git strategy to have a set of commits limited to a particular branch

Posted by becomingGuru on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by becomingGuru
Published on 2010-03-30T11:19:59Z Indexed on 2010/03/30 11:23 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 398

Filed under:
|
|
|

I need to merge between dev and master frequently.

I also have a commit that I need to apply to dev only, for things to work locally.

Earlier I only merged from dev to master, so I had a branch production_changes that contained the "undo commit" of the dev special commit. and from the master, I merged this. Used to work fine.

Now each time I merge from dev to master and vice versa, I am having to cherry-pick and apply the same commit again and again :(. Which is UGLY.

What strategy can I adapt so that I can seamlessly merge between 2 branches, yet retain some of the changes only on one of those branches?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about git

Related posts about strategy