Search Results

Search found 22765 results on 911 pages for 'jquery layout'.

Page 585/911 | < Previous Page | 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592  | Next Page >

  • Animated Circular bar on hover

    - by Anthony
    I'm building a portfolio website and want to implement a skill set page which feature an animated circular bar which represent each of my skills. There will be 6 buttons around the circle which when the user hovers over, and when one is hovered I want a circular bar to animate anti-clockwise. I've made a quick .gif in photoshop to demonstrate But I can't find any tutorial to help. I found this website which features a similar concept on the left hand side at the top, an animated pie chart - Website Example And this is a quick .gif Mockup I did in photoshop of what I am trying to achieve - Animated Circular Bar Animation

    Read the article

  • Create a jQueryUI 1.8 Button menu

    - by Brian M. Hunt
    Now that jQueryUI 1.8 is out, I was browsing through the updates and came across the new Button widget, and in particular one of the demos with the SplitButton with a dropdown. This demo seems to suggest that the Button widget could be used to create a dropdown menu here. As a matter of discussion, I was wondering what ways there are to go about creating a dropdown menu with this new Button widget. Cheers.

    Read the article

  • animate() not working for opacity in IE

    - by Karthik
    I'm trying to animate a div from 100% opacity to 40% opacity WITHOUT using fadeTo(). I need to use animate(). It works fine in chrome/FF/safari, but in IE, the opacity doesn't animate, it simply changes to that after the animation is done. Happens in IE 7 and 8. I'm doing this: .animate({ width: new_width, top: new_top, left: new_left, padding: new_padding, opacity: 0.4, filter: "alpha(opacity=40)" }, ... it's just not animating the opacity. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • How to replace slide effect to fade out/fade in effect on this slideshow?

    - by LDam
    Hi guys! I need replace slide effect to fade-out/fade-in effect on the prev and next slide functions: function animate(dir,clicked){ u = true; switch(dir){ case 'next': t = t+1; m = (-(t*w-w)); current(t); if(o.autoHeight){autoHeight(t);} if(s<3){ if (t===3){$(o.slides,obj).children(':eq(0)').css({left:(s*w)});} if (t===2){$(o.slides,obj).children(':eq('+(s-1)+')').css({position:'absolute',left:(w)});} } $(o.slides,obj).animate({left: m}, o.slidespeed,function(){ if (t===s+1) { t = 1; $(o.slides,obj).css({left:0},function(){$(o.slides,obj).animate({left:m})}); $(o.slides,obj).children(':eq(0)').css({left: 0}); $(o.slides,obj).children(':eq('+(s-1)+')').css({ position:'absolute',left:-w}); } if (t===s) $(o.slides,obj).children(':eq(0)').css({left:(s*w)}); if (t===s-1) $(o.slides,obj).children(':eq('+(s-1)+')').css({left:s*w-w}); u = false; }); break; case 'prev': t = t-1; m = (-(t*w-w)); current(t); if(o.autoHeight){autoHeight(t);} if (s<3){ if(t===0){$(o.slides,obj).children(':eq('+(s-1)+')').css({position:'absolute',left:(-w)});} if(t===1){$(o.slides,obj).children(':eq(0)').css({position:'absolute',left:0});} } $(o.slides,obj).animate({left: m}, o.slidespeed,function(){ if (t===0) { t = s; $(o.slides,obj).children(':eq('+(s-1)+')').css({position:'absolute',left:(s*w-w)}); $(o.slides,obj).css({left: -(s*w-w)}); $(o.slides,obj).children(':eq(0)').css({left:(s*w)}); } if (t===2 ) $(o.slides,obj).children(':eq(0)').css({position:'absolute',left:0}); if (t===1) $(o.slides,obj).children(':eq('+ (s-1) +')').css({position:'absolute',left:-w}); u = false; }); break; case 'fade': t = [t]*1; m = (-(t*w-w)); current(t); if(o.autoHeight){autoHeight(t);} $(o.slides,obj).children().fadeOut(o.fadespeed, function(){ $(o.slides,obj).css({left: m}); $(o.slides,obj).children(':eq('+(s-1)+')').css({left:s*w-w}); $(o.slides,obj).children(':eq(0)').css({left:0}); if(t===s){$(o.slides,obj).children(':eq(0)').css({left:(s*w)});} if(t===1){$(o.slides,obj).children(':eq('+(s-1)+')').css({ position:'absolute',left:-w});} $(o.slides,obj).children().fadeIn(o.fadespeed); u = false; }); break; default: break; } }; I had tried, but the auto restart didn't work! You can view the documentation and download the complete code with the examples in this link: http://github.com/nathansearles/loopedSlider/tree/master Please help me! (Sorry for my bad english!)

    Read the article

  • Scroll to a text position in Javascript

    - by Andy
    I have a real-time HTML editor, with a textarea on the left for code entry, and a 'preview' DIV on the right to contain the preview of the code entered. At the moment, when editing the code in the left pane, the preview just sits where it is, so often the part of the code you're editing is not in the visible area of the preview (especially when images are involved). My question is how do I make the preview scroll to show the part of the code that's currently being edited? Here is the page I have so far: http://www.caerphoto.com/rtedit.html You'll notice in the source I have a (currently unused) matchPreview() function that tries to match the scroll position of the preview based on the scroll position of the textarea, but obviously if images or large text are involved the two panes no longer match.

    Read the article

  • Lightbox scrolling issue with IE7 & 8

    - by BlazeK
    The lightbox that i am using works great with all browsers except for IE. In IE, its giving me triple scrolls. http://obliqueinteractive.com/demo/monster/ CSS code for the iframe: #wrap { float:left; width:800px; height:500px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: scroll; } #content-wrap { float:left; width:700px; padding-left:50px; } Why is IE adding additional scrolls to the lightbox window? any suggestions?

    Read the article

  • How to reenable event.preventDefault?

    - by Richbits
    I have a web page which I have prevented the default action on all submit buttons, however I would like to re-enable default submit action on a button how can I do this? I am currently preventing the default action using the following: $("form").bind("submit", function(e){ e.preventDefault(); }); I have successfully done this using the following: $(document).ready(function(){ $("form:not('#press')").bind("submit", function(e){ e.preventDefault(); }); But can I do this dynamically when the button is clicked?

    Read the article

  • how to get the checked ID's on submit click

    - by rockers
    $('#PbtnSubmit').click(function(event) { alert("ABC"); $('#PricingEditExceptions input[name=PMchk]').each(function() { if ($("#PricingEditExceptions input:checkbox:checked").length > 0) { var checked = $('#PricingEditExceptions input[name=PMchk]:checked'); alert(checked);.........................this is not working var PMstrIDs = checked.map(function() { return $(this).val(); }).get().join(','); alert(PMstrIDs); $('#1_exceptiontypes').attr('value', exceptiontypes) $('#1_PMstrIDs').attr('value', PMstrIDs); } else { alert("Please select atleast one exception"); event.preventDefault(); } }); when I use this On submit click i am getting first popup window as ABC.. but this.. var checked = $('#PricingEditExceptions input[name=PMchk]:checked'); but this returns Object-object.. in both Firefox and IE8.. but in Firefox alert("PMstrIDs"); return exactly how any checkboxes are check.. but in IE8 it is only returning first Checkbox ID not all..is that any differnce between IE8 and Firefox for this behaviour please can anybody help me out? or can i do this one any other method so that it will work in IE8 browser? thanks

    Read the article

  • Behavior of local variables in JavaScripts with()-statement

    - by thr
    I noticed some weird (and to my knowledge undefined behavior, by the ECMA 3.0 Spec at least), take the following snippet: var foo = { bar: "1", baz: "2" }; alert(bar); with(foo) { alert(bar); alert(bar); } alert(bar); It crashes in both Firefox and Chrome, because "bar" doesn't exist in the first alert(); statement, this is as expected. But if you add a declaration of bar inside the with()-statement, so it looks like this: var foo = { bar: "1", baz: "2" }; alert(bar); with(foo) { alert(bar); var bar = "g2"; alert(bar); } alert(bar); It will produce the following: undefined, 1, g2, undefined It seems as if you create a variable inside a with()-statement most browsers (tested on Chrome or Firefox) will make that variable exist outside that scope also, it's just set to undefined. Now from my perspective bar should only exist inside the with()-statement, and if you make the example even weirder: var foo = { bar: "1", baz: "2" }; var zoo; alert(bar); with(foo) { alert(bar); var bar = "g2"; zoo = function() { return bar; } alert(bar); } alert(bar); alert(zoo()); It will produce this: undefined, 1, g2, undefined, g2 So the bar inside the with()-statement does not exist outside of it, yet the runtime somehow "automagically" creates a variable named bar that is undefined in its top level scope (global or function) but this variable does not refer to the same one as inside the with()-statement, and that variable will only exist if a with()-statement has a variable named bar that is defined inside it. Very weird, and inconsistent. Anyone have an explanation for this behavior? There is nothing in the ECMA Spec about this.

    Read the article

  • preventing jCarousel form returning to begining position after loading page

    - by Crippletoe
    Hi all, i am using jCarousel as a menu in my website. there is a list of links there which is longer than its containing elements and jCarousel is used as a scroll bar to view that list. my problem is that whenever a link is clicked and a new page is loaded, jCarousel resets to its begining position thus sometimes an active link is no longer visible after the page reloads. any idea how i can make jCarousel focus on the specific active link? you can see an example of what i mean here: http://174.133.190.8/~goldarch/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=50&Itemid=57 (check out the menu on top) thank you all.

    Read the article

  • Reading only one row from table in model binder

    - by user281180
    I am filling a table dynamically. I can see the table filled with 3 rows, but in my model binder I can read only one value. How can I solve this problem? My code is as follows: function AddTableRow(jQtable, value, text){ var count = 0; jQtable.each(function() { var $table = $(this); var tds = '<tr>'; tds += '<td>' + '<input type="text" value = ' + text + ' disabled ="disabled" style="width:auto"/>' + '<input type="hidden" name="projectList[' + count + '].ID" value = ' + value + ' /></td>' + '<td><input type="button" value="Remove"/></td>'; tds += '</tr>'; if ($('tbody', this).length > 0) { $('tbody', this).append(tds); } else { $(this).append(tds); } count++;}); } function ReadSelectedProject() { $("#Selected option").each(function() { AddTableRow($('#projectTable'), $(this).val(), $(this).text()); }); }

    Read the article

  • Clear Select options when selecting one field while using multiple forms on same page

    - by Nizam
    Hi all, I have a situation where the second select list option is generated from the first select list selected option. Like when we select Country corresponding states are generated in next select list. In my case I am having multiple forms on single page which are same. Can anyone let me know how to implement it on multiple forms. I tried the following code but it didn't work $(".country").change(function(){ $.get("sample.php?val=" + $(this).val(), function(data){ $(this).parent().next().children('.state').children('option').remove(); $(this).parent().next().children('.state').append(data); }); Waiting for your support thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • Fading out everything but (this) - while honoring a click()

    - by Kasper Lewau
    I'm trying to achieve a fading navigation system, where everything in the nav but the element being hovered will fade out to say, 0.3 opacity. At the same time, I want clicks to have a greater "value", so as to not fade out a clicked element (or in this case, the active subpage).. That didn't make much sense to me either, I'll just post the code I have. <nav id="main"> <ul> <li> <a>work</a> </li> <li> <a>about me</a> </li> <li> <a>contact</a> </li> </ul> </nav> And the script that makes it sparkle: var nava = "nav#main ul li a"; $(nava).hover(function(){ $(nava).not(this).removeClass().addClass("inactive"); $(this).addClass("active"); }); $(nava).click(function(){ $(this).removeClass().addClass("active"); }); }); And the classes / css(less): .inactive{color:@color2; border-bottom:0 solid #000;} .active{color:@color1; border-bottom:1px solid #000;} nav#main ul li a{color:@color1;} Basically the hover states take priority over the click, which I do not want to happen. Ideally I'd like for all of the anchor elements to revert to its original state whenever you hover out from the unordered list holding it all. If anyone has some pointers on this it'd be greatly appreciated. Cheers!

    Read the article

  • Is there a better way to serially submit multiple AJAX requests?

    - by friedo
    I have a page with multiple forms that I submit via Ajax POSTs serially. At first, I tried using synchronous XHR requests, but this causes the browser to lock up for the duration of the request, and breaks my DOM-manipulation effects, which is unacceptable. So the pattern I ended up using is basically this: var fcount = 0; // incremented for each form to be submitted function submit_form( num ) { var fdata = { ... }; // data from form # num $.ajax( { async: true, url: '/index.cgi', data: fdata, type: 'POST', success: function() { if ( num < fcount ) { submit_form( ++num ); } } } ); } $( '#submit_form_btn' ).click( function() { submit_form( 1 ) } ); The recursion strikes me as a bit of an ugly solution to what is essentially an iterative problem. Is there a cleaner or more elegant way that this could be handled?

    Read the article

  • whats faster, more efficient, loading a js file with arrays or populating arrays from tables

    - by Leigh
    I am rebuilding an ecom site where the product data is stored in a multidimensional JS array that gets loaded on page load. This data is constantly being accessed with JS due to the nature of the site, to update prices based on user selections. There are many options that affect final price. From a programming standpoint, a DB table is much easier to maintain and update than are JS arrays, and since I am porting the site over to PHP and MYSQL, I have been considering moving these arrays into tables. So, would it be better to populate an array from the DB on load so that the pricing data is always available to the JS, or stay with hard coded JS files? I considered getting data via ajax as needed, but since this site has to constantly update pricing with user interaction, I have pretty much ruled that out. How would you handle it?

    Read the article

  • protect_from_forgery & Unobtrusive Javascript

    - by Matt Grande
    Hi all, I have some javascript making an ajax call in my Rails site: $.ajax({type: "PUT", url: url, data: { dummy: data }, complete: function(data) {}}); When Rails gets it, it throws back an ActionController::InvalidAuthenticityToken Error. I'd like to keep the protect_from_forgery stuff in there, if possible... But I'm at a loss for how can I pass the auth token from a javascript file? Can anyone help me out?

    Read the article

  • Problem Render backbone collection using Mustache template

    - by RameshVel
    I am quite new to backbone js and Mustache. I am trying to load the backbone collection (Object array) on page load from rails json object to save the extra call . I am having troubles rendering the backbone collection using mustache template. My model & collection are var Item = Backbone.Model.extend({ }); App.Collections.Items= Backbone.Collection.extend({ model: Item, url: '/items' }); and view App.Views.Index = Backbone.View.extend({ el : '#itemList', initialize: function() { this.render(); }, render: function() { $(this.el).html(Mustache.to_html(JST.item_template(),this.collection )); //var test = {name:"test",price:100}; //$(this.el).html(Mustache.to_html(JST.item_template(),test )); } }); In the above view render, i can able to render the single model (commented test obeject), but not the collections. I am totally struck here, i have tried with both underscore templating & mustache but no luck. And this is the Template <li> <div> <div style="float: left; width: 70px"> <a href="#"> <img class="thumbnail" src="http://placehold.it/60x60" alt=""> </a> </div> <div style="float: right; width: 292px"> <h4> {{name}} <span class="price">Rs {{price}}</span></h4> </div> </div> </li> and my object array kind of looks like this

    Read the article

  • Backbone.js Collection Iteration Using .each()

    - by the_archer
    I've been doing some Backbone.js coding and have come across a particular problem where I am having trouble iterating over the contents of a collection. The line Tasker_TodoList.each(this.addOne, this);in the addAll function in AppView is not executing properly for some reason, throwing the error: Uncaught TypeError: undefined is not a function the code in question is: $(function() { var Todo = Backbone.Model.extend({ defaults: { title: "Some Title...", status: 0 //not completed } }); var TodoList = Backbone.Collection.extend({ model: Todo, localStorage: new Store('tasker') }); var Tasker_TodoList = new TodoList(); var TodoView = Backbone.View.extend({ tagName: 'li', template: _.template($('#todoTemplate').html()), events: { 'click .delbtn': 'delTodo' }, initialize: function(){ console.log("a new todo initialized"); //this.model.on('change', this.render, this); }, render: function(){ this.$el.html(this.template(this.model.toJSON())); return this; }, delTodo: function(){ console.log("deleted todo"); } }); var AppView = Backbone.View.extend({ el: 'body', events: { 'click #addBtn': 'createOnClick' }, initialize: function(){ Tasker_TodoList.fetch(); Tasker_TodoList.on('add', this.addAll); console.log(Tasker_TodoList); }, addAll: function(){ $('#tasksList').html(''); console.log("boooooooma"); Tasker_TodoList.each(this.addOne, this); }, addOne: function(todo){ console.log(todo); }, createOnClick: function(){ Tasker_TodoList.create(); } }); var Tasker = new AppView(); }); can somebody help me in finding out what I am doing wrong? Thank you all for your help :-)

    Read the article

  • Please help clean this loop

    - by Alex Angelini
    I do not code much in Javascript, but I have the following snippet which IMHO looks horrendous and I have to do this nested iteration quite often in my code. Does anyone have a prettier/easier to read solution? function addBrowse(data) { var list = $('<ul></ul>') for(i = 0; i < data.list.length; i++) { var file = list.append('<li class="toLeft">' + data.list[i].name + '</li>') for(j = 0; j < data.list[i].children.length; j++) { var db = file.append('<li>' + data.list[i].children[j].name + '</li>') for(k = 0; k < data.list[i].children[j].children.length; k++) db.append('<li class="toRight">' + data.list[i].children[j].children[k].name + '</li>') } } $('#browse').append(list).show()} Here is a sample data element {"file":"","db":"","tbl":"","page":"browse","list":[ { "name":"/home/alex/GoSource/test1.txt", "children":[ { "name":"go", "children":[ { "name":"validation1", "children":[ ] } ] } ] }, { "name":"/home/alex/GoSource/test2.txt", "children":[ { "name":"go", "children":[ { "name":"validation2", "children":[ ] } ] } ] }, { "name":"/home/alex/GoSource/test3.txt", "children":[ { "name":"go", "children":[ { "name":"validation3", "children":[ ] } ] } ] }]} Thanks a lot

    Read the article

  • how to design two inputs in or/And logic for email form with validation

    - by Raj Nimbalkar
    my purpose is user enter only email or mobile number.i have the partial success in that.code notify user in OR logic but....IF user entered the incorrect mobile & email @same time then user must be notified for dat. var emailReg = /^([\w-\.]+@([\w-]+\.)+[\w-]{2,4})?$/; var emailaddressVal = $("#UserEmail").val(); ////email & mobile input cheak if(emailaddressVal == '' && $("#mobile").val() == '') { $("#UserEmail").after('<p><span class="error">Please enter your email address.</span></p>') $("#mobile").after('<p><span class="error">Please enter your Mobile number.</span></p>') hasError = true; } //////validating currect email else if(!emailReg.test(emailaddressVal)) { $("#UserEmail").after('<p><span class="error">Enter a valid email address.</span></p>') hasError = true; } //////Mobile number else if( $("#mobile").val()) { $("#mobile").after('<p><span class="error">Enter currect Mobile number.</span></p>') hasError = true; }

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592  | Next Page >