Search Results

Search found 4150 results on 166 pages for 'markov models'.

Page 5/166 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

• Using Mapping Models to migrate between Core Data Object Models

  - by westsider

  I have a fairly simply scheme. Essentially, Run <-- Data (where a Run holds a data, e.g., Temperature, sampled from some sort of sensor). Now, it seems that sensors can have more than one measurement (e.g., Temperature and Humidity). So, a single Run could have multiple data samples. Hence, Run <-- Sample and Sample <-- Data. (And for simplicity I am leaving Run <-- Data in place, for now.) If I create a new mapping model, then things generally work - except that no new Samples are created, no relationships are established between Runs and Samples nor between Samples and Datas. I am trying to get mapping model to migrate my model but even the slightest change to the generated mapping model results in Cocoa error 134110. For example, if I take the "Sample" mapping (which has no Source) and set its Source to 'Run' (so that I can set Sample's inverse relationship 'run' appropriately) then the mapping changes its name to "RunToSample". There are two relationships handled in this mapping: data and run. The data property gets set automatically to FUNCTION($manager, "destinationInstancesForEntityMappingNamed:sourceInstances:" , "DataToData", $source.dataSet) Following this example, I set the run property to FUNCTION($manager, "destinationInstancesForEntityMappingNamed:sourceInstances:" , "RunToRun", $source) Similarly, I set the 'sample' property mapping in RunToRun to FUNCTION($manager, "destinationInstancesForEntityMappingNamed:sourceInstances:" , "RunToSample", $source) and the 'sample' property in DataToData to FUNCTION($manager, "destinationInstancesForEntityMappingNamed:sourceInstances:" , "RunToSample", $source.run) So, what, I wonder, is going wrong? I have tried various permutations, such as leaving the 'inverse' relationships unspecified. But I continue to get the same error (134110) regardless. I imagine that this is a lot easier than it seems and that I am missing some fundamental but minor piece. I have also tried subclassing NSEntityMigrationPolicy and overriding -createDestinationInstancesForSourceInstance: but these efforts have met with much the same results. Thanks in advance for any pointers or (relevant :-) advice.

  Read the article

• Django manager for _set in model

  - by Daniel Johansson

  Hello, I'm in the progress of learning Django at the moment but I can't figure out how to solve this problem on my own. I'm reading the book Developers Library - Python Web Development With Django and in one chapter you build a simple CMS system with two models (Story and Category), some generic and custom views together with templates for the views. The book only contains code for listing stories, story details and search. I wanted to expand on that and build a page with nested lists for categories and stories. - Category1 -- Story1 -- Story2 - Category2 - Story3 etc. I managed to figure out how to add my own generic object_list view for the category listing. My problem is that the Story model have STATUS_CHOICES if the Story is public or not and a custom manager that'll only fetch the public Stories per default. I can't figure out how to tell my generic Category list view to also use a custom manager and only fetch the public Stories. Everything works except that small problem. I'm able to create a list for all categories with a sub list for all stories in that category on a single page, the only problem is that the list contains non public Stories. I don't know if I'm on the right track here. My urls.py contains a generic view that fetches all Category objects and in my template I'm using the *category.story_set.all* to get all Story objects for that category, wich I then loop over. I think it would be possible to add a if statement in the template and use the VIEWABLE_STATUS from my model file to check if it should be listed or not. The problem with that solution is that it's not very DRY compatible. Is it possible to add some kind of manager for the Category model too that only will fetch in public Story objects when using the story_set on a category? Or is this the wrong way to attack my problem? Related code urls.py (only category list view): urlpatterns += patterns('django.views.generic.list_detail', url(r'^categories/$', 'object_list', {'queryset': Category.objects.all(), 'template_object_name': 'category' }, name='cms-categories'), models.py: from markdown import markdown import datetime from django.db import models from django.db.models import permalink from django.contrib.auth.models import User VIEWABLE_STATUS = [3, 4] class ViewableManager(models.Manager): def get_query_set(self): default_queryset = super(ViewableManager, self).get_query_set() return default_queryset.filter(status__in=VIEWABLE_STATUS) class Category(models.Model): """A content category""" label = models.CharField(blank=True, max_length=50) slug = models.SlugField() class Meta: verbose_name_plural = "categories" def __unicode__(self): return self.label @permalink def get_absolute_url(self): return ('cms-category', (), {'slug': self.slug}) class Story(models.Model): """A hunk of content for our site, generally corresponding to a page""" STATUS_CHOICES = ( (1, "Needs Edit"), (2, "Needs Approval"), (3, "Published"), (4, "Archived"), ) title = models.CharField(max_length=100) slug = models.SlugField() category = models.ForeignKey(Category) markdown_content = models.TextField() html_content = models.TextField(editable=False) owner = models.ForeignKey(User) status = models.IntegerField(choices=STATUS_CHOICES, default=1) created = models.DateTimeField(default=datetime.datetime.now) modified = models.DateTimeField(default=datetime.datetime.now) class Meta: ordering = ['modified'] verbose_name_plural = "stories" def __unicode__(self): return self.title @permalink def get_absolute_url(self): return ("cms-story", (), {'slug': self.slug}) def save(self): self.html_content = markdown(self.markdown_content) self.modified = datetime.datetime.now() super(Story, self).save() admin_objects = models.Manager() objects = ViewableManager() category_list.html (related template): {% extends "cms/base.html" %} {% block content %} <h1>Categories</h1> {% if category_list %} <ul id="category-list"> {% for category in category_list %} <li><a href="{{ category.get_absolute_url }}">{{ category.label }}</a></li> {% if category.story_set %} <ul> {% for story in category.story_set.all %} <li><a href="{{ story.get_absolute_url }}">{{ story.title }}</a></li> {% endfor %} </ul> {% endif %} {% endfor %} </ul> {% else %} <p> Sorry, no categories at the moment. </p> {% endif %} {% endblock %}

  Read the article

• Rails: show some examples of code from controllers, models and views

  - by Totty

  Hy, my controller example: class FriendsController < ApplicationController before_filter :authorize, :except => [:friends] ############## ############## ## REQUESTS ## ############## ############## ################## # GET MY FRIENDS # ################## # Get my friends. def friends @friends = @my_profile.friends.paginate({:page => params[:page], :per_page => 3}) @profile = @my_profile end ################### # REMOVED FRIENDS # ################### # Get my deleted friends. def removed_friends @removed_friends = @my_profile.friends('removed_friends', params[:page]) end ################### # PENDING FRIENDS # ################### # Friend requests made by other profiles to me. def pending_friends @pending_friends = @my_profile.friends('pending_friends', params[:page]) end ############################ # REJECTED PENDING FRIENDS # ############################ # Rejected friend requests made by other profiles to me. def rejected_pending_friends @rejected_pending_friends = @my_profile.friends('rejected_pending_friends', params[:page]) end ##################### # REQUESTED FRIENDS # ##################### # The friend requests I've sent to others profiles. def requested_friends @requested_friends = @my_profile.friends('requested_friends', params[:page]) end ############################# # DELETED REQUESTED FRIENDS # ############################# # The requests I've sent to others # profiles and then canceled. def deleted_requested_friends @deleted_requested_friends = @my_profile.friends('deleted_requested_friends', params[:page]) end ############# ############# ## ACTIONS ## ############# ############# ########################## # ADD FRIENDSHIP REQUEST # ########################## # Add a friendship request. def add_friendship_request friendship = @my_profile.add_friendship_request(params[:profile_id]) render :json => friendship end ############################# # REMOVE FRIENDSHIP REQUEST # ############################# # Removes a friendship request I've done. def remove_friendship_request friendship = @my_profile.remove_friendship_request(params[:profile_id]) render :json => friendship end ###################### # PROCESS FRIENDSHIP # ###################### # Process friendship: accept or reject a friend. # This will make a new friend or # will make a new rejected pending friend. def process_friendship friendship = @my_profile.process_friendship(params[:profile_id].to_i, params[:accepted].to_i) render :json => friendship end ################### # REMOVE A FRIEND # ################### # Remove a friend from my friends by id. def remove_friend friendship = @my_profile.remove_friend(params[:profile_id]) render :json => friendship end end

  Read the article

• ASP.net MVC - Update Model on complex models

  - by ludicco

  Hi there, I'm struggling myself trying to get the contents of a form which is a complex model and then update the model with that complex model. My account model has many individuals [AcceptVerbs(HttpVerbs.Post)] public ActionResult OpenAnAccount(string area,[Bind(Exclude = "Id")]Account account, [Bind(Prefix="Account.Individuals")] EntitySet<Individual> individuals){ var db = new DB(); account.individuals = invdividuals; db.Accounts.InsertOnSubmit(account); db.SubmitChanges(); } So it works nicely for adding new Records, but not for update them like: [AcceptVerbs(HttpVerbs.Post)] public ActionResult OpenAnAccount(string area,[Bind(Exclude = "Id")]Account account, [Bind(Prefix="Account.Individuals")] EntitySet<Individual> individuals){ var db = new DB(); var record = db.Accounts.Single(a => a.Reference == area); account.individuals = invdividuals; try{ UpdateModel(record, account); // I can't convert account ToValueProvider() db.SubmitChanges(); } catch{ return ... //Error Message } } My problem is being how to use UpdateModel with the account model since it's not a FormCollection. How can I convert it? How can I use ToValueProvider with a complex model? I hope I was clear enough Thanks a lot :)

  Read the article

• How to display total record count against models in django admin

  - by Rog

  Is there a neat way to make the record/object count for a model appear on the main model list in the admin module? I have found techniques for showing counts of related objects within sets in the list_display page (and I can see the total in the pagination section at the bottom of the same), but haven't come across a neat way to show the record count at the model list level.

  Read the article

• Rails Multiple Models per Form, Optional FK Association

  - by ckarbass

  Given the following pseudo-code: Company has_many :jobs Job belongs_to :company I'm creating a form to post a new job. In the form, I want to have two fields for an optional company. On submission, if a company was entered, I want to either create or update the company and associate it with the new job. I know if the company exists by searching the companies table for the company's url. Is it possible to do this using form_for, fields_for, and accepts_nested_attributes_for given the company may not exist?

  Read the article

• Complex derived attributes in Django models

  - by rabidpebble

  What I want to do is implement submission scoring for a site with users voting on the content, much like in e.g. reddit (see the 'hot' function in http://code.reddit.com/browser/sql/functions.sql). My submission model currently keeps track of up and down vote totals. Currently, when a user votes I create and save a related Vote object and then use F() expressions to update the Submission object's voting totals. The problem is that I want to update the score for the submission at the same time, but F() expressions are limited to only simple operations (it's missing support for log(), date_part(), sign() etc.) From my limited experience with Django I can see 4 options here: extend F() somehow (haven't looked at the code yet) to support the missing SQL functions; this is my preferred option and seems to fit within the Django framework the best define a scoring function (much like reddit's 'hot' function) in my database, and have Django use the value of that function for the value of the score field; as far as I can tell, #2 is not possible wrap my two step voting process in a suitably isolated transaction so that I can calculate the voting totals in Python and then update the Submission's voting totals without fear that another vote against the submission could be added/changed in the meantime; I'm hesitant to take this route because it seems overly complex - what is a "suitably isolated transaction" in this case anyway? use raw SQL; I would prefer to avoid this entirely -- what's the point of an ORM if I have to revert to SQL for such a common use case as this! (Note that this coming from somebody who loves sprocs, but is using Django for ease of development.) Before I embark on this mission to extend F() (which I'm not sure is even possible), am I about to reinvent the wheel? Is there a more standard way to do this? It seems like such a common use case and yet in an hour of searching I have yet to find a common solution...

  Read the article

• Using Models and Forms outside of Django?

  - by RadiantHex

  Is it possible to run a view file using Django Model and Form outside of the Django environment?

  Read the article

• Aggregation over a few models - Django

  - by RadiantHex

  Hi folks, I'm trying to compute the average of a field over various subsets of a queryset. Player.objects.order_by('-score').filter(sex='male').aggregate(Avg('level')) This works perfectly! But... if I try to compute it for the top 50 players it does not work. Player.objects.order_by('-score').filter(sex='male')[:50].aggregate(Avg('level')) This last one returns the exact same result as the query above it, which is wrong. What am I doing wrong? Help would be very much appreciated!

  Read the article

• Why repeat database constraints in models?

  - by BWelfel

  In a CakePHP application, for unique constraints that are accounted for in the database, what is the benefit of having the same validation checks in the model? I understand the benefit of having JS validation, but I believe this model validation makes an extra trip to the DB. I am 100% sure that certain validations are made in the DB so the model validation would simply be redundant. The only benefit I see is the app recognizing the mistake and adjusting the view for the user accordingly (repopulating the fields and showing error message on the appropriate field; bettering the ux) but this could be achieved if there was a constraint naming convention and so the app could understand what the problem was with the save (existing method to do this now?)

  Read the article

• Trying to make models in Kohana, relations problem.

  - by Asaf

  I have a table of Hits, Articles and Categories Now, a Hit belongs_to an Article/Category (depends on where it was done). so I have a column on Hits table with the name 'parenttype' That tells me 'Article' or 'Category'. I wrote in the Hit model (extends ORM) protected $_belongs_to= array( 'page' => array('model'=> $this->parenttype) ); Now it complains about $this-parenttype not being expected?

  Read the article

• Django: CharField with fixed length, how?

  - by Giovanni Di Milia

  Hi everybody, I wold like to have in my model a CharField with fixed length. In other words I want that only a specified length is valid. I tried to do something like volumenumber = models.CharField('Volume Number', max_length=4, min_length=4) but it gives me an error (it seems that I can use both max_length and min_length at the same time). Is there another quick way? Thanks EDIT: Following the suggestions of some people I will be a bit more specific: My model is this: class Volume(models.Model): vid = models.AutoField(primary_key=True) jid = models.ForeignKey(Journals, db_column='jid', null=True, verbose_name = "Journal") volumenumber = models.CharField('Volume Number') date_publication = models.CharField('Date of Publication', max_length=6, blank=True) class Meta: db_table = u'volume' verbose_name = "Volume" ordering = ['jid', 'volumenumber'] unique_together = ('jid', 'volumenumber') def __unicode__(self): return (str(self.jid) + ' - ' + str(self.volumenumber)) What I want is that the volumenumber must be exactly 4 characters. I.E. if someone insert '4b' django gives an error because it expects a string of 4 characters. So I tried with volumenumber = models.CharField('Volume Number', max_length=4, min_length=4) but it gives me this error: Validating models... Unhandled exception in thread started by <function inner_run at 0x70feb0> Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Library/Python/2.5/site-packages/django/core/management/commands/runserver.py", line 48, in inner_run self.validate(display_num_errors=True) File "/Library/Python/2.5/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py", line 249, in validate num_errors = get_validation_errors(s, app) File "/Library/Python/2.5/site-packages/django/core/management/validation.py", line 28, in get_validation_errors for (app_name, error) in get_app_errors().items(): File "/Library/Python/2.5/site-packages/django/db/models/loading.py", line 131, in get_app_errors self._populate() File "/Library/Python/2.5/site-packages/django/db/models/loading.py", line 58, in _populate self.load_app(app_name, True) File "/Library/Python/2.5/site-packages/django/db/models/loading.py", line 74, in load_app models = import_module('.models', app_name) File "/Library/Python/2.5/site-packages/django/utils/importlib.py", line 35, in import_module __import__(name) File "/Users/Giovanni/src/djangoTestSite/../djangoTestSite/journaldb/models.py", line 120, in <module> class Volume(models.Model): File "/Users/Giovanni/src/djangoTestSite/../djangoTestSite/journaldb/models.py", line 123, in Volume volumenumber = models.CharField('Volume Number', max_length=4, min_length=4) TypeError: __init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'min_length' That obviously doesn't appear if I use only "max_length" OR "min_length". I read the documentation on the django web site and it seems that I'm right (I cannot use both together) so I'm asking if there is another way to solve the problem. Thanks again

  Read the article

• Django models & Python class attributes

  - by Geo

  The tutorial on the django website shows this code for the models: from django.db import models class Poll(models.Model): question = models.CharField(max_length=200) pub_date = models.DateTimeField('date published') class Choice(models.Model): poll = models.ForeignKey(Poll) choice = models.CharField(max_length=200) votes = models.IntegerField() Now, each of those attribute, is a class attribute, right? So, the same attribute should be shared by all instances of the class. A bit later, they present this code: class Poll(models.Model): # ... def __unicode__(self): return self.question class Choice(models.Model): # ... def __unicode__(self): return self.choice How did they turn from class attributes into instance attributes? Did I get class attributes wrong?

  Read the article

• Suggestions for a django db structure

  - by rh0dium

  Hi Say I have the unknown number of questions. For example: Is the sky blue [y/n] What date were your born on [date] What is pi [3.14] What is a large integ [100] Now each of these questions poses a different but very type specific answer (boolean, date, float, int). Natively django can happily deal with these in a model. class SkyModel(models.Model): question = models.CharField("Is the sky blue") answer = models.BooleanField(default=False) class BirthModel(models.Model): question = models.CharField("What date were your born on") answer = models.DateTimeField(default=today) class PiModel(models.Model) question = models.CharField("What is pi") answer = models.FloatField() But this has the obvious problem in that each question has a specific model - so if we need to add a question later I have to change the database. Yuck. So now I want to get fancy - How do a set up a model where by the answer type conversion happens automagically? ANSWER_TYPES = ( ('boolean', 'boolean'), ('date', 'date'), ('float', 'float'), ('int', 'int'), ('char', 'char'), ) class Questions(models.model): question = models.CharField(() answer = models.CharField() answer_type = models.CharField(choices = ANSWER_TYPES) default = models.CharField() So in theory this would do the following: When I build up my views I look at the type of answer and ensure that I only put in that value. But when I want to pull that answer back out it will return the data in the format specified by the answer_type. Example 3.14 comes back out as a float not as a str. How can I perform this sort of automagic transformation? Or can someone suggest a better way to do this? Thanks much!!

  Read the article

• How to generate Markov Chain in C#

  - by Nabeel Bukhari

  I want to create this Markov Chain in C#. I need to know if there is any other structure other than adjacency list which can work better in this situation. Also how can I use the existing .Net collection type to implement this.

  Read the article

• How can I iterate through all of the Models in my rails app?

  - by James

  I would like to be able to iterate over and inspect all the models in my rails app. In pseudo-code it would look something like: rails_env.models.each do |model| associations = model.reflect_on_all_associations(:has_many) ... do some stuff end My question is how do I inspect my rails app to get a collection of the models (rails_env.models) ?

  Read the article

• Django admin site populated combo box based on imput

  - by user292652

  hi i have to following model class Match(models.Model): Team_one = models.ForeignKey('Team', related_name='Team_one') Team_two = models.ForeignKey('Team', related_name='Team_two') Stadium = models.CharField(max_length=255, blank=True) Start_time = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=False, auto_now=False, blank=True, null=True) Rafree = models.CharField(max_length=255, blank=True) Judge = models.CharField(max_length=255, blank=True) Winner = models.ForeignKey('Team', related_name='winner', blank=True) updated = models.DateTimeField('update date', auto_now=True ) created = models.DateTimeField('creation date', auto_now_add=True ) def save(self, force_insert=False, force_update=False): pass @models.permalink def get_absolute_url(self): return ('view_or_url_name') class MatchAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin): list_display = ('Team_one','Team_two', 'Winner') search_fields = ['Team_one','Team_tow'] admin.site.register(Match, MatchAdmin) i was wondering is their a way to populated the winner combo box once the team one and team two is selected in admin site ?

  Read the article

• Django admin site auto populate combo box based on input

  - by user292652

  hi i have to following model class Match(models.Model): Team_one = models.ForeignKey('Team', related_name='Team_one') Team_two = models.ForeignKey('Team', related_name='Team_two') Stadium = models.CharField(max_length=255, blank=True) Start_time = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=False, auto_now=False, blank=True, null=True) Rafree = models.CharField(max_length=255, blank=True) Judge = models.CharField(max_length=255, blank=True) Winner = models.ForeignKey('Team', related_name='winner', blank=True) updated = models.DateTimeField('update date', auto_now=True ) created = models.DateTimeField('creation date', auto_now_add=True ) def save(self, force_insert=False, force_update=False): pass @models.permalink def get_absolute_url(self): return ('view_or_url_name') class MatchAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin): list_display = ('Team_one','Team_two', 'Winner') search_fields = ['Team_one','Team_tow'] admin.site.register(Match, MatchAdmin) i was wondering is their a way to populated the winner combo box once the team one and team two is selected in admin site ?

  Read the article

• Django model manager didn't work with related object when I do aggregated query

  - by Satoru.Logic

  Hi, all. I'm having trouble doing an aggregation query on a many-to-many related field. Let's begin with my models: class SortedTagManager(models.Manager): use_for_related_fields = True def get_query_set(self): orig_query_set = super(SortedTagManager, self).get_query_set() # FIXME `used` is wrongly counted return orig_query_set.distinct().annotate( used=models.Count('users')).order_by('-used') class Tag(models.Model): content = models.CharField(max_length=32, unique=True) creator = models.ForeignKey(User, related_name='tags_i_created') users = models.ManyToManyField(User, through='TaggedNote', related_name='tags_i_used') objects_sorted_by_used = SortedTagManager() class TaggedNote(models.Model): """Association table of both (Tag , Note) and (Tag, User)""" note = models.ForeignKey(Note) # Note is what's tagged in my app tag = models.ForeignKey(Tag) tagged_by = models.ForeignKey(User) class Meta: unique_together = (('note', 'tag'),) However, the value of the aggregated field used is only correct when the model is queried directly: for t in Tag.objects.all(): print t.used # this works correctly for t in user.tags_i_used.all(): print t.used #prints n^2 when it should give n Would you please tell me what's wrong with it? Thanks in advance.

  Read the article

• Post and Comment with the same Model.

  - by xRobot

  I have created a simple project where everyone can create one or more Blog. I want to use this models for Post and for Comment: class Post_comment(models.Model): content_type = models.ForeignKey(ContentType) object_id = models.PositiveIntegerField(_('object ID')) content_object = generic.GenericForeignKey() # Hierarchy Field parent = models.ForeignKey('self', null=True, blank=True, default=None, related_name='children') # User Field user = models.ForeignKey(User) # Date Fields date_submitted = models.DateTimeField(_('date/time submitted'), default = datetime.now) date_modified = models.DateTimeField(_('date/time modified'), default = datetime.now) title = models.CharField(_('title'), max_length=60, blank=True, null=True) post_comment = models.TextField(_('post_comment')) markup = models.IntegerField(choices=MARKUP_CHOICES, default=DEFAULT_MARKUP, null=True, blank=True) if it is a comment the parent is not null. So in most case the text field will contain a little bit of text. Can I use this model for both Post and Comment ?

  Read the article

• ** EDITED ** 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'day'

  - by Asinox

  Hi guy, i dont know where is my error, but Django 1.2.1 is give this error: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'day' when i try to save form from the Administrator Area models.py from django.db import models from django.contrib.auth.models import User class Editorial(models.Model): titulo = models.CharField(max_length=250,help_text='Titulo del editorial') editorial = models.TextField(help_text='Editorial') slug = models.SlugField(unique_for_date='pub_date') autor = models.ForeignKey(User) pub_date = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True) activa = models.BooleanField(verbose_name="Activa") enable_comments = models.BooleanField(verbose_name="Aceptar Comentarios",default=False) editorial_html = models.TextField(editable=False,blank=True) def __unicode__(self): return unicode(self.titulo) def get_absolute_url(self): return "/editorial/%s/%s/" % (self.pub_date.strftime("%Y/%b/%d").lower(), self.slug) class Meta: ordering=['-pub_date'] verbose_name_plural ='Editoriales' def save(self,force_insert=False, force_update=False): from markdown import markdown if self.editorial: self.editorial_html = markdown(self.editorial) super(Editorial,self).save(force_insert,force_update) i dont know why this error, COMPLETED ERROR: Traceback: File "C:\wamp\bin\Python26\lib\site-packages\django\core\handlers\base.py" in get_response 100. response = callback(request, *callback_args, **callback_kwargs) File "C:\wamp\bin\Python26\lib\site-packages\django\contrib\admin\options.py" in wrapper 239. return self.admin_site.admin_view(view)(*args, **kwargs) File "C:\wamp\bin\Python26\lib\site-packages\django\utils\decorators.py" in _wrapped_view 76. response = view_func(request, *args, **kwargs) File "C:\wamp\bin\Python26\lib\site-packages\django\views\decorators\cache.py" in _wrapped_view_func 69. response = view_func(request, *args, **kwargs) File "C:\wamp\bin\Python26\lib\site-packages\django\contrib\admin\sites.py" in inner 190. return view(request, *args, **kwargs) File "C:\wamp\bin\Python26\lib\site-packages\django\utils\decorators.py" in _wrapper 21. return decorator(bound_func)(*args, **kwargs) File "C:\wamp\bin\Python26\lib\site-packages\django\utils\decorators.py" in _wrapped_view 76. response = view_func(request, *args, **kwargs) File "C:\wamp\bin\Python26\lib\site-packages\django\utils\decorators.py" in bound_func 17. return func(self, *args2, **kwargs2) File "C:\wamp\bin\Python26\lib\site-packages\django\db\transaction.py" in _commit_on_success 299. res = func(*args, **kw) File "C:\wamp\bin\Python26\lib\site-packages\django\contrib\admin\options.py" in add_view 777. if form.is_valid(): File "C:\wamp\bin\Python26\lib\site-packages\django\forms\forms.py" in is_valid 121. return self.is_bound and not bool(self.errors) File "C:\wamp\bin\Python26\lib\site-packages\django\forms\forms.py" in _get_errors 112. self.full_clean() File "C:\wamp\bin\Python26\lib\site-packages\django\forms\forms.py" in full_clean 269. self._post_clean() File "C:\wamp\bin\Python26\lib\site-packages\django\forms\models.py" in _post_clean 345. self.validate_unique() File "C:\wamp\bin\Python26\lib\site-packages\django\forms\models.py" in validate_unique 354. self.instance.validate_unique(exclude=exclude) File "C:\wamp\bin\Python26\lib\site-packages\django\db\models\base.py" in validate_unique 695. date_errors = self._perform_date_checks(date_checks) File "C:\wamp\bin\Python26\lib\site-packages\django\db\models\base.py" in _perform_date_checks 802. lookup_kwargs['%s__day' % unique_for] = date.day Exception Type: AttributeError at /admin/editoriales/editorial/add/ Exception Value: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'day' thanks guys sorry with my English

  Read the article

• How to make custom join query with Django ?

  - by xRobot

  I have these 2 models: genre = ( ('D', 'Dramatic'), ('T', 'Thriller'), ('L', 'Love'), ) class Book(models.Model): title = models.CharField(max_length=100) genre = models.CharField(max_length=1, choices=genre) class Author(models.Model): user = models.ForeignKey(User, unique=True) born = models.DateTimeField('born') book = models.ForeignKey(Book) I need to retrieve first_name and last_name of all authors of dramatic's books. How can I do this in django ?

  Read the article

• Storing GenericForeignKey content_type in another model?

  - by slypete

  I have a typical definition/instance situation in my data modeling. I'm trying to store the content_type of a GenericForeignKey in another model (the definition model) like so: class IndicatorFieldInstance(models.Model): definition = models.ForeignKey(IndicatorField) object_id = models.PositiveIntegerField() content_object = generic.GenericForeignKey(definition.content_type, 'object_id') indicator_instance = models.ForeignKey(IndicatorInstance) I've also tried it like this: content_object = generic.GenericForeignKey('definition__content_type', 'object_id') Neither of these methods seem to work. Is it possible to achieve this? For reference, here's the definition model: class IndicatorField(models.Model): name = models.CharField(max_length='255') content_type = models.ForeignKey(ContentType) indicator = models.ForeignKey(Indicator) Thanks, Pete

  Read the article

• How do I relate two models/tables in Django based on non primary non unique keys?

  - by wizard

  I've got two tables that I need to relate on a single field po_num. The data is imported from another source so while I have a little bit of control over what the tables look like but I can't change them too much. What I want to do is relate these two models so I can look up one from the other based on the po_num fields. What I really need to do is join the two tables so I can do a where on a count of the related table. I would like to do filter for all Order objects that have 0 related EDI856 objects. I tried adding a foreign key to the Order model and specified the db_column and to_fields as po_num but django didn't like that the fact that Edi856.po_num wasn't unique. Here are the important fields of my current models that let me display but not filter for the data that I want. class Edi856(models.Model): po_num = models.CharField(max_length=90, db_index=True ) class Order(models.Model): po_num = models.CharField(max_length=90, db_index=True) def in_edi(self): '''Has the edi been processed?''' return Edi856.objects.filter(po_num = self.po_num).count() Thanks for taking the time to read about my problem. I'm not sure what to do from here.

  Read the article

• using R to estimate finite mixture model with underlying Markov process

  - by stevejb

  Hello, My apologies if this is more of a statistics question than an R question. I am trying to estimate the following model in R. y_t = mu0 (1 - S_t) + mu1 S_t + e_t e_t ~ N(0, sigma_t^2) sigma_t^2 = sigma_0^2 (1 - S_t) + sigma_1^2 S_t where mu_t = mu0 if S_t = 0, mu_t = mu1 if S_t = 1, and S_t is a Markov process, either 0 or 1, with transition probabilities P(S_t = 1 | S_t-1 = 1 ) = p and P(S_t = 0 | S_t-1 = 0 ) = q. Would 'flexmix' be a good library to use for this? I am new to this kind of statistics so any pointer to the right library would be appreciated. Thanks,

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >