Is there any chance that my data will get silently corrupted with a robocopy SMB network transfer?

Posted by Archagon on Super User See other posts from Super User or by Archagon
Published on 2012-12-04T00:06:18Z Indexed on 2012/12/19 23:05 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 184

Filed under:
|
|
|
|

I'm setting up a NAS box for the first time. At the moment, I have most of my data backed up to a few local hard drives, and I intend to transfer all the data to my NAS over ethernet once the RAID array is setup. Since this is all happening over the network, I'm a bit worried about my data getting corrupted silently during transfer. From what I understand, data generally doesn't get corrupted without notice on local transfers because a checksum is performed at some point by the drive or the OS. (This could be totally wrong.) Does the same thing happen with SMB, or is it up to the transferrer to check the integrity of their data? And if it doesn't happen with SMB, is there a protocol that does ensure data integrity? I know that rsync can checksum a transfer, but I'm on Windows and I already have a robocopy configuration that I like. Will my data be safe or do I have to use an external checksum tool to make sure?

© Super User or respective owner

Related posts about networking

Related posts about backup