Search Results

Search found 35513 results on 1421 pages for 'java interfaces'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 461/1421 | < Previous Page | 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468  | Next Page >

  • Which of the following Java coding fragments is better?

    - by Simon
    This isn't meant to be subjective, I am looking for reasons based on resource utilisation, compiler performance, GC performance etc. rather than elegance. Oh, and the position of brackets doesn't count, so no stylistic comments please. Take the following loop; Integer total = new Integer(0); Integer i; for (String str : string_list) { i = Integer.parse(str); total += i; } versus... Integer total = 0; for (String str : string_list) { Integer i = Integer.parse(str); total += i; } In the first one i is function scoped whereas in the second it is scoped in the loop. I have always thought (believed) that the first one would be more efficient because it just references an existing variable already allocated on the stack, whereas the second one would be pushing and popping i each iteration of the loop. There are quite a lot of other cases where I tend to scope variables more broadly than perhaps necessary so I thought I would ask here to clear up a gap in my knowledge. Also notice that assignment of the variable on initialisation either involving the new operator or not. Do any of these sorts of semi-stylistic semi-optimisations make any difference at all?

    Read the article

  • Java - Can i have a faster performance for this loop ?

    - by Brad
    I am reading a book and deleting a number of words from it. My problem is that the process takes long time, and i want to make its performance better(Less time), example : Vector<String> pages = new Vector<String>(); // Contains about 1500 page, each page has about 1000 words. Vector<String> wordsToDelete = new Vector<String>(); // Contains about 50000 words. for( String page: pages ) { String pageInLowCase = page.toLowerCase(); for( String wordToDelete: wordsToDelete ) { if( pageInLowCase.contains( wordToDelete ) ) page = page.replaceAll( "(?i)\\b" + wordToDelete + "\\b" , "" ); } // Do some staff with the final page that does not take much time. } This code takes around 3 minutes to execute. If i skipped the loop of replaceAll(...) i can save more than 2 minutes. So is there a way to do the same loop with a faster performance ?

    Read the article

  • How do I make this Java code operate properly? [Multi-threaded, race condition]

    - by Fixee
    I got this code from a student, and it does not work properly because of a race condition involving x++ and x--. He added synchronized to the run() method trying to get rid of this bug, but obviously this only excludes threads from entering run() on the same object (which was never a problem in the first place) but doesn't prevent independent objects from updating the same static variable x at the same time. public class DataRace implements Runnable { static volatile int x; public synchronized void run() { for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) { x++; x--; } } public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { Thread [] threads = new Thread[100]; for (int i = 0; i < threads.length; i++) threads[i] = new Thread(new DataRace()); for (int i = 0; i < threads.length; i++) threads[i].start(); for (int i = 0; i < threads.length; i++) threads[i].join(); System.out.println(x); // x not always 0! } } Since we cannot synchronize on x (because it is primitive), the best solution I can think of is to create a new static object like static String lock = ""; and enclose the x++ and x-- within a synchronized block, locking on lock. But this seems really awkward. Is there a better way?

    Read the article

  • Java: Best approach to have a long list of variables needed all the time without consuming memory?

    - by evilReiko
    I wrote an abstract class to contain all rules of the application because I need them almost everywhere in my application. So most of what it contains is static final variables, something like this: public abstract class appRules { public static final boolean IS_DEV = true; public static final String CLOCK_SHORT_TIME_FORMAT = "something"; public static final String CLOCK_SHORT_DATE_FORMAT = "something else"; public static final String CLOCK_FULL_FORMAT = "other thing"; public static final int USERNAME_MIN = 5; public static final int USERNAME_MAX = 16; // etc. } The class is big and contains LOTS of such variables. My Question: Isn't setting static variables means these variables are floating in memory all the time? Do you suggest insteading of having an abstract class, I have a instantiable class with non-static variables (just public final), so I instantiate the class and use the variables only when I need them. Or is what am I doing is completely wrong approach and you suggest something else?

    Read the article

  • Java-Hibernate-Newbie: How do I acces the values from this list?

    - by Mes
    I have this class mapped @Entity @Table(name = "USERS") public class User { private long id; private String userName; } and I make a query: Query query = session.createQuery("select id, userName, count(userName) from User order by count(userName) desc"); return query.list(); How can I acces the value returned by the query?

    Read the article

  • Java generic function for performing calculations on integer, on double?

    - by Daniel
    Is this possible? Surely if you passed in a double, any sort of function implementation code which casts an object to an Integer would not be able to work unless the cast 'Integer' was specifically used? I have a function like: public static void increment(Object o){ Integer one = (Integer)o; system.out.println(one++); } I cant see how this could be made generic for a double? I tried public static <E> void increment(E obj){ E one = (E)o; system.out.println(one++); } but it didn't like it?

    Read the article

  • How to plot the graph(line) from a file in java?

    - by kiran
    I have a directory containing list of files. Those files have some list of values as x and y ordered as line by line. And my question is just I would like to read those files one by one and to plot line graphs based on those values. Could you please help me for that?

    Read the article

  • Java: How to display a multi-line ToolTip with AWT?

    - by Martijn Courteaux
    Hi, I wrote an application and now I'm making a tray-icon. Now I want to set a multi-line tooltiptext to the tray-icon. But I don't know how. I know how to do this with Swing: component.setToolTipText("<html>Line 1<br>Line2</html>"); But this doesn't work with AWT. Also serarating lines by \n doesn't work. Any help would be very appreciated. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Using two threads and controlling one from the other in java?

    - by sidra
    Can someone please help me out. I need to use two threads in a way that one thread will run permanently while(true) and will keep track of a positioning pointer (some random value coming in form a method). This thread has a logic, if the value equals something, it should start the new thread. And if the value does not equal it should stop the other thread. Can someone give me some code snippet (block level) about how to realize this?

    Read the article

  • Copy not null and not empty fields from one object to another object of the same type(Objects are same type) in java

    - by Chinni
    I am using hibernate, struts, extjs in my project. I have a Customer object with these fields: custId, custName, address, phone and in my project from UI side I get an object customer with custName. So I need to update the above object(custName is unique). I have only one object with the same customer name. So I will get that object using customer name (object from DB). Now I have to save the object with the updated customer name. If I save as follows I have Customer Object from UI, is cust Customer cust1 = getCustomerByName(cust.getCustName()); cust.setCustId(cust1.getCustId()); save(cust); If I do this I lose the customer address and phone number. So, how can I copy one object not null or not empty field values to another object of same type. Can any one please help. I just stuck here. It's stopping me to save. Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • What is my error in a map in java?

    - by amveg
    Hello everyone I am trying to solve this problem: http://www.cstutoringcenter.com/problems/problems.php?id=4, but I cant figure out why my code doesnt solve this, I mean in the "for" how can I can multiply the letters? what is my error?, It just tell always 7, but I want to multiple all the letters, I hope you can help me enter code here public class ejercicio3 { public static void main(String args[]) { Map<Character, Integer> telefono = new HashMap<Character, Integer>(); telefono.put('A', 2); telefono.put('B', 2); telefono.put('C', 2); telefono.put('D', 3); telefono.put('E', 3); telefono.put('F', 3); telefono.put('G', 4); telefono.put('H', 4); telefono.put('I', 4); telefono.put('J', 5); telefono.put('K', 5); telefono.put('L', 5); telefono.put('M', 6); telefono.put('N', 6); telefono.put('O', 6); telefono.put('P', 7); telefono.put('R', 7); telefono.put('S', 7); telefono.put('T', 8); telefono.put('U', 8); telefono.put('V', 8); telefono.put('W', 9); telefono.put('X', 9); telefono.put('Y', 9); String mensaje = "Practice"; int producto = 1; for (char c : mensaje.toCharArray()) { if (telefono.containsKey(c)) { producto = telefono.get(c) * producto; System.out.println(producto); } } } }

    Read the article

  • Java reflection Method invocations yield result faster than Fields?

    - by omerkudat
    I was microbenchmarking some code (please be nice) and came across this puzzle: when reading a field using reflection, invoking the getter Method is faster than reading the Field. Simple test class: private static final class Foo { public Foo(double val) { this.val = val; } public double getVal() { return val; } public final double val; // only public for demo purposes } We have two reflections: Method m = Foo.class.getDeclaredMethod("getVal", null); Field f = Foo.class.getDeclaredField("val"); Now I call the two reflections in a loop, invoke on the Method, and get on the Field. A first run is done to warm up the VM, a second run is done with 10M iterations. The Method invocation is consistently 30% faster, but why? Note that getDeclaredMethod and getDeclaredField are not called in the loop. They are called once and executed on the same object in the loop. I also tried some minor variations: made the field non-final, transitive, non-public, etc. All of these combinations resulted in statistically similar performance. Edit: This is on WinXP, Intel Core2 Duo, Sun JavaSE build 1.6.0_16-b01, running under jUnit4 and Eclipse.

    Read the article

  • How can I get relative path of the folders in my project? (java)

    - by masterkapu
    How can I get the relative path of the folders in my project (using code)? I created new folder in my project and I want its relative path so no matter where is the app the path will be correct. Maybe this can be useful: I trying to do it not inside any function just inside the class and I want to init with it a final variable. the app is android and the class is "extends Activity" thanks

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468  | Next Page >