUEST['type']) ) { $defpic = $osDB-getOne('select picno from ! where userid = ? and ( album_id is null or album_id = ?) and default_pic = ? and active = ? ',array(USER_SNAP_TABLE, $userid,'0','Y','Y' ) ); if ($defpic != '') { $picid = $defpic; } else { $picid = $osDB-getOne('select picno from ! where userid = ? and ( album_id is null or album_id = ?) and active=? order by rand()',array(USER_SNAP_TABLE, $userid,'0','Y' ) ); } unset( $defpic); } } else { $picid = $_GET['picid']; } $typ = isset( $_GET['typ'])?$_GET['typ']:'pic' ; $cond = ''; if ( ($config['snaps_require_approval'] == 'Y' || $config['snaps_require_approval'] == '1') && $userid != $_SESSION['UserId'] ) { $cond = " and active = 'Y' "; } $sql = 'select * from ! where userid = ? and picno = ? '.$cond; //Get the pic $row =& $osDB-getRow ( $sql, array( USER_SNAP_TABLE, $userid, $picid ) ); //Okay pic was found in the DB, Lets actually do something // $id = $userid; $dir = str_pad(($id - ($id % 1000))/100000,6,'0',STR_PAD_LEFT); $zimg = USER_IMAGES_DIR.$dir; $img = getPicture($zimg, $userid, $picid, $typ, $row); //$img = getPicture($userid, $picid, $typ, $row); //$img = getPicture($dir, $userid, $picid, $typ, $row); $ext = ($typ = 'tn')?$row['tnext']:$row['picext']; // Now pic is built as // something pic_x.ext ie pic_2.jpg if ( $img != '' && ( ( hasRight('seepictureprofile') && ( $config['snaps_require_approval'] == 'Y' && $row['active'] == 'Y' ) ||$config['snaps_require_approval'] == 'N' ) || $userid == $_SESSION['UserId'] ) ) { $img2 = $img; //$img2 = $dir.'/'.$img; } else { $gender = $osDB-getOne( 'select gender from ! where id = ?', array( USER_TABLE, $userid ) ) ; if ($gender == 'M') { $nopic = SKIN_IMAGES_DIR.'male.jpg'; } elseif ($gender == 'F') { $nopic = SKIN_IMAGES_DIR.'female.jpg'; } elseif ($gender == 'D') { $nopic = SKIN_IMAGES_DIR.'director.jpg'; } $img2 = imagecreatefromjpeg($nopic); $ext = 'jpg'; } ob_end_clean(); header("Pragma: public"); header("Content-Type: image/".$ext); header("Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary"); header("Cache-Control: must-revalidate"); $ExpStr = "Expires: " . gmdate("D, d M Y H:i:s", time() - 30) . " GMT"; header($ExpStr); $id = $userid; $dir = str_pad(($id - ($id % 1000))/100000,6,'0',STR_PAD_LEFT); $zimg = USER_IMAGES_DIR.$dir; //header("Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=profile_".$userid."_".$typ.".".$ext); //header("Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=$dir.'/'.profile_".$userid."".$typ.".".$ext); //header("Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=profile"$dir".'/'.".$userid."_".$typ.".".$ext); header("Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=profile_".$userid."_".$typ.".".$ext); /* if ($_SESSION['browser'] != 'MSIE') { header("Content-Disposition: inline" ); } */ if ($ext == 'jpg') { imagejpeg($img2); } elseif ($ext == 'gif') { imagegif($img2); } elseif ($ext == 'png') { imagepng($img2); } elseif ($ext == 'bmp') { imagewbmp($img2); } imagedestroy($img2); ?

    Read the article

  • sql UPDATE, a calculation is used multiple times, can it just be calculated once?

    - by Zachery Delafosse
    UPDATE `play` SET `counter1` = `counter1` + LEAST(`maxchange`, FLOOR(`x` / `y`) ), `counter2` = `counter2` - LEAST(`maxchange`, FLOOR(`x` / `y`) ), `x` = MOD(`x`, `y`) WHERE `x` `y` AND `maxchange` 0 As you can see, " LEAST(`maxchange`, FLOOR(`x` / `y`) ) " is used multiple times, but it should always have the same value. Is there a way to optimize this, to only calculate once? I'm coding this in PHP, for the record.

    Read the article

  • SQL - get latest records from table where field is unique

    - by 89stevenharris
    I have a table of data as follows id status conversation_id message_id date_created 1 1 1 72 2012-01-01 00:00:00 2 2 1 87 2012-03-03 00:00:00 3 2 2 95 2012-05-05 00:00:00 I want to get all the rows from the table in date_created DESC order, but only one row per conversation_id. So in the case of the example data above, I would want to get the rows with id 2 and 3. Any advice is much appreciated.

    Read the article

  • What might be causing this Rails method error?

    - by Trip
    My error: Notice the undefined method '-@' . This is for a sort by. All sorts on one page break, but all the sorts on other pages use the same helper and do not break. Does it allude to something obvious? Processing OrganizationsController#search (for ::1 at 2010-05-13 15:42:01) [GET] Parameters: {"action"=>"search", "controller"=>"organizations", "direction"=>"desc", "_"=>"1273779721464", "order_by"=>"published_at"} SQL (0.5ms) SHOW TABLES Organization Columns (2.2ms) SHOW FIELDS FROM `organizations` NoMethodError (undefined method `-@' for #<Array:0x2f88cc8>): app/controllers/organizations_controller.rb:190:in `search' sunspot (1.0.5) lib/sunspot/util.rb:84:in `call' sunspot (1.0.5) lib/sunspot/util.rb:84:in `instance_eval_or_call' sunspot (1.0.5) lib/sunspot/search.rb:200:in `build' sunspot (1.0.5) lib/sunspot/session.rb:45:in `new_search' sunspot (1.0.5) lib/sunspot/session.rb:53:in `search' sunspot (1.0.5) lib/sunspot/session_proxy/abstract_session_proxy.rb:11:in `search' sunspot (1.0.5) lib/sunspot.rb:323:in `search' app/controllers/organizations_controller.rb:183:in `search' haml (2.2.2) [v] rails/./lib/sass/plugin/rails.rb:19:in `process' lib/flash_session_cookie_middleware.rb:14:in `call' vendor/gems/hoptoad_notifier-2.2.2/lib/hoptoad_notifier/rack.rb:27:in `call' /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/webrick/httpserver.rb:104:in `service' /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/webrick/httpserver.rb:65:in `run' /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/webrick/server.rb:173:in `start_thread' /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/webrick/server.rb:162:in `start' /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/webrick/server.rb:162:in `start_thread' /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/webrick/server.rb:95:in `start' /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/webrick/server.rb:92:in `each' /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/webrick/server.rb:92:in `start' /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/webrick/server.rb:23:in `start' /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/webrick/server.rb:82:in `start' Rendered rescues/_trace (68.5ms) Rendered rescues/_request_and_response (0.6ms) Rendering rescues/layout (internal_server_error)

    Read the article

  • Activetopics - Get max 5 topics per category

    - by Arjen
    Hey, I want to get the 5 latest active topics within several category's. Each topic has a subcatid and this subcatid relates to a catid. What I want is to get the 5 active topics within each catid. I'm trying to use the query below, but this isn't working at all: set @num := 0, @catid := 0; SELECT forum_posts.topicid, forum_topics.titel, forum_topics.sticky, forum_topics.gesloten, MAX(forum_cats.id) AS catid, MAX(forum_cats.titel) AS cattitel, MAX(forum_subcats.id) AS subcatid, MAX(forum_posts.id) AS maxid, DATE_FORMAT(MAX(forum_posts.datum), '%d-%m-%Y om %H:%i uur') AS datum, UNIX_TIMESTAMP(MAX(forum_posts.datum)) AS laatstereactieunix, (COUNT(forum_posts.id) - 1) AS reactieaantal, @num := IF(@catid = MAX(forum_cats.id), @num + 1, 1) AS row_number, @catid := MAX(forum_cats.id) AS dummy FROM forum_posts INNER JOIN forum_topics ON forum_topics.id = forum_posts.topicid INNER JOIN forum_subcats ON forum_subcats.id = forum_topics.subcat INNER JOIN forum_cats ON forum_cats.id = forum_subcats.cat WHERE forum_cats.id IN (1) AND forum_topics.gesloten != '1' GROUP BY forum_posts.topicid, forum_topics.titel, forum_topics.sticky, forum_topics.gesloten HAVING row_number <= 5 ORDER BY forum_cats.id ASC, MAX(forum_posts.datum) DESC When executing this code I get always the same number (1) for row_number, so this is not the result I want. Does anyone know how I can get this work? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Facebook style messaging system schema design

    - by Jamie
    Hi all, I'm looking to implement a facebook style messaging system (thread messages) into a site of mine. Do you think this schema markup looks okay? Doctrine schema.yml: UserMessage: tableName: user_message actAs: [Timestampable] columns: id: { type: integer(10), primary: true, autoincrement: true } sender_id : { type: integer(10), notnull: true } sender_read: { type: boolean, default: 1 } subject: { type: string(255), notnull: true } message: { type: string(1000), notnull: true } hash: { type: string(32), notnull: true } relations: UserMessageRecipient as Recipient: type: many local: id foreign: message_id UserMessageReply as Reply: type: many local: id foreign: message_id UserMessageReply: tableName: user_message_reply columns: id: { type: integer(10), primary: true, autoincrement: true } user_message_id as message_id: { type: integer(10), notnull: true } message: { type: string(1000), notnull: true } sender_id: { type: integer(10), notnull: true } relations: UserMessage as Message: local: message_id foreign: id type: one UserMessageRecipient: tableName: user_message_recipient actAs: [Timestampable] columns: id: { type: integer(10), primary: true, autoincrement: true } user_message_id as message_id: { type: integer(10), notnull: true } recipient_id: { type: integer(10), notnull: true } recipient_read: { type: boolean, default: 0 } When I a new reply is made,i'll make sure the boolean for "recipient_read" for each recipient is set to false and of course i'll make sure sender_read is set to false too. I'm using a hash for the URL: http://example.com/user/messages/aadeb18f8bdaea49882ec4d2a8a3c062 (As the id will be starting from 1, i don't wish to have http://example.com/user/messages/1. Yeah, I could start incrementing from a bigger number, but i'd prefer to start at 1.) Is this a good way to go about it? Your thoughts and suggestions would be hugely appreciated. Thanks guys!

    Read the article

  • PHP - Drilling down Data and Looping with Loops

    - by stogdilla
    I'm currently having difficulty finding a way of making my loops work. I have a table of data with 15 minute values. I need the data to pull up in a few different increments $filters=Array('Yrs','Qtr','Day','60','30','15'); I think I have a way of finding out what I need to be able to drill down to but the issue I'm having is after the first loop to cycle through all the Outter most values (ex: the user says they want to display by Hours, each hour should be able to have a "+" that will then add a new div to display the half hour data, then each half hour data have a "+" to display the 15 minute data upon request. Now I can just program the number of outputs for each value (6 different outputs) just in-case... but isn't there a way I can make it do the drill down for each one in a loop? so I only have to code one output once and have it just check if there are any more intervals after it and check for those? I'm sure I'm just overlooking some very simple way of doing this but my brain isn't being clever today. Sorry in advance if this is a simple solution. I guess the best way I could think of it as a reply on a form. How you would check to see if it's a reply of a reply, and then if that reply has any replys...etc for output. Can anyone help or at least point me in the right direction? Or am I stuck coding each possible check? Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • database design - empty fields

    - by imanc
    Hey, I am currently debating an issue with a guy on my dev team. He believes that empty fields are bad news. For instance, if we have a customer details table that stores data for customers from different countries, and each country has a slightly different address configuration - plus 1-2 extra fields, e.g. French customer details may also store details for entry code, and floor/level plus title fields (madamme, etc.). South Africa would have a security number. And so on. Given that we're talking about minor variances my idea is to put all of the fields into the table and use what is needed on each form. My colleague believes we should have a separate table with extra data. E.g. customer_info_fr. But this seams to totally defeat the purpose of a combined table in the first place. His argument is that empty fields / columns is bad - but I'm struggling to find justification in terms of database design principles for or against this argument and preferred solutions. Another option is a separate mini EAV table that stores extra data with parent_id, key, val fields. Or to serialise extra data into an extra_data column in the main customer_data table. I think I am confused because what I'm discussing is not covered by 3NF which is what I would typically use as a reference for how to structure data. So my question specifically: - if you have slight variances in data for each record (1-2 different fields for instance) what is the best way to proceed?

    Read the article

  • How to check with PHP does a SQL database already have

    - by Dan Horvat
    I've tried to find the answer to this question but none of the answers fit. I have two databases, one has 15.000.000 entries and I want to extract the necessary data and store it in a much smaller database with around 33.000 entries. Both databases are open at the same time. Or at least they should be. While having the big database open and extracting the entries from it, is it possible to check whether the value already exists in the smaller database? I just need some generic way which checks that.

    Read the article

  • Scalable way of doing self join with many to many table

    - by johnathan
    I have a table structure like the following: user id name profile_stat id name profile_stat_value id name user_profile user_id profile_stat_id profile_stat_value_id My question is: How do I evaluate a query where I want to find all users with profile_stat_id and profile_stat_value_id for many stats? I've tried doing an inner self join, but that quickly gets crazy when searching for many stats. I've also tried doing a count on the actual user_profile table, and that's much better, but still slow. Is there some magic I'm missing? I have about 10 million rows in the user_profile table and want the query to take no longer than a few seconds. Is that possible?

    Read the article

  • How do I workaround this error ? You can't specify target table my table for update in FROM clause

    - by Jules
    I'm struggling to convert my select query into a update query, it has aliases.. Update pads set RemoveMeDate = '1999-01-01 00:00:00' where padid in ( SELECT old_table.padid FROM `jules-fix-reasons`.`pads` AS old_table JOIN `jules`.`pads` AS new_table ON old_table.padid = new_table.`PadID` WHERE new_table.RemoveMeDate <> '2001-01-01 00:00:00' AND old_table.RemoveMeDate = '2001-01-01 00:00:00') I've tried removing the aliases, but that doesn't help :(

    Read the article

  • Perl daemon script for message queue hanging for 20 seconds after each process. Why?

    - by Mike Diena
    I have daemon script written in Perl that checks a database tables for rows, pulls them in one by one, sends the contents via HTTP post to another service, then logs the result and repeats (only a single child). When there are rows present, the first one is posted and logged immediately, but every subsequent one is delayed for around 20 seconds. There are no sleep()'s running, and I can't find any other obvious delays. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • CakePHP HABTM Filtering

    - by James Haigh
    Hi, I've got two tables - users and servers, and for the HABTM relationship, users_servers. Users HABTM servers and vice versa. I'm trying to find a way for Cake to select the servers that a user is assigned to. I'm trying things like $this->User->Server->find('all'); which just returns all the servers, regardless of whether they belong to the user. $this->User->Server->find('all', array('conditions' => array('Server.user_id' => 1))) just gives an unknown column SQL error. I'm sure I'm missing something obvious but just need someone to point me in the right direction. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • diffing two databases

    - by flybywire
    Is there a tool to find the difference between two databases. Both the schema and the actual data are pretty much the same, but not 100%. Do you know a tool that can help to succinctly describe the changes.

    Read the article

  • Inbreeding-immune database structure

    - by Nick Savage
    I have an application that requires a "simple" family tree. I would like to be able to perform queries that will give me data for an entire family given one id from a member in the family. I say simple because it does not need to take into account adoption or any other obscurities. The requirements for the application are as follows: Any two people will not be able to breed if they're from the same genetic line Needs to allow for the addition of new family lines (new people with no previous family) Need to be able to pull siblings, parents separately through queries I'm having trouble coming up with the proper structure for the database. So far I've come up with two solutions but they're not very reliable and will probably get out of hand quite quickly. Solution 1 involves placing a family_ids field on the people table and storing a list of unique family ids. Each time two people breed the lists are checked against each other to make sure no ids match and if everything checks out will merge the two lists and set that as the child's family_ids field. Example: Father (family_ids: (null)) breeds with Mother (family_ids: (213, 519)) -> Child (family_ids: (213, 519)) breeds with Random Person (family_ids: (813, 712, 122, 767)) -> Grandchild (family_ids: (213, 519, 813, 712, 122, 767)) And so on and so forth... The problem I see with this is the lists becoming unreasonably large as time goes on. Solution 2 uses cakephp's associations to declare: public $belongsTo = array( 'Father' => array( 'className' => 'User', 'foreignKey' => 'father_id' ), 'Mother' => array( 'className' => 'User', 'foreignKey' => 'mother_id' ) ); Now setting recursive to 2 will fetch the results of the mother and father, along with their mother and father, and so on and so forth all the way down the line. The problem with this route is that the data is in nested arrays and I'm unsure of how to efficiently work through the code. If anyone would be able to steer me in the direction of the most efficient way to handle what I want to achieve that would be tremendously helpful. Any and all help is greatly appreciated and I'll gladly answer any questions anyone has. Thanks a lot.

    Read the article

  • How to bring out checboxes based on drop down list selection from DB

    - by user2199877
    I got stuck again. Can't overcome this step: loop through (in a form of checkboxes) pallets based on the lot drop down list selection, so it can be further submitted to complete the table. Please, please help. So, basically, first submit button (drop down menu) brings into the table lot number and description and also checkboxes to choose pallets. Second submit button (checboxes) brings into the table pallets numbers and weights. Thank you for any help. <?php mysql_connect('localhost','user',''); mysql_select_db('base'); $query="SELECT DISTINCT lot_number FROM pl_table"; $result=mysql_query($query); ?> <form action="" method="POST"> <select name="option_chosen"> <option>-- Select lot --</option> <?php while(list($lot_number)=mysql_fetch_row($result)) { echo "<option value=\"".$lot_number."\">".$lot_number."</option>"; } ?> </select> <input type='submit' name='submitLot' value='Submit' /> </form> <!-- need help here <h4>-- Select pallets --</h4> <form action="" method="POST"> <input type='submit' name='submitPal' value='Submit'/> </form> --> <table border="1" id="table"> <tr> <th width=80 height=30>Lot<br/>number</th> <th width=110 height=30>Description</th> <th width=90 height=30>Pallet<br/>number</th> <th width=60 height=30>Net</th> <th width=60 height=30>Gross</th> </tr> <?php if($_SERVER['REQUEST_METHOD'] =='POST') {$option_chosen=$_POST['option_chosen']; $query="SELECT * FROM pl_table WHERE lot_number='$option_chosen'"; $run=mysql_query($query); $row=mysql_fetch_array($run, MYSQLI_ASSOC); echo "<tr><td>".''."</td>"; echo "<td rowspan='5'>".$row['descr']."</td>"; echo "<td><b>".'Total weight'."<b></td>"; echo "<td>".''."</td><td>".''."</td></tr>"; echo "<td>".$row['lot_number']."</td>"; echo "<td colspan='3'>".''."</td>"; //This to be echoed when "select pallets" submited //echo "<tr><td>".$row['lot_number']."</td>"; //echo "<td>".$row['pallet_number']."</td>"; //echo "<td>".$row['net']."</td><td>".$row['gross']."</td></tr>"; } ?> </table> the table +--------------------------+-------------------------+---------+-------+ | id | lot_number | descr | pallet_number | net | gross | +--------------------------+-------------------------+---------+-------+ | 1 | 111 | black | 1 | 800 | 900 | | 2 | 111 | black | 2 | 801 | 901 | | 3 | 111 | black | 3 | 802 | 902 | | 4 | 222 | white | 1 | 800 | 900 | | 5 | 222 | white | 2 | 801 | 901 | | 6 | 222 | white | 3 | 802 | 902 | +--------------------------+-------------------------+---------+-------+

    Read the article

  • Want to calculate the sum of the count rendered by group by option..

    - by Vijay
    i have a table with the columns such id, tid, companyid, ttype etc.. the id may be same for many companyid but unique within the companyid and tid is always unique and i want to calculate the total no of transactions entered in the table, a single transaction may be inserted in more than one row, for example, id tid companyid ttype 1 1 1 xxx 1 2 1 may be null 2 3 1 yyy 2 4 1 may be null 2 5 1 may be null the above entries should be counted as only 2 transactions .. it may be repeated for many companyids.. so how do i calculate the total no of transactions entered in the table i tried select sum(count(*)) from transaction group by id,companyId; but doesn't work select count(*) from transaction group by id; wont work because the id may be repeated for different companyids.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412  | Next Page >