Search Results

Search found 44058 results on 1763 pages for 'function module'.

Page 821/1763 | < Previous Page | 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828  | Next Page >

  • How to use $.get data to replace certain elements in a webpage?

    - by Jack Ha
    I'm using jQuery 1.4.2 to navigate smoothly between similar webpages (in ff3). When clicking on a link, a javascript script should load the new html, filter out the right elements and replace them on the current page. It looks like the $(htmlcode) does not do the thing I expected. The actions below work when loading the page directly, but when using the $.get I have the following problems: the find function seems only to look inside a div element called id="page", which is inside the body element one of the elements has <script>...</script>, but the <script>...</script> is not present in the DOM of $(htmlcode). Anybody knows how to solve this? $.get( url, function(responseText, textStatus, xmlHttpRequest) { alert($(responseText).find("#header")); // works, #header is inside div#page alert($(responseText).find("#header").html()); // displays content, but WITHOUT the <script>...</script> alert($(responseText).find("title")); // does not work, title is outside div#page } );

    Read the article

  • Converting keys of an array/object-tree to lowercase

    - by tstenner
    Im currently optimizing a PHP application and found one function being called around 10-20k times, so I'd thought I'd start optimization there. function keysToLower($obj) { if(!is_object($obj) && !is_array($obj)) return $obj; foreach($obj as $key=>$element) { $element=keysToLower($element); if(is_object($obj)) { $obj->{strtolower($key)}=$element; if(!ctype_lower($key)) unset($obj->{$key}); } else if(is_array($obj) && ctype_upper($key)) { $obj[strtolower($key)]=$element; unset($obj[$key]); } } return $obj; } Most of the time is spent in recursive calls (which are quite slow in PHP), but I don't see any way to convert it to a loop. What would you do?

    Read the article

  • How to read the values returned by the Json?

    - by user281180
    I have the following code in my view: <% using (Ajax.BeginForm("JsonCreate", new AjaxOptions { OnComplete = "createCategoryComplete" })) { % Add new category <%=Html.TextBox("CategoryId")% <%=Html.TextBox("Test")% Name: <%= Html.TextBox("Name")% <%= Html.ValidationMessage("Name")% </p> <p> <input type="submit" value="Create" /> </p> </fieldset> </div> <% } % In the controller the code is as follows: [AcceptVerbs(HttpVerbs.Post)] public JsonResult JsonCreate(string Name) { if (ModelState.IsValid) { try { //Return a json object to the javascript return Json(new { CategoryId = 123, Test= "test successful" }); } catch { #region Log errors about the exception //Log error to administrator here #endregion } } //If we got this far, something failed, return an empty json object return Json(new { /* Empty object */ }); } What should be the code in the view for the following function to read the values returned by the Json and update the textboxes for CategoryId and Test? function createCategoryComplete() {....???}

    Read the article

  • JQuery image gallery non functional fade effects

    - by Robin Knight
    Here is a simple image gallery script for fading in and out divs with background images. It is slow and not working properly. It would appear all images are appearing and disappearing together without any animation This gallery should fade each image out into the next one function gallery() { timerp = window.setInterval(function() { $('.cornerimg').fadeOut(2000); if ($('.cornerimg:visible') == $('.cornerimg').last()) { $('.cornerimg').first().fadeIn(2000); } else { $('.cornerimg').next().fadeIn(2000); }; }, 6000); } } Any ideas what has gone wrong with it?

    Read the article

  • Why is const required [C++] ? [closed]

    - by Andy Leman
    Possible Duplicate: What's the difference between a const member function and a non-const member function? class Message { public: Message(const char* pStr, const char* key); Message(const char* pStr); Message(); void encryptMessage(); void decryptMessage(); const char* getUnMessage() const; const char* getEnMessage() const; void getMessage(); void getKey(); ~Message(); private: char* pUnMessage; char* pEnMessage; char* pKey; }; In this program, why using const? (2 different places) Please explain those 2 for me. Thank you very much!

    Read the article

  • Jquery convert string of one type to string array.....

    - by chandru_cp
    Consider a string which is {"Table" : [{"Bird" : "Peacock"}, {"Bird" : "Crow"}]} to this ["Peacock", "Crow"] in jquery... Is this possible? EDIT: I am doing this but didnt work... $(document).ready(function() { var obj = JSON.parse('{"Table" : [{"Bird" : "Peacock"},{"Bird" : "Crow"}]}'); myarray = []; $.each(obj.table, function(i, v) { myarray.push(v.Bird); }); $("#tags").autocomplete(myarray, { width: 138, max: 4, highlight: false, multiple: true, multipleSeparator: " ", scroll: true, scrollHeight: 300 }); });

    Read the article

  • C++ static virtual members?

    - by cvb
    Is it possible in C++ to have a member function that is both static and virtual? Apperantly, there isn't a straight-forward way to do it (static virtual member(); is a complie error), but at least a way to acheive the same effect? I.E: struct Object { struct TypeInformation; static virtual const TypeInformation &GetTypeInformation() const; }; struct SomeObject : public Object { static virtual const TypeInformation &GetTypeInformation() const; }; It makes sence to use GetTypeInformation() both on an instance (object->GetTypeInformation()) and on a class (SomeObject::GetTypeInformation()), which can be useful for comparsions and vital for templates. The only ways I can think of involves writing two functions / a function and a constant, per class, or use macros. Any other solutions?

    Read the article

  • send javaScript variable to php variable

    - by mrbunyrabit
    First i thought that i had to convert javascript to php, but then i found out that cant because of server and client side executions. So now I simply want to send ONE variable <script type="text/javascript"> function scriptvariable() { var theContents = "the variable"; } </script> to a php variable <?php $phpvariable ?> That function in the javascript executes when lets say i click on a button. Now i have Nooo idea how to get that phpvariable Equal to the javascript one so i can use that phpvariable to look up stuff in my Database. I know i can add it to my url or some thing, and just refresh the page.. But id like to do it with AJAX as further in my webpage i might have to use this Ajax method.. So is there an easy way to do this without having to dump pages of code on my page to do one simple thing?

    Read the article

  • Dynamic change of class of <TR> with Jquery

    - by Coronier
    Hi all, This is my first post, and first please forgive me for my poor english. I have a problem I really can't fix: I have a <table> of questions, the first question is visible (class:visible), the others are hidden (class:hidden) $(document).ready(function(){ $('.hidden').hide(); When people click on the first question, I want the second question to appear (and the first question to turn to grey, using a 'done' class). $('.visible:not(.done)').click(function(){ $(this).addClass('done'); $('.hidden:first').toggle(500).removeClass('hidden').addClass('visible'); }) The first question is now done (class:done) and the 2nd question should be the only one to react to a click(), and so on... But it doesn't work: the other <tr> appear only when I click on the 1st <tr>. Can someone give me a hand on this problem ? Thank you.

    Read the article

  • How should I initialize jQuery?

    - by Reigel
    I have seen this (I'm also using it): $(document).ready(function(){ // do jQuery }) and also this (I have tried lately): (function(){ // do jQuery })(jQuery) both works fine. My question is what is the difference of the two ( except on how it looks ). Which one is more proper to use?. Can you give me some pro's and con's for each? Is there also another way of doing this? (also help me with the title above. SO suggested, "The question you're asking appears subjective and is likely to be closed.") Thanks everyone.

    Read the article

  • Simple integer encryption

    - by tloflin
    Is there a simple algorithm to encrypt integers? That is, a function E(i,k) that accepts an n-bit integer and a key (of any type) and produces another, unrelated n-bit integer that, when fed into a second function D(i,k) (along with the key) produces the original integer? Obviously there are some simple reversible operations you can perform, but they all seem to produce clearly related outputs (e.g. consecutive inputs lead to consecutive outputs). Also, of course, there are cryptographically strong standard algorithms, but they don't produce small enough outputs (e.g. 32-bit). I know any 32-bit cryptography can be brute-forced, but I'm not looking for something cryptographically strong, just something that looks random. Theoretically speaking it should be possible; after all, I could just create a dictionary by randomly pairing every integer. But I was hoping for something a little less memory-intensive.

    Read the article

  • basic modal dialog problem

    - by senzacionale
    image for opening popup. <div id='basic-modal'> <a href="#"><input type="image" name="HelpHealthCenter" class="basic" id="imgHelpHealthCenter" tabindex="-1" title="Some text that will display" src="/images/help.gif" style="border-width:0px;" /></a> </div> i am using basic modal dialog (first demo) in thi link: http://www.ericmmartin.com/projects/simplemodal-demos/ This is JS for opening popup windows jQuery(function ($) { $('#basic-modal .basic').click(function (e) { $('#basic-modal-content').modal(); return false; }); }); but i want to read title="" from image instead of reading text from "basic-modal-content" div when popup is opened. <div id="basic-modal-content"> text on popup window </div> Thx for help.

    Read the article

  • how to return static variable PHP

    - by GOsha
    function build_path($cid) { static $fr=array(); $DB = new MySQLTable; $DB->TblName = 'shop_categories'; $where['cat_id']['='] = $cid; $res = $DB->Select('cat_id,cat_name,cat_parent', $where); if($res !== false) { $pid = mysql_fetch_array($res); if($pid['cat_parent'] !== "0") { $fr[] = $pid['cat_id']; build_path($pid['cat_parent']); } else { $fr[] = $cid; $fr = array_reverse($fr); print_r($fr); return $fr; } } } print_r(build_path(100)); Why is working print_r in function, but second print_r returns NULL?

    Read the article

  • With custom binding for Masonry how would I resize the container appropriately

    - by BigDubb
    Based on the suggestion give here, and the information given here on how to make a custom bindingHandler for a forEach, I decided to attempt to write my own custom binding for a forEach and Masonry. Because the elements are added on the fly the redrawing and moving around of elements to fill the space doesn't occur. So, this functionality needed to be moved after the elements have been rendered or called after each item has been added. Here is my bindingHandler ko.bindingHandlers.masonry = { init: function (element, valueAccessor, allBindingsAccessor) { var $element = $(element), originalContent = $element.html(); $element.data("original-content", originalContent); //var msnry = new Masonry($element); return { controlsDescendantBindings: true } }, update: function (element, valueAccessor, allBindingsAccessor) { var value = ko.utils.unwrapObservable(valueAccessor()), //get the list of items items = value.items(), //get a jQuery reference to the element $element = $(element), //get the current content of the element elementContent = $element.data("original-content"); $element.html(""); var container = $element[0]; var msnry = new Masonry(container); for (var index = 0; index < items.length; index++) { (function () { //get the list of items var item = ko.utils.unwrapObservable(items[index]), $childElement = $(elementContent); ko.applyBindings(item, $childElement[0]); //add the child to the parent $element.append($childElement); msnry.appended($childElement[0]); })(); msnry.layout(); msnry.bindResize(); } } }; and the HTML implementing the handler. <div id="criteriaContainer" data-bind="masonry: { items: SearchItems.Items }"> <div class="searchCriterion control-group"> <label class="control-label" data-bind="text: Description"></label> <div class="controls"> <input type="hidden" data-bind="value: Value, select2: { minimumInputLength: 3, queryUri: SearchUri(), placeholder: Placeholder(), allowClear: true }" style="width: 450px"> </div> <p data-bind="text: Value"></p> </div> </div> When this shows up on the page It stacks all if the elements rendered via the append method right on top of each other. You can see in my bindingHandler I am calling bindResize as well as layout(), neither of which seem to be having any effect. Here's a screenshot of what it looks like in the UI.

    Read the article

  • character matching in grayscale image

    - by maximus
    I made patterns: images with the "A" letter of different sizes (from 12 to 72: 12, 14, .., 72) And I tested the method of pattern matching and it gave a good results. One way to select text regions from image is to run that algorithm for all small and big letters and digits of different sizes. And fonts! I don't like it. Instead of it I want to make something like a universal pattern or better to say: scanning image with different window sizes and select those regions where some function (probability of that there is a character at that window) is more than some fixed value. Do you know any methods or ideas to make that function? It must work with original image (grayscale).

    Read the article

  • contain new elements of an "instance" in javascript

    - by iamnotmad
    Hi, so I know there are tons of ways to simulate inheritance and other OO features. I have chosen one to use for my project and am wondering if I can create an instance and add stuff to it and keep it contained (within braces). Consider the following: function BaseClass(){ <this.stuff here> } function SubClass(){ this.superClass = BaseClass(); this.superClass(); <this.other stuff here> } myObj = new SubClass(); so myObj is an instance of SubClass. I can add things to myObj like: myObj.blah = "funtimes"; What I would like is to be able to add stuff to the "instance" and keep it organized in braces much like the constructor. psuedo code like: myObj = new SubClass() { var blah = "funtimes" <more instance specific stuff here> } Is something like this possible? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • How do I toggle two images using jQuery and radio buttons?

    - by trench
    This isn't pretty, but I think you'll get what I'm trying to do. <label><input name="jpgSel" type="radio" value="0">jpg 1</label><br /> <label><input name="jpgSel" type="radio" value="1">jpg 2</label><br /> <div id="showjpg"></div> and $(document).ready(function() { $("select").change(function () { if ($("jpgSel:checked").val() == 1) { $('#showjpg').attr({ src: 'one.jpg', alt: 'one dot jpg' }); } else { $('#showjpg').attr({ src: 'two.jpg', alt: 'two dot jpg' }); } });

    Read the article

  • Is posible to submit multipart/form-data without refresh page in jQuery?

    - by bugbug
    I want to upload picture from "my_form" in jQuery, I tried submit() function it alway redirect to SavePicture.jsp. Is posible to sumbit this form without refresh any page? This is my html code <form action="SavePicture.jsp" method="post" id="my_form" enctype="multipart/form-data"> <input name="file" type="file" id="file" size="35"> <input type="button" onClick="upload()" value="upload"></input> </form> And my script function upload{ jQuery("form#my_form").submit(); }

    Read the article

  • Drupal best way to change text

    - by booze2go
    Hi Guys, I'm using the module "simplenews" and during the registration process it reads "Select the newsletter(s) to which you wish to subscribe.". I'd like to change this line and wanted to ask what the best way is to do so without hard coding it? Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • What's the deal with a leading underscore in PHP class methods?

    - by nocash
    While looking over various PHP libraries I've noticed that a lot of people choose to prefix some class methods with a single underscore, such as public function _foo() ...instead of... public function foo() I realize that ultimately this comes down to personal preference, but I was wondering if anyone had some insight into where this habit comes from. My thought is that it's probably being carried over from PHP 4, before class methods could be marked as protected or private, as a way of implying "do not call this method from outside the class". However, it also occurred to me that maybe it originates somewhere (a language) I'm not familiar with or that there may be good reasoning behind it that I would benefit from knowing. Any thoughts, insights and/or opinions would be appreciated.

    Read the article

  • boost scoped_lock mutex crashes

    - by JahSumbar
    hello, I have protected a std::queue's access functions, push, pop, size, with boost::mutexes and boost::mutex::scoped_lock in these functions from time to time it crashes in a scoped lock the call stack is this: 0 0x0040f005 boost::detail::win32::interlocked_bit_test_and_set include/boost/thread/win32/thread_primitives.hpp 361 1 0x0040e879 boost::detail::basic_timed_mutex::timed_lock include/boost/thread/win32/basic_timed_mutex.hpp 68 2 0x0040e9d3 boost::detail::basic_timed_mutex::lock include/boost/thread/win32/basic_timed_mutex.hpp 64 3 0x0040b96b boost::unique_lock<boost::mutex>::lock include/boost/thread/locks.hpp 349 4 0x0040b998 unique_lock include/boost/thread/locks.hpp 227 5 0x00403837 MyClass::inboxSize - this is my inboxSize function that uses this code: MyClass::inboxSize () { boost::mutex::scoped_lock scoped_lock(m_inboxMutex); return m_inbox.size(); } and the mutex is declared like this: boost::mutex m_inboxMutex; it crashes at the last pasted line in this function: inline bool interlocked_bit_test_and_set(long* x,long bit) { long const value=1<<bit; long old=*x; and x has this value: 0xababac17 Thanks for the help

    Read the article

  • The glutKeyboardFunc does not react to key presses immediately

    - by Nibirue
    I have a function glutKeyboardFunc(keyboard), where keyboard has: void keyboard(unsigned char key, int x, int y){ float alpha = 1.0; switch(key){ case 'c': glClearColor(1,0,0,alpha); printf("success"); break; } } This is a summary of the function; it works properly, but only once some other action has occurred. For instance, the printf statement reports success immediately on keystroke 'c', but the background color does not become active until I click somewhere else on the canvas. I want all keystrokes to have an immediate effect.

    Read the article

  • refactor this javascript code

    - by nathanvda
    I have two click-events, that are nearly similar, but not quite. I am wondering how to refactor them best: $('.remove_fields.dynamic').live('click', function(e) { var $this = $(this); var after_removal_trigger_node = $this.closest(".nested-fields").parent(); trigger_removal_callback($this); e.preventDefault(); $this.closest(".nested-fields").remove(); trigger_after_removal_callback(after_removal_trigger_node); }); $('.remove_fields.existing').live('click', function(e) { var $this = $(this); var after_removal_trigger_node = $this.closest(".nested-fields").parent(); trigger_removal_callback($this); e.preventDefault(); $this.prev("input[type=hidden]").val("1"); $this.closest(".nested-fields").hide(); trigger_after_removal_callback(after_removal_trigger_node); }); As you can tell there is a fair bit of overlap. I am wondering what the best/nicest way would be to refactor this code.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828  | Next Page >