Search Results

Search found 50247 results on 2010 pages for 'base class'.

Page 606/2010 | < Previous Page | 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613  | Next Page >

  • Tallying records using annotate() not working as should.

    - by 47
    I have two classes: Vehicle and Issues....a Vehicle object can have several issues recorded in the Issues class. What I want to do is to have a list of all issues, with each vehicle appearing only once and the total number of issues shown, plus other details....clicking on the record will then take the user to another page with all those issues for a selected vehicle shown in detail now. I tried this out using annotate, but I could only access the count and vehicle foreign key, but none of the other fields in the Vehicle class. class Issues(models.Model): vehicle = models.ForeignKey(Vehicle) description = models.CharField('Issue Description', max_length=30,) type = models.CharField(max_length=10, default='Other') status = models.CharField(max_length=12, default='Pending') priority = models.IntegerField(default='8', editable=False) date_time_added = models.DateTimeField(default=datetime.today, editable=False) last_updated = models.DateTimeField(default=datetime.today, editable=False) def __unicode__(self): return self.description The code I was using to annotate is: issues = Issues.objects.all().values('vehicle').annotate(count=Count('id')) What could be the problem?

    Read the article

  • Ruby on rails edit form for has_one relation

    - by user2900873
    I have a clan.rb and clan_options.rb clan.rb class Clan < ActiveRecord::Base has_one :options, :class_name => "ClanOptions", :foreign_key => "clan_id", dependent: :destroy end clan_options.rb class ClanOptions < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :clan end To create an edit form for clan.rb I use the following: <%= form_for @clan, :html => {:class => 'form-horizontal'} do |clan| %> <fieldset> <!-- form stuff --> </fieldset> <% end %> It works how I want. But now I want to create an edit form for the clan_options.rb, I have no idea how to do this. If anymore information is needed to solve this, ask me.

    Read the article

  • PHP IF statement not taking variable into account!

    - by Jess
    I have a tabled view in a while loop, where a user can view information on books. For example, book ISBN, book name, read status... Basically, when the user sets their 'readstatus' to 'complete' I want that specific table row to become grey! The logic is very straight forward, however I can't get my IF statement to recognise this: $readstatus = $_GET['readstatus']; if ($readstatus == 'complete') { echo '<tr class="completed">'; } else if ($readstatus != 'complete') { echo '<tr class="reading">'; } I'm obviously doing something wrong here, but all I need is the CSS class of the table row to change if the value of 'readstatus' = 'complete', if not, then output the default CSS table row color ('reading') Should I be putting $result as the variable or something? I have this coming just before my nested IF statement: $result = mysql_query($sql, $connection) or die ("Couldn't perform query $sql <br />".mysql_error()); while($row = mysql_fetch_array($result)) { ?>

    Read the article

  • jquery change element to element

    - by Isis
    Hello <div class="leftlink" id="mcontacts"> <img src="test.gif" class="arrowred"/> <a href="/contacts/" class="u">????????</a> </div> if(window.location == 'http://my.site.com/contacts/') { $('.menuwelcome').css('display', 'block'); $('.leftlink').find('????????').css('font-weight', 'bold'); $('#mcontacts').find('a').html('<b>????????</b>').remove(); } How do remove tag "a" html, and change his for '<b>????????</b>' ? =) Than you, sorry for bad english

    Read the article

  • Jquery Templeate, droping last item off in the each

    - by Lawrence
    Currently I am using jquery templating with some json data, I have a couple images that I am getting and I would like to drop the last image that I am getting from my json data. Right now I have this coded ( this only a snippet of the spot I am having the problem at): <div class="altViews"> <ul class="clearfix"> {{each(i,addImage) AdditionalImages}} <li class="altImage"> <img src="http://images.url.com/images/products/${addImage}" alt="${Name}" id="${addImage}"/> </li> {{/each}} </ul> </div> SO the main help I need is to be able to drop the last li, I just dont know how to use my index to do that.

    Read the article

  • Android Timer update UI between multiple tasks

    - by Rilcon42
    I have tried multiple ways to have a single persistent timer update the ui in multiple activities, and nothing seems to work. I have tried an AsyncTask, a Handler, and a CountDownTimer. The code below does not execute the first Log.i statement.... Is there a better way to start the timer (which must be called from another class) in Main (which is the only persistent class)? public static void MainLawTimer() { MainActivity.lawTimer = new CountDownTimer(MainActivity.timeLeft, 1000) { public void onTick(long millisUntilFinished) { Log.i("aaa","Timer running. Time left: "+MainActivity.timeLeft); MainActivity.timeLeft--; if(MainActivity.timeLeft<=0) { //do stuff } else { //call method in another class } }

    Read the article

  • 'Caching' a large table in ASP.NET

    - by TheNewGuy
    I understand that each page refresh, especially in 'AjaxLand', causes my back-end/code-behind class to be called from scratch... This is a problem because my class (which is a member object in System.Web.UI.Page) contains A LOT of data that it sources from a database. So now every page refresh in AjaxLand is causing me to making large backend DB calls, rather than just to reuse a class object from memory. Any fix for this? Is this where session variables come into play? Are session variables the only option I have to retain an object in memory that is linked to a single-user and a single-session instance?

    Read the article

  • TypeError: object not callable when making instance

    - by TSM
    I've searched around other threads with similar questions, but I'm not finding the answer. Basically, I have a class: import Android_Class class Android_Revision(object): def __init__(self): # dict for storing the classes in this revision # (format {name : classObject}): self.Classes = {} self.WorkingClass = Android_Class() self.RevisionNumber = '' def __call__(self): print "Called" def make_Class(self, name): newClass = Android_Class(name) self.Classes.update({name : newClass}) self.WorkingClass = newClass def set_Class(self, name): if not(self.Classes.has_key(name)): newClass = Android_Class(name) self.Classes.update({name : newClass}) self.WorkingClass = self.Classes.get(name) I'm trying to make an instance of this class: Revision = Android_Revision() and that's when I'm getting the error. I'm confused because I have another situation where I'm doing almost the exact same thing, and it's working fine. I can't figure out what differences between the two would lead to this error. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Calling a Sub or Function contained in a module using "CallByName" in VB/VBA

    - by Kratz
    It is easy to call a function inside a classModule using CallByName How about functions inside standard module? 'inside class module 'classModule name: clsExample Function classFunc1() MsgBox "I'm class module 1" End Function ' 'inside standard module 'Module name: module1 Function Func1() MsgBox "I'm standard module 1" End Function ' ' The main sub Sub Main() ' to call function inside class module dim clsObj as New clsExample Call CallByName(clsObj,"ClassFunc1") ' here's the question... how to call a function inside a standard module ' how to declare the object "stdObj" in reference to module1? Call CallByName(stdObj,"Func1") ' is this correct? End Sub

    Read the article

  • How is a constructor executed?

    - by simion
    I am doing some reviison from the lecture slides and it says a constructor is executed in the following way; If the constructor starts with this, recursively execute the indicated constructor, then go to step 4. Invoke the explicitly or implicitly indicated superclass constructor (unless this class is java.lang.Object) Initialise the fields of the object in the order in which they were declared in this class Execute the rest of the body of this constructor. What i dont undertsand is that, a constructor can never "start" with this, because even if it forms no class heirarchy/relationship then super() is inserted by default. How would this fit in with the description above? Thanks

    Read the article

  • How to instantiate objects of classes that have dependencies injected?

    - by chester89
    Let's say I have some class with dependency injected: public class SomeBusinessCaller { ILogger logger; public SomeBusinessCaller(ILogger logger) { this.logger = logger; } } My question is, how do I instantiate an object of that class? Let's say I have an implementation for this, called AppLogger. After I say ObjectFactory.For<ILogger>().Use<AppLogger>(); how do I call constructor of SomeBusinessCaller? Am I calling SomeBusinessCaller caller = ObjectFactory.GetInstance<SomeBusinessCaller>(); or there is a different strategy for that?

    Read the article

  • jquery .load() function only gets called once

    - by user1288099
    the html <div class="stackwrapper" id="user1"></div> <div class="stackwrapper" id="user2"></div> <div class="userdrawings"></div> the javascript $('.stackwrapper').click(function(e){ var id=$(this).attr('id'); $('.userdrawings').load('loadSession.php?user='+id).fadeIn("slow"); }); Somehow it only works at once, only at the first click on stackwrapper, when I click on the second one, the function is not triggered again.

    Read the article

  • Is it possible to select data with max value for a column using Criteria in Hibernate?

    - by Palo
    Lets say I have the following mapping: <hibernate-mapping package="mypackage"> <class name="User" table="user"> <id name="id" column="id"> <generator class="native"></generator> </id> <property name="name" /> <property name="age" /> </class> </hibernate-mapping> Is it possible to select the oldest user (that is age is maximal) using Criteria in Hibernate? I can imagine that i could do this with 2 selects. (first select total number of users and then order the entries descending by age and select the first entry). But is it possible with a single select? Thank you Palo

    Read the article

  • Ruby forwarding method calls

    - by JP
    I have an instance of a master class which generates instances of a subclass, these subclasses need to forward some method calls back to the master instance. At the moment I have code looking something like this, but it feels like I should be able to do the same thing more efficiently (maybe with method_missing?) class Master def initalize(mynum) @mynum = mynum end def one_thing(subinstance) "One thing with #{subinstance.var} from #{@mynum}" end def four_things(subinstance) "Four things with #{subinstance.var} from #{@mynum}" end def many_things(times,subinstance) "#{times} things with #{subinstance.var} from #{@mynum}" end def make_a_sub(uniqueness) Subthing.new(uniqueness,self) end class Subthing def initialize(uniqueness,master) @u = uniqueness @master = master end # Here I'm forwarding method calls def one_thing master.one_thing(self) end def four_things master.four_things(self) end def many_things(times) master.many_things(times,self) end end end m = Master.new(42) s = m.make_a_sub("very") s.one_thing === m.one_thing(s) s.many_things(8) === m.many_things(8,s) I hope you can see what's going on here. I would use method_missing, but I'm not sure how to cope with the possibility of some calls having arguments and some not (I can't really rearrange the order of the arguments to the Master methods either) Thanks for reading!

    Read the article

  • Why is it possible to save entity but not delete if transactional annotation is set to readonly=true

    - by jakob
    Hello experts! My class is annotated with org.springframework.transaction.annotation.Transactional like this: @Transactional(readOnly = true) public class MyClass { I then have a dao class: @Override public void delete(final E entity) { getSession().delete(entity); } @Override public void save(final E entity) { getSession().saveOrUpdate(entity); } Then I have two methods in MyClass @Transactional(readOnly = false) public void doDelete(Entity entity){ daoImpl.delete(entity) } //@Transactional(readOnly = false) public void doSave(){ daoImpl.save(entity) } Saving and deleting works like a charm. But if I remove the @Transactional(readOnly = false) on doDelete method deletion stops working, Saving works with and without the method annotation. So my question is: WHY?

    Read the article

  • template specilization using member enums

    - by Altan
    struct Bar { enum { Special = 4 }; }; template<class T, int K> struct Foo {}; template<class T> struct Foo<T::Special> {}; Usage: Foo<Bar> aa; fails to compile using gcc 4.1.2 It complains about the usage of T::Special for partial specilization of Foo. If Special was a class the solution would be to a typename in front of it. Is there something equivalent to it for enums (or integers)? Thanks, Altan

    Read the article

  • Force result for empty() test on an object

    - by hsz
    Hello ! Simple class for example: class Foo { protected $_bar; public function setBar( $value ) { $this->_bar = $value; } } And here is the question: $obj = new Foo(); var_dump( empty( $obj ) ); // true $obj->setBar( 'foobar' ); var_dump( empty( $obj ) ); // false Is it possible to change class's behaviour with testing it with empty() function so it will returns true when object is not filled with data ? I know about magic function __isset( $name ) but it is called only when we test specific field like: empty( $obj->someField ); but not when test whole object.

    Read the article

  • C++ enforce conditions on inherited classes

    - by user231536
    I would like to define an abstract base class X and enforce the following: a) every concrete class Y that inherits from X define a constructor Y(int x) b) it should be possible to test whether two Y objects are equal. For a, one not very good solution is to put a pure virtual fromInt method in X which concrete class will have to define. But I cannot enforce construction. For b), I cannot seem to use a pure virtual method in X bool operator == (const X& other) const =0; because in overridden classes this remains undefined. It is not enough to define bool operator == (const Y& other) const { //stuff} because the types don't match. How do I solve these problems?

    Read the article

  • Serialize object from within

    - by Maximus
    I have the class testClass which has the method save. This method saves object to a database. But it needs to serialize object before saving. How can I serialize object from within the class to do that? class testClass { private $prop = 777; public function save() { $serializedObject = serialize(self); DB::insert('objects', array('id', 'object')) ->values(array(1, $serializedObject)) ->execute(); } } serialize(self) obviously doesn't work.

    Read the article

  • how to create 2 controllers with same actionresult 2 views but one implementation

    - by amalatsliit
    I got a controller in my mvc application like below. public class BaseController: Controller { protected void LogInfo() { logger.InfoFormat("[SessionID: {0}, RemoteIP: {1}]", Session.SessionID, Request.UserHostAddress); } } public class FirstController : BaseController { public ActionResult Index(string name) { LogInfo(); getQueryString(); if(IsValidRec()) { if(Errors())) { return View("Error"); } var viewname = getViewName(name); return view(viewname); } else return view("NotFound"); } } I need to create another controller(SecondController ) with same ActionResult method that FirstController has but without any implementation. Because I dont wont to repeat same code in 2 ActionResult methods. what is the best way to do that. I tried in following way but I m getting error when I initialize my protected method 'LogInfo()' public class SecondController : BaseController { public ActionResult Index(string name) { var firstcontroller = new FirstController(); return firstcontroller.Index(name); } }

    Read the article

  • PHP Variable Passing in Foreach on same page

    - by tooly228
    I've been struggling this for a while and I simply can't figure this out. Here is my code: <?php foreach($list as $id =>$name) { echo("<td style=\"vertical-align:middle;\"> <a href=\"item=$id#confirm\" role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"modal\"> Buy</a></td></tr>"); }?> <html> <div class="modal small hide fade" id="confirm" tabindex="-1" role="dialog" aria- labelledby="myModalLabel" aria-hidden="true"> <a href="redeem.php?item=<?php echo $id; ?>"><button class="btn btn-danger"> Buy</button></a></div> The main issue here is that the $id from the foreeach is not the same as the $id in the div class link. Instead the link is the end value of the foreach list.

    Read the article

  • Parsing data without HMLT tags

    - by user296507
    Hi, I need to extract the actual phone number form the html listed below, but I'm not really sure how to do it using Nokogiri CSS since there are no html tags around it. When an at_css(.phonetitle) it only parse Phone and not the number. <div class="detail"> <span class="address">Corner of Toorak Road and Chapel Street, South Yarra</span><br> <span class="phonetitle">Phone</span> 95435 34341 <br><br> </div>

    Read the article

  • Why can't I enforce derived classes to have parameterless constructors?

    - by FrisbeeBen
    I am trying to do the following: public class foo<T> where T : bar, new() { public foo() { _t = new T(); } private T _t; } public abstract class bar { public abstract void someMethod(); // Some implementation } public class baz : bar { public overide someMethod(){//Implementation} } And I am attempting to use it as follows: foo<baz> fooObject = new foo<baz>(); And I get an error explaining that 'T' must be a non-abstract type with a public parameterless constructor in order to use it as parameter 'T' in the generic type or method. I fully understand why this must be, and also understand that I could pass a pre-initialized object of type 'T' in as a constructor argument to avoid having to 'new' it, but is there any way around this? any way to enforce classes that derive from 'bar' to supply parameterless constructors?

    Read the article

  • Several modules in a package importing one common module

    - by morpheous
    I am writing a python package. I am using the concept of plugins - where each plugin is a specialization of a Worker class. Each plugin is written as a module (script?) and spawned in a separate process. Because of the base commonality between the plugins (e.g. all extend a base class 'Worker'), The plugin module generally looks like this: import commonfuncs def do_work(data): # do customised work for the plugin print 'child1 does work with %s' % data In C/C++, we have include guards, which prevent a header from being included more than once. Do I need something like that in Python, and if yes, how may I make sure that commonfuncs is not 'included' more than once?

    Read the article

  • AngularJS: Better way to display success messages

    - by Sup
    $('body').on('click', '#save-btn', function () { $('#greetingsModal').modal('show'); }); <div id="greetingsModal" class="modal hide fade" tabindex="-1" role="dialog" aria- labelledby="myModalLabel" aria-hidden="true"> <div class="alert alert-success"> <a href="../admin/Supplier" class="close" data-dismiss="alert">x</a> <strong>Well done!</strong>. </div> I want to display a popup message using the above styles whenever 'save-btn' is clicked. The above code works fine but there is a lot of time delay by doing it this way. Is there any way to display such a alert message using angular?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613  | Next Page >