What am I (a beginner) losing, by choosing Cherokee over Apache for serving dynamic content?

Posted by Bad Learner on Server Fault See other posts from Server Fault or by Bad Learner
Published on 2011-11-12T22:07:37Z Indexed on 2011/11/13 1:55 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 541

Filed under:
|
|
|
|

I am a complete beginner and am planning to setup a photo sharing site. This is the setup I am planning, basically for a start - - Cherokee (instead of Apache) for serving dynamic content (python-based application), and Nginx for serving static files.

Since, I am a beginner, what have I, to lose? So, can someone, from your experience, please tell me, what I'd lose by choosing Cherokee over Apache for serving dynamic content in PHP/Python/whatever?

Anything other than the fact that there's lot of documentation, many people who can help when there's an issue etc as Apache is well established and the most popular web server?

Again, my intention is not to spurt a flame war here. Just wanted to know if Cherokee would be better than Apache in terms of performance, reliability, and speed, when it matters (peak load times). Also, I heard it's a lot faster than Apache in serving dynamic content, is it true?

© Server Fault or respective owner

Related posts about apache2

Related posts about php