Search Results

Search found 45316 results on 1813 pages for 'class literals'.

Page 551/1813 | < Previous Page | 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558  | Next Page >

• Java how does Key Event Handling Mechanism(KeyListeners notified) work ?

  - by Carbonizer

  How does application/JVM know which classes if implemented key handling interfaces ? Does it use java Reflections or does it check all the classes for methods ? How can a application or executing JVM understanding to deliver the user event or call the specific methods on a class that implemented the keylistener interface. Does it look at all the classes if those methods are implemented or how does it know which classes implmented keylistener interface ? If you dont implement the keylistener Interface for a class but still implmentation all its methods. Do the class still process the user event occurred ?

  Read the article

• When can we mock an object and its methods?

  - by Shailendra

  I am novice to the Moq and unit testing. I have to write unit tests to a lot of classes which has the objects of other classes. can i mock the methods of the class objects. Here is the exact scenerio- I have a class two classes A and B and A has a private object of B and in a method of A i am internally calling the method of B and then doing some calculation and returning the result. Can i mock the method of B in this scenerio? Please try to give me full detail about the conditions where i can mock the methods and functions of the class. Thanx

  Read the article

• does anyone see any issues with this thread pattern?

  - by prmatta

  Here is a simple thread pattern that I use when writing a class that needs just one thread, and needs to a specific task. The usual requirements for such a class are that it should be startable, stopable and restartable. Does anyone see any issues with this pattern that I use? public class MyThread implements Runnable { private boolean _exit = false; private Thread _thread = null; public void start () { if (_thread == null) { _thread = new Thread(this, "MyThread"); _thread.start(); } } public void run () { while (_exit) { //do something } } public void stop () { _exit = true; if (_thread != null) { _thread.interrupt(); _thread = null; } } } I am looking for comments around if I am missing something, or if there is a better way to write this.

  Read the article

• TypeError: object not callable when making instance

  - by TSM

  I've searched around other threads with similar questions, but I'm not finding the answer. Basically, I have a class: import Android_Class class Android_Revision(object): def __init__(self): # dict for storing the classes in this revision # (format {name : classObject}): self.Classes = {} self.WorkingClass = Android_Class() self.RevisionNumber = '' def __call__(self): print "Called" def make_Class(self, name): newClass = Android_Class(name) self.Classes.update({name : newClass}) self.WorkingClass = newClass def set_Class(self, name): if not(self.Classes.has_key(name)): newClass = Android_Class(name) self.Classes.update({name : newClass}) self.WorkingClass = self.Classes.get(name) I'm trying to make an instance of this class: Revision = Android_Revision() and that's when I'm getting the error. I'm confused because I have another situation where I'm doing almost the exact same thing, and it's working fine. I can't figure out what differences between the two would lead to this error. Thanks.

  Read the article

• Programming to interfaces while mapping with Fluent NHibernate.

  - by Lucious

  Fluent Mapping I Have the following scenario public class CustomerMap : ClassMap { public CustomerMap() { Table("Customer"); Id(c = c.Id); Map(c = c.Name); HasMany(c = c.Orders); } } public class OrderMap : ClassMap<IOrder> { public OrderMap() { Table("Orders"); References(o => o.Customer).Access.; Id(o => o.Id); Map(o => o.DateCreated); } } Problems When schema exported the order table has two columns ICustomer_Id,Customer_Id. refers to an unmapped class Order exception Can you please help me out?

  Read the article

• [c++] Resolving namespace conflicts

  - by Kyle

  I've got a namespace with a ton of symbols I use, but I want to overwrite one of them: external_library.h namespace lottaStuff { class LotsOfClasses {}; class OneMoreClass {}; }; my_file.h using namespace lottaStuff; namespace myCustomizations { class OneMoreClass {}; }; my_file.cpp using myCustomizations::OneMoreClass; int main() { OneMoreClass foo; // error: reference to 'OneMoreClass' is ambiguous return 0; } How do I get resolve the 'ambiguous' error without resorting to replacing 'using namespace lottaStuff' with a thousand individual "using xxx;" statements?

  Read the article

• How do you like to define your module-wide variables in drupal 6?

  - by sprugman

  I'm in my module file. I want to define some complex variables for use throughout the module. For simple things, I'm doing this: function mymodule_init() { define('SOME_CONSTANT', 'foo bar'); } But that won't work for more complex structures. Here are some ideas that I've thought of: global: function mymodule_init() { $GLOBALS['mymodule_var'] = array('foo' => 'bar'); } variable_set: function mymodule_init() { variable_set('mymodule_var', array('foo' => 'bar')); } property of a module class: class MyModule { static $var = array('foo' => 'bar'); } Variable_set/_get seems like the most "drupal" way, but I'm drawn toward the class setup. Are there any drawbacks to that? Any other approaches out there?

  Read the article

• Why is the value of __name__ changing after assignment to sys.modules[__name__]?

  - by martineau

  While trying to do something similar to what's in the ActiveState recipe titled Constants in Python by Alex Martelli, I ran into an unexpected side-effect that assigning a class instance to an entry in sys.modules apparently has in Python 2.7 -- namely that doing so apparent changes the value of __name__ to None as illustrated in the following code fragment: class _test(object): pass import sys print '__name__: %r' % __name__ # __name__: '__main__' sys.modules[__name__] = _test() print '__name__: %r' % __name__ # __name__: None if __name__ == '__main__': # never executes... import test print "done" I'd like to understand why this is happening. I don't believe it was that way in Python 2.6 and earlier versions since I have some older code where apparently the if __name__ == '__main__': conditional worked as expected following the assignment (but no longer does). FWIW, I also noticed that the name _class is getting rebound from a class object to None, too, after the assignment. Also seems odd to me that they're being rebound to 'None' rather than disappearing altogether... Update: I'd like to add that any workarounds for achieving the effect of if __name__ == '__main__':, given what happens would be greatly appreciated. TIA!

  Read the article

• Setting custom control properties

  - by Rob

  I though it would be very simple but I can not get it today. I have a user control, with a grid control contained in it. public Unit Width { get { return CustomerGrid.Width; } set { CustomerGrid.Width = value; } } I expose the width property and when I set it in the designer it works at run-time but not design time. What class do I inherit from or method to override to get my controls to function at design time. Note I tried to inherit from WebControl but got the message Make sure that the class defined in this code file matches the 'inherits' attribute, and that it extends the correct base class

  Read the article

• how to create 2 controllers with same actionresult 2 views but one implementation

  - by amalatsliit

  I got a controller in my mvc application like below. public class BaseController: Controller { protected void LogInfo() { logger.InfoFormat("[SessionID: {0}, RemoteIP: {1}]", Session.SessionID, Request.UserHostAddress); } } public class FirstController : BaseController { public ActionResult Index(string name) { LogInfo(); getQueryString(); if(IsValidRec()) { if(Errors())) { return View("Error"); } var viewname = getViewName(name); return view(viewname); } else return view("NotFound"); } } I need to create another controller(SecondController ) with same ActionResult method that FirstController has but without any implementation. Because I dont wont to repeat same code in 2 ActionResult methods. what is the best way to do that. I tried in following way but I m getting error when I initialize my protected method 'LogInfo()' public class SecondController : BaseController { public ActionResult Index(string name) { var firstcontroller = new FirstController(); return firstcontroller.Index(name); } }

  Read the article

• Does Visual Studio 2010 support something like Eclipse's "Generate delegate methods"?

  - by devoured elysium

  Eclipse allows us to define a class as: interface MyInterface { void methodA(); int methodB(); } class A : MyInterface { MyInterface myInterface; } and then with this "Generate delegate methods", it will implement all needed methods for the interface, redirecting their logic to myInterface's methods: class A : MyInterface { MyInterface myInterface; public void methodA() { myInterface.methodA(); } public int methodB() { return myInterface.methodB(); } } Is it possible to accomplish the same with VS2010? And with R#? Thanks

  Read the article

• Tallying records using annotate() not working as should.

  - by 47

  I have two classes: Vehicle and Issues....a Vehicle object can have several issues recorded in the Issues class. What I want to do is to have a list of all issues, with each vehicle appearing only once and the total number of issues shown, plus other details....clicking on the record will then take the user to another page with all those issues for a selected vehicle shown in detail now. I tried this out using annotate, but I could only access the count and vehicle foreign key, but none of the other fields in the Vehicle class. class Issues(models.Model): vehicle = models.ForeignKey(Vehicle) description = models.CharField('Issue Description', max_length=30,) type = models.CharField(max_length=10, default='Other') status = models.CharField(max_length=12, default='Pending') priority = models.IntegerField(default='8', editable=False) date_time_added = models.DateTimeField(default=datetime.today, editable=False) last_updated = models.DateTimeField(default=datetime.today, editable=False) def __unicode__(self): return self.description The code I was using to annotate is: issues = Issues.objects.all().values('vehicle').annotate(count=Count('id')) What could be the problem?

  Read the article

• Annotation retention policy: what real benefit is there in declaring `SOURCE` or `CLASS`?

  - by watery

  I know there are three retention policies for Java annotations: CLASS: Annotations are to be recorded in the class file by the compiler but need not be retained by the VM at run time. RUNTIME: Annotations are to be recorded in the class file by the compiler and retained by the VM at run time, so they may be read reflectively. SOURCE: Annotations are to be discarded by the compiler. And although I understand their usage scenarios, I don't get why it is such an important thing to specify the retention policy that retention policies exist at all. I mean, why aren't all the annotations just kept at runtime? Do they generate so much bytecode / occupy so much memory that stripping those undeclared as RUNTIME does make that much difference?

  Read the article

• Is there anything wrong with taking immediate actions in constructors?

  - by pestaa

  I have classes like this one: class SomeObject { public function __construct($param1, $param2) { $this->process($param1, $param2); } ... } So I can instantly "call" it as some sort of global function just like new SomeObject($arg1, $arg2); which has the benefits of staying concise, being easy to understand, but might break unwritten rules of semantics by not waiting till a method is called. Should I continue to feel bad because of a bad practice, or there's really nothing to worry about? Clarification: I do want an instance of the class. I do use internal methods of the class only. I initialize the object in the constructor, but call the "important" action-taker methods too. I am selfish in the light of these sentences.

  Read the article

• 'Caching' a large table in ASP.NET

  - by TheNewGuy

  I understand that each page refresh, especially in 'AjaxLand', causes my back-end/code-behind class to be called from scratch... This is a problem because my class (which is a member object in System.Web.UI.Page) contains A LOT of data that it sources from a database. So now every page refresh in AjaxLand is causing me to making large backend DB calls, rather than just to reuse a class object from memory. Any fix for this? Is this where session variables come into play? Are session variables the only option I have to retain an object in memory that is linked to a single-user and a single-session instance?

  Read the article

• WPF data binding issue .

  - by Praveen

  Hi All, I have a wpf app and there i simply have a dock panel and inside dock panel i have a textblock. I want to bind the text property of textblock to my custom objects property but that' not working. I think i am missing something here but don't know what. Here is the code snippet. <TextBlock Text="{Binding Source=myDataSource, Path=ColorName}"/> </DockPanel> My custom class. class MyData { public string ColorName { get; set; } } and main window constructor.. public partial class MainWindow : Window { MyData myDataSource; public MainWindow() { InitializeComponent(); myDataSource = new MyData { ColorName = "Red" }; } }

  Read the article

• jQuery parent()

  - by Happy

  jQuery snippet: $(".sliders dt a").click(function(){ $(this).parent().parent().parent().find(".triggers a").removeClass("active"); return false }); HTML: <div class="triggers"><a href="#" class="active">Hide all</a></div> <dl class="sliders"> <dt><a href="#">text</a></dt> <dd>text</dd> </dl> Three .parent() is used, to catch .triggers block. Is there any way to merge them?

  Read the article

• @ExceptionHandler doesn't handle the thrown exceptions

  - by Javi

  Hello, I have a method in my controller which will handle the exceptions thrown by the application. So I have a method like this one. @Controller public class ExceptionController { @RequestMapping(value="/error") @ExceptionHandler(value={Exception.class, NullPointerException.class}) public String showError(Exception e, Model model){ return "tiles:error"; } } And to try I if it works I throw a NullPointerException in another method in other method controller: boolean a = true; if(a){ throw new NullPointerException(); } After the exception is thrown it is printed in the JSP, but it doesn't go throw my showError() method (I've set a breakpoint there and it never enters). showError() method will catch the exception and will show different error pages depending on the exception type (though now it always shows the same error page). If I go to the url /error it shows the error page so the showError() method is OK. I'm using Spring 3. What can be the problem? Thanks.

  Read the article

• How is a constructor executed?

  - by simion

  I am doing some reviison from the lecture slides and it says a constructor is executed in the following way; If the constructor starts with this, recursively execute the indicated constructor, then go to step 4. Invoke the explicitly or implicitly indicated superclass constructor (unless this class is java.lang.Object) Initialise the fields of the object in the order in which they were declared in this class Execute the rest of the body of this constructor. What i dont undertsand is that, a constructor can never "start" with this, because even if it forms no class heirarchy/relationship then super() is inserted by default. How would this fit in with the description above? Thanks

  Read the article

• Why would a 'public event EventHandler cccc' be null?

  - by Matt

  Why would a 'public event EventHandler cccc' be null? I have a class that's public class Builder { public event EventHandler StartedWorking; public Builder() { // Constructor does some stuff } public void Start() { StartedWorking(this, eventargobject); //StartedWorking is null -- } } This seems straightforward and something I do all the time? Am I missing something obvious or is there something that could cause this? EDIT: Does this mean that if I fire an event that is not subscribed to in a client class I have to check that it is not null? EDIT-2: I guess I'd never had events that were never not subscribed to and hence never ran into this -- You learn something new every day Sorry about the seemingly stupid question....

  Read the article

• ActiveRecord has_many and polymorphic

  - by leomayleomay

  I've came into a problem while working with AR and polymorphic, here's the description, class Base < ActiveRecord::Base; end class Subscription < Base set_table_name :subscriptions has_many :posts, :as => :subscriptable end class Post < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :subscriptable, :polymorphic => true end in the console, >> s = Subscription.create(:name => 'test') >> s.posts.create(:name => 'foo', :body => 'bar') and it created a Post like: #<Post id: 1, name: "foo", body: "bar", subscriptable_type: "Base", subscriptable_id: 1, created_at: "2010-05-10 12:30:10", updated_at: "2010-05-10 12:30:10"> the subscriptable_type is Base but Subscription, anybody can give me a hand on this?

  Read the article

• Android Timer update UI between multiple tasks

  - by Rilcon42

  I have tried multiple ways to have a single persistent timer update the ui in multiple activities, and nothing seems to work. I have tried an AsyncTask, a Handler, and a CountDownTimer. The code below does not execute the first Log.i statement.... Is there a better way to start the timer (which must be called from another class) in Main (which is the only persistent class)? public static void MainLawTimer() { MainActivity.lawTimer = new CountDownTimer(MainActivity.timeLeft, 1000) { public void onTick(long millisUntilFinished) { Log.i("aaa","Timer running. Time left: "+MainActivity.timeLeft); MainActivity.timeLeft--; if(MainActivity.timeLeft<=0) { //do stuff } else { //call method in another class } }

  Read the article

• Extension methods on a static object

  - by Max Malygin

  I know (or so I hear) that writing extension methods for a single stand alone .net class (not an implementation of IEnumerable) is potential code smell. However, for the sake of making the life easier I need to attach a method to the ConfigurationManager class in asp.net. It's a static object so this won't work: public static List<string> GetSupportedDomains(this ConfigurationManager manager) { //the manager needs to be static. } So the question is - is it possible to write an extension method for a static class in .net?

  Read the article

• PHP Variable Passing in Foreach on same page

  - by tooly228

  I've been struggling this for a while and I simply can't figure this out. Here is my code: <?php foreach($list as $id =>$name) { echo("<td style=\"vertical-align:middle;\"> <a href=\"item=$id#confirm\" role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"modal\"> Buy</a></td></tr>"); }?> <html> <div class="modal small hide fade" id="confirm" tabindex="-1" role="dialog" aria- labelledby="myModalLabel" aria-hidden="true"> <a href="redeem.php?item=<?php echo $id; ?>"><button class="btn btn-danger"> Buy</button></a></div> The main issue here is that the $id from the foreeach is not the same as the $id in the div class link. Instead the link is the end value of the foreach list.

  Read the article

• PHP IF statement not taking variable into account!

  - by Jess

  I have a tabled view in a while loop, where a user can view information on books. For example, book ISBN, book name, read status... Basically, when the user sets their 'readstatus' to 'complete' I want that specific table row to become grey! The logic is very straight forward, however I can't get my IF statement to recognise this: $readstatus = $_GET['readstatus']; if ($readstatus == 'complete') { echo '<tr class="completed">'; } else if ($readstatus != 'complete') { echo '<tr class="reading">'; } I'm obviously doing something wrong here, but all I need is the CSS class of the table row to change if the value of 'readstatus' = 'complete', if not, then output the default CSS table row color ('reading') Should I be putting $result as the variable or something? I have this coming just before my nested IF statement: $result = mysql_query($sql, $connection) or die ("Couldn't perform query $sql <br />".mysql_error()); while($row = mysql_fetch_array($result)) { ?>

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558  | Next Page >