Search Results

Search found 39207 results on 1569 pages for 'foreign function interfac'.

Page 515/1569 | < Previous Page | 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522  | Next Page >

  • Quick question about jQuery selector content efficiency

    - by serg
    I am loading HTML page through ajax and then doing a bunch of searches using selectors: $.ajax({ ... dataType: "html", success: function(html) { $("#id1", html); $(".class", html); //... } } Should I extract $(html) into a variable and use it as a content, or it doesn't matter (from performance point)? success: function(html) { $html = $(html); $("#id1", $html); $(".class", $html); //... }

    Read the article

  • MySQL Date_Format based on today's date and another column?

    - by JM4
    I am aware of the MySQL Date_Format function but am looking to achieve the following: I have on column with a day date in 2 digit format (01-30). I am trying to update another date formatted field with the current year, the next month (m+1) and the day field mentioned previously. In PHP i would do this using mktime function but this must be done using mysql calls only. Is it possible to transform in this way?

    Read the article

  • how to access objects in run-time in qtp?

    - by Onnesh
    We have a function which accesses two types of controls like button and list box in standard windows app. The function uses only the control name as arguments, so there is no way qtp could understand what type of control it is. how to resolve this? Write 2 separate functions- 1 for button & another for list box?

    Read the article

  • How to get points that intersect the treadline?

    - by chutsu
    Basically I did the Cavendish experiment, and I have a damped sinusoidal wave plotted on Excel. With Position (mm) against Time (s). My problem is that I have added a tread line through the wave function, and wish to calculate the points of which the wave function intersects the tread line. From this I will then be able to calculate the time period. At the moment I'm just having difficulty getting the intersects.. Thanks

    Read the article

  • order array containing text and numbers

    - by ptrn
    I'm looking for the easiest way to sort an array that consists of numbers and text, and a combination of these. E.g. '123asd' '19asd' '12345asd' 'asd123' 'asd12' turns into '19asd' '123asd' '12345asd' 'asd12' 'asd123' This is going to be used in combination with the solution to another question I've asked here. The sorting function in itself works, what I need is a function that can say that that '19asd' is smaller than '123asd'. I'm writing this in JavaScript.

    Read the article

  • Jquery validation on click event instead of on submit

    - by Mazzi
    I looked all around SOF but no luck to find me answer. It is either too easy or the answer is not just there. What I simply need to do is to validate the form when my <img id='submit'/> is clicked and submit it afterwards. $(document).ready(function(){ $('#submit').click(function() { }); // Validation $('#suzuki_scb').validate({ // My Rules and Messages! }); });

    Read the article

  • Can Prototype or JQuery return an HTTP status code on an AJAX request

    - by jotto
    url = "http://example.com" new Ajax.Request(url, { onComplete: function(transport) { alert(transport.status); } }); I'd like that to return a status of 200 if the site is working, or 500 if it is not working, etc.. But that code is returning 0 all the time. Ultimately, I want to have a setinterval function that regularly pings a website for uptime status.

    Read the article

  • jQuery nextUntill id < num or alternative

    - by Volmar
    Hi, i'm using jQuery to show/hide different LI-elements based on their classes. Look at this example. <li id="1" class="fp de1"></li> <li id="2" class="fp de1"><button onclick="hide(2,2);"></li> <li id="3" class="fp de2"><button onclick="hide(3,3);"></li> <li id="4" class="fp de3"><button onclick="hide(4,4);"></li> <li id="5" class="fp de4"></li> <li id="6" class="fp de3"></li> <li id="7" class="fp de3"></li> <li id="8" class="fp de1"><button onclick="hide(8,2);"></li> <li id="9" class="fp de2"><button onclick="hide(9,3);"></li> <li id="10" class="fp de3"><button onclick="hide(10,4);"></li> <li id="11" class="fp de4"></li> You se that some of these have a button with a hide funcion. what i want is that when you press the hide button The following elements the have a highernumber in the .de# class should be hidden untill it reaches a LI with the same .de#-class. so if you press the hide(), i want LIs with ids 3,4,5,6,7 to be hiden. if i press the next on i want 4,5,6,7, and the thirs i want id 5 to be hidden. so this is the Javascript i made for it: function hide(id,de){ var de2 = de-1; $('#'+id).nextUntil('li.de'+de2).hide(); } The problem is that this function is not working exactly as i want. it would work correctly in the first hide()-function and the thirs but not in hide()function number two. here it will hide IDs: 4-8. so i want to do something. so i want the nextuntill() to hide elements untill it reaches a LI-element with the same .de# or a lower .de#. i hope i didn't complicate it to much in my description of the problem. if you have better idea than using nextUntill i'm all ears.

    Read the article

  • applying apply() to deeply embeded list elements only

    - by romunov
    I would like to apply my function to only elements that are deeper in the list structure. For example, I would like to apply a certain function to list elements of second order only. Is this feasible with apply()? > str(l) List of 3 $ :List of 2 ..$ : num 5 ..$ : num 10 $ :List of 2 ..$ : num 15 ..$ : num 20 $ :List of 2 ..$ : num 25 ..$ : num 30

    Read the article

  • is it possible that a greasemonkey script can work on one computer but not on another?

    - by plastic cloud
    i'm writing an greasemonkey script for somebody else. he is a moderator and i am not. and the script will help him do some moderating things. now the script works for me. as far as it can work for me.(as i am not a mod) but even those things that work for me are not working for him.. i checked his version of greasemonkey plugin and firefox and he is up to date. only thing that's really different is that i'm on a mac and he is pc, but i wouldn't think that would be any problem. this is one of the functions that is not working for him. he does gets the first and third GM_log message. but not the second one ("got some(1) .."). kmmh.trackNames = function(){ GM_log("starting to get names from the first "+kmmh.topAmount+" page(s) from leaderboard."); kmmh.leaderboardlist = []; for (var p=1; p<=(kmmh.topAmount); p++){ var page = "http://www.somegamesite.com/leaderboard?page="+ p; var boardHTML = ""; dojo.xhrGet({ url: page, sync: true, load: function(response){ boardHTML = response; GM_log("got some (1) => "+boardHTML.length); }, handleAs: "text" }); GM_log("got some (2) => "+boardHTML.length); //create dummy div and place leaderboard html in there var dummy = dojo.create('div', { innerHTML: boardHTML }); //search through it var searchN = dojo.query('.notcurrent', dummy).forEach(function(node,index){ if(index >= 10){ kmmh.leaderboardlist.push(node.textContent); // add names to array } }); } GM_log("all names from "+ kmmh.topAmount +" page(s) of leaderboard ==> "+ kmmh.leaderboardlist); does anyone have any idea what could be causing this ?? EDIT: i know i had to write according to what he would see on his mod screen. so i asked him to copy paste source of pages and so on. and besides that, this part of the script is not depending on being a mod or not. i got everything else working for him. just this function still doesn't on neither of his pc's.

    Read the article

  • Improved way to build nested array of unique values in javascript

    - by dualmon
    The setup: I have a nested html table structure that displays hierarchical data, and the individual rows can be hidden or shown by the user. Each row has a dom id that is comprised of the level number plus the primary key for the record type on that level. I have to have both, because each level is from a different database table, so the primary key alone is not unique in the dom. example: id="level-1-row-216" I am storing the levels and rows of the visible elements in a cookie, so that when the page reloads the same rows the user had open are can be shown automatically. I don't store the full map of dom ids, because I'm concerned about it getting too verbose, and I want to keep my cookie under 4Kb. So I convert the dom ids to a compact json object like this, with one property for each level, and a unique array of primary keys under each level: { 1:[231,432,7656], 2:[234,121], 3:[234,2], 4:[222,423], 5:[222] } With this structure stored in a cookie, I feed it to my show function and restore the user's previous disclosure state when the page loads. The area for improvement: I'm looking for better option for reducing my map of id selectors down to this compact format. Here is my function: function getVisibleIds(){ // example dom id: level-1-row-216-sub var ids = $("tr#[id^=level]:visible").map(function() { return this.id; }); var levels = {}; for(var i in ids ) { var id = ids[i]; if (typeof id == 'string'){ if (id.match(/^level/)){ // here we extract the number for level and row var level = id.replace(/.*(level-)(\d*)(.*)/, '$2'); var row = id.replace(/.*(row-)(\d*)(.*)/, '$2'); // *** Improvement here? *** // This works, but it seems klugy. In PHP it's one line (see below): if(levels.hasOwnProperty(level)){ if($.inArray(parseInt(row, 10) ,levels[level]) == -1){ levels[level].push(parseInt(row, 10)); } } else { levels[level] = [parseInt(row, 10)]; } } } } return levels; } If I were doing it in PHP, I'd build the compact array like this, but I can't figure it out in javascript: foreach($ids as $id) { if (/* the criteria */){ $level = /* extract it from $id */; $row = /* extract it from $id */; $levels[$level][$row]; } }

    Read the article

  • jQuery - Form input return confirm to delete

    - by bruno
    hello guys. I struggled a lot before posting here :) now, I want to replace my default javascript confirmation for deleting a file. I saw a lot of examples here, but no example with form input. Now I have his form: <form action="delete.php" method="post"> <input type="hidden" name="id" value="<{$pid}>" /> <input type="hidden" name="picture" value="<{$lang_del_pic}>" /> <input type="image" src="<{xoImgUrl}>img/del-icon.gif" width="16" height="16" align="bottom" border="0" alt="Delete media" name="pictured" value="<{$lang_del_pic}>" onclick="javascript: return confirm('<{$lang_confirm_del}>');" /> </form> Now, I did everything, I have this div: <div id="dialog-confirm" title="Empty the recycle bin?"> <p><span class="ui-icon ui-icon-alert" style="float:left; margin:0 7px 20px 0;"></span>These items will be permanently deleted and cannot be recovered. Are you sure?</p> </div> this javascript: <script type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function() { $("#dialog").dialog({ autoOpen: false, modal: true }); }); $(".confirmLink").click(function(e) { e.preventDefault(); var targetUrl = $(this).attr("href"); $("#dialog").dialog({ buttons : { "Confirm" : function() { window.location.href = targetUrl; }, "Cancel" : function() { $(this).dialog("close"); } } }); $("#dialog").dialog("open"); }); </script> and this new form: <form name="dialog-confirm" id="dialog-confirm" method="post"> <input type="hidden" name="id" value="<{$pid}>" /> <input type="hidden" name="picture" value="<{$lang_del_pic}>" /> <input type="image" src="<{xoImgUrl}>img/del-icon.gif" width="16" height="16" align="bottom" border="0" alt="Delete media" name="pictured" value="" id="opener" /> </form> On press, I call successfuly the jQuery modal diolog, and everything works, but somehow, when I press 'delete all' the script tells me - "the script is called without the necessary parameters" Now I guess I am failig to send the pic ID to be deleted with the jQuery, .. but do not know how to fix it. Any ideas ?

    Read the article

  • Why doesn't my javascript work after AJAX filling the HTML?

    - by alex
    $.ajax({ method:"get", url:"/details/", data:"id="+id, beforeSend:function(){ }, success:function(html){ $("#holder").html(html); } }); After I fill a div with a HTML from an AJAX call, this is my javascript at the top of /details/ <script type="text/javascript"> alert('hi'); </script> MY DETAILS HTML CONTENT GOES HERE But it's not working

    Read the article

  • Jquery child elements

    - by Anton
    When I add event handler to a some elements using query: $('div').mouseover(function () { }); how can I check inside this function next: Have this "DIV"child elements "DIV"? Have this "DIV" child element "DIV" whith height more than 300?

    Read the article

  • Message passing chrome extension

    - by Mayur Kataria
    I wants to create an extension where content script will send message to background page and then on browser action means clicking on extension icon will access that background page and get some data.I am using chrome Version 23.0.1271.64 m on windows8. I am getting following error. Port error: Could not establish connection. Receiving end does not exist. I tried to solve the same. but people are using sendRequest which is not supported by chrome20+. i also found solution mentioned for chrome 20+. But not working. Please help. Below is the file contents. manifest.json { "name": "Test Extension", "version": "1.0", "manifest_version": 2, "description": "A test extension.", "background": "background.html", "content_scripts": [ { "matches": ["<all_urls>"], "js": ["jquery.js","content.js"] } ], "permissions": ["tabs", "http://*/", "https://*/"], "browser_action": { "default_icon": "icon.png", "default_popup": "popup.html" } } background.html <html> <head> <script src="background.js"></script> </head> <body> <h1>Wy</h1> </body> </html> background.js chrome.extension.onMessage.addListener(function(request, sender, sendResponse) { // Chrome 20+ alert(request); console.log('received in listener'); sendResponse({farewell: "goodbye"}); }); content.js $(function(){ console.log('start-sending message'); chrome.extension.sendMessage({greeting: "hello"},function(response){alert(response);}); console.log('end-sending message'); }); popup.html <!doctype html> <html> <head> <title>Getting Started Extension's Popup</title> </style> <!-- JavaScript and HTML must be in separate files for security. --> <script src="jquery.js"></script> <script src="popup.js"></script> </head> <body> </body> </html> popup.js $(function(){ var str_html = "<tr><td width='60%'>S</td><td width='40%'>15</td></tr><tr><td width='60%'>M</td><td width='40%'>25</td></tr>"; $('#sizes_container').html(str_html); var bkg = chrome.extension.getBackgroundPage(); console.log(bkg); });

    Read the article

  • Should we use temporary variables for the returned values of functions?

    - by totymedli
    I thought about this: Is there a performance difference in these two practices: Store the return value of a function in a temporary variable than give that variable as a parameter to another function. Put the function into the other function. Specification Assuming all classes and functions are written correctly. Case 1. ClassA a = function1(); ClassB b = function2(a); function3(b); Case 2. function3(function2(function1())); I know there aren't a big difference with only one run, but supposed that we could run this a lot of times in a loop, I created some tests. Test #include <iostream> #include <ctime> #include <math.h> using namespace std; int main() { clock_t start = clock(); clock_t ends = clock(); // Case 1. start = clock(); for (int i=0; i<10000000; i++) { double a = cos(1); double b = pow(a, 2); sqrt(b); } ends = clock(); cout << (double) (ends - start) / CLOCKS_PER_SEC << endl; // Case 2. start = clock(); for (int i=0; i<10000000; i++) sqrt(pow(cos(1),2)); ends = clock(); cout << (double) (ends - start) / CLOCKS_PER_SEC << endl; return 0; } Results Case 1 = 6.375 Case 2 = 0.031 Why is the first one is much slower, and if the second one is faster why dont we always write code that way? Anyway does the second pratice has a name? I also wondered what happens if I create the variables outside the for loop in the first case, but the result was the same. Why?

    Read the article

  • Getting an array back from php using $.ajax

    - by Wurlitzer
    A php script is giving this array (which has been passed through json_encode()) [{name:"a1",path:"b1"},{name:"a2",path:"b2"}] I use the following function to retrieve the array to jquery: $.ajax({ type: "POST", url: "functions.php", data: "action=" + something, cache: false, success: function(response) { alert(response); } }); The problem is I get the array back as a string: (new String("[{name:"a1",path:"b1"},{name:"a2",path:"b2"}}]")) How can I get it to be a javascript array? Help would be much appreciated.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522  | Next Page >