Search Results

Search found 89372 results on 3575 pages for 'code migration'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 615/3575 | < Previous Page | 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622  | Next Page >

  • NullTransport for WCF

    This article describes design, implementation and the usage of the custom in-process transport for Microsoft Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) model.

    Read the article

  • Apps Script Office Hours - October 18, 2012

    Apps Script Office Hours - October 18, 2012 In this episode Ikai and Arun talk about this week's Apps Script news, a Twillio integration and demo, and answer questions from developers on topics such as: - An issue with Apps Script gadgets on Google Sites with custom domains. - Determining the maximum number of objects that can fit in ScriptDB. - Backing up scripts to an outside file store. From: GoogleDevelopers Views: 30 8 ratings Time: 29:14 More in Science & Technology

    Read the article

  • Visual Studio 2005 Project And Item Templates

    All about Project and Item Templates. You can use Custom Templates to make your development process faster than you ever think. Create your own Template for Visual Studio and distribute with all others. You can also learn how to create an installer to install a template.

    Read the article

  • "Collection Wrapper" pattern - is this common?

    - by Prog
    A different question of mine had to do with encapsulating member data structures inside classes. In order to understand this question better please read that question and look at the approach discussed. One of the guys who answered that question said that the approach is good, but if I understood him correctly - he said that there should be a class existing just for the purpose of wrapping the collection, instead of an ordinary class offering a number of public methods just to access the member collection. For example, instead of this: class SomeClass{ // downright exposing the concrete collection. Things[] someCollection; // other stuff omitted Thing[] getCollection(){return someCollection;} } Or this: class SomeClass{ // encapsulating the collection, but inflating the class' public interface. Thing[] someCollection; // class functionality omitted. public Thing getThing(int index){ return someCollection[index]; } public int getSize(){ return someCollection.length; } public void setThing(int index, Thing thing){ someCollection[index] = thing; } public void removeThing(int index){ someCollection[index] = null; } } We'll have this: // encapsulating the collection - in a different class, dedicated to this. class SomeClass{ CollectionWrapper someCollection; CollectionWrapper getCollection(){return someCollection;} } class CollectionWrapper{ Thing[] someCollection; public Thing getThing(int index){ return someCollection[index]; } public int getSize(){ return someCollection.length; } public void setThing(int index, Thing thing){ someCollection[index] = thing; } public void removeThing(int index){ someCollection[index] = null; } } This way, the inner data structure in SomeClass can change without affecting client code, and without forcing SomeClass to offer a lot of public methods just to access the inner collection. CollectionWrapper does this instead. E.g. if the collection changes from an array to a List, the internal implementation of CollectionWrapper changes, but client code stays the same. Also, the CollectionWrapper can hide certain things from the client code - from example, it can disallow mutation to the collection by not having the methods setThing and removeThing. This approach to decoupling client code from the concrete data structure seems IMHO pretty good. Is this approach common? What are it's downfalls? Is this used in practice?

    Read the article

  • Classic vs universal and loss of historical data

    - by iss42
    I'm keen to use some of the new features in Google Universal Analytics. I have an old site though that I don't want to lose the historical data for. The comparisons with historical data are interesting for example. However Google doesn't appear to allow you to change a property from the classic code to the new code. Am I missing something? I'm surprised this isn't a bigger issue for many other users.

    Read the article

  • Release Notes for 8/16/2012

    Below are the release notes for today's deployment. Source Tab Improvements Revamped fork navigation to make it more clear that you are within a fork verses the parent project. Infrastructure Updated CodePlex to ASP.Net MVC 4.0. RTM+1 how's that for a turnaround? Bug Fixes Fixed a set of user experience issues with the in-line diff view experience. Fixed issue with date mismatches between UTC and local time for discussions and issue tracker Fixed issue where new issues would not show up in search results. Changed the default destination branch for pull requests to master. Have ideas on how to improve CodePlex? Please visit our suggestions page! Vote for existing ideas or submit a new one. As always you can reach out to the CodePlex team on Twitter @codeplex or reach me directly @mgroves84

    Read the article

  • WebService DIME Bridge

    The DIME Bridge transferring a web service response (any serializable object) in the binary format across the Internet. It's a full transparent loosely coupled solution between the web service and its consumer - just injecting the bridge in their config files.

    Read the article

  • Workflow Adapter/Connector Pair

    The Workflow Adapter/Connector pair are custom WF Activities for a Business-To-Business Logical Connectivity based on the Interface Contract. The connectivity handles the invoking and consuming of Workflows, Remoting objects, WCF Services in the transparent manner based on the configuration.

    Read the article

  • Web Animations - the next generation

    Web Animations - the next generation The GDL event page for this event: developers.google.com Ask and vote for questions at www.google.com Browser developers are designing the next generation of animation features that will enhance HTML5 with rich, powerful new animation primitives. Designers and web app developers will all benefit from improved methods of animating content. Hear from developers of Google Chrome and Mozilla Firefox how this works, and learn how to try out the new animation features now in your favorite browser. From: GoogleDevelopers Views: 0 3 ratings Time: 30:00 More in Science & Technology

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622  | Next Page >