Why TVs are costlier than Monitor for same screen size?

Posted by Vikrant Chaudhary on Super User See other posts from Super User or by Vikrant Chaudhary
Published on 2010-06-03T15:44:29Z Indexed on 2010/06/03 15:45 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 318

Filed under:
|
|
|

Just wondering, why LCD/LED-backlit TVs cost more (almost double) than LCD/LED-backlit monitors for same screen size.

Because I guess that TVs and Monitors, both use almost same technologies and both nowadays support some common connectors (HDMI/D-Sub/DVI etc).

And since a Monitor has much higher resolution than a TV for that size, and they are used more closely than TVs, Monitors probably require more engineering effort. So, Monitors are supposed to be costlier than TVs, right?

Ex: A ViewSonic (or any) 22"/26" monitor supports Full-HD resolution at 1080p (WSXGA+-1680×1050, WUXGA-1920×1200), while all 22"/26" HDTVs support HD-ready 720p (WXGA-1366x768) only, which is also the resolution of my Notebook's 15.6" screen.

© Super User or respective owner

Related posts about monitor

Related posts about tv