3 Servers, is this is a cluster?

Posted by Andy Barlow on Server Fault See other posts from Server Fault or by Andy Barlow
Published on 2010-04-26T12:29:00Z Indexed on 2010/04/26 13:13 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 368

Filed under:
|
|
|

Hello,

At the moment I have one Ubuntu server, 9.10, running with a simple Samba share, a mail server, DNS server and DHCP server. Mostly its just there for file sharing and email server.

I also have 2 other servers that are exactly the same hardware and spec as the first, which have an rsync set up to retrieve the shared folders and backs them up. However, if the first server goes down, all of our shares disappear along with our mail and the system must be rebuilt.

Also I tend to find if people are downloading a large amount from the file server, no-one can access there emails - especially in the morning when everyone is signing in at once.

Would it be more beneficial for me to have all 3 servers, all running the same services, doing the same thing with some sort of cluster with load balancing?

I'm not really sure where to begin looking, or how to go about such a setup where 3 servers are all identical, but perhaps one acts as the main load balancer??

If someone can point me in the right direction, or if this simply sounds like one of those Enterprise Cloud's that is now a default setup in Ubuntu Server 9.10+, then I'll go down that route.

Cheers in advance.

Andy

© Server Fault or respective owner

3 Servers, is this is a cluster?

Posted by Andy Barlow on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Andy Barlow
Published on 2010-04-26T12:29:00Z Indexed on 2010/04/26 12:33 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 368

Filed under:
|
|
|

Hello,

At the moment I have one Ubuntu server, 9.10, running with a simple Samba share, a mail server, DNS server and DHCP server. Mostly its just there for file sharing and email server.

I also have 2 other servers that are exactly the same hardware and spec as the first, which have an rsync set up to retrieve the shared folders and backs them up. However, if the first server goes down, all of our shares disappear along with our mail and the system must be rebuilt.

Also I tend to find if people are downloading a large amount from the file server, no-one can access there emails - especially in the morning when everyone is signing in at once.

Would it be more beneficial for me to have all 3 servers, all running the same services, doing the same thing with some sort of cluster with load balancing?

I'm not really sure where to begin looking, or how to go about such a setup where 3 servers are all identical, but perhaps one acts as the main load balancer??

If someone can point me in the right direction, or if this simply sounds like one of those Enterprise Cloud's that is now a default setup in Ubuntu Server 9.10+, then I'll go down that route.

Cheers in advance.

Andy

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about ubuntu

Related posts about server