Why darcs instead of git?

Posted by Ctrl Alt D-1337 on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Ctrl Alt D-1337
Published on 2010-03-23T01:53:22Z Indexed on 2010/03/23 2:01 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 384

Filed under:
|
|

Using pure functional languages can have a lot of benefits over using impure imperatives but low level systems languages will generally allow you to achieve much greater performance especially when they are imperative because it allows you to specify the exact steps in how the cpu should compute the result.

If there is ever list of tools where high performance is an absolute must then I would put source version controls systems right at the top of that list and git achieves this very well but performance is not it's only advantage over many other other types of version control systems anyway.

The git team are handling the unsafe c code very well and I never worry about my type system or any other features of the language it is written in so why is it that there is a lot of haskell developers that must use darcs when they will only be using the finished product?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about git

Related posts about darcs