Search Results

Search found 61651 results on 2467 pages for 'function object'.

Page 629/2467 | < Previous Page | 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636  | Next Page >

• Problems With SWT on Mac

  - by Jav

  I've got a java project that uses an SWT UI and I'm having trouble deploying it on any Mac OS X computers. The program itself works perfectly on Windows when it is either run from within Eclipse or from a jar file. On Mac, the program also works fine in Eclipse, but when I try to run it from a jar file, I get the following error: 2010-04-30 13:33:04.564 java[17825:41b] *** _NSAutoreleaseNoPool(): Object 0x10b9b0 of class NSCFString autoreleased with no pool in place - just leaking Stack: (0x944acf4f 0x943b9432 0x678fb79 0x35a19b1 0x359ba7f) 2010-04-30 13:33:04.566 java[17825:41b] *** _NSAutoreleaseNoPool(): Object 0x115ef0 of class NSCFNumber autoreleased with no pool in place - just leaking Stack: (0x944acf4f 0x943b9432 0x678a0b0 0x35a19b1 0x359ba7f) 2010-04-30 13:33:04.567 java[17825:41b] *** _NSAutoreleaseNoPool(): Object 0x121000 of class NSCFString autoreleased with no pool in place - just leaking Stack: (0x944acf4f 0x943b9432 0x678fb79 0x35a19b1) 2010-04-30 13:33:04.581 java[17825:41b] *** _NSAutoreleaseNoPool(): Object 0x123720 of class NSPathStore2 autoreleased with no pool in place - just leaking Stack: (0x944acf4f 0x943ba637 0x943c238f 0x943c1e8e 0x943c694b 0x678992e 0x35a19b1) 2010-04-30 13:33:04.582 java[17825:41b] *** _NSAutoreleaseNoPool(): Object 0x12d660 of class NSPathStore2 autoreleased with no pool in place - just leaking Stack: (0x944acf4f 0x943ba637 0x943b9739 0x943c3eb2 0x943c6b22 0x678992e 0x35a19b1) ... ... ... The actual error is much larger, and continues until the program crashes. I know that I am using the correct swt.jar file and I have tried running the program with the -XstartOnFirstThread VM argument, but still have not had any luck. Does anybody have any ideas or any suggestions where I could start looking for a solution? Thanks.

  Read the article

• Return from jQuery Ajax Method

  - by Lijo

  I have a button named searchReportButton. On this button click, I need to check session value from server using a ajax web method "Error.aspx/CheckSessionExpiry".This is done in checkSession javascript function. The checkSession is not returning anything now - instead it is handling the required operation based on the result (redirecting to error page). I need to return the result of ajax web method to the Main Caller. How can we do this return? Main Caller searchReportButton.click(function () { checkSession(); //Remainging Code }); Helper function checkSession() { var win = 101; $.ajax( { type: "POST", url: "Error.aspx/CheckSessionExpiry", data: '{"winNumber": "' + win + '"}', contentType: "application/json; charset=utf-8", dataType: "json", success: handleSessionResult } ); } Result Helper function handleSessionResult(result) { if (result.hasOwnProperty("d")) { result = result.d } if (result == "ACTIVE") { window.location.href("Error.aspx"); return false; } //alert(result); }

  Read the article

• jquery elements by class

  - by tom

  Hi there im trying to get all dropdown lists by class and change their names, my code is not working, is there something i am missing? $(document).ready(function () { $('.mutuallyexclusive').live("click", function () { checkedState = $(this).attr('checked'); $('.mutuallyexclusive:checked').each(function () { $(this).attr('checked', false); $(this).attr('name', 'chk'); }); $(this).attr('checked', checkedState); if (checkedState) { var prev = $(this).prev('select').attr("name", 'cat.parent_id'); elements = $('select.selected'); elements.each(function () { $(this).attr("name", "bbb"); }); } else { var prev = $(this).prev('select').attr("name", 'dd'); } }); });

  Read the article

• how to get the content of iframe in a php variable? [closed]

  - by Sahil

  My code is somewhat like this: <?php if($_REQUEST['post']) { $title=$_REQUEST['title']; $body=$_REQUEST['body']; echo $title.$body; } ?> <script type="text/javascript" src="texteditor.js"> </script> <form action="" method="post"> Title: <input type="text" name="title"/><br> <a id="bold" class="font-bold"> B </a> <a id="italic" class="italic"> I </a> Post: <iframe id="textEditor" name="body"></iframe> <input type="submit" name="post" value="Post" /> </form> the texteditor.js file code is: $(document).ready(function(){ document.getElementById('textEditor').contentWindow.document.designMode="on"; document.getElementById('textEditor').contentWindow.document.close(); $("#bold").click(function(){ if($(this).hasClass("selected")) { $(this).removeClass("selected"); }else { $(this).addClass("selected"); } boldIt(); }); $("#italic").click(function(){ if($(this).hasClass("selected")) { $(this).removeClass("selected"); }else { $(this).addClass("selected"); } ItalicIt(); }); }); function boldIt(){ var edit = document.getElementById("textEditor").contentWindow; edit.focus(); edit.document.execCommand("bold", false, ""); edit.focus(); } function ItalicIt(){ var edit = document.getElementById("textEditor").contentWindow; edit.focus(); edit.document.execCommand("italic", false, ""); edit.focus(); } function post(){ var iframe = document.getElementById("body").contentWindow; } actualy i want to fetch data from this texteditor (which is created using iframe and javascript) and store it in some other place. i'm not able to fetch the content that is entered in the editor (i.e. iframe here). please help me out of this....

  Read the article

• Check for changes with jquery and a database

  - by Steve

  I am doing a notification system. When a new post is published, users will be notified immediately by an small notification on the screen. I am currently using this: setInterval(function(){ checkForChanges(); }, 2*1000); function checkForChanges(){ $.post("http://"+ document.domain + "/posts/checkForChanges/", function(dat){ if(dat>0){ .... /*create notification*/ } }); } And i was wondering if this is the correct way to do it or not. Because, this is calling a PHP function every 2 seconds and making a query to the database. In case there are no new changes, it won't do anything... Thanks.

  Read the article

• Difference between c++11 vs c++03

  - by aiao

  I have spend a few hours about rvalue s and lvalue. Here is what I understand int main() { //..... Foo foo = Bar1(); Foo foo = Bar2(); //...... } Foo Bar1() { //Do something return foo; } Foo& Bar2() { //Do something return foo; } Under c++03, Bar1() would copy the return object (just before return), and then return the address of the copied object; executing a wasteful copy of an object which is about to be destroyed. Bar2() would return the object created within the function. Under c++11, Bar1() and Bar2() would essentially be equivalent (and also equivalent to Bar2() of c++03). Is that right? If not, please elaborate.

  Read the article

• "this" in JavaScript

  - by cf_PhillipSenn

  I'm trying to understand the syntax of how to put together a JavaScript function as an object. Q: Is this the right way to do it? The reason why I ask is because I'm looking at it in Firebug and I was hoping to be able to drill down and see the value of myVar and myVariable, but instead Firebug only says that "this" is an object Object. var myObject = { init: function() { var myVar = 1; myObject.myVariable = 2; console.log('"this" when called as an object: ' + this); } } myObject.init(); Also, what's the funny little syntax to call it directly upon declaration? Something about (), but when I remove the last line and put () at the end of the declaration, I get a syntax error.

  Read the article

• Problem with fetching table to array

  - by jasmine

  I have writed this function: function news_array() { $sql = "SELECT * FROM content WHERE home=1"; $query = mysql_query($sql); $i = 0; while($row = mysql_fetch_array($query)){ $row_array[$i] = array( TITLE => $row['title'], ABSTRACTT => $row['abstract'], BODY => $row['body'], ID => $row['conID'] ); $i++; } return $row_array; } When using this function like this: <?php $row_array = news_array(); for($i = 0 ; $i < count($row_array) ; $i++){ echo $row_array[$i][TITLE]; } ?> There no output in html. What is wrong in my function? Thanks in advance

  Read the article

• Getting Results from a Web SQL database

  - by andrew8088

  I'm playing around with the new Web SQL databases. Is there a way to return results from a SELECT statement? Here's my example: function getTasks (list) { db.transaction(function (tx) { list = list || 'inbox'; tx.executeSql("SELECT * FROM tasklist WHERE list = ?", [list], function (tx, results) { var retObj = [], i, len = results.rows.length; for ( i = 0; i < len; i++ ) { retObj[i] = results.rows.item(i); } return retObj; }); }); } The getTasks function is returning before the success callback does; is there a way to get the results out of the executeSql method, or do I have to do all the processing within the callback?

  Read the article

• Is it poor practice to identify objects via an enumeration property, instead of using GetType()?

  - by James

  I have a collection of objects that all implement one (custom) interface: IAuditEvent. Each object can be stored in a database and a unique numeric id is used for each object type. The method that stores the objects loops around a List<IAuditEvent>, so it needs to know the specific type of each object in order to store the correct numeric id. Is it poor practice to have an enumeration property on IAuditEvent so that each object can identify itself with a unique enumeration value? I can see that the simplest solution would be to write a method that translates a Type into an integer, but what if I need an enumeration of audit events for another purpose? Would it still be wrong to have my enumeration property on IAuditEvent?

  Read the article

• Prototype with a callback problem

  - by Lisio

  function Foo() { this.bar = false; } Foo.prototype={ onLoad: function() { this.bar=true; }, create: function(id) { SomeClass.someMethod({ id: id, onWorkIsDone: this.onLoad }); } }; var temp=new Foo(); temp.create(); This sample has a logic error in string 'onWorkIsDone: this.onLoad'. What I have to place instead of 'this.onLoad' to make SomeClass call exactly the temp.onLoad method when it finishes it's work?

  Read the article

• IE8 doesnt like my jQuery

  - by danit

  Can anyone see any reason why IE8 might not run this jQuery? $("#slid").toggle( function() { $("#Silver").animate({top: "25px"}, 200); }, function() { $("#Silver").animate({top: "89px"}, 200); } ); It runs the first function but ignores the 2nd top: "89px" and ideas? Or a better way the same toggle effect can be achieveD?

  Read the article

• Fade out menu doesn't work in IE8

  - by user1787488

  I used this script in my website. But it doesn't work in IE8 or lower versions. Is it possible to work perfectly in all browsers? <script type="text/javascript" src="/web/upload/js/jquery-1.3.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> $(function() { $(window).scroll(function(){ var scrollTop = $(window).scrollTop(); if(scrollTop != 0) $('#header').stop().animate({'opacity':'0'},400); else $('#header').stop().animate({'opacity':'1'},400); }); $('#header').hover( function (e) { var scrollTop = $(window).scrollTop(); if(scrollTop != 0){ $('#header').stop().animate({'opacity':'1'},400); } }, function (e) { var scrollTop = $(window).scrollTop(); if(scrollTop != 0){ $('#header').stop().animate({'opacity':'0'},400); } } ); }); </script>

  Read the article

• Obtaining frame pointer in C

  - by assketchum

  I'm trying to get the FP in my C program, I tried two different ways, but they both differ from what I get when I run GDB. The first way I tried, I made a protocol function in C for the Assembly function: int* getEbp(); and my code looks like this: int* ebp = getEbp(); printf("ebp: %08x\n", ebp); // value i get here is 0xbfe2db58 while( esp <= ebp ) esp -= 4; printf( "ebp: %08x, esp" ); //value i get here is 0xbfe2daec My assembly code getEbp: movl %ebp, %eax ret I tried making the prototype function to just return an int, but that also doesn't match up with my GDB output. We are using x86 assembly. EDIT: typos, and my getEsp function looks exactly like the other one: getEsp: movl %esp, %eax ret

  Read the article

• Best way to ignore less specific click event with jquery?

  - by acidzombie24

  I have the code below. The main code is in the 2nd function however the first is called which is interfering with the more specific a.One code. Whats the best way to not run code in the first function if the div i click is a .main .a.One event? $('.main .a').live('click', function () { alert('first'); //2 lines of code }); $('.main .a.One').live('click', function () { alert('second'); //lots of logic });

  Read the article

• Works in Firefox but not IE

  - by Abs

  Hello all, I make use of the following to find a string in a particular element, if it exists, tick a checkbox. This works great on Firefox but not internet explorer (8). I am having trouble finding why. $.fn.searchString = function(str) { return this.filter('*:contains("' + str + '")'); }; var myID = $('div').searchString(files_array[i].substr(-4)); alert(myID);//[object object] alert(myID.children());//[object object] myID.children().attr('checked', true);//does not tick checkbox alert(myID.children().attr('checked'));//undefined Does IE not like the children() function? Thanks all for any help

  Read the article

• Force the use of interface instead of concrete implementation in declaration (.NET)

  - by gammelgul

  In C++, you can do the following: class base_class { public: virtual void do_something() = 0; }; class derived_class : public base_class { private: virtual void do_something() { std::cout << "do_something() called"; } }; The derived_class overrides the method do_something() and makes it private. The effect is, that the only way to call this method is like this: base_class *object = new derived_class(); object->do_something(); If you declare the object as of type derived_class, you can't call the method because it's private: derived_class *object = new derived_class(); object->do_something(); // --> error C2248: '::derived_class::do_something' : cannot access private member declared in class '::derived_class' I think this is quite nice, because if you create an abstract class that is used as an interface, you can make sure that nobody accidentally declares a field as the concrete type, but always uses the interface class. Since in C# / .NET in general, you aren't allowed to narrow the access from public to private when overriding a method, is there a way to achieve a similar effect here?

  Read the article

• Setting up an independent delegate?

  - by fuzzygoat

  Its common for the dataSource and delegate to be the same object, its also common for this object to be the viewController. In all the info/tutorials that I have seen online delegates are always setup as above. If I wanted to create my own class instead can anyone give me any pointers as to how I might do that. Where does that object get instantiated, how do you connect the dataSource and delegate items etc. I am using UITableView to test this.

  Read the article

• What is the explanation of this java code ?

  - by M.H

  I have the following code : public class Main { public void method(Object o) { System.out.println("Object Version"); } public void method(String s) { System.out.println("String Version"); } public static void main(String args[]) { Main question = new Main(); question.method(null);//1 } } why is the result is "String Version" ? and why there is a compiler error if the first method takes a StringBuffer object ?

  Read the article

• how to generate uncorrelated random numbers in repeated calls in parallel?

  - by user1446948

  I want to write a function which will be repeatedly called by other functions many times. Inside this function it is supposed to generate a lot of random numbers and this part will be treated in parallel. If only for one run, the seed can be chosen differently for each thread, so that the random numbers will be uncorrelated. However, if this function will be called the 2nd time, it seems that the random numbers will repeat unless the seed will be again changed during the later calls. So my question is, is there a good way to generate the random numbers or reset the seed so that the random numbers generated by repeated calls to this function and also by different threads are really random? Thank you.

  Read the article

• What's happening to my lists?

  - by byte1918

  Hello, why does List<Object> objectList; = some objects List<Object> getList() { return objectList; //or return new List<Object>(objectList); } return a list with all items referenced to the original list's items? Thanks.

  Read the article

• linq to sql delete

  - by mazhar

  how would i delete in linq to sql with groupfeature object

  Read the article

• $.each - wait for jSON request before proceeding

  - by GaaayLooord

  I have an issue with the below code: the jQuery.each is speeding on without waiting for the JSON request to finish. As a result, the 'thisVariationID' and 'thisOrderID' variables are being reset by the latest iteration of a loop before they can be used in the slower getJSON function. Is there a way to make each iteration of the the .each wait until completion of the getJSON request and callback function before moving on to the next iteration? $.each($('.checkStatus'), function(){ thisVariationID = $(this).attr('data-id'); thisOrderID = $(this).attr('id'); $.getJSON(jsonURL+'?orderID='+thisOrderID+'&variationID='+thisVariationID+'&callback=?', function(data){ if (data.response = 'success'){ //show the tick. allow the booking to go through $('#loadingSML'+thisVariationID).hide(); $('#tick'+thisVariationID).show(); }else{ //show the cross. Do not allow the booking to be made $('#loadingSML'+thisVariationID).hide(); $('#cross'+thisVariationID).hide(); $('#unableToReserveError').slideDown(); //disable the form $('#OrderForm_OrderForm input').attr('disabled','disabled'); } }) })

  Read the article

• Login verification always this same redirect

  - by user1738013

  This is my code: session_helper if ( ! function_exists('is_login')) { function is_login() { $CI =& get_instance(); $is_logged_in = $CI->session->userdata('is_logged_in'); if (!isset($is_logged_in) || $is_logged_in != TRUE) { redirect('login'); } } } check_login <?php if ( ! defined('BASEPATH')) exit('No direct script access allowed'); class Check_login extends CI_Controller { function __construct() { parent::__construct(); $this->is_logged_in(); } function is_logged_in() { $this->load->helper('session_helper'); $this->load->helper('url'); is_login(); } } When I induction this function: Every time is induction redirect('login'); Where is my problem?

  Read the article

• Cannot get document.getElementByID to work

  - by user1804234

  The following function doesn't work for some reason. Can someone see what the problem is? function checkMaxLen(txt, maxLen) { var actualLen = txt.value.length; var remain = maxLen - actualLen; document.getElementById('remainChar').Value = remain; } <input type="text" id="remainChar" runat="server" value="500"/> Whenever I try to run the function, I get this error: Microsoft JScript runtime error: Unable to set value of the property 'Value': object is null or undefined

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636  | Next Page >