Postgresql - one database for everyone, or one-database per customer

Posted by user337876 on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by user337876
Published on 2010-05-11T04:14:29Z Indexed on 2010/05/11 4:24 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 421

Filed under:
|
|

I'm working on a web-based business application where each customer will need to have their own data (think basecamphq.com type model) For scalability and ease-of-upgrades, I'd prefer to have a single database where each customer gets a filtered version of the data. The problem is how to guarantee that they stay sandboxed to their own data. Trying to enforce it in code seems like a disaster waiting to happen. I know Oracle has a way to append a where clause to every query based on a login id, but does Postgresql have anything similar?

If not, is there a different design pattern I could use (like creating a view of each table for each customer that filters)?

Worse case scenario, what is the performance/memory overhead of having 1000 100M databases vs having a single 1Tb database? I will need to provide backup/restore functionality on a per-customer basis which is dead-simple on a single database but quite a bit trickier if they are sharing the database with other customers.

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about postgresql

Related posts about database