Search Results

Search found 63877 results on 2556 pages for 'mysql error 1452'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 581/2556 | < Previous Page | 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588  | Next Page >

  • SQL Server - How Do I Substract 2 Hours from Formatted Time

    - by user1842653
    I need to know how to add 2 hours to the below 'Completed' timestamp. Here is the Select statement Select Tsk.task_id,Tsk.org_id,Tsk.completed,Tsk.assgn_acct_id,name FROM tdstelecom.tasks As Tsk WHERE Tsk.task_id = '11094836' AND DATE(Tsk.completed) < CURDATE() AND DATE(Tsk.completed) >= DATE_SUB(CURDATE (),INTERVAL 180 DAY) Here are the results: 2012-08-22 14:18:14 Desired results: 2012-08-22 16:18:14

    Read the article

  • Improve SQL query performance

    - by Anax
    I have three tables where I store actual person data (person), teams (team) and entries (athlete). The schema of the three tables is: In each team there might be two or more athletes. I'm trying to create a query to produce the most frequent pairs, meaning people who play in teams of two. I came up with the following query: SELECT p1.surname, p1.name, p2.surname, p2.name, COUNT(*) AS freq FROM person p1, athlete a1, person p2, athlete a2 WHERE p1.id = a1.person_id AND p2.id = a2.person_id AND a1.team_id = a2.team_id AND a1.team_id IN ( SELECT id FROM team, athlete WHERE team.id = athlete.team_id GROUP BY team.id HAVING COUNT(*) = 2 ) GROUP BY p1.id ORDER BY freq DESC Obviously this is a resource consuming query. Is there a way to improve it?

    Read the article

  • INSERT ... ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE with WHERE?

    - by Raven
    Hi! I'm doing a INSERT ... ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE but I need the update part to be conditional, only doing the update if some extra condition has changed. However, WHERE is not allowed on this UPDATE. Is there any workaround for this? I can't do combinations of INSERT/UPDATE/SELECT since this needs to work over a replication.

    Read the article

  • Changing CCK content-types details results in numerous DB calls for the menu system

    - by Paul Strugger
    Every time I make a change in the details of a content-type it takes too long. I though it had to do with the fact that I had too many content-types and fields (~500), but when I load the devel module to see the queries that take that long I see: Executed 32212 queries in 12267.57 milliseconds. Queries taking longer than 5 ms and queries executed more than once, are highlighted. Page execution time was 55763.32 ms When I see the details I notice that the vast majority of db calls come from the menu system, e.g.: _menu_route menu_local_tasks admin_menu_link_save Why is that? Can I avoid some of these? It doesn't seem logical!

    Read the article

  • SQL Join only returning 1 row.

    - by kevin
    Not quite sure what I'm missing, but my SQL statement is only returning one row. SELECT tl.*, (tl.topic_total_rating/tl.topic_rates) as topic_rating, COUNT(pl.post_id) - 1 as reply_count, MIN(pl.post_time) AS topic_time, MAX(pl.post_time) AS topic_bump FROM topic_list tl JOIN post_list pl ON tl.topic_id=pl.post_parent WHERE tl.topic_board_link = %i AND topic_hidden != 1 ORDER BY %s I have two tables (post_list and topic_list), and post_list's post_parent links to a topic_list's topic_id. Instead of returning all the topics (where their board's topic_board_link is n), it only returns one topic.

    Read the article

  • reading into table: comma values and quotes SQL

    - by every_answer_gets_a_point
    i have a string like this something = "something, something1, "something2, something else", something3" i need it to be read into a table like this: field1 = "something" field2= "something2" field3 = "something2, something else" field4 = "something3" please notice that the double quotes in the something string signified that the string inside the quotes is to be placed in one field anyone know how to do this with an insert into statement or some other way? the answer can be purely sql or can be vba with sql. thanks!

    Read the article

  • How to update mutual entries in DB?

    - by Sthita
    I am not able to perform mutual update to my Database. My Requirement is like this : Insert IDS UPDate DB Entries ID ConnectedTo ID connectedTo connectedVia 2 1 --- No Entry ----- 2 3 -- No Entry ----- When ID 1 Comes in to picture (Enties happened to Table) 1 4 1 3 2 1 5 2 4 1 1 2 2 5 1 When ID 3 Comes into picture (Enties happened to Table) 3 4 3 5 1 3 1 ---- 3 2 ---- Similarly when ID 4 Comes in to picture 4 9 4 2 3 4 10 4 5 1 4 3 4 2 1 4 1 1 9 4 1 10 4 Its basically Updating the mutual connections.No Duplicate entries should happen. Like for example 2 3 and 3 2 are mutually connected and 1 is associated with them so there is no need to insert (3 2 via 1). I think this is my requirement. Anything possible combinations i have missed please let me know. i will Update. Please help me writing the logic or any example using jdbc and java.

    Read the article

  • Array values changing unexpectedly

    - by Lizard
    I am using cakephp 1.2 and I have an array that appears to have a value change even though that variable is not being manipulated. Below is the code to that is causing me trouble. PLEASE NOTE - UPDATE Changing the variable name makes no difference to the outcome, The values get changed somewhere between the two print_r calls, and I can't see why the $this-find would do this . echo "Start of findCountByString()"; print_r($myArr); $test = $this->find('count', array( 'conditions' => $conditions, 'joins' => array('LEFT JOIN `articles_entities` AS ArticleEntity ON `ArticleEntity`.`article_id` = `Article`.`id`'), 'group' => 'Article.id' )); echo "End of findCountByString()"; print_r($myArr); I am getting the following output: Start of findCountByString() Array ( [0] => 4bdb1d96-c680-4c2c-aae7-104c39d70629 [1] => 4bdb1d6a-9e38-479d-9ad4-105c39d70629 [2] => 4bdb1b55-35f0-4d22-ab38-104e39d70629 [3] => 4bdb25f4-34d4-46ea-bcb6-104f39d70629 ) End of findCountByString() Array ( [0] => 4bdb1d96-c680-4c2c-aae7-104c39d70629 [1] => 4bdb1d6a-9e38-479d-9ad4-105c39d70629 [2] => 4bdb1b55-35f0-4d22-ab38-104e39d70629 [3] => '4bdb25f4-34d4-46ea-bcb6-104f39d70629' # This is now in inverted commas ) The the value in my array have changed, and I don't know why? Any suggestions?

    Read the article

  • how can I check data has been inserted successfully

    - by Piyush
    I have two insert statements.Second one will be executed only after successful execution of First one.What I wd like to do is- $sqlone="Insert into ....."; $sqltwo="Insert into....."; If(mysql_query($sqlone)) { If(mysql_query($sqltwo)) { show message Data inserted in both tables. } }

    Read the article

  • Set AUTO_INCREMENT value programmatically

    - by Tim
    So this works... ALTER TABLE variation AUTO_INCREMENT = 10; But I want to do this; ALTER TABLE variation AUTO_INCREMENT = (SELECT MAX(id)+1 FROM old_db.varaition); but that doesnt work, and neither does; SELECT MAX(id)+1 INTO @old_auto_inc FROM old_db.variation ALTER TABLE variation AUTO_INCREMENT = @old_auto_inc; So does anyone know how to do this? ( I'm trying to ensure that AUTO_INCREMENT keys dont collide between an old and a new site and need to do this automatically. So I can just run a script when the new db goes live )

    Read the article

  • Solution for this SQL query?

    - by homeWorkBoy
    Suppose you have these tables: Table Name: Salesman Fields: S_ID(Primary Key), Name Table Name: Region_1 Fields: Reg_ID(Primary Key), S_ID(Foreign Key), sales Table Name: Region_2 Fields: Reg_ID(Primary Key), S_ID(Foreign Key), sales Table Name: Region_3 Fields: Reg_ID(Primary Key), S_ID(Foreign Key), sales Table Name: Region_4 Fields: Reg_ID(Primary Key), S_ID(Foreign Key), sales Query 1: Find out total of sales of each salesman in all the regions. Query 2: Find out total of sales of a particual salesman in all the regions. (if the first one is solved I think this will be easy. :-) )

    Read the article

  • Is this a good database design?

    - by alokpatil
    I am planning to make a railway reservation project... I am maintaining following tables: trainTable (trainId,trainName,trainFrom,trainTo,trainDate,trainNoOfBoogies)...PK(trainId) Boogie (trainId,boogieId,boogieName,boogieNoOfseats)...CompositeKey(trainId,boogieId)... Seats (trainId,boogieId,seatId,seatStatus,seatType)...CompositeKey(trainId,boogieId,seatId)... user (userId,name...personal details) userBooking (userId,trainId,boogieId,seatId)... Is this good design?

    Read the article

  • Convert tax like IRS function to SQL

    - by CrashRoX
    Trying to convert this tax-like IRS function http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1817920/calculating-revenue-share-at-different-tiers to SQL. The assumption is the table would be one column (price) and the tiers will be added dynamically. My first attempt has some case statements that didn't work out well. I have since scrapped it :) Thanks for the help!

    Read the article

  • Combining IN and NOT IN in SQL as single result

    - by UltraVi01
    I apologize for the vague title. I am attempting to write a query that returns an alias column with matching values (resulting from an IN) as well as an alias column with values that do not match (using NOT IN). I want the result set to have: userId | matches | nonmatches. I currently have the following query which returns the matches as expected. I am having trouble getting the nonmatches in the result set -- that is, from a NOT IN statement SET @userId = 9; SELECT ug.user_id, COUNT(DISTINCT goal_id) as matches FROM user_goal ug WHERE ug.user_id!=@userId AND goal_id IN (SELECT iug.goal_id FROM user_goal iug WHERE user_id=@userId) GROUP BY user_id ORDER BY matches DESC LIMIT 4 So, the NOT IN would look something like this: goal_id NOT IN(SELECT uggg.goal_id FROM user_goal uggg WHERE user_id=@userId) AS nonmatches I am just not sure how to incorporate the NOT IN statement in my query so I get all the results

    Read the article

  • How do I do Textbox Submit

    - by Newb
    Hello everyone, I have a search box and a buttion. currently a user enter some text and press the search button. But I want to add another feature that instead of clicking the search button people can hit enter to search. How can I do that? Here is my code sample: <form method="post" action=""> <input id="search" name="search" type="text" /> <input id="search_btn" name="search_btn" type="submit" /> </form> Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • adding count( ) column on each row

    - by Arsenal
    I'm not sure if this is even a good question or not. I have a complex query with lot's of unions that searches multiple tables for a certain keyword (user input). All tables in which there is searched are related to the table book. There is paging on the resultset using LIMIT, so there's always a maximum of 10 results that get withdrawn. I want an extra column in the resultset displaying the total amount of results found however. I do not want to do this using a seperate query. Is it possible to add a count() column to the resultset that counts every result found? the output would look like this: ID Title Author Count(...) 1 book_1 auth_1 23 2 book_2 auth_2 23 4 book_4 auth_.. 23 ... Thanks!

    Read the article

  • how to select all the data from many tables?

    - by Syom
    how to select all the data from many tables? i try `"SELECT * FROM `table1`, `table2`"` , but result none understandable for me. it returns only some rows from table1, and 3 times all the data from table2. i've red one same question here, but don't understand the answer. so could you help me? thanks in advance. update: when i try (SELECT * FROM `videos`) UNION (SELECT * FROM `users`) it returns #1222 - The used SELECT statements have a different number of columns

    Read the article

  • highlighting data values in a sql result set

    - by potatoe
    I can think of a number of ways to do this in PHP or even JavaScript, but I'm wondering if there's a SQL-based technique I'm overlooking. I have a database table, let's say 20 fields X 10 rows. I want to display the entire table on an web page, so I'd do something like SELCT * FROM data_table;, and then format the result set using HTML table tags. However, I'd also like to highlight values in the table based on whether they are the maximum or minimum value in their column. For example, I'd add bold tags around the max in each column. A resulting table might look something like this, with bold tags shown: id | field1 | field2 | field3 | ... 0 | 5 | 2 | <b>7</b> | ... 1 | 3 | <b>8</b> | 6 | ... 2 | <b>9</b> | 5 | 1 | ... ... I could do a separate SELECT with an ORDER BY for each field and then interpret the results, but that seems like a lot of extra DB access. My alternative right now is to just fetch the whole table, and then sort/search for the highlight values using PHP. Is there a better way?

    Read the article

  • Select past date from database x days from now

    - by Pr0no
    Consider the following table daterange _date trading_day ------------------------ 2011-08-01 1 2011-07-31 0 2011-07-30 0 2011-07-29 1 2011-07-28 1 2011-07-27 1 2011-07-26 1 2011-07-25 1 2011-07-24 0 2011-07-23 0 2011-07-22 1 2011-07-21 1 2011-07-20 1 2011-07-19 1 2011-07-18 1 2011-07-17 0 I'm in need of a query that returns a _date, x days before a given _date. When counting back, _days with trading_day = 0 should be ignored. A few examples: input | output -------------------------+------------ 1 day before 2011-07-19 | 2011-07-18 2 days before 2011-08-01 | 2011-07-28 (trading_day = 0 don't count) 3 days before 2011-07-29 | 2001-07-26 The first one is easy: SELECT _date FROM daterange WHERE trading_day = 0 AND _date < '2011-07-19' LIMIT 1 But I don't know how to query for the other examples. Do you?

    Read the article

  • memory access violation error - 0xC0000005

    - by nobody
    I got memory access violation error sometimes.... but I don't know where the error comes from... So I reviewed the code and I found some strange code... delete m_p1; A *a = new A(); a->b = *c; m_p1 = a; --> strange code. I think it's a little strange line.... can i use the m_p1 after delete the m_p1? It can make some memory access error??

    Read the article

  • SUM a pair of COUNTs from two tables based on a time variable

    - by Kevin O.
    Been searching for an answer to this for the better part of an hour without much luck. I have two regional tables laid out with the same column names and I can put out a result list for either table based on the following query (swap Table2 for Table1): SELECT Table1.YEAR, FORMAT(COUNT(Table1.id),0) AS Total FROM Table1 WHERE Table1.variable='Y' GROUP BY Table1.YEAR Ideally I'd like to get a result that gives me a total sum of the counts by year, so instead of: | REGION 1 | | REGION 2 | | YEAR | Total | | YEAR | Total | | 2010 | 5 | | 2010 | 1 | | 2009 | 2 | | 2009 | 3 | | | | | 2008 | 4 | I'd have: | MERGED | | YEAR | Total | | 2010 | 6 | | 2009 | 5 | | 2008 | 4 | I've tried a variety of JOINs and other ideas but I think I'm caught up on the SUM and COUNT issue. Any help would be appreciated, thanks!

    Read the article

  • Multisite Enabling a Table

    - by Joe Fitzgibbons
    I am creating a table (table A) that will have a number of columns(of course) and there will be another table (table B) that holds metadata associated to rows in table A. I am working with a multi site implementation that has one database for the whole shabang. Rows in table A could belong to any number of sites but must belong to at least one. The problem I have is I am not sure what the best practice is for defining what site each row in table A belongs to. I want performance and scalability. There is no finite number of sites going forward. Rows in table A could belong to any number of sites in the future. Right now there are only 3. My initial thoughts are to have a primary site ID in Table A and then metadata in table B will have rows defining additional sites as needed. Another thought is to have a column in Table A for each site and it is a boolean as to wether it belongs to that site. Lastly I have thought about having another table to map rows in Table A to each site. What is the best way to associate rows in a table with any number of sites with performance and scalability in mind?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588  | Next Page >