Search Results

Search found 53590 results on 2144 pages for 'dot net slackers'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 635/2144 | < Previous Page | 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642  | Next Page >

  • ASP.Net MVC, strongly typed view with DateTime not accepted?

    - by Anders Juul
    Hi all, I wish to create a view like <%@ Control Language="C#" Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewUserControl<System.DateTime?>" %> but I get an error saying that DateTime must be a reference type in order to use for parameter TModel. Fair enough, but I google plenty of examples that implement just what I try to achieve. Any clues as to what I need to change/install/update? Any comments welcome, Anders, Denmark

    Read the article

  • How do you unit test web page authorization using ASP.NET MVC?

    - by Kevin Pang
    Let's say you have a profile page that can only be accessed by the owner of that profile. This profile page is located at: User/Profile/{userID} Now, I imagine in order to prevent access to this page by other users, you could structure your UserController class's Profile function to check the current session's identity: HttpContext.Current.User.Identity.Name If the id matches the one in the url, then you proceed. Otherwise you redirect to some sort of error page. My question is how do you unit test something like this? I'm guessing that you need to use some sort of dependency injection instead of the HttpContext in the controller to do the check on, but I am unclear what the best way to do that is. Any advice would be helpful.

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET ASPX Designer question. Bug?

    - by Velika
    Check out this Screenshot. Shouldn't a hierarchy list of tags appear here? Usually it appears. Sometimes, the tag "appears" there but without text (but the tag object is there as evident when you hover over it.) Other times, like this, nothing appears. It's a usual feature to see the hierarchy or tags which gives me easily access to the tags from design view for easy altering in the properties window. I think too many developers love to do things the hard way and sludge thru tags in HTML view and hardly use this, but it frustrates me when it doesn't work all the time. Is it me? Nah....

    Read the article

  • how do i call an overloaded action in .net mvc?

    - by Jeff Martin
    I have an overloaded action in my Controller: public ActionResult AssignList(int id) { ... } [AcceptVerbs((HttpVerbs.Get))] public ActionResult AssignList(int id, bool altList) { ... } I'd like to use the same partial view for both lists but it will potentially have a differently filtered list of Images. I am trying to call it from another view using RenderAction: <% Html.RenderAction("AssignList", "Image", new { id = Model.PotholeId, altList = true }); %> However I am getting the following error: The current request for action 'AssignList' on controller type 'ImageController' is ambiguous between the following action methods: System.Web.Mvc.ActionResult AssignList(Int32) on type UsiWeb.Controllers.ImageController System.Web.Mvc.ActionResult AssignList(Int32, Boolean) on type UsiWeb.Controllers.ImageController How can I call the specific overload?

    Read the article

  • How to prevent DOS attacks using image resizing in an ASP.NET application?

    - by Waleed Eissa
    I'm currently developing a site where users can upload images to use as avatars, I know this makes me sound a little paranoid but I was wondering what if a malicious user uploads an image with incredibly large dimensions that will eat the server memory (as a DOS attack), I already have a limit on the file size that can be uploaded (250 k) but even that size can allow for an image with incredibly large dimensions if the image for example is a JPEG that contains one color and created with a very low quality setting. Taking into consideration that the image is uploaded as a bitmap in memory when being resized (ie. not compressed), I wonder if such DOS attacks occur, even to check the image dimensions it has to be uploaded in memory first, did you hear about any attacks that exploited this? Am I too worried?

    Read the article

  • json returned from a jsonresult in asp.net mvc .....

    - by Pandiya Chendur
    I am returning this from a json result from a controller, var genericResult = new { redirectUrl = Url.Action("Create", "Registration") , isRedirect = true }; return Json(genericResult); but when i inspect through firebug, {"redirectUrl":"/","isRedirect":true} if (data.isRedirect) { window.location.href = json.redirectUrl; } Any suggestion.... How to redirect?

    Read the article

  • ASP.Net MVC Toggling IsAjaxRequest property based on file upload?

    - by Jon
    I have a form all setup to upload a file and that is working fine. However the way my form is submitted is through AJAX. The button that submits is still a type="submit" in case JS is off. When I save my form the controller determines whether the IsAjaxRequest is true and if so returns some JSON otherwise it does a RedirectToAction. When I don't specify a filepath in my input type="file" it considers IsAjaxRequest as true. If there is a filepath set then it thinks that IsAjaxRequest is false. How is it determining that? My other problem is that when it thinks IsAjaxRequest is false and does a RedirectToAction("Index") I don't actually get sent to the Index view. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Why are .NET app.config load rules different for win2k3?

    - by Dan
    ...and are there any other caveat for other platforms? I create an app.config for a win forms project, for example Application.exe. By default I expect that at runtime my application is going to look for a file called Application.exe.config. But there seem to be exceptions to this, for example in a Windows Server 2003 environment an app will look for Application.config. The full path of the config file being searched for is different in Windows Server 2003, why is this? Where is the definition for these cosmic app.config loading rules?

    Read the article

  • My ASP.NET Accordion will not animate panel changes when triggered by check boxes.

    - by CowKingDeluxe
    My accordion panel in markup: <ajaxToolkit:Accordion ID="MyAccordion" runat="server" SelectedIndex="0" HeaderCssClass="accordionHeader" HeaderSelectedCssClass="accordionHeaderSelected" ContentCssClass="accordionContent" AutoSize="None" FadeTransitions="true" TransitionDuration="250" FramesPerSecond="40" RequireOpenedPane="false" SuppressHeaderPostbacks="true"> <Panes> <ajaxToolkit:AccordionPane ID="AccordionPane10" runat="server"> <Header>BBBBBBBBBB</Header> <Content> FFFFFFFF:<br /><br /> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="750"><tr><td width="450" class="verificationtdleft"> <asp:Image ID="step4_originalimage" runat="server" AlternateText="" /> </td><td width="300"> <asp:CheckBox ID="CB_Verification0" runat="server" AutoPostBack="true" /> Verify </td></tr> </table> </Content> </ajaxToolkit:AccordionPane> <ajaxToolkit:AccordionPane ID="AccordionPane11" runat="server"> <Header>GGGGGGGGG</Header> <Content> HHHHHHHHHH:<br /><br /> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="750"><tr><td width="450" class="verificationtdleft"> <asp:Image ID="step4_image_thumbnail" runat="server" AlternateText="" /> </td><td width="300"> <asp:CheckBox ID="CB_Verification1" runat="server" AutoPostBack="true" /> Verify </td></tr> </table> </Content> </ajaxToolkit:AccordionPane> </Panes> Here's how I handle the checkbox check: Private Sub CB_Verification0_CheckedChanged(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles CB_Verification0.CheckedChanged MyAccordion.SelectedIndex = 1 End Sub I'm causing the panels to change correctly, it's just that they don't animate like they do when I click the headers. When I click the checkbox to change the panel, the panel just disappears instantly and the new one appears instantly, but I want it to be animated as if I clicked the headers. Is there a way to cause the animation to happen when force changing the visible panel?

    Read the article

  • How to use CodeDomSerializer to serialize an object in .Net?

    - by user341127
    I have a class, which is defined as the following: [ToolboxItem(false)] [DesignTimeVisible(false)] [DesignerSerializer("DevExpress.XtraEditors.Design.RepositoryItemCodeDomSerializer, DevExpress.XtraEditors.v10.1.Design", "System.ComponentModel.Design.Serialization.CodeDomSerializer, System.Design")] [Designer("DevExpress.XtraEditors.Design.BaseRepositoryItemDesigner, DevExpress.XtraEditors.v10.1.Design")] [LicenseProvider(typeof(DXEditorLicenseProvider))] public class RepositoryItem : Component, ISupportInitialize, ICustomTypeDescriptor, IImageCollectionHelper {......} I tried the following code to serialize the object of this class. DesignerSerializationManager m = new System.ComponentModel.Design.Serialization.DesignerSerializationManager(); m.CreateSession(); DevExpress.XtraEditors.Design.RepositoryItemCodeDomSerializer s = m.GetSerializer(typeof(RepositoryItem), typeof(DevExpress.XtraEditors.Design.RepositoryItemCodeDomSerializer)) as DevExpress.XtraEditors.Design.RepositoryItemCodeDomSerializer; RepositoryItem i = persistentRepository1.Items[0]; //m.Container.Add(i); s.Serialize(m,i );// An error "Object reference not set to an instance of an object." happended here. For I am not familiar with CodeDom, I have spent one day to get the way out. I guess the above code has some stupid mistakes. Please give me a hand to show how to serialize AND DeSelialize such objects of the class of Repository. BTW, the reason I don't use any other serializer is that I am supposed not to have rights to know the source code of RepositoryItem and others could inherit RepositoryItem at the same time. And actually I have to deal with RepositoryItem and its descendants. Thank you in advance. Ying

    Read the article

  • [ASP.NET ERROR] The request was aborted: Could not create SSL/TLS secure channel.

    - by Mark Cidade
    I'm posting this on behalf of a co-worker. He gets a "The request was aborted: Could not create SSL/TLS secure channel" error while using a WebRequest object to make an HTTPS request. Th funny thing is that this only happens after a while, and is temporarily fixed when the application is restarted, which suggests that something is being filled to capacity or something. Has anyone seen this kind of thing before?

    Read the article

  • Applying a Dojo Toolkit (Dijit) theme to ASP.NET pages.

    - by mcoolbeth
    In the code below, I am trying to apply a Dijit theme to the controls in my .aspx page. However, the controls persist in their normal, unthemed appearance. Anybody know why? Master Page: <%@ Master Language="C#" AutoEventWireup="true" CodeBehind="Main.master.cs" Inherits="WebJournalEntryClient.Main" %> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" > <head runat="server"> <title>My Web Application</title> <link rel="stylesheet" href="dojoroot/dijit/themes/tundra/tundra.css" /> <script type="text/javascript" src="dojoroot/dojo/dojo.js"/> <script type="text/javascript"> dojo.require("dijit.form.Button"); dojo.require("dijit.form.TextBox"); dojo.require("dijit.form.ComboBox"); </script> </head> <body class = "tundra"> <form id="form1" runat="server"> <div> <div> This is potentially space for a header bar. </div> <table> <tr> <td> Maybe <br /> a <br /> Side <br /> bar. </td> <td> <asp:ContentPlaceHolder ID="CenterPlaceHolder" runat="server"/> </td> </tr> </table> <div> This is potentially space for a footer bar. </div> </div> </form> </body> </html> Content Page: <%@ Page Title="" Language="C#" MasterPageFile="~/Main.Master" AutoEventWireup="true" CodeBehind="LogIn.aspx.cs" Inherits="WebJournalEntryClient.LogIn" %> <asp:Content ID="Content" ContentPlaceHolderID="CenterPlaceHolder" runat="server"> <div> User ID: <asp:TextBox ID = "UserName" dojoType="dijit.form.TextBox" runat="server" /><br /> Password: <asp:TextBox ID = "PassWord" dojoType="dijit.form.TextBox" runat="server" /><br /> <asp:Button ID="LogInButton" Text="Log In" dojoType="dijit.form.Button" runat="server" /> </div> </asp:Content>

    Read the article

  • Why would the VB.NET compiler think an interface isn't implemented when it is?

    - by Dan Tao
    I have this happen sometimes, particularly with the INotifyPropertyChanged interface in my experience but I have no idea if the problem is limited to that single interface (which would seem bizarre) or not. Let's say I have some code set up like this. There's an interface with a single event. A class implements that interface. It includes the event. Public Interface INotifyPropertyChanged Event PropertyChanged As PropertyChangedEventHandler End Interface Public Class Person Implements INotifyPropertyChanged Public Event PropertyChanged _ (ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As PropertyChangedEventArgs) _ Implements INotifyPropertyChanged.PropertyChanged ' more code below ' End Class Every now and then, when I build my project, the compiler will suddenly start acting like the above code is broken. It will report that the Person class does not implement INotifyPropertyChanged because it doesn't have a PropertyChanged event; or it will say the PropertyChanged event can't implement INotifyPropertyChanged.PropertyChanged because their signatures don't match. This is weird enough as it is, but here's the weirdest part: if I just cut out the line starting with Event PropertyChanged and then paste it back in, the error goes away. The project builds. Does anybody have any clue what could be going on here?

    Read the article

  • Strategy in exporting to Excel with formatting from ASP.NET?

    - by Jiho Han
    So this is another exporting to Excel question. I have a page that has a table with formatting by stylesheet. When I export the page by setting the ContentType to application/excel and Content-Disposition to attachment, I can export the table to Excel (not CSV). However, it loses all formatting. I think it's because Excel does not load CSS and I guess that's reasonable. So, in a scenario where I have to show the table on the web and also export to Excel, both with similar (even if not exact) formatting, what would be the best approach without using something like NPOI? I am trying to minimize the work and keep the single template if possible. Is it necessary for me to create two separate templates: one with stylesheet, the other with embedded style in the table itself for Excel? Having a single template with conditional formatting inside would be very messy. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • How to set an array to a list of values in VB.NET?

    - by IPX Ares
    I cannot figure out how to set an array to one of two sets of numbers (there will be more later), every way that I have tried throws some kind of error. I have tried to Dim the array inside the case statements, but then I cannot use the array in the For Each, which makes this worthless.... any ideas would be appreciated. Code: Dim HourArray() As Integer Select Case CurrentShapeRow(ROW_PERIOD) Case "ON", "2X16" HourArray = {6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21} Case "2X8", "5X8" HourArray = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 22, 23} Case Else Throw New Exception(String.Format("Unhandled Period: {0}", CurrentShapeRow(ROW_PERIOD))) End Select For Each HourCount As Integer In HourArray() 'DO SOME STUFF HERE Next

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET MVC: Is it "wrong" to use HTTP 500 via an AJAX request to return invalid form content?

    - by Daniel Schaffer
    Here's the situation: I've got two partial views. One has a form. What needs to happen is when the form is posted via an AJAX request, if the operation succeeds, the area with the second partial is repopulated with the content. However, if the posted data was invalid, the original partial is repopulated with an error message. I'm using jQuery and the ajaxForm plugin to handle the form posts and responses. Would it be "wrong"/bad coding/wtf-worthy to conditionally use $.html() to replace the content in one area when it's a 200, and a different area if it's a 500? To me, this idea smells, but I'm not sure how else to accomplish the goal.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642  | Next Page >