Is a cluster the most cost effective redundancy method for windows server 2003?

Posted by Ryan on Server Fault See other posts from Server Fault or by Ryan
Published on 2010-03-26T18:24:23Z Indexed on 2010/03/26 18:33 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 365

We had a server with bad ram which caused a long outage while they figured it out and our client facing apps had to go down for a while. We are coming up with a solution for instant fail-over but are not sure what the most cost effective method would be. Is a windows server cluster the best method for this? Also note we are using Parallels Virtuozzo if that makes any difference here. We found Parallels has a documented method for setting this up but it said it required a Domain Controller as well as a Fiber connection to shared storage, is all that really needed?

Thanks.

© Server Fault or respective owner

Related posts about windows-server-2003

Related posts about clustering