Using Lazy<T> and abstract wrapper class to lazy-load complex system parameters
Posted
by DigiMortal
on ASP.net Weblogs
See other posts from ASP.net Weblogs
or by DigiMortal
Published on Fri, 11 Nov 2011 12:19:24 GMT
Indexed on
2011/11/11
17:53 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 561
.NET
|Architecture & Design
.NET Framework 4.0 introduced new class called Lazy<T> and I wrote blog post about it: .Net Framework 4.0: Using System.Lazy<T>. One thing is annoying for me – we have to keep lazy loaded value and its value loader as separate things. In this posting I will introduce you my Lazy<T> wrapper for complex to get system parameters that uses template method to keep lazy value loader in parameter class.
Problem with original implementation
Here’s the sample code that shows you how Lazy<T> is usually used. This is just sample code, don’t focus on the fact that this is dummy console application.
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var temperature = new Lazy<int>(LoadMinimalTemperature);
Console.WriteLine("Minimal room temperature: " + temperature.Value);
Console.ReadLine();
}
protected static int LoadMinimalTemperature()
{
var returnValue = 0;
// Do complex stuff here
return true;
}
}
The problem is that our class with many lazy loaded properties will grow messy if it has all value loading code inside it. This code may be complex for more than one parameter and in this case it is better to use separate class for this parameter.
Defining base class for parameters
As a first step I will define base class for all lazy-loaded parameters. This class is wrapper around Lazy<T> and it also offers one template method that parameter classes have to override to provide loaded data.
public abstract class LazyParameter<T>
{
private Lazy<T> _lazyParam;
public LazyParameter()
{
_lazyParam = new Lazy<T>(Load);
}
protected abstract T Load();
public T Value
{
get { return _lazyParam.Value; }
}
}
It is also possible to extend Lazy<T> but I don’t prefer to do it as Lazy<T> has six constructors we have to take care of. Also I don’t like to expose Lazy<T> public interface to users of my parameter classes.
Creating parameter class
Now it’s time to create our first parameter class. Notice how few stuff we have in this class besides overridden Load() method.
public class MinimalRoomTemperature : LazyParameter<int>
{
protected override int Load()
{
var returnValue = 0;
// Do complex stuff here
return returnValue;
}
}
Using parameter class is simple. Here’s my test code.
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var parameter = new MinimalRoomTemperature();
Console.WriteLine("Minimal room temperature: " + parameter.Value);
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
Conclusion
Lazy<T> is useful class that you usually don’t want to use outside from API-s. I like this class but I don’t like when people are using this class directly in application code. In this posting I showed you how to use Lazy<T> with wrapper class to get complex parameter loading code out from classes that use this parameter. We ended up with generic base class for parameters that you can also use as base for other similar classes (you have to find better name to base class in this case).
© ASP.net Weblogs or respective owner
