Contrary to Python 3.1 Docs, hash(obj) != id(obj). So which is correct?

Posted by Don O'Donnell on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Don O'Donnell
Published on 2010-06-12T07:12:11Z Indexed on 2010/06/12 7:23 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 207

Filed under:
|

The following is from the Python v3.1.2 documentation:

From The Python Language Reference Section 3.3.1 Basic Customization:

object.__hash__(self)

... User-defined classes have __eq__() and __hash__() methods 
by default; with them, all objects compare unequal (except
with themselves) and x.__hash__() returns id(x).

From The Glossary:

hashable

... Objects which are instances of user-defined classes are 
hashable by default; they all compare unequal, and their hash 
value is their id().

This is true up through version 2.6.5:

Python 2.6.5 (r265:79096, Mar 19 2010 21:48:26) ...
...
>>> class C(object): pass
...
>>> c = C()
>>> id(c)
11335856
>>> hash(c)
11335856

But in version 3.1.2:

Python 3.1.2 (r312:79149, Mar 21 2010, 00:41:52) ...
...
>>> class C: pass
...
>>> c = C()
>>> id(c)
11893680
>>> hash(c)
743355

So which is it? Should I report a documentation bug or a program bug? And if it's a documentation bug, and the default hash() value for a user class instance is no longer the same as the id() value, then it would be interesting to know what it is or how it is calculated, and why it was changed in version 3.

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about python

Related posts about hash