Is there a reason to use internal DNS over 8.8.8.8 ?

Posted by skylarking on Server Fault See other posts from Server Fault or by skylarking
Published on 2010-04-15T18:13:29Z Indexed on 2010/04/15 18:23 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 499

Filed under:
|

I've inherited a LAN where there is really no name resolution being done for local resources... i.e. all users enter IP addresses manually to access printers and network shares. There are no LDAP servers or domains either....workstations simply connect to the network without authentication. DHCP is handled via a core switch... And DNS settings are also handed out by this same core switch. Currently, the DNS assignments are as such, and in this order:

10.1.1.50     / old Pentium III Windows 2003 box running DNS service- 128 MB RAM
169.200.x.x   / ISP
4.2.2.2.      / the well known public one

There a couple thousand clients on the LAN....and most of the activity is web browsing ( this is an educational setting ).

First of all, the server seems woefully underpowered for this task...yet there is virtually no slowness when web surfing by clients....

How much horsepower should a heavily used DNS server have ?

I have also heard using 4.2.2.2 is a bad idea .... since it has been so overused...

Finally, wouldn't it make sense to have a robust external DNS server listed first? ( Google's 8.8.8.8 would seem to be a logical candidate )

© Server Fault or respective owner

Related posts about dns

Related posts about internal-dns