Search Results

Search found 2575 results on 103 pages for 'canonical cover'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 5/103 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • CHM e-book cover extraction

    - by Robottinosino
    I would like to extract a "book cover image" from a series of CHM files, which command line tool can do that, please? I have looked at the source of the QuickLook plug-in "quickchm1.1_source" and at the calibre command line conversion options (ebook-convert) but couldn't find anything akin to simple: name_of_tool file_to_convert output_image as in: mytool routermanual.chm routermanualcoverimage.png

    Read the article

  • Different canonical URLs for Facebook and Google?

    - by Victor P
    The following URLs point to the same resource: http://www.domain.com/books/123 http://www.domain.com/books/123-Harry-Potter http://www.domain.com/books/123-Harry-Potter-And-The-Deathly-Hallows I would like to use (1) as the canonical URL for OpenGraph/Facebook, so if you "like" (2) and (3) then will count for (1). But I would like to use (3) as the canonical URL for Google, because of SEO. Is this recommended?

    Read the article

  • Canonicalization of single, small pages like reviews or product categories [SEO]

    - by Valorized
    In general I pretty much like the idea of canonicalization. And in most cases, Google explains possible procedures in a clear way. For example: If I have duplicates because of parameters (eg: &sort=desc) it's clear to use the canonical for the site, provided the within the head-tag. However I'm wondering how to handle "small - no to say thin content - sites". What's my definition of a small site? An Example: On one of my main sites, we use a directory based url-structure. Let's see: example.com/ (root) example.com/category-abc/ example.com/category-abc/produkt-xy/ Moreover we provide on page, that includes all products example.com/all-categories/ (lists all products the same way as in the categories) In case of reviews, we use a similar structure: example.com/reviews/product-xy/ shows all review for one certain product example.com/reviews/product-xy/abc-your-product-is-great/ shows one certain review example.com/reviews/ shows all reviews for all products (latest first) Let's make it even more complicated: On every product site, there are the latest 2 reviews at the end of the page. So you see, a lot of potential duplicates. Q1: Should I create canonicals for a: example.com/category-abc/ to example.com/all-categories/ b: example.com/reviews/product-xy/abc-your-product-is-great/ to example.com/reviews/product-xy/ or to example.com/review/ or none of them? Q2: Can I link the collection of categories (all-categories/) and collection of all reviews (reviews/ and reviews/product-xy/) to the single category respectively to the single review. Example: example.com/reviews/ includes - let's say - 100 reviews. Can I somehow use a markup that tells search engines: "Hey, wait, you are now looking at a collection of 100 reviews - do not index this collection, you should rather prefer indexing every single review as a single page!". In HTML it might be something like that (which - of course - does not work, it's only to show you what I mean): <div class="review" rel="canonical" href="http://example.com/reviews/product-xz/abc-your-product-is-great/">HERE GOES THE REVIEW</div> Reason: I don't think it is a great user experience if the user searches for "your product is great" and lands on example.com/reviews/ instead of example.com/reviews/product-xy/abc-your-product-is-great/. On the first site, he will have to search and might stop because of frustration. The second result, however, might lead to a conversion. The same applies for categories. If the user is searching for category-Z, he might land on the all-categories page and he has to scroll down to the (last) category, to find what he searched for (Z). So what's best practice? What should I do? Thank you for your help!

    Read the article

  • Canonicalization of single, small pages like reviews or product categories

    - by Valorized
    In general I pretty much like the idea of canonicalization. And in most cases, Google explains possible procedures in a clear way. For example: If I have duplicates because of parameters (eg: &sort=desc) it's clear to use the canonical for the site, provided the within the head-tag. However I'm wondering how to handle "small - no to say thin content - sites". What's my definition of a small site? An Example: On one of my main sites, we use a directory based url-structure. Let's see: example.com/ (root) example.com/category-abc/ example.com/category-abc/produkt-xy/ Moreover we provide on page, that includes all products example.com/all-categories/ (lists all products the same way as in the categories) In case of reviews, we use a similar structure: example.com/reviews/product-xy/ shows all review for one certain product example.com/reviews/product-xy/abc-your-product-is-great/ shows one certain review example.com/reviews/ shows all reviews for all products (latest first) Let's make it even more complicated: On every product site, there are the latest 2 reviews at the end of the page. So you see, a lot of potential duplicates. Q1: Should I create canonicals for a: example.com/category-abc/ to example.com/all-categories/ b: example.com/reviews/product-xy/abc-your-product-is-great/ to example.com/reviews/product-xy/ or to example.com/review/ or none of them? Q2: Can I link the collection of categories (all-categories/) and collection of all reviews (reviews/ and reviews/product-xy/) to the single category respectively to the single review. Example: example.com/reviews/ includes - let's say - 100 reviews. Can I somehow use a markup that tells search engines: "Hey, wait, you are now looking at a collection of 100 reviews - do not index this collection, you should rather prefer indexing every single review as a single page!". In HTML it might be something like that (which - of course - does not work, it's only to show you what I mean): <div class="review" rel="canonical" href="http://example.com/reviews/product-xz/abc-your-product-is-great/"> HERE GOES THE REVIEW</div> Reason: I don't think it is a great user experience if the user searches for "your product is great" and lands on example.com/reviews/ instead of example.com/reviews/product-xy/abc-your-product-is-great/. On the first site, he will have to search and might stop because of frustration. The second result, however, might lead to a conversion. The same applies for categories. If the user is searching for category-Z, he might land on the all-categories page and he has to scroll down to the (last) category, to find what he searched for (Z). So what's best practice? What should I do?

    Read the article

  • Reach Local Proxy Page - Duplicate content?

    - by Simon Bennett
    We have a client who has instructed Reach Local to manage their paid SEO work etc. RL have created a proxy version of the page at http://example-px.rtrk.co.uk which mirrors the existing site completely. Would I be correct in assuming that this would count as duplicate content and one or both of the sites would be penalized because of this? And would the addition of a rel="canonical" meta-tag on the proxy site assist with this? Many thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Can I benefit from links to pages on my site which have a `noindex` meta tag?

    - by Noam
    I'm trying to understand if/how I can benefit from people linking to pages on my site which are with pages that have a noindex meta tag. 2 actions I'm considering to perform: Remove the robots.txt disallow to these pages, to make sure inner links get the propagated link juice. Adding a canonical tag to the most similar page that doesn't have a noindex meta tag Are these valid approaches that might help? Any others I should consider?

    Read the article

  • URL Rewrite is adding HTTPS to my canonical redirects in IIS7

    - by Derek Hunziker
    Hello, I have the following rule defined in my Web.config: <rule name="Enforce canonical hostname" stopProcessing="true"> <match url="(.*)" /> <conditions> <add input="{HTTP_HOST}" negate="true" pattern="^www\.mydomain\.org$" /> </conditions> <action type="Redirect" url="http://www.mydomain.com/" redirectType="Permanent" /> </rule> What I am experiencing is strange... It appears that I am being redirected to https://www.mydomain.com/ which causes my browser to hang. I do not have SSL encryption turned on, nor do I have any special authorization rules. The web server in question is behind an F5 load balancer. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Open source alternative for Canonical Landscape?

    - by netvope
    From Canonical: Landscape is an easy-to-use systems management and monitoring service that enables you to manage multiple Ubuntu machines as easily as one through a simple Web-based interface. However, Landscape is not free. The RedHat counterpart Satellite has a free version called Spacewalk, but it doesn't work on Ubuntu. (There is an attempt to port Spacewalk to Debian, but it doesn't look like it's stable yet.) Are there any open source alternative to Landscape? Better yet, are there any Spacewalk-like software that works for both RedHat-based and Debian-based systems?

    Read the article

  • Open source alternative for Canonical Landscape? [on hold]

    - by netvope
    From Canonical: Landscape is an easy-to-use systems management and monitoring service that enables you to manage multiple Ubuntu machines as easily as one through a simple Web-based interface. However, Landscape is not free. The RedHat counterpart Satellite has a free version called Spacewalk, but it doesn't work on Ubuntu. (There is an attempt to port Spacewalk to Debian, but it doesn't look like it's stable yet.) Are there any open source alternative to Landscape? Better yet, are there any Spacewalk-like software that works for both RedHat-based and Debian-based systems?

    Read the article

  • How to scroll programmetically to selected cover in coverflow view ?

    - by hib
    Hi all , I am using a coverflow component for my application . It is working nicely till now . But now I want to scroll to selected cover in coverflow . I am currently doing this : TKCoverView *cover = [self.coverflow coverAtIndex:currentIndex]; CGRect frame = cover.frame ; frame.origin.x = frame.origin.x * 1.2; // **main setting** [self.coverflow bringCoverAtIndexToFront:currentIndex animated:YES]; [self.coverflow scrollRectToVisible:frame animated:YES]; and the cover At index method - (TKCoverView*) coverflowView:(TKCoverflowView*)coverflowView coverAtIndex:(int)index{ TKCoverView *cover = [coverflowView dequeueReusableCoverView]; NSLog(@"Index value :%i",index); if(cover == nil){ cover = [[[TKCoverView alloc] initWithFrame:CGRectMake(0, 0, 224, 300)] autorelease]; // 224 cover.baseline = 224; cover.image = [UIImage imageNamed:@"Placeholder_2.png"]; cover.tag = index; }else { cover.image = ((object *)[array objectAtIndex:index]).appIconNormal; } return cover; and - (TKCoverView*) dequeueReusableCoverView{ if(yard == nil || [yard count] < 1) return nil; TKCoverView *v = [[[yard lastObject] retain] autorelease]; v.layer.transform = CATransform3DIdentity; [yard removeLastObject]; return v; } So can any one tell me what is the perfect and standard way of setting the frame for the scrollRectToVisibleRegion method .

    Read the article

  • Default /etc/apt/sources.list?

    - by piemesons
    I need default source list for ubuntu 10.04. Can anybody help me? Here is Mine:--- Ubuntu supported packages deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid main restricted multiverse universe deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-backports main restricted universe multiverse deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates main restricted multiverse universe deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu lucid-security main restricted universe multiverse deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu lucid-proposed main restricted universe multiverse deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid main restricted multiverse universe deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-backports main restricted universe multiverse deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates main restricted multiverse universe deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu lucid-security main restricted universe multiverse deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu lucid-proposed main restricted universe multiverse Canonical Commercial Repository deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid partner deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid-backports partner deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid-updates partner deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid-security partner deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid-proposed partner deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid partner deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid-backports partner deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid-updates partner deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid-security partner deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid-proposed partner medibuntu deb http://packages.medibuntu.org/ lucid free non-free deb-src http://packages.medibuntu.org/ lucid free non-free PlayOnLinux deb http://deb.playonlinux.com/ lucid main opera deb http://deb.opera.com/opera/ lenny non-free google deb http://dl.google.com/linux/deb/ stable non-free main Dropbox Official Source deb http://linux.dropbox.com/ubuntu karmic main Skype deb http://download.skype.com/linux/repos/debian/ stable non-free This is the error i am getting:-- (sudo apt-get update) Get:9 http://dl.google.com stable/main Packages [1,076B] Err http://ppa.launchpad.net lucid/main Packages 404 Not Found Get:10 http://dl.google.com stable/main Packages [735B] and finally :-- Fetched 9,724B in 3s (2,645B/s) W: Failed to fetch http://ppa.launchpad.net/bisig/ppa/ubuntu/dists/lucid/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz 404 Not Found E: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead.

    Read the article

  • PPA causing 404 error?

    - by piemesons
    I need default source list for ubuntu 10.04. Can anybody help me? Here is Mine:--- Ubuntu supported packages deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid main restricted multiverse universe deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-backports main restricted universe multiverse deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates main restricted multiverse universe deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu lucid-security main restricted universe multiverse deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu lucid-proposed main restricted universe multiverse deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid main restricted multiverse universe deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-backports main restricted universe multiverse deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates main restricted multiverse universe deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu lucid-security main restricted universe multiverse deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu lucid-proposed main restricted universe multiverse Canonical Commercial Repository deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid partner deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid-backports partner deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid-updates partner deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid-security partner deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid-proposed partner deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid partner deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid-backports partner deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid-updates partner deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid-security partner deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid-proposed partner medibuntu deb http://packages.medibuntu.org/ lucid free non-free deb-src http://packages.medibuntu.org/ lucid free non-free PlayOnLinux deb http://deb.playonlinux.com/ lucid main opera deb http://deb.opera.com/opera/ lenny non-free google deb http://dl.google.com/linux/deb/ stable non-free main Dropbox Official Source deb http://linux.dropbox.com/ubuntu karmic main Skype deb http://download.skype.com/linux/repos/debian/ stable non-free This is the error i am getting:-- (sudo apt-get update) Get:9 http://dl.google.com stable/main Packages [1,076B] Err http://ppa.launchpad.net lucid/main Packages 404 Not Found Get:10 http://dl.google.com stable/main Packages [735B] and finally :-- Fetched 9,724B in 3s (2,645B/s) W: Failed to fetch http://ppa.launchpad.net/bisig/ppa/ubuntu/dists/lucid/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz 404 Not Found E: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead.

    Read the article

  • Support same url in different forms

    - by Vikas Gulati
    I have seen many websites supporting multiple forms of the same URL. For example consider www.example.com/question1/ OR www.example.com/Question1/ OR www.example.com/QUESTION1/ etc. all lead to one page with say <link rel="canonical" href="http://www.example.com/question1/" > or a 301 redirect to www.example.com/question1/. Does this affect the page rank anyhow or its just for seemless user experience or there is some other reason behind this? Infact even stackoverflow/stackexchange does this. No matter what the text after the id of the question in url they redirect you to the correct question!

    Read the article

  • Is there a real name policy in the Ubuntu community?

    - by martin001
    I'm not ashamed to be a part of Ubuntu, but I'm trying to keep the number of web search hits for my real name low, which is kinda impossible if you use a Launchpad account. So, I'm wondering if there is a real name policy in the Ubuntu community, or if it's okay to use a pseudonym/nick name/fake name? While it might be okay to use nick names on IRC and in forums, how about these topics: Adding an OpenPGP key to Launchpad. Signing the Ubuntu Code of Conduct. Becoming an Ubuntu member. Code contributions (e.g., signing the Canonical CLA). Thanks in advance for your answers!

    Read the article

  • Should mobile webpages have hreflang links to non-mobile pages?

    - by Noam
    My site has multilingual links, which are specified like this on non-mobile pages: <link rel="alternate" hreflang="en" href="http://mydomain.com/page" /> <link rel="alternate" hreflang="jp" href="http://ja.mydomain.com/page" /> <link rel="alternate" hreflang="ko" href="http://ko.mydomain.com/page" /> In addition, these non-mobile pages link to a mobile version: <link rel="alternate" media="only screen and (max-width: 640px)" href="/mobile/page" /> Now the question is about what links should be in the mobile page, which isn't translated to different languages now. Is this enough: <link rel="canonical" href="/page"/> Or should I also have the same group of hreflangs that point to non-mobile pages?

    Read the article

  • cover/image that will hide a UIButton, but still let it be touched

    - by Sam Jarman
    Any ideas on how to create a cover that has alpha 100 but is able to let a button behind it be touched, and an action to be called. i dont want to apply the action to the cover, nor change the buttons image - as a convaluted set up is required for each one. any ideas? what im after is effective not a see-through button, but a touch through button... Cheers in advance guys sam

    Read the article

  • Cover flow model screen adjust in iphone

    - by abdulsamad
    Hi All, Below is the link for making the cover flow model in iphone. This is a sample tutorial. http://www.chaosinmotion.com/flowcover.m Can any one tell me how can i make the cover flow model to adjust some where up on the screen. Currently it is in the centre of the screen i want if about 70 to 80pixels to move up in the screen. Your help will be highly appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Cover flow model in iphone

    - by abdulsamad
    I am making the cover flow model on the iPhone using the tutorial found here: http://www.chaosinmotion.com/flowcover.m I want to move the cover flow animation up in the screen at height of about 150, but when I change the starting y point of the rectangle, then my image is cut off from the top. How can I prevent this?

    Read the article

  • Letting search engines know that different links to identical pages stress different parts of the page

    - by balpha
    When you follow a permalink to a chat message in the Stack Exchange chat, you get a view of the transcript page for the day that contains the particular message. This message is highlighted in yellow, and the page is scrolled to its position. Sometimes – admittedly rarely, but it happens – a web search will result in such a transcript link. Here's a (constructed, obviously) example: A Google search for strange behavior of the \bibliography command site:chat.stackexchange.com gives me a link to this chat message. This message is obiously unrelated to my query, but the transcript page does indeed contain my search terms – just in a totally different spot. Both the above links lead to the same content, and Google knows this, since both pages have <link rel="canonical" href="/transcript/41/2012/4/9/0-24" /> in their <head>. The only difference between the two links is Which message has the highlight css class?. Is there a way to let Google know that while all three links have the same content, they put an emphasis on a different part of the content? Note that the permalinks on the transcript page already have a #12345 hash to "point" to the relavant chat message, but Google appears to drop it.

    Read the article

  • The Ubuntu Advantage Service right for my non-profit?

    - by Robert
    My small 5 computer office currently runs on Ubuntu. 2 of the desktops run Windows7 in Sun Virtualbox software, and are used for Quickbooks. I am going off to college, and I am looking for a paid tech support solution to replace my IT position. I have an approx $300/mth budget, and I am wiling to discuss higher rates. Everyone in the office is currently comfortable with regular desktop usage, but I am handling all of the software installation and updates. I was hoping to get a total support package for all of their tech related questions, but I cannot find any services which will support linux. Is the Ubuntu Advantage Service something which can take my place? They would mostly need network help, printer help, and an occasional software compatibly troubleshooting session. If this is not a solution, does anyone know of a tech support forum/hotline which would cover all of this? Thank you for reading.

    Read the article

  • Avoid SEO loss after URL structure change

    - by Eric Nguyen
    We recently re-wrote our site from Umbraco to WordPress. This has been done by third-party developers. I have been the project manager and it is my mistake that I haven't notice the change of URLs that affect SEO until now. New site was launch last Thursday. The old URL for a "place" (a WordPress custom post type, in case you're WordPress expert and want/ need to point me to another discussion on WP Stackexchange) page is as follows: ourdomain.com/singapore/central/alexandra/an-interesting-place Now it has been changed to ourdomain.com/places/an-interesting-place I have already requested the third-party developers to work rewriting the URLs to emulate the old URL structure. However, it's taking quite a lot of time (we have multiple custom post types e.g. events etc. so it might be complicated; the developers seem quite by blur when I first mentioned rewriting URLs for the custom post types) In the meantime, I wonder if there is a quicker work around for this 1) Use .htaccess to rewrite ourdomain.com/singapore/central/alexandra/an-interesting-place to ourdomain.com/places/an-interesting-place This should avoid 90% loss of the search traffic. I suppose I can learn how to do this quite quickly but no harm mentioning it here 2) Use rel="canonical" to indicate that ourdomain.com/places/an-interesting-place is the exact duplicate of ourdomain.com/singapore/central/alexandra/an-interesting-place I will definitely go for both approaches (and also I'm changing 404 page to cater for this temporary isue) but I wonder if 2) is even feasible and if I have missed anything. Is there anything else you could recommend me in this situation. Let me know if my question is not clear anywhere. Clarifications The old website is on a Windows Server EC2 completely separated from the Linux EC2 instance on which the new site is running. In addition, the same domain "ourdomain.com" is used here (an A record is used to point to an EC2 Elastic IP). Therefore, the old server is completely inaccessible at the moment, unless you we use the IP address to old server (which doesn't help me at all in this case). Even if the old server is accessible, I can't see where one can put the .htaccess or a HTML file to do 301 redirect here. Unless I'm successful with my approach 1) or the developers can rewrite the URLs with coding, 404 page is really a choice for me.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >