I'm replicating a small piece of Sugarscape agent simulation model in Python 3. I found the performance of my code is ~3 times slower than that of NetLogo. Is it likely the problem with my code, or can it be the inherent limitation of Python?

Obviously, this is just a fragment of the code, but that's where Python spends two-thirds of the run-time. I hope if I wrote something really inefficient it might show up in this fragment:

UP = (0, -1)
RIGHT = (1, 0)
DOWN = (0, 1)
LEFT = (-1, 0)
all_directions = [UP, DOWN, RIGHT, LEFT]
# point is just a tuple (x, y)
def look_around(self):
    max_sugar_point = self.point
    max_sugar = self.world.sugar_map[self.point].level
    min_range = 0

    random.shuffle(self.all_directions)
    for r in range(1, self.vision+1):
        for d in self.all_directions:
            p = ((self.point[0] + r * d[0]) % self.world.surface.length,
                (self.point[1] + r * d[1]) % self.world.surface.height)
            if self.world.occupied(p): # checks if p is in a lookup table (dict)
                continue
            if self.world.sugar_map[p].level > max_sugar:
                max_sugar = self.world.sugar_map[p].level
                max_sugar_point = p
    if max_sugar_point is not self.point:
        self.move(max_sugar_point)

Roughly equivalent code in NetLogo (this fragment does a bit more than the Python function above):

; -- The SugarScape growth and motion procedures. --
to M    ; Motion rule (page 25)
    locals [ps p v d]
    set ps (patches at-points neighborhood) with [count turtles-here = 0]
    if (count ps > 0) [
        set v psugar-of max-one-of ps [psugar]              ; v is max sugar w/in vision
        set ps ps with [psugar = v]                         ; ps is legal sites w/ v sugar
        set d distance min-one-of ps [distance myself]      ; d is min dist from me to ps agents
        set p random-one-of ps with [distance myself = d]   ; p is one of the min dist patches
        if (psugar >= v and includeMyPatch?) [set p patch-here]
        setxy pxcor-of p pycor-of p                         ; jump to p
        set sugar sugar + psugar-of p                       ; consume its sugar
        ask p [setpsugar 0]                                 ; .. setting its sugar to 0
    ]
    set sugar sugar - metabolism    ; eat sugar (metabolism)
    set age age + 1
end

On my computer, the Python code takes 15.5 sec to run 1000 steps; on the same laptop, the NetLogo simulation running in Java inside the browser finishes 1000 steps in less than 6 sec.

EDIT: Just checked Repast, using Java implementation. And it's also about the same as NetLogo at 5.4 sec. Recent comparisons between Java and Python suggest no advantage to Java, so I guess it's just my code that's to blame?

EDIT: I understand MASON is supposed to be even faster than Repast, and yet it still runs Java in the end.