Search Results

Search found 18648 results on 746 pages for 'left join'.

Page 53/746 | < Previous Page | 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60  | Next Page >

• How to make custom join query with Django ?

  - by xRobot

  I have these 2 models: genre = ( ('D', 'Dramatic'), ('T', 'Thriller'), ('L', 'Love'), ) class Book(models.Model): title = models.CharField(max_length=100) genre = models.CharField(max_length=1, choices=genre) class Author(models.Model): user = models.ForeignKey(User, unique=True) born = models.DateTimeField('born') book = models.ForeignKey(Book) I need to retrieve first_name and last_name of all authors of dramatic's books. How can I do this in django ?

  Read the article

• Join column with different collation issue

  - by George2

  Hello everyone, I am using SQL Server 2005. I have two tables, and they are using different collations. It is not allowed to concatenate columns from tables with different collations, for example the following SQL is not allowed, select table1column1 + table2column2 from ... My question is, why concatenation of two columns from different collations is not allowed from database engine design perspective? I do not know why collation will impact results, the result is just concatenating strings -- should be simple enough and not dependent on collation... thanks in advance, George

  Read the article

• Join collection of objects into comma-separated string

  - by Helen Toomik

  In many places in our code we have collections of objects, from which we need to create a comma-separated list. The type of collection varies: it may be a DataTable from which we need a certain column, or a List<Customer>, etc. Now we loop through the collection and use string concatenation, for example: string text = ""; string separator = ""; foreach (DataRow row in table.Rows) { text += separator + row["title"]; separator = ", "; } Is there a better pattern for this? Ideally I would like an approach we could reuse by just sending in a function to get the right field/property/column from each object.

  Read the article

• mysql prevent displaying a row ONE which has reference in another row TWO but no reference in row THREE

  - by Jayapal Chandran

  I have a table like the following id | name | pid 1 | sam | NULL 2 | sams ref | 1 3 | pam | NULL For the first time the first row gets inserted which will have pid as null I insert a row which is related to the first row and then i insert a row which is new and which may be referred by another row in future. now i want only the third row to be displayed and not the first and second row as the second row contains the reference of first row. so if any row has a reference to another row then both the rows should not be displayed. Only rows which is not having any reference should be displayed. BESIDES, IS IT A GOOD PRACTICE? PLEASE ADVICE ON THIS. Edited When i updated in server the query is always giving empty result. here is what i have and this one When pid is NULL then that row should appear but when another entry in the same table with pid as its parent id or any other rows id appears then both the rows should not appear. so if any pid has been referred then both the rows should not appear. here only one row will refer another row and not more than that. in my localhost i have mysql version 5.0.1 or something like that but when i installed xampp in another system it had 5.5 and in the live server it was 5.3 so in version around 5.0 the query is returning rows but in higher versions it is returning empty rows. so now i this case how to make a query?

  Read the article

• MongoDB-PHP: JOIN-like query

  - by mdm414

  Here are the objects: courses { "name" : "Biology", "_id" : ObjectId("4b0552b0f0da7d1eb6f126a1") } students { "name" : "Joe", "classes" : [ { "$ref" : "courses", "$id" : ObjectId("4b0552b0f0da7d1eb6f126a1") } ], "_id" : ObjectId("4b0552e4f0da7d1eb6f126a2") } Using the PHP Mongo Class, how do I get all the students that has a biology course? Thanks

  Read the article

• Grails - Self Join

  - by WaZ

  Hi, When I write the following class, I get the following compilation error: could not resolve property How can I achive the following: class Employee{ String Name String Email Employee Manager static hasMany = [desginations:Designation] static constraints = { Name(unique:true) Email(unique:true) } Thanks, Much appreciated.

  Read the article

• DB2 SQL count in join or where clause

  - by Pat

  This is probably an amateur question but I'm an amateur ! ;o) I have several tables: Account table, Officer table, Location table, Web table... The Officer table doesn't give me the number of officers per account. I need to retrieve only the accounts that have more than 20 officers. Should I use the COUNT ? If so, how ? Your help is greatly appreciated. Thanks. Pat

  Read the article

• SQL Join Problem

  - by Harley

  Table one contains ID|Name 1 Mary 2 John Table two contains ID|Color 1 Red 1 Blue 2 Green 2 Blue 2 Black I want to end up with is ID|Name|Red|Blue|Green|Black 1 Mary    Y      Y 2 John            Y        Y       Y Thanks for and help.

  Read the article

• What are appropriate ways to represent relationships between people in a database table?

  - by Emilio

  I've got a table of people - an ID primary key and a name. In my application, people can have 0 or more real-world relationships with other people, so Jack might "work for" Jane and Tom might "replace" Tony and Bob might "be an employee of" Rob and Bob might also "be married to" Mary. What's the best way to represent this in the database? A many to many intersect table? A series of self joins? A relationship table with one row per relationship pair and type, where I insert records for the relationship in both directions?

  Read the article

• Many-to-Many Relationships in MySQL

  - by Kaji

  I've been reading up on foreign keys and joins recently, and have been pleasantly surprised that many of the basic concepts are things I'm already putting into practice. For example, with one project I'm currently working on, I'm organizing word lists, and have a table for the sets, like so: `words` Table `word_id` `headword` `category_id` `categories` Table `category_id` `category_name` Now, generally speaking this would be a one-to-many relationship, with several words being placed under a single category with the foreign key category_id. Let's assume for a moment, however, that a user chooses to add another category to a word, making it many-to-many—Is there a way to set up my words table to handle additional categories for words without creating extra columns like category_2, category_3, etc.?

  Read the article

• SQLite join selection from the same table using reference from another table

  - by daikini

  I have two tables: table: points |key_id | name | x | y | ------------------------ |1 | A |10 |20 | |2 | A_1 |11 |21 | |3 | B |30 |40 | |4 | B_1 |31 |42 | table: pairs |f_key_p1 | f_key_p2 | ---------------------- |1 | 2 | |3 | 4 | Table 'pairs' defines which rows in table 'points' should be paired. How can I query database to select paired rows? My desired query result would be like this: |name_1|x_1|x_2|name_2|x_2|y_2| ------------------------------- |A |10 |20 |A_1 |11 |21 | |B |30 |40 |B_1 |31 |41 |

  Read the article

• HABTM and belongsTo at the same join, cakePhp

  - by Cynthia

  Hello everyone. I have a model Fix with a relationship HABTM Device model. Device model has a belongsTo to Device_type model, like this, for only getting the device type name: var $belongsTo = array('Device_type'=>array('fields'=>'name')); So, I need every Fix, its devices and its Device_types. When I make a Fix->find('all', array('recursive' => 2)) I expect to get every Device related to Fix (this works ok) and ALSO for every device, its Device_type.name (which is not working). This is what I get instead for every Device in the result (an empty array): ["Device_type"]=> array(0) { } Besides this, when I make this query for testing: Fix->Device->find('all'), it returns the current Device_type.names for every device related to fixes, which means models are related propertly. Any help? Thanks.

  Read the article

• Showing all rows for keys with more than one row

  - by Leif Neland

  Table kal id integer primary key init char 4 indexed job char4 id init job --+----+------ 1 | aa | job1 2 | aa | job2 3 | bb | job1 4 | cc | job3 5 | cc | job5 I want to show all rows where init has more than one row id init job --+----+------ 1 | aa | job1 2 | aa | job2 4 | cc | job3 5 | cc | job5 I tried select * from kal where init in (select init from kal group by init having count(init)2); Actually, the table has 60000 rows, and the query was count(init)<40, but it takes humongus time, phpmyadmin and my patience runs out. Both select init from kal group by init having count(init)2) and select * from kal where init in ('aa','bb','cc') runs in "no time", less than 0.02 seconds. I've tried different subqueries, but all takes "infinite" time, more than a few minutes; I've actually never let them finish. Leif

  Read the article

• How to make an entity out of a join table without primary key

  - by tputkonen

  I'm trying to generate JPA entities out of an existing database having an "interesting" design. Database has a table called UserSet, which can have links to several other UserSets. There is a one to many relation between UserSets and LinkedUserSets. LinkedUserSets also has one to one relation to UserSets. I tried to generate a JPA Entity out of the database structure using Dali JPA Tools. The resulting entity Linkeduserset misses @Id or @EmbeddedId annotation and thus failes to compile. As the resulting entity contains only two @JoinColumns (which cannot be marked as @Id), I have not so far found a way around this issue. Database structure can not be modified in any way. Is there a way to overcome this somehow? Relevant pars of create table statements: CREATE TABLE `LinkedUserSets` ( `UsrSetID` INT(11) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0' , `ChildID` INT(11) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0' , CONSTRAINT `fk_LinkedUserSets_UserSet1` FOREIGN KEY (`UsrSetID` ) REFERENCES `UserSet` (`UsrSetID` )); CREATE TABLE `UserSet` ( `UsrSetID` INT(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT , PRIMARY KEY (`UsrSetID`), CONSTRAINT `fk_UserSet_LinkedUserSets1` FOREIGN KEY (`UsrSetID` ) REFERENCES `LinkedUserSets` (`ChildID` )); Generated entities: @Entity @Table(name="linkedusersets") public class Linkeduserset { //bi-directional many-to-one association to Userset @ManyToOne @JoinColumn(name="UsrSetID") private Userset userset1; //bi-directional one-to-one association to Userset @OneToOne @JoinColumn(name="ChildID") private Userset userset2; } @Entity @Table(name="userset") public class Userset { private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L; @Id @Column(name="UsrSetID") private int jngSetID; //bi-directional many-to-one association to Linkeduserset @OneToMany(mappedBy="userset1") private Set<Linkeduserset> linkedusersets; //bi-directional one-to-one association to Linkeduserset @OneToOne(mappedBy="userset2") private Linkeduserset linkeduserset; } Error message: Entity "Linkeduserset" has no Id or EmbeddedId

  Read the article

• SQL Server Select Distinct

  - by homam

  I want to write a query like this: For a table that has these columns: ColA ColB ColC, ColD select first(ColA, ColB, ColC, ColD) distinct(ColB, ColC) from table order by ColD The query is supposed to order the table by ColD, then group the results by the combination of ColB and ColC (they may have different data types) and returns the first rows (with all the columns of the table) in the groups. How is it possible in MS SQL Server 2005?

  Read the article

• SQL Query syntax, I want to use INNER JOIN

  - by amol kadam

  Hi . I'm working on a windows application project using front end "vb.net" & back end "Ms Access" I have problem in wrinting sql query Actually there are 5 tables Transaction,items,itemtitle,itemtype & userinfo. check the following query & with this referance if u get idea then plz change in correct query Thanking You SELECT TRANSACTIONS.ACCESSIONNO AS ACCESSIONNO,TRANSACTIONS.TYPEID, TRANSACTIONS.CHECKOUTDATE AS CHECKOUTDATE,ITEMTITLE.ITEMTITLE, TRANSACTIONS.CHECKEDOUTBY, USERINFO.FULLNAME_ENG, USERINFO.FULLNAME_MAR, TRANSACTIONS.ACCOUNTNO, ITEMTYPE.TYPES_MAR, ITEMTYPE.TYPES_ENG FROM TRANSACTIONS,ITEMTYPE, ITEMTITLE, USERINFO WHERE TRANSACTIONS.ACCOUNTNO=USERINFO.ACCOUNTNO AND TRANSACTIONS.ACCESSIONNO=ITEMS.ACCESSIONNO AND ITEMS.ITEMTITLEID=ITEMTITLE.ITEMTITLEID AND TRANSACTIONS.TYPEID=ITEMTYPE.TYPEID AND TRANSACTIONS.STATUS='Enabled'

  Read the article

• Minimizing SQL queries using join with one-to-many relationship

  - by Brian

  So let me preface this by saying that I'm not an SQL wizard by any means. What I want to do is simple as a concept, but has presented me with a small challenge when trying to minimize the amount of database queries I'm performing. Let's say I have a table of departments. Within each department is a list of employees. What is the most efficient way of listing all the departments and which employees are in each department. So for example if I have a department table with: id name 1 sales 2 marketing And a people table with: id department_id name 1 1 Tom 2 1 Bill 3 2 Jessica 4 1 Rachel 5 2 John What is the best way list all departments and all employees for each department like so: Sales Tom Bill Rachel Marketing Jessica John Pretend both tables are actually massive. (I want to avoid getting a list of departments, and then looping through the result and doing an individual query for each department). Think similarly of selecting the statuses/comments in a Facebook-like system, when statuses and comments are stored in separate tables.

  Read the article

• Vertically Merge Multiple Tables in MySQL by Joint Primary Key

  - by world

  Hello, I'll attempt to make my question as clear as possible. I'm fairly unexperienced with SQL, only know the really basic queries. In order to have a better idea I'd been reading the MySQL manual for the past few days, but I couldn't really find a concrete solution and my needs are quite specific. I've got 3 MySQL MyISAM tables: table1, table2 and table3. Each table has an ID column (ID, ID2, ID3 respectively), and different data columns. For example table1 has [ID, Name, Birthday, Status, ...] columns, table2 has [ID2, Country, Zip, ...], table3 has [ID3, Source, Phone, ...] you get the idea. The ID, ID2, ID3 columns are common to all three tables... if there's an ID value in table1 it will also appear in table2 and table3. The number of rows in these tables is identical, about 10m rows in each table. What I'd like to do is create a new table that contains (most of) the columns of all three tables and merge them into it. The dates, for instance, must be converted because right now they're in VARCHAR YYYYMMDD format. Reading the MySQL manual I figured STR_TO_DATE() would do the job, but I don't know how to write the query itself in the first place so I have no idea how to integrate the date conversion. So basically, after I create the new table (which I do know how to do), how can I merge the three tables into it, integrating into the query the date conversion?

  Read the article

• limiting consecutive values of one column in a sql query.

  - by Brad Smith

  I have a table with the following structure: id -int(11) event_id -int(11) photo_id -int(11) created_at -datetime How do I write a query that will return the 100 most recent rows, but insuring that there are no more than 4 consecutive rows with the same value in photo_id

  Read the article

• Porting join from Oracle to Postgres

  - by Grasper

  INSERT INTO MISSION_OBJECTIVE( MSN_INT_ID, MO_INT_ID, MO_MSN_CLASS_NM, MO_MSN_CLASS_CD, MO_MSN_TYPE, MO_PRIORITY, MO_COMMENT, MO_START_DT, MO_END_DT, ASP_AIRSPACE_NM, MO_OBJ_LOCATION, MO_ALO_LEG_ID, MO_ALO_ARRIVE_LOC) SELECT '1025', '1', 'AIRDROP', 'ADP', 'LAPES', NULL, COALESCE( NULL, ' '), TO_TIMESTAMP( '1002260900', 'YYMMDDHH24MI'), TO_TIMESTAMP( '1002260915', 'YYMMDDHH24MI'), 'TRANSIT ALPHA', 'TRANSIT ALPHA', '1', 'TRANSIT ALPHA' FROM AIRSPACE ASP, apsmain .MISSION_CLASS MC WHERE ASP.ASP_AIRSPACE_NM(+)= 'TRANSIT ALPHA' AND MC.MCS_MISSION_CLASS_NAME= 'AIRDROP' AND 'TRANSIT ALPHA' IS NOT NULL Is that exactly the same as: INSERT INTO MISSION_OBJECTIVE( MSN_INT_ID, MO_INT_ID, MO_MSN_CLASS_NM, MO_MSN_CLASS_CD, MO_MSN_TYPE, MO_PRIORITY, MO_COMMENT, MO_START_DT, MO_END_DT, ASP_AIRSPACE_NM, MO_OBJ_LOCATION, MO_ALO_LEG_ID, MO_ALO_ARRIVE_LOC) SELECT '1025', '1', 'AIRDROP', 'ADP', 'LAPES', NULL, COALESCE( NULL, ' '), TO_TIMESTAMP( '1002260900', 'YYMMDDHH24MI'), TO_TIMESTAMP( '1002260915', 'YYMMDDHH24MI'), 'TRANSIT ALPHA', 'TRANSIT ALPHA', '1', 'TRANSIT ALPHA' FROM AIRSPACE ASP, apsmain .MISSION_CLASS MC WHERE ASP.ASP_AIRSPACE_NM = 'TRANSIT ALPHA' AND MC.MCS_MISSION_CLASS_NAME= 'AIRDROP' AND 'TRANSIT ALPHA' IS NOT NULL I just deleted the (+). The part that is confusing me is that ASP.ASP_AIRSPACE_NM is being right joined to a constant.

  Read the article

• SQL How to join multiplue columns with same name to one column

  - by Choi Shun Chi

  There is a super class account {User, TYPE} and subclasses saving{User, ID, balance,TYPE,interest,curency_TYPE} time{User,ID,balance,TYPE,interest,curency_TYPE,start_date,due_date,period} fore{User,ID,balance,interest,curency_TYPE} User and TYPE is the primary key of account and foreign key of three subclasses ID is primary key of three subclasses how to make a list of showing all IDs in one column?Also the same as balance and TYPE meet the problem I considered a.ID as saving, b.ID as time but it showing them separately

  Read the article

• Is there a LINQ equivalent of string.Join(string, string[])

  - by mdresser

  Is there any way to convert a collection of objects into a single new object using LINQ? I want to use this within another LINQ to SQL expression.

  Read the article

• MySQL query pulling from two tables, display in correct fields

  - by Matt Nathanson

  I'm trying to select all fields in two separate tables as long as they're sharing a common ID. //mysql query $result = mysql_query("SELECT * FROM project, links WHERE project.id = links.id and project.id = $clientID") //displaying the link if ($row['url'] != null){ echo "<div class='clientsection' id='links'>Links</div>"; echo "<a class='clientlink' id='link1' href='" . $row['url'] . "'>" . $row['name'] . "</a>"; } else { echo "<a class='clientlink' id='link1' href='" . $row['url'] . "' style='display:none;'>" . $row['name'] . "</a>"; }; As you can see, my tables are "projects", and "links" Each is sharing a common field "id" for reference. It looks as though where both links.id and project.id are equal, it outputs anything, but when there is no links.id associated with a given $clientID the container relative to the $clientID doesn't display at all. Essentially I'm using this to add links dynamically to a specific client in this CMS and if there are no links, I want the container to show up anyway. Hopefully I've expressed myself clearly, any pointers in the right direction are appreciated. Thanks!

  Read the article

• SQL to join to the best matching row

  - by williamjones

  I have a wiki system where there is a central table, Article, that has many Revisions in their own table. The Revisions each contain a created_at time and date column. I want to update the Articles to contain a denormalized field sort_name from the most recent Revision's name field. What SQL command can I issue to fill in each Article's sort_name field with its most recent Revision's name field? For what it's worth, I'm on PostgreSQL.

  Read the article

• Nhibernate join on a table twice

  - by Zuber

  Consider the following Class structure... public class ListViewControl { public int SystemId {get; set;} public List<ControlAction> Actions {get; set;} public List<ControlAction> ListViewActions {get; set;} } public class ControlAction { public string blahBlah {get; set;} } I want to load class ListViewControl eagerly using NHibernate. The mapping using Fluent is as shown below public UIControlMap() { Id(x => x.SystemId); HasMany(x => x.Actions) .KeyColumn("ActionId") .Cascade.AllDeleteOrphan() .AsBag() .Cache.ReadWrite().IncludeAll(); HasMany(x => x.ListViewActions) .KeyColumn("ListViewActionId") .Cascade.AllDeleteOrphan() .AsBag() .Cache.ReadWrite().IncludeAll(); } This is how I am trying to load it eagerly var baseActions = DetachedCriteria.For<ListViewControl>() .CreateCriteria("Actions", JoinType.InnerJoin) .SetFetchMode("BlahBlah", FetchMode.Eager) .SetResultTransformer(new DistinctRootEntityResultTransformer()); var listViewActions = DetachedCriteria.For<ListViewControl>() .CreateCriteria("ListViewActions", JoinType.InnerJoin) .SetFetchMode("BlahBlah", FetchMode.Eager) .SetResultTransformer(new DistinctRootEntityResultTransformer()); var listViews = DetachedCriteria.For<ListViewControl>() .SetFetchMode("Actions", FetchMode.Eager) .SetFetchMode("ListViewActions",FetchMode.Eager) .SetResultTransformer(new DistinctRootEntityResultTransformer()); var result = _session.CreateMultiCriteria() .Add("listViewActions", listViewActions) .Add("baseActions", baseActions) .Add("listViews", listViews) .SetResultTransformer(new DistinctRootEntityResultTransformer()) .GetResult("listViews"); Now, my problem is that the class ListViewControl get the correct records in both Actions and ListViewActions, but there are multiple entries of the same record. The number of records is equal to the number of joins made to the ControlAction table, in this case two. How can I avoid this? If I remove the SetFetchMode from the listViews query, the actions are loaded lazily through a proxy which I don't want.

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60  | Next Page >