Search Results

Search found 29575 results on 1183 pages for 'dynamic javascript'.

Page 502/1183 | < Previous Page | 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509  | Next Page >

  • Possible to modify DOM during/before initial DOM parsing?

    - by AMO
    Is it possible to modify the DOM during or before the initial DOM parsing? Or do I have to wait until the DOM is parsed and built before interacting with it? More specifically, is it possible to hinder a script element in DOM from running using userscripts/content scripts or similar in chrome or firefox? Tried using eventListeners on DOMNodeInserted before the DOM is parsed, but these are only fired after the DOM is built.

    Read the article

  • "'data(...).options' is null or not an object" in jquery-ui

    - by ripper234
    I'm using jquery-ui 1.8, and getting this error in Internet Explorer: Webpage error details User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/4.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E) Timestamp: Mon, 10 May 2010 06:26:48 UTC Message: 'data(...).options' is null or not an object Line: 75 Char: 13074 Code: 0 URI: http://localhost:58365/Scripts/Lib/jquery-ui-1.8.custom.min.js Is this a known bug? Is there a workaround? The error happens when I use droppable/draggable.

    Read the article

  • what browser is document.layers sniffing?

    - by mkoryak
    I am looking at some JS code from the 20th century, and they are using document.layers in code that is trying to get the current key code. What browser are they sniffing for? i am about to replace the code with something like this: var fn = function(event){ event = event || window.event; var code = event.charCode || event.keyCode; } but i am afraid of breaking something arcane and releasing the evil

    Read the article

  • converting code from not CPS to CPS (CPS aka Continuation Passing Style aka Continuations)

    - by Delirium tremens
    before: function sc_startSiteCompare(){ var visitinguri; var validateduri; var downloaduris; var compareuris; var tryinguri; sc_setstatus('started'); visitinguri = sc_getvisitinguri(); validateduri = sc_getvalidateduri(visitinguri); downloaduris = new Array(); downloaduris = sc_generatedownloaduris(validateduri); compareuris = new Array(); compareuris = sc_generatecompareuris(validateduri); tryinguri = 0; sc_finishSiteCompare(downloaduris, compareuris, tryinguri); } function sc_getvisitinguri() { var visitinguri; visitinguri = content.location.href; return visitinguri; } after (I'm trying): function sc_startSiteCompare(){ var visitinguri; sc_setstatus('started'); visitinguri = sc_getvisitinguri(sc_startSiteComparec1); } function sc_startSiteComparec1 (visitinguri) { var validateduri; validateduri = sc_getvalidateduri(visitinguri, sc_startSiteComparec2); } function sc_startSiteComparec2 (visitinguri, c) { var downloaduris; downloaduris = sc_generatedownloaduris(validateduri, sc_startSiteComparec3); } function sc_startSiteComparec3 (validateduri, c) { var compareuris; compareuris = sc_generatecompareuris(downloaduris, validateduri, sc_startSiteComparec4); } function sc_startSiteComparec4 (downloaduris, compareuris, validateduri, c) { var tryinguri; tryinguri = 0; sc_finishSiteCompare(downloaduris, compareuris, tryinguri); } function sc_getvisitinguri(c) { var visitinguri; visitinguri = content.location.href; c(visitinguri); } What should the code above become? I need CPS, because I have XMLHttpRequests when validating uris, then downloading pages, but I can't use return statements, because I use asynchronous calls. Is there an alternative to CPS? Also, I'm having to pass lots of arguments to functions now. global in procedural code look like this / self in modular code. Any difference? Will I really have to convert from procedural to modular too? It's looking like a lot of work ahead.

    Read the article

  • WCF REST with jQuery AJAX - removing/working around same origin policy

    - by csauve
    So I'm trying to create a C# WCF REST service that is called by jQuery. I've discovered that jQuery requires that AJAX calls are made under the same origin policy. I have a few questions for how I might proceed. I am already aware of; 1. The hacky solution of JSONP with a server callback 2. The way too much server overhead of having a cross-domain proxy. 3. Using Flash in the browser to make the call and setting up crossdomain.xml at my WCF server root. I'd rather not use these because; 1. I don't want to use JSON, or at least I don't want to be restricted to using it 2. I would like to separate the server that serves static pages from the one that serves application state. 3. Flash in this day in age is out of the question. What I'm thinking: is there anything like Flash's crossdomain.xml file that works for jQuery? Is this "same-origin" policy a part of jQuery or is it a restriction in specific browsers? If it's just a part of jQuery, maybe I'll try digging in the code to work around it.

    Read the article

  • Fixed mouse pointer with jQuery draggable

    - by MikeWyatt
    I'm building a little game in HTML5. The canvas element is a viewport into the game world. The user can move the viewport's position in the world by clicking and dragging with the mouse on a small icon. The problem is that the scrolling stops when the mouse pointer hits the edge of the screen. In all likelihood, that will limit scrolling in one of the directions severely, since the icon will be in one of the corners of the page. The only technical solution I can think of would be to somehow fix the mouse pointer's position on the icon and detect the relative movement each frame. Basically I would just reset the pointer position back to the center of the icon after each drag event. Unfortunately, I'm fairly positive that this is not possible. Playing with the user's pointer is a big no-no from a usability and security standpoint. So, is there any other way to do what I want? I'm primarily looking for technical ideas here, but suggestions for a more appropriate interface would also be welcome.

    Read the article

  • jQuery Validate - resetForm() Not Behaving as Expected

    - by Kevin C.
    Site in question is http://epraxadev.com/kw/palisade-palms/ "Click here for brochure" and "Learn More about Palisade Palms" both bring up a lightbox with the same HTML form to be filled out...the "learn more..." link also changes some of the HTML in the form (the value for a hidden form field, and the fields required). I'm using Colorbox for the lightbox, and for its onClosed event, I have this to reset the form: onClosed: function() { $('#brochure-form label em').remove(); $('#brochure-form').data('validator').resetForm(); } Now here's the problem: User tries to submit the "brochure" form, but it fails validation. User closes the lightbox. User opens up the "Learn more" lightbox, and tries to submit the form...now, instead of using the correct validation rules (only requiring e-mail and referrer), it requires all fields to be filled out (as is the case with the "Brochure Form") Is there something that I can add to the onClosed function, to clean up all the validation rules? Thanks guys!

    Read the article

  • jquery function problem

    - by user295189
    I have this function function onclickRowRecord(recordID) { $.ajax({ type: "POST", url: '/file/to/post.to.php' , data: {recordID:recordID}, success: function(data) { //how to post this to function howToPost(recordID) the recordID } }); } function howToPost(recordID){ alert(recordID); } so how can I get the response from ajax success and post to the other function

    Read the article

  • Automatically resize jQuery UI dialog to the width of the content loaded by ajax

    - by womp
    I'm having a lot of trouble finding specific information and examples on this. I've got a number of jQuery UI dialogs in my application attached to divs that are loaded with .ajax() calls. They all use the same setup call: $(".mydialog").dialog({ autoOpen: false, resizable: false, modal: true }); I just want to have the dialog resize to the width of the content that gets loaded. Right now, the width just stays at 300px (the default) and I get a horizontal scrollbar. As far as I can tell, "autoResize" is no longer an option for dialogs, and nothing happens when I specify it. I'm trying to not write a separate function for each dialog, so .dialog("option", "width", "500") is not really an option, as each dialog is going to have a different width. Specifying width: 'auto' for the dialog options just makes the dialogs take up 100% of the width of the browser window. What are my options? I'm using jQuery 1.4.1 with jQuery UI 1.8rc1. It seems like this should be something that is really easy. EDIT: I've implemented a kludgy workaround for this, but I'm still looking for a better solution.

    Read the article

  • jQuery parent element inner HTML

    - by Anton
    I am getting inner HTML of element by next way: $(this).context.innerHTML Then I am getting parent inner HTML: $(this).parent().context.innerHTML But this code returns same values. Any ideas what is wrong?

    Read the article

  • How would this code be refactored to use jQuery?

    - by C.W.Holeman II
    How would this code be refactored to use jQuery? var lu = function luf(aPrefix){ switch (aPrefix){ case 'xhtml': return 'http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'; case 'math': return 'http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML'; case 'svg': return 'http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'; case 'emleo': return 'http://emle.sf.net/emle020000/emleo'; } return ''; }; function emleProcessOnLoad(aThis) { var result = document.evaluate("//xhtml:span[@class='emleOnLoad']", aThis.document, lu, XPathResult.UNORDERED_NODE_SNAPSHOT_TYPE, null); for (var jj=0; jj<result.snapshotLength; jj++){ var emleOnLoad = result.snapshotItem(jj).textContent; eval("var emleThis=result.snapshotItem(jj);" + emleOnLoad); } }

    Read the article

  • GameQuery Collision Detection

    - by Pez Cuckow
    I am having a problem with GameQuery (jQuery) collision detection Tthey just never seem to fire?!? I have checked all the .arrow's exist and the same for the .bot's but it just never seems to call the function I have the below code in my main callback: $(".bot").each(function(){ $(this).collision(".arrow").each(function(){ alert("Test"); }); }); Do you have any idea why this would just simply be doing nothing? The bot walks (has it's x value) moved right over the arrow. Current revision online at http://labs.pezcuckow.com/solveit/game.html (no where near finished) if anyone doesn't mine having a look! Many thanks,

    Read the article

  • IE-only Styling for jQuery qTip

    - by Kevin C.
    I'm using jquery.qTip on http://comps.gunnjerkens.com/phws/services/ Looks beautiful with the drop shadow and rounded borders in modern browsers...unfortunately the drop shadow is lost on IE. So I want to specify an IE-only rule that makes the border a different color than white. Here's how I currently have it setup: $(this).qtip({ content: the_content, position: { corner: { target: 'bottomLeft', tooltip: 'topLeft' }, adjust: { screen: true } }, style: { border: { radius: 4, color: '#FFFFFF' }, color: '#7D9240' } }); // qtip() }); I appreciate any help!

    Read the article

  • Windows Sidebar gadget - cannont access a div in Flyout DOM

    - by cyrix86
    In the main gadget html, there is a div with an onclick that calls this method in the Gadget script file: ShowFlyout = function() { System.Gadget.Flyout.show = true; var flyoutDoc = System.Gadget.Flyout.document; var mainFlyoutDiv = flyoutDoc.getElementById('divFlyout'); mainFlyoutDiv.innerHTML = "hello"; } Here is the Flyout html: <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <title>This is a flyout</title> <link href="Css\FlyoutStyle.css" type="text/css" rel="Stylesheet" /> </head> <body> <div id="divFlyout" > </div> </body> </html> The problem is that mainFlyoutDiv is always null. When peering into the System.Gadget.Flyout.document object through the debugger, the body parameter is null - I don't think that's right. The System.Gadget.Flyout.file value is being set elsewhere when the gadget first loads. What am I doing wrong? Also, does the System.Gadget.Flyout.show property have to be true before the System.Gadget.Flyout.document property can be accessed? My ultimate goal is to open a flyout and dynamically populate it's html

    Read the article

  • Jquery Countup Timer

    - by knightrider
    Hello, I was trying to achieve count up timer with this jquery plugin. As I am newbie on this, I really don't understand their documentation. What I want to display is. I want to display counter which counts from 1st January 2005 till current date. Example of output display is 5 years 5months 5hours 5seconds (seconds will be keep counting) Please kindly help me by posting snippets to achieve. Thanks for your time and greatly appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Adding new rows to a jQuery TableSorter with Pager

    - by macca1
    I have a basic table with the jQuery tableSorter on it in addition to a filter and pager: $("#myTable") .tablesorter({ debug: false, widgets: ['zebra'] }) .tablesorterFilter({ filterContainer: $("#filterBoxOne"), filterClearContainer: $("#filterClearOne"), filterColumns: [0, 1, 2], filterCaseSensitive: false }) .tablesorterPager({ container: $("#pagerOne"), positionFixed: false }); I'm trying to dynamically add a whole bunch of rows to it: function addRows() { $("#myTable tbody").append( $("#newRows").html() ); $("#myTable").trigger("update") .trigger("applyWidgets"); //.trigger("appendCache"); //tried this, didn't help } Everything is working fine except for the pager: it doesn't get updated when I add more rows, and upon clicking on one of the buttons (first, next, last, etc), the newly added rows disappear. Is there a way I can remove the pager and re-add it? Or is there some other way to achieve this?

    Read the article

  • accessing embedded object with jquery not working in firefox 3.6

    - by taber
    Hi, this code in my plugin used to work just fine: jQuery('#embedded_obj', context).get(0).getVersion(); and in html... <object id="embedded_obj" type="application/x-versionchecker-1.0.0.1"</object Basically trying to get the properties from an embedded object. But it looks like get(0) is returning an html object instead of the actual embedded object. For example, if I do: var launcher = jQuery('#embedded_obj', context).get(0); for(prop in launcher){ alert(prop + ': ' + launcher[prop]); } ... it alerts things like "getElementByNode," "scrollWidth," "clientLeft," "clientTop" etc. Again this worked before Firefox 3.6. Has anyone else seen this or have any ideas/suggestions? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • funny behavior of jquery code

    - by user253530
    Funny thing is that if i delete the comment for alert(data[i].id) the code works. As it is in the example, the string is not concatenated thus i have no options in the select box. Hints? Help? var bookmarkingSites = ''; $.getJSON("php/socialbookmark-get-bookmarking-sites.php",function(data){ for(var i = 0; i < data.length; i++){ //alert( data[i].id); bookmarkingSites += '<option value = \"' + data[i].id + '\">' + data[i].title + '</option>'; } }); <some more code> -------> toAppend += '<td><select name="sb2" id="sb2">'+ '<option value="'+ data.results[i].bookmark +'">' + data.results[i].bookmark +'</option>' + bookmarkingSites + '</select></td>'; <some more code>

    Read the article

  • Tablesorter, Color rows depending on an specific value

    - by vikitor
    Hi all, I've been looking around for a solution to this thing but I haven't found anything similar to what I'm looking for. The thing is that I've got a table filled with data from a database, and what I want is to change the background colour of an specific row depending on a value of the class I'm loading in each row. The thing is that I have to display some data but as the fields to be displayed are quite a lot, I don't have more space to show an status field, so I would like to show the row in red if the status is inactive, and the rest of the rows in the normal color of the blue stylesheet. Is there a way to do that through tablesorter? I'm opened to suggestions, as I'm not sure how to do it. Thank you all in advance, Victor

    Read the article

  • How do I DRY up my CouchDB views?

    - by James A. Rosen
    What can I do to share code among views in CouchDB? Example 1 -- utility methods Jesse Hallett has some good utility methods, including function dot(attr) { return function(obj) { return obj[attr]; } } Array.prototype.map = function(func) { var i, r = [], for (i = 0; i < this.length; i += 1) { r[i] = func(this[i]); } return r; }; ... Where can I put this code so every view can access it? Example 2 -- constants Similarly for constants I use in my application. Where do I put MyApp = { A_CONSTANT = "..."; ANOTHER_CONSTANT = "..."; }; Example 3 -- filter of a filter: What if I want a one view that filters by "is this a rich person?": function(doc) { if (doc.type == 'person' && doc.net_worth > 1000000) { emit(doc.id, doc); } } and another that indexes by last name: function(doc) { if (doc.last_name) { emit(doc.last_name, doc); } } How can I combine them into a "rich people by last name" view? I sort of want the equivalent of the Ruby my_array.select { |x| x.person? }.select { |x| x.net_worth > 1,000,000 }.map { |x| [x.last_name, x] } How can I be DRYer?

    Read the article

  • Making an Ajax request to a page method in ASP.NET MVC 2

    - by JLago
    I'm trying to call a page method belonging to a MVC Controller from another site, by means of: $.ajax({ type: "GET", url: "http://localhost:54953/Home/ola", data: "", contentType: "application/json; charset=utf-8", dataType: "json", success: function(data) { console.log(data.Name); } }); the method code is as follows, really simple, just to test: public ActionResult ola() { return Json(new ActionInfo() { Name = "ola" },JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet); } I've seen this aproach being suggested here, and I actually like it a lot, should it work... When I run this, firebug gets a 200 OK, but the data received is null. I've tried a lot of different approaches, like having the data in text (wish grants me "(an empty string)" instead of just "null") or returning string in the server method... Can you tell me what am I doing wrong? Thank you in advance, João

    Read the article

  • Confirm box before closing a tab

    - by piemesons
    I want to have a confirm box when user tries to close the window. window.onbeforeunload = function (evt) { var message = 'Are you sure you want to leave, cause there are some unsaved changes?'; if (typeof evt == 'undefined') { evt = window.event; } if (evt ) { evt.returnValue = message; } return message; } The thing is i want to check a variables value var sncro=1; If its value is not equal to one then this confirmation box should be there..else no need to have a confirmation. I m not able to figure this..Its soo silly but i request anybody can have a look on the code. thnks.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509  | Next Page >