.NET Security Part 3

Posted by Simon Cooper on Simple Talk See other posts from Simple Talk or by Simon Cooper
Published on Thu, 16 May 2013 16:51:45 +0000 Indexed on 2013/06/24 16:33 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 434

Filed under:

You write a security-related application that allows addins to be used. These addins (as dlls) can be downloaded from anywhere, and, if allowed to run full-trust, could open a security hole in your application. So you want to restrict what the addin dlls can do, using a sandboxed appdomain, as explained in my previous posts.

But there needs to be an interaction between the code running in the sandbox and the code that created the sandbox, so the sandboxed code can control or react to things that happen in the controlling application. Sandboxed code needs to be able to call code outside the sandbox.

Now, there are various methods of allowing cross-appdomain calls, the two main ones being .NET Remoting with MarshalByRefObject, and WCF named pipes. I’m not going to cover the details of setting up such mechanisms here, or which you should choose for your specific situation; there are plenty of blogs and tutorials covering such issues elsewhere. What I’m going to concentrate on here is the more general problem of running fully-trusted code within a sandbox, which is required in most methods of app-domain communication and control.

Defining assemblies as fully-trusted

In my last post, I mentioned that when you create a sandboxed appdomain, you can pass in a list of assembly strongnames that run as full-trust within the appdomain:

// get the Assembly object for the assembly
Assembly assemblyWithApi = ...    

// get the StrongName from the assembly's collection of evidence
StrongName apiStrongName = assemblyWithApi.Evidence.GetHostEvidence<StrongName>();

// create the sandbox
AppDomain sandbox = AppDomain.CreateDomain(
    "Sandbox", null, appDomainSetup, restrictedPerms, apiStrongName);

Any assembly that is loaded into the sandbox with a strong name the same as one in the list of full-trust strong names is unconditionally given full-trust permissions within the sandbox, irregardless of permissions and sandbox setup. This is very powerful! You should only use this for assemblies that you trust as much as the code creating the sandbox.

So now you have a class that you want the sandboxed code to call:

// within assemblyWithApi
public class MyApi
{
    public static void MethodToDoThings() { ... }
}

// within the sandboxed dll
public class UntrustedSandboxedClass
{
    public void DodgyMethod()
    {        
        ...
        MyApi.MethodToDoThings();
        ...
    }
}

However, if you try to do this, you get quite an ugly exception:

MethodAccessException: Attempt by security transparent method ‘UntrustedSandboxedClass.DodgyMethod()’ to access security critical method ‘MyApi.MethodToDoThings()’ failed.
Security transparency, which I covered in my first post in the series, has entered the picture. Partially-trusted code runs at the Transparent security level, fully-trusted code runs at the Critical security level, and Transparent code cannot under any circumstances call Critical code.

Security transparency and AllowPartiallyTrustedCallersAttribute

So the solution is easy, right? Make MethodToDoThings SafeCritical, then the transparent code running in the sandbox can call the api:

[SecuritySafeCritical]
public static void MethodToDoThings() { ... }

However, this doesn’t solve the problem. When you try again, exactly the same exception is thrown; MethodToDoThings is still running as Critical code. What’s going on?

By default, a fully-trusted assembly always runs Critical code, irregardless of any security attributes on its types and methods. This is because it may not have been designed in a secure way when called from transparent code – as we’ll see in the next post, it is easy to open a security hole despite all the security protections .NET 4 offers. When exposing an assembly to be called from partially-trusted code, the entire assembly needs a security audit to decide what should be transparent, safe critical, or critical, and close any potential security holes.

This is where AllowPartiallyTrustedCallersAttribute (APTCA) comes in. Without this attribute, fully-trusted assemblies run Critical code, and partially-trusted assemblies run Transparent code. When this attribute is applied to an assembly, it confirms that the assembly has had a full security audit, and it is safe to be called from untrusted code. All code in that assembly runs as Transparent, but SecurityCriticalAttribute and SecuritySafeCriticalAttribute can be applied to individual types and methods to make those run at the Critical or SafeCritical levels, with all the restrictions that entails.

So, to allow the sandboxed assembly to call the full-trust API assembly, simply add APCTA to the API assembly:

[assembly: AllowPartiallyTrustedCallers]

and everything works as you expect. The sandboxed dll can call your API dll, and from there communicate with the rest of the application.

Conclusion

That’s the basics of running a full-trust assembly in a sandboxed appdomain, and allowing a sandboxed assembly to access it. The key is AllowPartiallyTrustedCallersAttribute, which is what lets partially-trusted code call a fully-trusted assembly. However, an assembly with APTCA applied to it means that you have run a full security audit of every type and member in the assembly. If you don’t, then you could inadvertently open a security hole. I’ll be looking at ways this can happen in my next post.

© Simple Talk or respective owner

Related posts about Uncategorized