Search Results

Search found 53991 results on 2160 pages for 'asp net 4'.

Page 730/2160 | < Previous Page | 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737  | Next Page >

  • How to find which existing .NET solutions contain a certain project?

    - by Daniel Daranas
    I am exploring a structure of folders with C# projects such as the following: Projects ProjectA ProjectB ProjectC ProjectD Scattered around in the same folders as the .csproj files, there are several solution (.sln) files. Is there a fast way to find all the solutions that contain ProjectD.csproj? I can open them one by one and see what they contain, but I would like a feature such as "find all the solutions containing this project".

    Read the article

  • Need help in listbox multiple select

    - by vaibhav
    I have a list box, filled with countries. A user can select multiple countries in the list box. <asp:ListBox ID="lstRegion" style="width: 115px;size:3px" runat="server" onselectedindexchanged="lstRegion_SelectedIndexChanged" SelectionMode="Multiple" > <asp:ListItem Text="Please Select" Value="" Selected="True"></asp:ListItem> </asp:ListBox> I need all the selected values in the list box. I am using lstRegion.selectedValue but it is giving me only one value. I tried a different soultion, run a loop to the count of items in the lstRegion and find if the particular item has been selected or not. But this solution does'nt look good for me. Can any one suggest me how to get all selectedvalues in the list box

    Read the article

  • alternative in .Net to building Tables/TR/TD manually?

    - by egrunin
    I've got a pile of code here that looks like this: if (stateTax > 0) { tr = new TableRow(); tbl.Rows.Add(tr); td = new TableCell(); td.CssClass = "stdLabel"; td.Text = "NY State Tax"; tr.Cells.Add(td); td = new TableCell(); td.Text = string.Format("{0:C}", stateTax); td.CssClass = "justRight"; tr.Cells.Add(td); } This is a horrible hash of data and layout, but creating a special class or control every time something like this comes up seems almost as bad. What I usually do is write a helper function, which is concise but ugly: if (stateTax > 0) MakeRow(tbl, "NY State Tax", "stdLabel", string.Format("{0:C}", stateTax), "justRight"); And now I'm thinking: haven't I done this 100 times before? Isn't there a more modern way? Just to be explicit: it's a whole list of miscellaneous labels and values. They don't come from any particular data source, and the rules for when rows should be suppressed vary. This example has only two columns, but I have other places with more.

    Read the article

  • C#.NET Problem with locking of page after writing stream to window.

    - by godlikeskills
    The code below works fine, the problem is the 1st two lines are appearing on screen. It basically loads the PDF but I can't see the btnAcceptProposal change name or become enabled. Tried a Thread for the load but it broke. Anyone got any ideas - it's a web application protected void btnPDFProposal_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { btnAcceptProposal.Enabled = true; btnAcceptProposal.Text = "sss"; byte[] p = Order.Proposal; Response.AppendHeader("content-disposition", "attachment; filename=Proposal.pdf"); Response.ContentType = "Application/pdf"; Response.Clear(); Response.BinaryWrite(p); Response.End(); }

    Read the article

  • how to use the results of a method in another method in a different class initialization at vb.net

    - by singgih
    I have a class which has the following methods: Public Function rumusbuffer () As Decimal buffer = (ukuranblok - pntrblok) / (ukrnrecord + pntrblok) Return buffer End Function Public Function rumusW () As Decimal interblock = pntrblok + ((pntrblok + intrblok) / buffer) Return interblock End Function how can I make the buffer can be used on its function rumusw but different forms so that her class should be re-initialization .. but the calculation method can rumusbuffer rumusw d use in the method?

    Read the article

  • Can't get a List(Of <my class>) from a Dictionary in .NET?

    - by magsto
    I have a Dictionary with key of type UInteger and the value is List(Of Session) where the (Public) class Session contains a couple of variables and a constructor (Public Sub New(...)). Some of the variables in my Session class is: Private count As Integer Private StartDate As Date Private Values As List(Of Integer) and a couple of methods like: Friend Sub Counter(ByVal c as Integer) count += c End Sub There is no problem to add values to the Dictionary: Dim Sessions As New List(Of Session) Dim dict As New Dictionary(Of Integer, Sessions) then some code to fill up a couple of Session objects in Sessions (not shown here) and then: dict.Add(17, Sessions) 'No problem Sessions.Clear() Sessions = dict(17) 'This doesn't return anything! The Sessions object is empty even if the code doesn't returned any error. Is my class Session to compex to be stored in a Dictionary?

    Read the article

  • In C# or .NET, is there a way to prevent other threads from invoking methods on a particular thread?

    - by YWE
    I have a Windows Forms application with a BackgroundWorker. In a method on the main form, a MessageBox is shown and the user must click the OK button to continue. Meanwhile, while the messagebox is being displayed, the BackgroundWorker finishes executing and calls the RunWorkerCompleted event. In the method I have assigned to that event, which runs on the UI thread, the Close method is called on the form. Even though the method that shows the message box is still running, the UI thread is not blocking other threads from invoking methods on it. So the Close method gets called on the form. What I want is for the UI thread to block other threads' invokes until the method with the message box has finished. Is there an easy way to do that?

    Read the article

  • How can I get the contents of my table with dynamic row adding?

    - by user359706
    how to retrieve from the server-side contained a table html constructed this way: <table id="myTable"> <tr> <th> <input type="text"> name </th> <th> <input type="text"> quantity </th> </tr> <tr> <th> <input id="name_1"> phone </th> <th> <input id="quantity_1"> 15 </th> </tr> <tr> <th> <input ="name_2"> id mp3 </th> <th> <input id="quantity_2"> 26 <</th> </tr> ... I can not make use of <asp:Table> ... because for technical reasons I did not find a solution following this post: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3003912/how-to-dynamic-adding-rows-into-asp-net-table How can retrieve the contents values of my table (dynamic) for each row. Rows will be added in client-side js Thank you.

    Read the article

  • .NET grouping forms so that pulling up the primary form shows all other forms?

    - by toasteroven
    I have an app that can open up some other forms at the user's request, and they're set to not show in the taskbar. The problem is, if one of the secondary windows becomes hidden by another app, switching to the primary window only brings that form to the forefront. Is there a good way to "group" the forms so that giving any of them focus brings the whole group to the front? I tried calling BringToFront() on each form in the primary form's Activated event, but that also gives the secondary forms focus, making it impossible to interact with the primary form.

    Read the article

  • Get REST Call is not returning the string I put in url

    - by wizage
    I have very simple code: using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Net; using System.Net.Http; using System.Web.Http; namespace Calculator.Controllers { public class CalcController : ApiController { public string Get(string type) { return type; } } } And this is what it returns when I type in http://www.example.com/api/calc/test <string xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/2003/10/Serialization/" i:nil="true"/> When I use http://www.example.com/api/calc/?test=test it returns this: <string xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/2003/10/Serialization/">type</string> How to I make it so I can just do the top one instead of the bottom one?

    Read the article

  • Any ORMs that easily support access to raw table schema?

    - by fizil
    I work with a ASP.NET UI framework that pulls fields for a particular screen off a database. These fields can be associated with particular data fields in another database for binding. The idea with this setup is that if a client needs a new column on a table, they can easily add it, and create a UI field that binds to it without any sort of application restart or recompile. The problem I've always had with this is that it has meant I'm always having to work with untyped datasets in my code. Are there any ORM libraries for .NET out there that could easily accommodate the requirement of being able to access arbitrary columns in the table schema over and above ones mapped to strongly typed fields?

    Read the article

  • Checkbox not working properly for IE with jquery

    - by wildanjel
    Hi, I am trying using several asp.net checkboxes on a page, disabling them accordingly. <asp:CheckBox ID='chkMenuItem' runat='server' CssClass='HiddenText' Text='Test' onclick='<%#String.Format("checkChild({0});", Eval("id")) %>' /> on javascript, I am using the following code function checkChild(id) { for (i = 0; i < $("input[id*=hdnParentMenuItemID]").length; i++) { if ($('input[id*=hdnParentMenuItemID]')[i].value.split(':')[0] == id) { var childID = $('input[id*=hdnParentMenuItemID]')[i].value.split(':')[1]; if ($("#" + childID).attr("disabled")) //$("#" + childID).attr('disabled', ''); $("#" + childID).removeAttr("disabled"); else $("#" + childID).attr('disabled', true); } } } Now is the checkboxes are disabled once the page is loaded, the removeAttr section doesn't work. I tried to step through the debugger and the logic works perfectly fine. If the checkboxes aren't disabled on page load, the code works fine. I tried replacing disabled 'attributes' with 'checked' to see if the other attributes work fine and it works perfectly fine. I tried $("#" + childID).attr('disabled', ''); but it didnt work either. Note: It works perfect on FF and Chrome but doesnt work in IE. Thanks,

    Read the article

  • question about LocalSqlServer

    - by Alexander
    I know that by default ASP.NET ships with LocalSqlServer... I just uploaded my website and I did the following: <remove name="LocalSqlServer"/> <add name="LocalSqlServer" connectionString="Data Source=winsqlus03.lxa.perfora.net,1433; Initial Catalog=db323219488; User ID= dboxxxxxxxxx; Password=xxxxx;"/> And inside my App_Data I still have the ASPNETDB.MDF, when I tried to run it... What I got is: Could not find stored procedure 'dbo.aspnet_CheckSchemaVersion'. why is this?

    Read the article

  • [VB.NET] Same name methods in different modules cause ambiguity.

    - by smwikipedia
    I have 2 modules. Each contains a Sub with the same name. See below: Module moduleA Public Sub f(ByVal arg1 As myType) Console.WriteLine("module A") End Sub End Module Module moduleB Public Sub f(ByVal arg1 As myType, ByVal arg2 As Boolean) Console.WriteLine("module B") End Sub End Module But the compiler complains that there's ambiguity between moduleA and moduleB. How could this be? I have totally different signatures. However, if I put the 2 methods into the same module, there's no ambiguity at all. Could someone tell me why? Many thanks.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737  | Next Page >