Search Results

Search found 30217 results on 1209 pages for 'website performance'.

Page 730/1209 | < Previous Page | 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737  | Next Page >

  • What are my X client options for MS Windows?

    - by Nick Bolton
    I need to connect to a headless X Windows server (running on Ubuntu) from my MS Windows 7 computer over a 100 Mbit network. I could use VNC (or any other remote viewer) but the 3D graphics performance would be lousy I imagine. I used to have it hooked up to a monitor, but that's broken now and I can't afford a new one. A friend advised that I could try and use an X client, and that the 3D graphics wont suffer too much over 100 Mbit. Cygwin seems to be an option, but I was wondering if there were any more lightweight options.

    Read the article

  • How do I find the source of soft page faults?

    - by David Robison
    I have Windows 7 x64 computer that according to Performance Monitor has 70,000 page faults / second when idling. That's seems like a lot to me (every other computer I check has basically 0 page faults / second when idling). If I use Resource Monitor or Process Explorer to check hard faults, I see that they are basically 0. So all the page faults are soft. Normally, soft page faults are not a problem, but I suspect they might be causing issues for this computer given there are so many. I would like to identify what programs are causing the soft faults. Are there any tools that exist the display the number of soft page faults for each process?

    Read the article

  • Bigger ProjectServer farm is performing worse

    - by MSPS DBA
    I am using Project Server 2007 sp3 with SharePoint 2007 sp3 and SQL Server 2008 r2. I have recently moved my farm from 2 servers (1 DB and 1 App/Web) to a very big farm having Many Servers, Clustered Database, Load Balancer, Powerful processors and Large RAM. This Farm has more than one Web Servers, Project App Servers, SharePoint App Servers and a separate Index Server. But the performance of Project Server in the new Farm has been downgraded. Views are taking even more time to load data and Project publishing time has also been increased. I am also facing deadlock problems which are causing the project server queue jobs to fail. Could anyone inform me that what would be the reason of this problem and what should be the starting point to look into the issue? Is it mainly because now the application server needs to communicate with other application servers which were not needed in the previous farm? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • misaligned raid partition in Ubuntu 10.04

    - by Linux Jedi
    I attached two identical hard drives to my linux machine. Then using gparted I formated the first 1024 mb at the beginning of each drive as linux swap space. Then I went into system-administration-disk utility. In there I went to file-create-RAID array. I selected the remaining space in each of the two identical hard drives and created a striped raid array. After the array was created, a warning message appeared. It said "The partition is misaligned by 522240 bytes. This may result in very poor performance. Repartitioning is suggested." What do I do now? As far as I can tell, the partitions are identical.

    Read the article

  • CPU clock scales down so computer is unusable after switching to battery

    - by Ryan
    When I am plugged in my laptop runs great however when I unplug it and I'm on battery power my CPU clock speed scales down pretty much all the way. I know this is happening by monitoring the clock speed. When plugged in it will usually stay between 1000MHz and 3000MHz but when I unplug it it quickly scales down to less than 500MHz and will get as low as 100MHz and it will NEVER scale up at all on battery power. After I plug the power back in it will then begin operating normally in about a minute. I have tried setting the MIN and MAX CPU performance in power options to 100% and have tried messing around with cooling settings which seemed to be a problem with HP laptops. I have a Toshiba Satellite M500-ST6444 running Windows 7. The BIOS is up to date. I have tried two versions.

    Read the article

  • Video problem with Windows 7 Games

    - by Jordan 1GT
    I have a Dell xps M1330 which originally ran Vista, but I upgraded to Windows 7. When I try to run a Win 7 game like spider solitaire I receive the following message: "The game is running in software rendering mode. Hardware acceleration is either disabled or not supported by your video card driver which could slow down game performance. Make sure you have the latest video card driver installed and that hardware acceleration is turned on." I confirmed that hardware acceleration is turned on. When I go to Dell's site, I'm told there is no later video driver. When I run the game it runs very choppy. I wouldn't care, but I loaded a .pptx file which is doing strange things in normal view and I suspect may be related to the same video problem. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Windows script to create directories of 3,000 files

    - by uhpl1
    We have some email archiving that is dumping all the emails into a directory. Because of some performance reasons with the server, I want to setup an automated task that will run a script once a day and if there is more than 3,000 (or whatever number) of files in the main directory, create a new directory with the date and move all the main directory files into it. I'm sure someone has already written something similar, so if anyone could point me at it that would be great. Batch file or Powershell would both be fine.

    Read the article

  • C drive should only contain OS. Myth or fact?

    - by Fasih Khatib
    So, I have a 500GB HDD @7200RPM. It is split as: C: 97GB D: 179GB E: 188GB My belief is to keep OS ONLY in C:\ and any adamant programs that won't go anywhere apart from C:\ [because this speeds up the PC during startup process] and install programs in D:\ so that in case I have to reinstall the OS, I will have the programs readily available after reinstall. But I have begun to think this approach is flawed because if C:\ is formatted, I will lose registry values and stuff that goes in %appdata% and so it is no use keeping programs in D:/ drive because they will be useless after all. Should I go ahead and install ALL of my programs in C:\ and then use D:\ and E:\ for storing my data like photos, text files, java files n all? How will this impact the performance of the HDD? I only have 3 programs in D:\Program Files so it will be easy to reinstall them :)

    Read the article

  • OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 APACHE

    - by Abby E
    I been noticing a lot lately in my /server-status the OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 has been coming up lately a lot. I'm running Ubuntu 12.04 with the latest apache/php/MySQL. I'm not sure what they're for but I would like to see if it would effect performance by some how turning it off. I host some stuff that is accessed a lot that uses PHP/MySQL (600 rps). I'm not sure what it's there for but I do see the local 127.0.0.1 IP, so I assume it's something running local. What is it? How do your turn it off? If turned off how would it effect performance? The list below is a small example of it. (127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) hostname has been removed) 211-0 - 0/0/1035 . 24.28 240189 0 0.0 0.00 0.18 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 212-0 - 0/0/51274 . 677.97 202960 0 0.0 0.00 8.99 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 213-0 - 0/0/419 . 11.85 240424 0 0.0 0.00 0.07 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 214-0 - 0/0/240 . 7.96 240552 0 0.0 0.00 0.04 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 215-0 - 0/0/309 . 9.29 240492 0 0.0 0.00 0.05 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 216-0 - 0/0/98510 . 1258.25 177391 0 0.0 0.00 17.29 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 217-0 - 0/0/338 . 10.18 240464 0 0.0 0.00 0.06 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 218-0 - 0/0/345 . 10.27 240469 0 0.0 0.00 0.06 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 219-0 - 0/0/118538 . 1507.99 168914 0 0.0 0.00 20.80 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 220-0 - 0/0/98452 . 1259.10 177412 0 0.0 0.00 17.29 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 221-0 - 0/0/384 . 10.84 240453 0 0.0 0.00 0.06 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 222-0 - 0/0/331 . 10.03 240477 0 0.0 0.00 0.06 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 223-0 - 0/0/314 . 9.04 240493 0 0.0 0.00 0.05 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 224-0 - 0/0/75193 . 975.24 188845 0 0.0 0.00 13.18 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 225-0 - 0/0/362 . 10.62 240457 0 0.0 0.00 0.06 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 226-0 - 0/0/125773 . 1593.26 165647 0 0.0 0.00 22.06 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 227-0 - 0/0/82541 . 1063.89 185092 0 0.0 0.00 14.48 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 228-0 - 0/0/409 . 11.50 240436 0 0.0 0.00 0.07 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 229-0 - 0/0/219 . 7.38 240581 0 0.0 0.00 0.04 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 230-0 - 0/0/357 . 10.48 240458 0 0.0 0.00 0.06 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 231-0 - 0/0/469 . 12.39 240411 0 0.0 0.00 0.08 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 232-0 - 0/0/394 . 11.32 240445 0 0.0 0.00 0.07 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 233-0 - 0/0/276 . 9.00 240510 0 0.0 0.00 0.05 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 234-0 - 0/0/245 . 8.51 240536 0 0.0 0.00 0.04 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 235-0 - 0/0/215 . 7.45 240555 0 0.0 0.00 0.04 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 236-0 - 0/0/370 . 11.00 240443 0 0.0 0.00 0.06 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 237-0 - 0/0/400 . 10.96 240446 0 0.0 0.00 0.07 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 238-0 - 0/0/266 . 8.51 240531 0 0.0 0.00 0.04 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 239-0 - 0/0/304 . 9.81 240499 0 0.0 0.00 0.05 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 240-0 - 0/0/446 . 12.47 240421 0 0.0 0.00 0.08 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 241-0 - 0/0/19741 . 282.90 230130 0 0.0 0.00 3.45 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 242-0 - 0/0/98503 . 1259.43 177404 0 0.0 0.00 17.28 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 243-0 - 0/0/251 . 7.93 240551 0 0.0 0.00 0.04 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 244-0 - 0/0/273 . 8.42 240534 0 0.0 0.00 0.05 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 245-0 - 0/0/118485 . 1508.14 168950 0 0.0 0.00 20.79 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 246-0 - 0/0/294 . 9.35 240509 0 0.0 0.00 0.05 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 247-0 - 0/0/413 . 12.34 240437 0 0.0 0.00 0.07 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 248-0 - 0/0/258 . 8.55 240529 0 0.0 0.00 0.04 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0 249-0 - 0/0/303 . 9.77 240485 0 0.0 0.00 0.05 127.0.0.1 REMOVED.(null) OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0

    Read the article

  • Few questions on giga tweaker

    - by user23950
    I better consult first the people here before I do anything unnecessary using this app called giga tweaker. I don't really understand what this increase the performance of your CPU thing. It is under Customization-Memory Management-ram & disk cache of giga tweaker. What will happen if I change the level cache size of l2 cache into the highest possible value which is 8Mb. What are the negative effects of doing it? The file system caching memory, still under Customization-Memory Management-ram & disk cache. What effects will it have on my system which has 2Gb of Ram and 2.50 Ghz of Dual Core CPU. Please enlighten me.

    Read the article

  • ESXi with non-headless VM

    - by Mike
    I'm going to receive a Xeon Server/Workstation soon and I was thinking about installing ESXi to host some server applications that I want (ex: SVN server, Web server, media server, etc). Most of these will be headless VM's. My question is: on top of all these headless VM's, is it possible for ESXi to have another VM that would be non-headless (so that it will output video through the VGA/DVI port)? Or are all VM's within ESXi only accessible through remote connections? I'll be using this non-headless VM like a regular workstation: browsing, development, media, gaming maybe. The other alternative I was thinking about is to install a very lightweight operating system and have the headless VM's running in Virtualbox. If it is possible to have have a non-headless VM, what would be the performance compared to a regular workstation? Noticeable or not when gaming?

    Read the article

  • I'll be setting up a dedicated web server at work soon, my first non hobby server - What should I know?

    - by Rogue Coder
    I've been running my own dedicated server running CentOS and a LAMP stack for 2-3 years now, but it's only been hosting my own websites which aren't super important. However, I will soon be setting up a Linux Webserver and Linux Database Server at work, and I'm wondering what are some important things I should be doing. It's an internal server only, so only people in the company can access it. Should I get a slave server for both of my servers for backups? If I do this, how many backups should I be keeping and how often should those backups be done? Right now on my current server I run a cron job nightly to backup my MySQL databases (Usually 40mb files once compressed), and bi-weekly cron jobs to backup my web root. I just store these files on my local computer via FTP. Also, for an internal server like this, should I look at using LightHTTPD or NginX to increase performance, or will Apache be fine?

    Read the article

  • Does Intel Smart Response provide any statistics on the cache usage?

    - by Tom Seddon
    I've set up my Z68-based Core i7 PC with a 60GB SSD dedicated as a Smart Response cache drive. Is there any way I can get any statistics out of it? It would be nice to have some information on how much cache space is actually being used, maybe how much of it was actually accessed recently, and how many reads in general are coming from the SSD rather than from the mechanical disk. These statistics might help to quickly provide some evidence for or against the use of Smart Response, without my having to reinstall Windows on the SSD (etc.) to find out. The Windows ReadyBoost feature has some performance counters you can access via the Windows 7 perfmon tool, for example, which is the kind of thing I'm hoping is somehow available. Smart Response provides no perfmon counters, though, and the Intel Rapid Storage Utility tells you pretty much nothing except that Smart Response is switched on.

    Read the article

  • How can I display images on a MS Access 2007+ form with a hyperlink source?

    - by Yaaqov
    I am looking improve the efficiency of an Access 2010 database by using a web server with images and only storing the hyperlink source (i.e, http://www.images.com/images/image1.jpg) in the table. I know that one can save images as "attachements", using a "blob" object type, but when you're dealing with thousands of images, queries are bogged down, and performance suffers. So in short, is there are relatively simple way of displaying images on MS Access forms with a source that is a hyperlink address (storing files locally and using filepaths is not preferable). Thanks.

    Read the article

  • How can I set deadline as the I/O scheduler for USB Flash devices by using udev rules?

    - by ????
    I have set CFQ as the default I/O scheduler. I often get bad performance when I write data into a Flash device. This is resolved if I use deadline as the I/O scheduler for USB Flash devices. I can't always change the scheduler manually, right? I think writing udev rules is a good idea. Can someone please write rules for me? I want: When I plug in a USB device, detect the type of the device. If it is a portable USB hard disk, do nothing (I think if a device has more than one partitions, it always a portable hard disk. If it is a USB Flash device, set deadline as it's scheduler.

    Read the article

  • Very slow Windows 7 on Thinkpad T61

    - by bogdanf
    I have a very strange problem with my fresh install of Windows 7 Profesional, 64bits on my Lenovo Thinkpad T61 : The overal performance is very slow, the disk is constantly spinning, even without any program running (after boot, no other programs installed). The boot process is very slow itself (4-5 minutes). I mention that the laptop was fine on XP until the upgrade. Thanks ! Additional info (as requested by the comments) : 2GB RAM Yes, I added all the manufacturer (Lenovo) drivers and updates (using the utility provided by Lenovo) Tried with both 32 and 64 bits editions. The 32 bits one is performing a little better, but not very usable either. The hdd has enough space (20 GB or so) The problem is still present on a fresh install, so no recycle bin emptying or unistall programs (there aren't any except plain 7) would help. I'm not a newbie, so no obvious causes are left unchecked

    Read the article

  • Any limitations for putting an SSD in a Mini? How fast would an external HDD be via Firewire? Is Ser

    - by Cyrcle
    I'm considering getting a Mini for web programming. I do a lot of text searches so I want to put a SSD in it. Does the Mini have any limitations that might effect the performance of a SSD? I'm trying to decide if I should get a Mini Server. I'd like to be able to have two internal drives so one can be SSD for OS and the code I'm working on, and the other can be my storage drive. However, I'm not sure if I'll be using the extra functionality of the server edition OSX or not, so I'm reluctant to pay the $200 premium. In a "regular" Mini I could put the SSD internal and use an external big drive, but would the external drive be fast enough via Firewire? Thanks in advance for any info.

    Read the article

  • How do I fix "Setup did not find any hard disk drives installed in your computer" error during Win XP Pro install?

    - by CT.
    I just bought a nettop. It came with WinXP Home. I first installed Win 7 on it. I wasn't that happy with the performance so I decided to go back to XP. I am using an external dvd drive and a Win XP Pro disc. I boot from the dvd drive and during the install get this error: Setup did not find any hard disk drives installed in your computer. Make sure any hard disk drives are powered on and properly connected to your computer, and that any disk-related hardware configuration is correct. This may involve running a manufacturer-supplied diagnostic or setup program. Setup cannot continue. To quit Setup, press F3. This is the nettop in question: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16883103228

    Read the article

  • What's faster for web-server virtualization ? (virtualbox or KVM)

    - by marc
    I have question, does anyone try to set up a webserver (debian) using virtualbox (x64) ? Right now i have few servers in KVM (x64) but i think it work slowly... Can i get something more (faster, performance) using virtualbox (x64)? On my home installation it looks very fast. Should i move to vbox against kvm ? I'm looking for answer from someone who have in virtualbox (x64) real server (can be headless) (debian/ubuntu) not windows xp or other home using things ;) I also got xp, 2k3, ubuntu in virtualbox (x86) and for me looking faster than kvm(x64). But it's hard to say anything without real tests done by multiple users not just one.

    Read the article

  • How do you explain ethernet cable problems to non networking people?

    - by Bryan McLemore
    We've recently been doing a large network migration in our datacenter. We've had a few cables in this start to deliver really bad pings (in excess of 500ms on a LAN) before they could be replaced. The cables we were replacing weren't made the best. They where all hand made and the runs were so short on some of them that the bend radius was definitely too tight. Some of them ran in bundles right in front of the heat exhaust of the power supplies. The cables were running ok until we started pulling the ones surrounding them out. Then a few started having the problem I mentioned above degrading performance and causing reliability issues. I'm trying to figure out the best way to explain this to non networking people. Is there any documentation that people could recommend or other methods?

    Read the article

  • Is paravirtualization evil?

    - by Daniel
    I have an VMWare ESX Server v3.5 with a few virtualized Debian Lenny VMs (kernel 2.6.22 with vmi) running Apache Tomcat 5.5. I enabled paravirtualization, and Disk IO increased from about 240MB/s to 380MB/s, making me a happy admin. The problem now is that my apache tomcat becomes deadlocked during startup, running with 200% CPU (I have 2 CPUS assigned to the VM), and don't know how to get both: A stable system and a fast system. I somewhere heared that paravirtualization is legacy anyway and won't be available on newer ESX servers. Is there a replacement for this seemingly performance-improving option, or is it discontinued becauses it is just unstable? What is the state of paravirtualization? Should I ignore it completely? Thanks for all answers in advance.

    Read the article

  • When is it time to buy a new hard drive, and what considerations go into buying a new hard drive?

    - by user1125620
    I've had my current hard drive for about 4-5 years now, and I've never had a problem with it before, but now it's making whirring noises. It's done this before and, last time, the noise did go away the next day, but I have accumulated quite a bit of information that I wouldn't want to lose on the drive. HD Tune Pro and Berlac Advisor both said the drive was healthy, and I wouldn't want to get a new one unless it was absolutely necessary or was going to show drastic performance improvements. My only knock against the drive would be that Visual Studio takes longer to load than I'd like it to. HD Tune Pro says the average read speed is 54.3MB/s. I'm not sure if that's good or bad, but it seems about average compared to similar drives on http://www.hdtune.com/testresults.html. Model #: WDC WD5000AAJS-22YFA0 So, should hard drives be replaced after a certain amount of time? Has mine reached that point? Would a new hard drive be any faster?

    Read the article

  • What does motherboard RAM slot colors mean?

    - by totymedli
    I always saw that the motherboard RAM slots are colored in pairs, but never know what does it means. I just put the 2 RAM in, and after a few tries it always worked. But after I tried to install a third one it always throws me a blue screen of death. Is there an order how should I install RAM to the borad? What does the colors mean? Does they indicate performance boost opportunity or are they just a guide for installation?

    Read the article

  • What type of security problems are mitigated by this .NET architecture?

    - by Jonno
    Given the following physical layout for a .NET web application: DB (sql server, windows) - No public route (no table access, only stored procs) Web Service DAL (iis, windows) - No public route (can be accessed by web server via port 80 and 443) Web Server (iis, windows) - Public route (only via port 80 and 443) What type(s) / examples of attack could be used to compromise the public web server but would be blocked by the Web Service DAL? i.e. can you think of concrete attack types that the DAL stops? Please note, I am interested only in the security aspect, not scaling / fault tolerance / performance / etc. In my mind if the web server has been compromised using an attack over port 80/443, then the same attack would work over port 80/443 to the Web Service DAL box.

    Read the article

  • Graphic Setup tune-up checklist

    - by Click Ok
    I was trying to play the game Warzone 2100 and the games runs fine, with nice speed, but the screen stays with a horizontal lines "flickering"... My PC have a integrated GeForce Go 6100 vga. Ok, not a powerfull vga, but it's not the end of the world to run a "simple" game like this (compared with another games that ask you send your eyes to purchase a expensive vga). So, I think that the problem can be of the configuration of my machine. I use it in first instance for programming jobs, so I underpay attention to video setup. I would like about a checklist to know if my PC is "ready" to games. By example, I know that I need: Lastest vga drivers Updated DirectX and OpenGL What you suggest? There is too some good programs to test performance and suggests improvements in the system? Thank you! PS: I'm using Windows 7

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737  | Next Page >