Search Results

Search found 29508 results on 1181 pages for 'object initializers'.

Page 712/1181 | < Previous Page | 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719  | Next Page >

  • Is it possible to start (and stop) a thread inside a DLL?

    - by Jerry Dodge
    I'm pondering some ideas for building a DLL for some common stuff I do. One thing I'd like to check if it's possible is running a thread inside of a DLL. I'm sure I would be able to at least start it, and have it automatically free on terminate (and make it forcefully terminate its self) - that I can see wouldn't be much of a problem. But once I start it, I don't see how I can continue communicating with it (especially to stop it) mainly because each call to the DLL is unique (as far as my knowledge tells me) but I also know very little of the subject. I've seen how in some occasions, a DLL can be loaded at the beginning and released at the end when it's not needed anymore. I have 0 knowledge or experience with this method, other than just seeing something related to it, couldn't even tell you what or how, I don't remember. But is this even possible? I know about ActiveX/COM but that is not what I want - I'd like just a basic DLL that can be used across languages (specifically C#). Also, if it is possible, then how would I go about doing callbacks from the DLL to the app? For example, when I start the thread, I most probably will assign a function (which is inside the EXE) to be the handler for the events (which are triggered from the DLL). So I guess what I'm asking is - how to load a DLL for continuous work and release it when I'm done - as opposed to the simple method of calling individual functions in the DLL as needed. In the same case - I might assign variables or create objects inside the DLL. How can I assure that once I assign that variable (or create the object), how can I make sure that variable or object will still be available the next time I call the DLL? Obviously it would require a mechanism to Initialize/Finalize the DLL (I.E. create the objects inside the DLL when the DLL is loaded, and free the objects when the DLL is unloaded). EDIT: In the end, I will wrap the DLL inside of a component, so when an instance of the component is created, DLL will be loaded and a corresponding thread will be created inside the DLL, then when the component is free'd, the DLL is unloaded. Also need to make sure that if there are for example 2 of these components, that there will be 2 instances of the DLL loaded for each component. Is this in any way related to the use of an IInterface? Because I also have 0 experience with this. No need to answer it directly with sample source code - a link to a good tutorial would be great.

    Read the article

  • Simple servlet or filter to process form

    - by David
    Is there a simple framework for processing form submissions via a servlet? For my needs, a framework like STRUTS seems like over kill. My ideal processor would be a servlet that converts form elements into a bean object, possibly using typing information in the form to help with the conversion. Does something like this exist or is there another solution out there geared toward simpler needs? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • How do I iterate over an Array field reflectively?

    - by kunjaan
    I have Class<? extends Object> class1 = obj.getClass(); Field[] fields = class1.getDeclaredFields(); for (Field aField : fields) { aField.setAccessible(true); if (!Modifier.isStatic(aField.getModifiers()) && Modifier.isPublic((aField.getModifiers()))) { if (aField.getType().isArray()) { for (?? vals : aField) { System.out.println(vals); } } } }

    Read the article

  • Is there a way to catch an attempt to access a non existant property or method?

    - by Tor Valamo
    For instance this code: function stuff() { this.onlyMethod = function () { return something; } } // some error is thrown stuff().nonExistant(); Is there a way to do something like PHP's __call as a fallback from inside the object? function stuff() { this.onlyMethod = function () { return something; } this.__call__ = function (name, params) { alert(name + " can't be called."); } } // would then raise the alert "nonExistant can't be called". stuff().nonExistant();

    Read the article

  • question on NSUserDefault Class

    - by user174761
    I have value in 1 string for particular key. but NSUserDefault class method doesn't work properly and it doesn't set object of a string forkey . in short setobject forkey method is not working of NSUserDefault class. why is it so?

    Read the article

  • How do I combine two interfaces when creating mocks?

    - by sduplooy
    We are using Rhino Mocks to perform some unit testing and need to mock two interfaces. Only one interface is implemented on the object and the other is implemented dynamically using an aspect-oriented approach. Is there an easy way to combine the two interfaces dynamically so that a mock can be created and the methods stubbed for both interfaces?

    Read the article

  • Set seed on Math.random()

    - by Kevin
    Hi - I need to write some junit tests on java code that calls Math.random(). I know that I can set the seed if I was instantiating my own Random object to produce repeatable results. Is there a way to do this also for Math.random() ?

    Read the article

  • Is Perforce's C++ P4API thread-safe?

    - by Scott Bilas
    Simple question - is the C++ API provided by Perforce thread-safe? There is no mention of it in the documentation. By "thread-safe" I mean for server requests from the client. Obviously there will be issues if I have multiple threads trying to set client names and such on the same connection. But given a single connection object, can I have multiple threads fetching changelists, getting status, translating files through a p4 map, etc.?

    Read the article

  • Using Predicate of a class to Search Generic list - Faster than looping?

    - by Srikanth
    Lets say we have a generic list of Class1, typically having ~100 objects for a given session. I would like to see if the list has a particular object. ASP.NET 2.0 allows me to do this: Dim objResult as Class1 = objList.Find(objSearch) How does this approach rate when compared to a traditional For loop, looking at a performance perspective? How would this vary with increase or decrease in length of the list?

    Read the article

  • "The operation has timed out" when trying to send email

    - by user1718859
    protected void Button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { try { SmtpClient sm = new SmtpClient(); MailMessage ms = new MailMessage(); ms.To.Add(new MailAddress(TextBox1 .Text )); ms.Subject = TextBox2.Text; ms.Body = TextBox3.Text; ms.IsBodyHtml = true; sm.Send(ms); } catch (Exception el) { Response.Write(el.Message); } }

    Read the article

  • correct function parameters designation

    - by david
    Every time i pass some parameters to a JavasScript or jQuery functon, i use some random letters. What are the correct letters for the corresponding variable types? function(o){} for example is for a object. But what are the other letters? Do someone have a list of those?

    Read the article

  • Resolve instance - Autofac

    - by user137348
    I'm trying to figure out how to resolve a instance somewhere in the code. At the application startup I registered a type static void Main() { var builder = new ContainerBuilder(); builder.RegisterType<Foo>().As<IFoo>(); } Now, how can I resolve an instance somewhere in the code ? In structure mam there is a static object ObjectFactory.GetInstance<IFoo>()

    Read the article

  • How to do a back-reference on Google AppEngine?

    - by jCuga
    I'm trying to access an object that is linked to by a db.ReferenceProperty in Google app engine. Here's the model's code: class InquiryQuestion(db.Model): inquiry_ref = db.ReferenceProperty(reference_class=GiftInquiry, required=True, collection_name="inquiry_ref") And I am trying to access it in the following way: linkedObject = question.inquiry_ref and then linkedKey = linkedObject.key but it's not working. Can anyone please help?

    Read the article

  • Returning the size of available virtual memory at run-time in C++

    - by Greenhouse Gases
    In C++ is there a predefined library function that will return the size of RAM currently available on a computer a program is being run on, at run-time? For instance, if an object is 4bytes, then can we divide the available virtual memory by 4 bytes to give an estimate of how many more objects could be stored by the program safely? I have used the sizeof() function to return the size of objects within my program. Thanks

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719  | Next Page >