Search Results

Search found 5679 results on 228 pages for 'kill processes'.

Page 1/228 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

• how is the windows kill process works?

  - by IttayD

  I'm unfamiliar with how processes are killed in Windows. In Linux, a "warm" kill sends a signal (15) and the process can handle by instantiating a signal handler it and a cold kill sends signal (9) which the OS handles killing the process by force. What is the procedure in Windows? How can I send a "kill" to a process? How does the process handle it? Is there a cross-platform way of responding to a kill/close request?

  Read the article

• How to Kill and Alternate X session via cli

  - by L. D. James

  Can someone tell me how to remove dormant X sessions. This question is similar to Logging out other users from the command line, but more specific to controlling X displays which I find hard to kill. I used the command "who -u" to get the session of the other screens: $ who -u Which gave me: user1 :0 2014-08-18 12:08 ? 2891 (:0) user1 pts/26 2014-08-18 16:11 17:18 3984 (:0) user2 :1 2014-08-18 18:21 ? 25745 (:1) user1 pts/27 2014-08-18 23:10 00:27 3984 (:0) user1 pts/32 2014-08-18 23:10 10:42 3984 (:0) user1 pts/46 2014-08-18 23:14 00:04 3984 (:0) user1 pts/48 2014-08-19 04:10 . 3984 (:0) The kill -9 25745 doesn't appear to do anything. I have a workshop where a number of users will use the computer under their own login. After the workshop is over there are a number of logins that are left open. I would prefer to kill the open sessions rather than try to log into each users' screen. Again, this question isn't just about logging users' out. I'm hoping to get clarity also for killing/removing stuck processes that are hard to kill. New Info While still pondering how to kill the process I wrote the following script, which did it: #!/bin/bash results=1 while [[ $results > 0 ]] do sudo kill -9 25745 results=$? echo -ne "Response:$results..." sleep 20 done After a graceful waiting period, if there isn't a better answer I'll mark this as answered with this resolution. This may resolve the problem with other stuck processes I have had in the past.

  Read the article

• How to kill an "exiting" process on OS X (state = E)

  - by sbwoodside

  I have a process on my Mac OS X system which is in state E ("The process is trying to exit."): % ps auwwwxc | grep -si JavaApplicationS sbwoodside 84547 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?? E Mon12am 0:00.00 (JavaApplicationS) kill -9 84547 does nothing. Is there any special trick to get this process to exit? It's holding some ports open that I would like it to let go of.

  Read the article

• N processes and M types of processes - enter and exit cs

  - by sarit

  i was asked to write: enter function and exit function for the following case: there are N processes and M types of processes (NM) tere is a critical section in which all processes with the same type can enter. for example: if type A is in cs, type B cannot enter cs. but all processes with type A can enter. i can use only mutex and "type" which is the type of the process. deadlock is not allowed. do you think this is ok? shared: this.type = -1; mutex m, m1=1; enter{ down(m) if (this.type == process.type) up(m1) down(m1) this.type= process.type up(m) } exit { this.type = -1 up(m1) } thanks! (by the way, this is not HW... i have an exam and im solvig tests from previous years)

  Read the article

• Kill a process by giving dir

  - by Gerculy Robert

  I'm working on a Control Panel for SA-MP. Firstly I want to make a start and a close button. The start button is done, I'm having some problems with the close button. I will host multiple server on same server with different IP. My problem is , when I send a ssh command kill samp03srv kills all running apps. My question : Is there any way to kill an app using cd ? Something like : pkill -9 -u root samp03svr cd ~~~~~/samp/RolePlay Thanks.

  Read the article

• How to terminate all [grand]child processes using C# on WXP (and newer MSWindows)

  - by NVRAM

  Question: How can I determine all processes in the child's Process Tree to kill them? I have an application, written in C# that will: Get a set of data from the server, Spawn a 3rd party utility to process the data, then Return the results to the server. This is working fine. But since a run consumes a lot of CPU and may take as long as an hour, I want to add the ability to have my app terminate its child processes. Some issues that make the simple solutions I've found elsewhere are: My app's child process "A" (InstallAnywhere EXE I think) spawns the real processing app "B" (a java.exe), which in turns spawns more children "C1".."Cn" (most of which are also written in Java). There will likely be multiple copies of my application (and hence, multiple sets of its children) running on the same machine. The child process is not in my control so there might be some "D" processes in the future. My application must run on 32-bit and 64-bit versions of MSWindows. On the plus side there is no issue of data loss, a "clean" shutdown doesn't matter as long as the processes end fairly quickly.

  Read the article

• How do you kill a process tree in linux?

  - by itsadok

  Sometimes, sending a SIGTERM to a process will cause it to send SIGTERM to all its child processes. However, sometimes this doesn't work. Is there a command or a utility that will allow me to kill a process and all its child processes at the same time? I usually resort to manually collecting all the pids into one kill command, but it feels stupid. This SO question asks how to do this with perl, but anything that gets the job done would be great.

  Read the article

• kill -9 doesn't work

  - by Daniel

  I have a server with 3 oracle instances on it, and the file system is nfs with netapp. After shutdown the databases, one process for each database doesn't quit for a long time. Each kill -i doesn't work. I tried to truss, pfile it, the command through error. And iostat shows there are lots of IO to the netapp server. So someone said the process was busy writing data to remote netapp server, and before the write complete, it won't quit. So what need to be done was just wait until all the IO was done. After wait for longer time (about 1.5 hours), the processes exit. So my question is: how can a process ignore the kill signal? As far as I know, if we kill -9, it will stop immediately. Do you encounter such situation kill -i doesn't kill the process right away? TEST7-stdby-phxdbnfs11$ ps -ef|grep dbw0 oracle 1469 25053 0 22:36:53 pts/1 0:00 grep dbw0 oracle 26795 1 0 21:55:23 ? 0:00 ora_dbw0_TEST7 oracle 1051 1 0 Apr 08 ? 3958:51 ora_dbw0_TEST2 oracle 471 1 0 Apr 08 ? 6391:43 ora_dbw0_TEST1 TEST7-stdby-phxdbnfs11$ kill -9 1051 TEST7-stdby-phxdbnfs11$ ps -ef|grep dbw0 oracle 1493 25053 0 22:37:07 pts/1 0:00 grep dbw0 oracle 26795 1 0 21:55:23 ? 0:00 ora_dbw0_TEST7 oracle 1051 1 0 Apr 08 ? 3958:51 ora_dbw0_TEST2 oracle 471 1 0 Apr 08 ? 6391:43 ora_dbw0_TEST1 TEST7-stdby-phxdbnfs11$ kill -9 471 TEST7-stdby-phxdbnfs11$ ps -ef|grep dbw0 oracle 26795 1 0 21:55:23 ? 0:00 ora_dbw0_TEST7 oracle 1051 1 0 Apr 08 ? 3958:51 ora_dbw0_TEST2 oracle 471 1 0 Apr 08 ? 6391:43 ora_dbw0_TEST1 oracle 1495 25053 0 22:37:22 pts/1 0:00 grep dbw0 TEST7-stdby-phxdbnfs11$ ps -ef|grep smon oracle 1524 25053 0 22:38:02 pts/1 0:00 grep smon TEST7-stdby-phxdbnfs11$ ps -ef|grep dbw0 oracle 1526 25053 0 22:38:06 pts/1 0:00 grep dbw0 oracle 26795 1 0 21:55:23 ? 0:00 ora_dbw0_TEST7 oracle 1051 1 0 Apr 08 ? 3958:51 ora_dbw0_TEST2 oracle 471 1 0 Apr 08 ? 6391:43 ora_dbw0_TEST1 TEST7-stdby-phxdbnfs11$ kill -9 1051 471 26795 TEST7-stdby-phxdbnfs11$ ps -ef|grep dbw0 oracle 1528 25053 0 22:38:19 pts/1 0:00 grep dbw0 oracle 26795 1 0 21:55:23 ? 0:00 ora_dbw0_TEST7 oracle 1051 1 0 Apr 08 ? 3958:51 ora_dbw0_TEST2 oracle 471 1 0 Apr 08 ? 6391:43 ora_dbw0_TEST1 TEST7-stdby-phxdbnfs11$ truss -p 26795 truss: unanticipated system error: 26795 TEST7-stdby-phxdbnfs11$ pfiles 26795 pfiles: unanticipated system error: 26795

  Read the article

• Killing all processes of current user

  - by Vi

  user@host$ killall -9 -u user Will it definitely kill all processes owned by user (including forkbombs)? No new processes is spawned to user from other users. No user's processes are in D-sleep and unkillable. No processes are trying to detect and ptrace or terminate this started killall. E.g. if killall will finish untampered and successfully is it 100% that no processes are left with this uid?

  Read the article

• Blank Processes (?) in Natty Narwhal

  - by A Hylian Human

  I've noticed that there a seemingly blank processes (no process name, no cmdline info, only an ID), which also appear to cause my CPU to be running like crazy. My fans are going pretty much full speed and I have no idea what to do. Restarting does not help. Whenever I try to kill the process IDs, nothing happens. It's like new blank processes are continuously being created. I am really surprised that I am able to write up this question without Firefox lagging like crazy (and trust me, it's not Firefox causing the issue, as far as I can tell).

  Read the article

• linux/solaris kill many proccess with one command

  - by yael

  Is it possible to kill all find process with one command? I do not want to kill each process as kill -9 25295 , kill -9 11994 , etc.. Rather, what I want is a simple way or command that kill all find process (my target is to perfrom this action on linux and solaris machines). $ ps -ef | grep find root 25295 25290 0 08:59:59 pts/1 0:01 find /etc -type f -exec grep -l 100.106.23.152 {} ; -print root 11994 26144 0 09:04:18 pts/1 0:00 find /etc -type f -exec grep -l 100.106.23.153 {} ; -print root 25366 25356 0 08:59:59 pts/1 0:01 find /etc -type f -exec grep -l 100.106.23.154 {} ; -print root 26703 26658 0 09:00:05 pts/1 0:01 find /etc -type f -exec grep -l 100.106.23.155 {} ; -print

  Read the article

• How to stop a random ramp in FCGI Processes Killing the server

  - by Andy Main

  So got the below earlier to day... Around that time the logs show a ramp in processes(600) and associated memory (1.2g), cpu usage load average (80) untill the server gave out. Server had to be hard reset by host as there was no ssh or plesk panel access. Fast CGI is configured as below and is setup for one high use site. As I understand it FcgidMaxProcesses 20 should protect against what happen but has not. I've read many forums with differing answers and references to many different fcgi directives, but have found nothing conclusive. Any one got some definitive answers on how to stop this sort of server process ramping and subsequent server failure? If you need more info let me know. Cheers Andy  /var/log/apache2/error_log [Thu May 17 07:40:47 2012] [warn] mod_fcgid: process 17651 graceful kill fail, sending SIGKILL [Thu May 17 07:40:47 2012] [warn] mod_fcgid: process 17650 graceful kill fail, sending SIGKILL [Thu May 17 07:40:47 2012] [warn] mod_fcgid: process 17649 graceful kill fail, sending SIGKILL [Thu May 17 07:40:47 2012] [warn] mod_fcgid: process 17644 graceful kill fail, sending SIGKILL [Thu May 17 07:40:47 2012] [warn] mod_fcgid: process 17643 graceful kill fail, sending SIGKILL [Thu May 17 07:40:47 2012] [warn] mod_fcgid: process 17638 graceful kill fail, sending SIGKILL [Thu May 17 07:40:47 2012] [warn] mod_fcgid: process 17633 graceful kill fail, sending SIGKILL [Thu May 17 07:40:47 2012] [warn] mod_fcgid: process 17627 graceful kill fail, sending SIGKILL [Thu May 17 07:40:47 2012] [warn] mod_fcgid: process 17622 graceful kill fail, sending SIGKILL [Thu May 17 07:40:51 2012] [warn] mod_fcgid: process 17674 graceful kill fail, sending SIGKILL [Thu May 17 07:40:51 2012] [warn] mod_fcgid: process 17673 graceful kill fail, sending SIGKILL [Thu May 17 07:40:51 2012] [warn] mod_fcgid: process 17672 graceful kill fail, sending SIGKILL [Thu May 17 07:40:51 2012] [warn] mod_fcgid: process 17667 graceful kill fail, sending SIGKILL [Thu May 17 07:40:51 2012] [warn] mod_fcgid: process 17666 graceful kill fail, sending SIGKILL [Thu May 17 07:40:51 2012] [warn] mod_fcgid: process 17665 graceful kill fail, sending SIGKILL [Thu May 17 07:40:51 2012] [warn] mod_fcgid: process 17664 graceful kill fail, sending SIGKILL [Thu May 17 07:40:51 2012] [warn] mod_fcgid: process 17659 graceful kill fail, sending SIGKILL [Thu May 17 07:40:51 2012] [warn] mod_fcgid: process 17658 graceful kill fail, sending SIGKILL [Thu May 17 07:40:51 2012] [warn] mod_fcgid: process 17657 graceful kill fail, sending SIGKILL [Thu May 17 07:40:51 2012] [warn] mod_fcgid: process 17656 graceful kill fail, sending SIGKILL [Thu May 17 07:40:51 2012] [warn] mod_fcgid: process 17651 graceful kill fail, sending SIGKILL https://docs.google.com/a/thesugarrefinery.com/open?id=0B_XbpWChge0VRmFLWEZfR2VBb2M https://docs.google.com/a/thesugarrefinery.com/open?id=0B_XbpWChge0VWTcwZEhoV2Fqejg https://docs.google.com/a/thesugarrefinery.com/open?id=0B_XbpWChge0VUUtVWWFINHZjZ0U https://docs.google.com/a/thesugarrefinery.com/open?id=0B_XbpWChge0VZEVMclh6ZUdaOUE <IfModule mod_fcgid.c> <IfModule !mod_fastcgi.c> AddHandler fcgid-script fcg fcgi fpl </IfModule> FcgidIPCDir /var/lib/apache2/fcgid/sock FcgidProcessTableFile /var/lib/apache2/fcgid/shm FcgidIdleTimeout 40 FcgidProcessLifeTime 30 FcgidMaxProcesses 20 FcgidMaxProcessesPerClass 20 FcgidMinProcessesPerClass 0 FcgidConnectTimeout 30 FcgidIOTimeout 120 FcgidInitialEnv RAILS_ENV production FcgidIdleScanInterval 10 FcgidMaxRequestLen 1073741824 </IfModule>

  Read the article

• kill + ignore to kill proccess if not alive

  - by yael

  how to tell kill command to ignore to kill proccess if the proccess not alive? for example 3453 is alive proccess but 44534 not kill -9 3453 44534

  Read the article

• Why Does Chrome Have So Many Open Processes?

  - by Jason Fitzpatrick

  If you’ve ever taken a peek in Task Manager while running Google Chrome, you may have been surprised to see that the number of chrome.exe entries radically exceeded the number of actual Chrome windows you had open. What’s the deal with all those processes? Today’s Question & Answer session comes to us courtesy of SuperUser—a subdivision of Stack Exchange, a community-drive grouping of Q&A web sites. HTG Explains: Is ReadyBoost Worth Using? HTG Explains: What The Windows Event Viewer Is and How You Can Use It HTG Explains: How Windows Uses The Task Scheduler for System Tasks

  Read the article

• Linux: close a program with command line (not kill it)

  - by CodeNoob

  Some applications only allow one running instance (like eclipse, if you want to use the same workspace). So if I log in from another location, I have to kill/close the application that was open when I previously logged in from another location. I always use kill command to kill the running process. But, if you kill a process, it might not save some states that are useful for future usage. However, if you "close" it properly byclicking on the close button, for example, it will save the states properly. Is there a way to properly "close" an application from command line? I know this can vary from applications, so let's be a bit more generic: how to send a signal to another running application, and this signal works just as if we click the "close" button in the top bar? thanks!

  Read the article

• kill -9 + disable messages (standart output) from kill command

  - by yael

  hi all I write the following script this script enable timeout of 20 second if grep not find the relevant string in the file the script working well but the output from the script is like that: ./test: line 11: 30039: Killed how to disable this message from the kill command? how to tell kill command to ignore if process not exist? THX Yael !/bin/ksh ( sleep 20 ; [[ ! -z ps -ef | grep "qsRw -m1" | awk '{print $2}' ]] && kill -9 2/dev/null ps -ef | grep "qsRw -m1" | awk '{print $2}' ; sleep 1 ) & RESULT=$! print "the proccess:"$RESULT grep -qsRw -m1 "monitohhhhhhhr" /var if [[ $? -ne 0 ]] then print "kill "$RESULT kill -9 $RESULT fi print "ENDED" ./test the proccess:30038 ./test: line 11: 30039: Killed kill 3003

  Read the article

• Cannot Kill Process in Vista 64

  - by JanSolo

  Hi I have a weird situation where a Zombie process is causing my Vista64 Dev machine to become useless. I use Incredibuild 3.40 to distribute builds of a large software product that I work on. Occasionally, a build will fail and a Zombie process is left behind. The process holds a handle to a file that is needed by the build system to retry the build. Since I cannot kill the process, the handle remains open and I cannot build my code at all. I've tried TargetManager and ProcessExplorer, but neither can kill this process. It gets worse; since Vista cannot kill all its processes, my PC refuses to shut down correctly, requiring a hard reboot after each failed build. Is there a way to really-really-kill a process in Vista? Or maybe a way to force a file handle to close? Any help is appreciated. Cheers Jan. EDIT: This is still occurring. I've used Lockhunter (which appears to successfully unlock the file handle), but retrying the build still fails because the (now unlocked) file cannot be deleted. Explorer and Lockhunter both fail to delete the file. LockHunter also tells me that there are no processes that hold handles to it. Basically, nothing owns it, but you still cant delete it. This sucks.

  Read the article

• Why does explorer restart automatically when I kill it with Process.Kill?

  - by Thomas Levesque

  If I kill explorer.exe like this: private static void KillExplorer() { var processes = Process.GetProcessesByName("explorer"); Console.Write("Killing Explorer... "); foreach (var process in processes) { process.Kill(); process.WaitForExit(); } Console.WriteLine("Done"); } It restarts immediately. But if I use taskkill /F /IM explorer.exe, or kill it from the task manager, it doesn't restart. Why is that? What's the difference? How can I close explorer.exe from code without restarting it? Sure, I could call taskkill from my code, but I was hoping for a cleaner solution...

  Read the article

• Why sometimes Windows cannot kill a process?

  - by Néstor Sánchez A.

  Right now I'm trying to Run/Debung my app on VisualStudio, but it cannot create it because the las instance of the app.vshost.exe is still running. Then, by using the Task Manager i'm trying to kill it, but it just remains there with no signal of activity. Beyond that particular case (maybe a VS bug), i'm very curious about the technical reasons why sometimes Windows cannot kill a process??? Can, an enlighted OS related developer, please try to explain? (And please don't start a Unix/Linux/Mac battle against Windows)

  Read the article

• Cannot kill firefox in OSX 10.6

  - by lydonchandra

  I tried killing Firefox 3.5 from OSX command line using "kill -9 pid", and the process was still running mini-2:~ prompt$ ps -ef | grep firefox 501 15087 183 0 0:00.00 ?? 0:00.00 (firefox-bin) After this, I could not start firefox (as it said Firefox is already running) nor can I kill firefox (again). What is going on? How can I fix this (besides logging of or restarting my machine) ?

  Read the article

• How do I kill CruiseControl?

  - by Adam Fraser

  I just went to run cruisecontrol only to find that it's already running when I thought it shut itself down. For some reason I can't find the pid for cruisecontrol with ps -e in order to use kill. How can I kill this?

  Read the article

• Find a process by name and kill it

  - by Fabiano PS

  So, I want to send a kill to a process, I know it's name ps -ef | grep '_rails master' root 2388 1 0 19:46 ? 00:00:04 unicorn_rails master -c /web/hero/config/unicorn.rb -E production -D root 2582 2172 0 20:28 pts/0 00:00:00 grep --color=auto _rails master It is unicorn_rails master [..] how do I kill it? I tried so far: sed and expr. But cant pass it as param to kill

  Read the article

• The Best Free Alternatives to the Windows Task Manager

  - by Lori Kaufman

  The Windows Task Manager is a built-in tool that allows you to check which services are running in the background, how much resources are being used by which software programs, and the all-to-common task of killing programs that are not responding. Even though the Windows Task Manager has several useful tools, there are many free alternatives available that provide additional or expanded features, allowing you to more closely monitor and tweak your system. How To Play DVDs on Windows 8 6 Start Menu Replacements for Windows 8 What Is the Purpose of the “Do Not Cover This Hole” Hole on Hard Drives?

  Read the article

• IIS6 cannot start additional processes when page request is called from other than localhost

  - by awe

  I have a web application dll that is running under iis6. This is starting a number of processes to be able to handle more than one request at the time. This is working perfect in a numbers of installations. In this particular installation, it runs perfectly when initialized by a call in IE on the server using http://localhost/apppath . The problem is when the processes are from another location, i.e. another computer on the same network initialising the call throught http://servername/apppath . In this case, the initial dll running under iis is executing (proved by logging), but it fails to initialize the additional processes. If the additional processes are already initialized by a call from localhost, it also works when called from another machine (in this case, it is just attached to the existing processes).

  Read the article

• kill -9 doesn't work

  - by Daniel

  I have a server with 3 oracle instances on it, and the file system is nfs with netapp. After shutdown the databases, one process for each database doesn't quit for a long time. Each kill -i doesn't work. I tried to truss, pfile it, the command through error. And iostat shows there are lots of IO to the netapp server. So someone said the process was busy writing data to remote netapp server, and before the write complete, it won't quit. So what need to be done was just wait until all the IO was done. After wait for longer time (about 1.5 hours), the processes exit. So my question is: how can a process ignore the kill signal? As far as I know, if we kill -9, it will stop immediately. Do you encounter such situation kill -i doesn't kill the process right away? TEST7-stdby-phxdbnfs11$ ps -ef|grep dbw0 oracle 1469 25053 0 22:36:53 pts/1 0:00 grep dbw0 oracle 26795 1 0 21:55:23 ? 0:00 ora_dbw0_TEST7 oracle 1051 1 0 Apr 08 ? 3958:51 ora_dbw0_TEST2 oracle 471 1 0 Apr 08 ? 6391:43 ora_dbw0_TEST1 TEST7-stdby-phxdbnfs11$ kill -9 1051 TEST7-stdby-phxdbnfs11$ ps -ef|grep dbw0 oracle 1493 25053 0 22:37:07 pts/1 0:00 grep dbw0 oracle 26795 1 0 21:55:23 ? 0:00 ora_dbw0_TEST7 oracle 1051 1 0 Apr 08 ? 3958:51 ora_dbw0_TEST2 oracle 471 1 0 Apr 08 ? 6391:43 ora_dbw0_TEST1 TEST7-stdby-phxdbnfs11$ kill -9 471 TEST7-stdby-phxdbnfs11$ ps -ef|grep dbw0 oracle 26795 1 0 21:55:23 ? 0:00 ora_dbw0_TEST7 oracle 1051 1 0 Apr 08 ? 3958:51 ora_dbw0_TEST2 oracle 471 1 0 Apr 08 ? 6391:43 ora_dbw0_TEST1 oracle 1495 25053 0 22:37:22 pts/1 0:00 grep dbw0 TEST7-stdby-phxdbnfs11$ ps -ef|grep smon oracle 1524 25053 0 22:38:02 pts/1 0:00 grep smon TEST7-stdby-phxdbnfs11$ ps -ef|grep dbw0 oracle 1526 25053 0 22:38:06 pts/1 0:00 grep dbw0 oracle 26795 1 0 21:55:23 ? 0:00 ora_dbw0_TEST7 oracle 1051 1 0 Apr 08 ? 3958:51 ora_dbw0_TEST2 oracle 471 1 0 Apr 08 ? 6391:43 ora_dbw0_TEST1 TEST7-stdby-phxdbnfs11$ kill -9 1051 471 26795 TEST7-stdby-phxdbnfs11$ ps -ef|grep dbw0 oracle 1528 25053 0 22:38:19 pts/1 0:00 grep dbw0 oracle 26795 1 0 21:55:23 ? 0:00 ora_dbw0_TEST7 oracle 1051 1 0 Apr 08 ? 3958:51 ora_dbw0_TEST2 oracle 471 1 0 Apr 08 ? 6391:43 ora_dbw0_TEST1 TEST7-stdby-phxdbnfs11$ truss -p 26795 truss: unanticipated system error: 26795 TEST7-stdby-phxdbnfs11$ pfiles 26795 pfiles: unanticipated system error: 26795

  Read the article

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >