Search Results

Search found 12704 results on 509 pages for 'security'.

Page 10/509 | < Previous Page | 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17  | Next Page >

  • Windows security unknown accounts: security breach?

    - by Keikoku
    I was uploading some images I had just created to imgur earlier today and noticed that chrome couldn't access my Pictures folder. Windows tells me access was denied. Firefox didn't have an issue though I went to it through windows explorer and it worked fine, and looked at the security tab under properties and noticed that there were four unknown accounts, one of which has full control privileges. I looked at my other folders in the same drive and none of them had these unknown accounts. It was only that specific Pictures folder, and all of its subfolders. What are these unknown accounts and what could it mean? Should I be worried that someone may have compromised the system (well, I should probably be worried about that all the time I guess) I read on microsoft support forums that it may be the result of a previously deleted account, but there has only been one account on this computer for months and no user account management has been performed for awhile.

    Read the article

  • Downloading Microsoft Security Essentials via https

    - by Marcel
    I want to download Microsoft Security Essentials on my brand new Windows 7 home PC. The official site presented to me is http://windows.microsoft.com/de-CH/windows/products/security-essentials, as I am located in Switzerland. The link to the actual package then is http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=231276 Obviously, the download is not secured with https. Why? Would this not be the first thing Microsoft should do? They could deliver the certificate already with the OS to make it really secure...

    Read the article

  • Microsoft Security Essentials Not Monitoring

    - by nateify
    When I boot into Windows Vista, Microsoft Security Essentials is set to run when the system starts. When I open the program, it says Microsoft Security Essentials isn't monitoring your computer because the program's service stopped. It tells me that it can't update definitions or enable real time protection unless I do it manually (every time I boot). Is there a way I can fix this so I always have real time protection and updating?

    Read the article

  • Is free security software as good as paid security software?

    - by Tester101
    I mostly use free security solutions to protect my home PC, but I wonder if I would get better protection from a paid solution. I prefer the free software, since I can have multiple applications protecting against different threats. With paid software I feel like I have to choose just one, and hope it can protect against everything. Is it worth it to pay for security when there are free options?

    Read the article

  • Security Newsletter November Edition is Out

    - by Tanu Sood
    The November edition of the Security Inside Out Newsletter is now out. This month’s newsletter captures the highlights from Oracle OpenWorld. The conference registration broken all the past records and so did all Security related events and activities at OpenWorld. From Security keynotes, conference sessions, hands-on-labs, product demonstrations to the very successful Executive Edge @ Openworld: Chief Security Officer Summit. The main feature discuses the key topics and trends compiled from across all the Security related sessions. The newsletter also features an interview with Amit Jasuja, Senior Vice President, Security and Identity Management at Oracle. Amit discusses the key trends in the industry and how these have helped shape innovation in the latest release of Oracle Identity Management solution set. If you are looking at cloud, social and mobile and are concerned about security, you don’t want to miss this feature. As always, the newsletter captures both recent and upcoming Security and Identity Management events, conferences, training, news and more. So, if you haven’t done so, we recommend you subscribe to the Security Inside Out Newsletter today. We’d love to hear from you. Let us know some topics you’d like to see covered in the upcoming editions. Or just let us know how we are doing. We look forward to hearing from you.

    Read the article

  • Another Security Exception on GoDaddy after Login attempt

    - by Brian Boatright
    Host: GoDaddy Shared Hosting Trust Level: Medium The following happens after I submit a valid user/pass. The database has read/write permissions and when I remove the login requirement on an admin page that updates the database work as expected. Has anyone else had this issue or know what the problem is? Anyone? Server Error in '/' Application. Security Exception Description: The application attempted to perform an operation not allowed by the security policy. To grant this application the required permission please contact your system administrator or change the application's trust level in the configuration file. Exception Details: System.Security.SecurityException: Request for the permission of type 'System.Security.Permissions.FileIOPermission, mscorlib, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089' failed. Source Error: An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below. Stack Trace: [SecurityException: Request for the permission of type 'System.Security.Permissions.FileIOPermission, mscorlib, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089' failed.] System.Security.CodeAccessSecurityEngine.Check(Object demand, StackCrawlMark& stackMark, Boolean isPermSet) +0 System.Security.CodeAccessPermission.Demand() +59 System.IO.FileStream.Init(String path, FileMode mode, FileAccess access, Int32 rights, Boolean useRights, FileShare share, Int32 bufferSize, FileOptions options, SECURITY_ATTRIBUTES secAttrs, String msgPath, Boolean bFromProxy) +684 System.IO.FileStream..ctor(String path, FileMode mode, FileAccess access, FileShare share) +114 System.Configuration.Internal.InternalConfigHost.StaticOpenStreamForRead(String streamName) +80 System.Configuration.Internal.InternalConfigHost.System.Configuration.Internal.IInternalConfigHost.OpenStreamForRead(String streamName, Boolean assertPermissions) +115 System.Configuration.Internal.InternalConfigHost.System.Configuration.Internal.IInternalConfigHost.OpenStreamForRead(String streamName) +7 System.Configuration.Internal.DelegatingConfigHost.OpenStreamForRead(String streamName) +10 System.Configuration.UpdateConfigHost.OpenStreamForRead(String streamName) +42 System.Configuration.BaseConfigurationRecord.InitConfigFromFile() +437 Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:2.0.50727.1433; ASP.NET Version:2.0.50727.1433

    Read the article

  • Spring Security: Multiple Logins to the same resources: Form Login + Facebook Connect (uid, sessionK

    - by Daxon
    To begin I know about http://blog.kadirpekel.com/2009/11/09/facebook-connect-integration-with-spring-security/ The only problem is that it completely replaces the Form Login with Facebook Connect. I have the native form login in place, I also have Facebook Connect in place, Upon gathering user information I link it to a native account but without a password. At that point I would like to call a link or method to start process of going into the Spring Security Filter Chain. Here is the source code that works, but am trying to modify. It contains all the files I'm taking about. Now from what I understand I need to add a custom FacebookAuthenticationProvider so that my AuthenticationManager knows about it. <bean id="facebookAuthenticationProvider" class="org.springframework.security.facebook.FacebookAuthenticationProvider"> </bean> <security:authentication-manager alias="authenticationManager"> <security:authentication-provider ref="facebookAuthenticationProvider" /> </security:authentication-manager> Then within the FacebookAuthenticationProvider I would have to call an FacebookAuthenticationToken that would take my the current facebook Uid and SessionKey of the user. Then try authenticate this Token. So where does the FacebookAuthenticationFilter come into it? I'm just trying to understand the order at which these 3 files are called. As if you were trying to implement any other custom authentication. FacebookAuthenticationFilter.java FacebookAuthenticationProvider.java FacebookAuthenticationToken.java I have also posted this on the Spring Security Forum

    Read the article

  • Java: What are the various available security settings for applets

    - by bguiz
    I have an applet that throws this exception when trying to communicate with the server (running on localhost). This problem is limited to Applets only - a POJO client is able to communicate with the exact same server without any problem. Exception in thread "AWT-EventQueue-1" java.security.AccessControlException: access denied (java.net .SocketPermission 127.0.0.1:9999 connect,resolve) at java.security.AccessControlContext.checkPermission(AccessControlContext.java:323) My applet.policy file's contents is: grant { permission java.security.AllPermission; }; My question is what are the other places where I need to modify my security settings to grant an Applet more security settings? Thank you. EDIT: Further investigation has lead me to find that this problem only occurs on some machines - but not others. So it could be a machine level (global) setting that is causing this, rather than a application-specific setting such as the one in the applet.policy file. EDIT: Another SO question: Socket connection to originating server of an unsigned Java applet This seems to describe the exact same problem, and Tom Hawtin - tackline 's answer provides the reason why (a security patch released that disallows applets from connecting to localhost). Bearing this in mind, how do I grant the applet the security settings such that in can indeed run on my machine. Also why does it run as-is on other machines but not mine?

    Read the article

  • Rendering a control generates security exception in .Net 4

    - by Jason Short
    I am having a problem with code that worked fine in .Net 2 giving this error under .Net 4. Build (web): Inheritance security rules violated while overriding member: 'Controls.RelatedPosts.RenderControl(System.Web.UI.HtmlTextWriter)'. Security accessibility of the overriding method must match the security accessibility of the method being overriden. This is in DotNetBlogEngine. There were several other security demands in the code that .Net 4 didn't seem to like. I followed some of the advice I found on blogs (and here) and got rid of all the other errors. But this one still eludes me. The Main blogengine core dll is not set for security demands anylonger and is compiled for .Net 4 as well. This error is in the website side attempting to use the dll. There are controls that call a RenderControl method taking an HtmlTextWriter. Apparently the text writer now has some soft of security attributes set on it. Each of the controls implements a custom interface ( public interface ICustomFilter ), there are no security permissions present or demands. The site is running full trust on my local dev machine.

    Read the article

  • Remote server security: handling compiler tools

    - by Gonzolas
    Hello! I was wondering wether to remove compiler tools (gcc, make, ...) from a remote production server, mainly for security purposes. Background: The server runs a web application on Linux. Consider Apache jailed. Otherwise, only OpenSSHd faces the public network. Of course there is no compiler stuff within the jail, so this is about the actual OS outside of any jails. Here's my personal PRO/CON list (regarding removal) so far: PRO: I had been reading some suggestions to remove compiler tools in order inhibit custom building of trojans etc. from within the host if an attacker attains unpriviliged user permissions. CON: I can't live without Perl/Python and a trojan/whatever could be written in a scripting language like that, anyway, so why bother about removing gcc et al. at all. There is a need to build new Linux kernels as well as some security tools from source directly on the server, because the server runs in 64-bits mode and (to my understanding) I can't (cross-)compile locally/elsewhere due to lack of another 64-bits hardware system. OK, so here are my questions for you: (a) Is my PRO/CON assessment correct? (b) Do you know of other PROs / CONs to removing all compiler tools? Do they weigh in more? (c) Which binaries should I consider dangerous if the given PRO statement holds? Only gcc, or also make, or what else? Should I remove the enitre software packages them come with? (d) Is it OK to just move those binaries to a root-only accessible directory when they are not needed? Or is there a gain in security if I "scp them in" every time? Thank you!

    Read the article

  • How to prevent getting infected by rogue security applications

    - by Ieyasu Sawada
    My computer never got infected with a virus before, because I'm using Web of Trust browser plugin, sandboxie and Avast Free antivirus. But today, it got infected with a rogue security application called antivirus.net. I have already removed it using MBAM, SAS, and Kaspersky Virus Removal Tool. And by the way, I was using MSE when my laptop got infected. Seems like the rogue application just killed off the MSE process. And I never even got a warning. I was using the wi-fi from our school, which I think is the cause since most of the computers in our laboratory has rogue applications on it. My question is, how do I prevent this from happening again? It took me about 6 hours to disinfect my computer and I don't want it to happen again. Please enlighten me if these rogue applications really just pop out of nowhere. Note I'm not dumb enough to agree with installing rogue security applications. It just came out of nowhere. I'm happy with MSE, well not after it let antivirus.net penetrate my computer. I've done a little bit of research and it says that it needs the permission of the user to actually install it in the computer: http://www.net-security.org/malware_news.php?id=1245 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rogue_security_software Is it possible that other computers in our school network have agreed to install those? Or maybe the network admin?

    Read the article

  • Google chrome not accepting any security certificates

    - by Jerry
    I've recently developed a problem with Google Chrome that's really annoying. I'm using Firefox at the moment with no problems whatsoever and it's the same with IE, so it's safe to say this problem is specific to Chrome. The problem is that it's not accepting security certificates from certain sites. I suppose the best place to start would be google itself. I can't search. The google search page will load but when I type some search term into the search box and hit 'search' I get the message: "You attempted to reach www.google.com, but the server presented an invalid certificate. You cannot proceed because the website operator has requested heightened security for this domain." No matter what the search term is, this is the result. Also when I try to log in to facebook - same message. Youtube works and many other sites that I know present security certs so I'm baffled. I've searched and there are other people who have had similar issues but I can't find a solution anywhere. The most common answer I'm picking up for this is to "check your system time" but I can safely say that it's not my system time. If anyone knows what is going on, I'd very much appreciate being informed. It's not super urgent as I can use Firefox to access those places Chrome won't, but it IS super annoying because I can usually sort out issues like this in no time.

    Read the article

  • .NET Declarative Security: Why is SecurityAction.Deny impossible to work with?

    - by rally25rs
    I've been messing with this for about a day and a half now sifting through .NET reflector and MSDN docs, and can't figure anything out... As it stands in the .NET framework, you can demand that the current Principal belong to a role to be able to execute a method by marking a method like this: [PrincipalPermission(SecurityAction.Demand, Role = "CanEdit")] public void Save() { ... } I am working with an existing security model that already has a "ReadOnly" role defined, so I need to do exactly the opposite of above... block the Save() method if a user is in the "ReadOnly" role. No problem, right? just flip the SecurityAction to .Deny: [PrincipalPermission(SecurityAction.Deny, Role = "ReadOnly")] public void Save() { ... } Well, it turns out that this does nothing at all. The method still runs fine. It seems that the PrincipalPermissionAttribute defines: public override IPermission CreatePermission() But when the attribute is set to SecurityAction.Deny, this method is never called, so no IPermission object is ever created. Does anyone know of a way to get .Deny to work? I've been trying to make a custom secutiry attribute, but even that doesn't work. I tried to get tricky and do: public class MyPermissionAttribute : CodeAccessSecurityAttribute { private SecurityAction securityAction; public MyPermissionAttribute(SecurityAction action) : base(SecurityAction.Demand) { if (action != SecurityAction.Demand && action != SecurityAction.Deny) throw new ArgumentException("Unsupported SecurityAction. Only Demand and Deny are supported."); this.securityAction = action; } public override IPermission CreatePermission() { // do something based on the SecurityAction... } } Notice my attribute constructor always passes SecurityAction.Demand, which is the one action that would work previously. However, even in this case, the CreatePermission() method is still only called when the attribute is set to .Demand, and not .Deny! Maybe the runtime is actually checking the attribute instead of the SecurityAction passed to the CodeAccessSecurityAttribute constructor? I'm not sure what else to try here... anyone have any ideas? You wouldn't think it would be that hard to deny method access based on a role, instead of only demanding it. It really disturbed me that the default PrincipalPermission appears from within an IDE like it would be just fine doing a .Deny, and there is like a 1-liner in the MSDN docs that hint that it won't work. You would think the PrincipalPermissionAttribute constructor would throw an exception immediately if anything other that .Demand is specified, since that could create a big security hole! I never would have realized that .Deny does nothing at all if I hadn't been unit testing! Again, all this stems from having to deal with an existing security model that has a "ReadOnly" role that needs to be denied access, instead of doing it the other way around, where I cna just grant access to a role. Thanks for any help! Quick followup: I can actually make my custom attribute work by doing this: public class MyPermissionAttribute : CodeAccessSecurityAttribute { public SecurityAction SecurityAction { get; set; } public MyPermissionAttribute(SecurityAction action) : base(action) { } public override IPermission CreatePermission() { switch(this.SecurityAction) { ... } // check Demand or Deny } } And decorating the method: [MyPermission(SecurityAction.Demand, SecurityAction = SecurityAction.Deny, Role = "ReadOnly")] public void Save() { ... } But that is terribly ugly, since I'm specifying both Demand and Deny in the same attribute. But it does work... Another interesting note: My custom class extends CodeAccessSecurityAttribute, which in turn only extends SecurityAttribute. If I cnage my custom class to directly extend SecurityAttribute, then nothing at all works. So it seems the runtime is definately looking for only CodeAccessSecurityAttribute instances in the metadata, and does something funny with the SecurityAction specified, even if a custom constructor overrides it.

    Read the article

  • Spring Security - Persistent Remember Me Issue

    - by Taylor L
    I've been trying to track down why Spring Security isn't creating the Spring Security remember me cookie (SPRING_SECURITY_REMEMBER_ME_COOKIE). At first glance, the logs make it seem like the login is failing, but the login is actually successful in the sense that if I navigate to a page that requires authentication I am not redirected back to the login page. However, the logs appear to be saying the login credentials are invalid. I'm using Spring 3.0.1, Spring Security 3.0.1, and Google App Engine 1.3.1. Any ideas as to what is going on? Mar 16, 2010 10:05:56 AM org.springframework.security.web.authentication.rememberme.PersistentTokenBasedRememberMeServices onLoginSuccess FINE: Creating new persistent login for user [email protected] Mar 16, 2010 10:10:07 AM org.springframework.security.web.authentication.rememberme.AbstractRememberMeServices loginFail FINE: Interactive login attempt was unsuccessful. Mar 16, 2010 10:10:07 AM org.springframework.security.web.authentication.rememberme.AbstractRememberMeServices cancelCookie FINE: Cancelling cookie Below is the relevant portion of the applicationContext-security.xml. <http auto-config="false"> <intercept-url pattern="/css/**" filters="none" /> <intercept-url pattern="/img/**" filters="none" /> <intercept-url pattern="/js/**" filters="none" /> <intercept-url pattern="/app/admin/**" filters="none" /> <intercept-url pattern="/app/login/**" filters="none" /> <intercept-url pattern="/app/register/**" filters="none" /> <intercept-url pattern="/app/error/**" filters="none" /> <intercept-url pattern="/" filters="none" /> <intercept-url pattern="/**" access="ROLE_USER" /> <logout logout-success-url="/" /> <form-login login-page="/app/login" default-target-url="/" authentication-failure-url="/app/login?login_error=1" /> <session-management invalid-session-url="/app/login" /> <remember-me services-ref="rememberMeServices" key="myKey" /> </http> <authentication-manager alias="authenticationManager"> <authentication-provider user-service-ref="userDetailsService"> <password-encoder hash="sha-256" base64="true"> <salt-source user-property="username" /> </password-encoder> </authentication-provider> </authentication-manager> <beans:bean id="userDetailsService" class="com.my.service.auth.UserDetailsServiceImpl" /> <beans:bean id="rememberMeServices" class="org.springframework.security.web.authentication.rememberme.PersistentTokenBasedRememberMeServices"> <beans:property name="userDetailsService" ref="userDetailsService" /> <beans:property name="tokenRepository" ref="persistentTokenRepository" /> <beans:property name="key" value="myKey" /> </beans:bean> <beans:bean id="persistentTokenRepository" class="com.my.service.auth.PersistentTokenRepositoryImpl" />

    Read the article

  • Cannot update, apt-get cannot fetch index files

    - by Evan
    I have a fresh install of Ubuntu 11.10 from the iso 'ubuntu-11.10-desktop-amd64.iso'. I installed this in VMWare Fusion 4.1.1 running on OSX 10.7.3. When setting up the VM, I allowed easy install to take care of creating my user and installing VMWare tools. No problems during installation, everything seems to be working great. The problem is that apt-get will NOT update, so I can't do software updates or install any software with apt-get install. I have been searching high and low, and have found several threads covering similar issues. How to fix a ruined package catalog? is one, Update manager generates 404 error while attempting update. Will not update is another, Ubuntu 11.10 Update issue (failed to fetch...) is a third I have tried changing my software source download location to "Main Server" rather than "Server for United States", to no avail. Same errors. Tried sudo apt-get clean, sudo apt-get autoclean, Have done a sudo rm /var/lib/apt/lists/*, still having the exact same problem. As I said, this is a brand new installation as of yesterday evening. Since I know it will be needed, here is my output from a sudo apt-get update: [email protected]:~$ sudo apt-get update Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric InRelease Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates InRelease Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports InRelease Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security InRelease Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric Release.gpg Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates Release.gpg Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports Release.gpg Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security Release.gpg Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric Release Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates Release Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports Release Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security Release Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/main TranslationIndex Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/multiverse TranslationIndex Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/restricted TranslationIndex Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/universe TranslationIndex Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/main TranslationIndex Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/multiverse TranslationIndex Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/restricted TranslationIndex Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/universe TranslationIndex Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/main TranslationIndex Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/multiverse TranslationIndex Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/restricted TranslationIndex Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/universe TranslationIndex Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/main TranslationIndex Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/multiverse TranslationIndex Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/restricted TranslationIndex Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/universe TranslationIndex Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/main Sources 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/restricted Sources 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/universe Sources 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/multiverse Sources 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/main amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/restricted amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/universe amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/multiverse amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/main i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/restricted i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/universe i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/multiverse i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/main Sources 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/restricted Sources 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/universe Sources 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/multiverse Sources 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/main amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/restricted amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/universe amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/multiverse amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/main i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/restricted i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/universe i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/multiverse i386 Packages 404 Not Found Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com oneiric InRelease Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/main Sources 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/restricted Sources 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/universe Sources 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/multiverse Sources 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/main amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/restricted amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/universe amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/multiverse amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/main i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/restricted i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/universe i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/multiverse i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/main Sources 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/restricted Sources 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/universe Sources 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/multiverse Sources 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/main amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/restricted amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/universe amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/multiverse amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/main i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/restricted i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/universe i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/multiverse i386 Packages 404 Not Found Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/main Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/main Translation-en Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/multiverse Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/multiverse Translation-en Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/restricted Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/restricted Translation-en Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/universe Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/universe Translation-en Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/main Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/main Translation-en Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/multiverse Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/multiverse Translation-en Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/restricted Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/restricted Translation-en Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/universe Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/universe Translation-en Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/main Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/main Translation-en Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/multiverse Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/multiverse Translation-en Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/restricted Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/restricted Translation-en Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/universe Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-backports/universe Translation-en Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/main Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/main Translation-en Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/multiverse Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/multiverse Translation-en Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/restricted Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/restricted Translation-en Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/universe Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/universe Translation-en Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com oneiric Release.gpg Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com oneiric Release Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com oneiric/main Sources Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com oneiric/main amd64 Packages Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com oneiric/main i386 Packages Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com oneiric/main TranslationIndex Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com oneiric/main Translation-en_US Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com oneiric/main Translation-en W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric/main/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric/restricted/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric/universe/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric/multiverse/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric/restricted/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric/universe/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric/multiverse/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric/main/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric/restricted/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric/universe/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric/multiverse/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-updates/main/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-updates/restricted/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-updates/universe/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-updates/multiverse/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-updates/restricted/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-updates/universe/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-updates/multiverse/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-updates/main/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-updates/restricted/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-updates/universe/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-updates/multiverse/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-backports/main/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-backports/restricted/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-backports/universe/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-backports/multiverse/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-backports/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-backports/restricted/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-backports/universe/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-backports/multiverse/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-backports/main/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-backports/restricted/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-backports/universe/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-backports/multiverse/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-security/main/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-security/restricted/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-security/universe/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-security/multiverse/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-security/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-security/restricted/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-security/universe/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-security/multiverse/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-security/main/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-security/restricted/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-security/universe/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-security/multiverse/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead. Here is my /etc/apt/source.list: [email protected]:~$ cat /etc/apt/sources.list # deb cdrom:[Ubuntu 11.10 _Oneiric Ocelot_ - Release amd64 (20111012)]/ dists/oneiric/main/binary-i386/ # deb cdrom:[Ubuntu 11.10 _Oneiric Ocelot_ - Release amd64 (20111012)]/ oneiric main restricted # See http://help.ubuntu.com/community/UpgradeNotes for how to upgrade to # newer versions of the distribution. deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric main restricted deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric main restricted ## Major bug fix updates produced after the final release of the ## distribution. deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-updates main restricted deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-updates main restricted ## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu ## team. Also, please note that software in universe WILL NOT receive any ## review or updates from the Ubuntu security team. deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric universe deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric universe deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-updates universe deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-updates universe ## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu ## team, and may not be under a free licence. Please satisfy yourself as to ## your rights to use the software. Also, please note that software in ## multiverse WILL NOT receive any review or updates from the Ubuntu ## security team. deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric multiverse deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric multiverse deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-updates multiverse deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-updates multiverse ## N.B. software from this repository may not have been tested as ## extensively as that contained in the main release, although it includes ## newer versions of some applications which may provide useful features. ## Also, please note that software in backports WILL NOT receive any review ## or updates from the Ubuntu security team. deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-backports main restricted universe multiverse deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-backports main restricted universe multiverse deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-security main restricted deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-security main restricted deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-security universe deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-security universe deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-security multiverse deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-security multiverse ## Uncomment the following two lines to add software from Canonical's ## 'partner' repository. ## This software is not part of Ubuntu, but is offered by Canonical and the ## respective vendors as a service to Ubuntu users. # deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu oneiric partner # deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu oneiric partner ## This software is not part of Ubuntu, but is offered by third-party ## developers who want to ship their latest software. deb http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric main deb-src http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric main And here is my output from lsb_release -a: [email protected]:~$ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu 11.10 Release: 11.10 Codename: oneiric If anyone could help me out here, that would be wonderful!

    Read the article

  • Spring security ldap: no declaration can be found for element 'ldap-authentication-provider'

    - by wuntee
    Following the spring-security documentation: http://static.springsource.org/spring-security/site/docs/3.0.x/reference/ldap.html I am trying to set up ldap authentication (very simple - just need to know if a user is authenticated or not, no authorities mapping needed) and have put this in my applicationContext-security.xml file <beans:beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/security" xmlns:beans="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-3.0.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/security http://www.springframework.org/schema/security/spring-security-3.0.xsd"> ... <ldap-server url="ldap://adapps.company.com:389/dc=company,dc=com" /> <ldap-authentication-provider user-search-filter="(samaccountname={0})" user-search-base="dc=company,dc=com"/> The problem I run into is that it doesnt seem like ldap-authentication-provider; I fell like i may be missing some configuration isn the beans definition. The error I get when trying to run the application is: SEVERE: Exception sending context initialized event to listener instance of class org.springframework.web.context.ContextLoaderListener org.springframework.beans.factory.xml.XmlBeanDefinitionStoreException: Line 27 in XML document from ServletContext resource [/WEB-INF/rvaContext-security.xml] is invalid; nested exception is org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: cvc-complex-type.2.4.c: The matching wildcard is strict, but no declaration can be found for element 'ldap-authentication-provider'. at org.springframework.beans.factory.xml.XmlBeanDefinitionReader.doLoadBeanDefinitions(XmlBeanDefinitionReader.java:396) at org.springframework.beans.factory.xml.XmlBeanDefinitionReader.loadBeanDefinitions(XmlBeanDefinitionReader.java:334) at org.springframework.beans.factory.xml.XmlBeanDefinitionReader.loadBeanDefinitions(XmlBeanDefinitionReader.java:302) at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanDefinitionReader.loadBeanDefinitions(AbstractBeanDefinitionReader.java:143) at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanDefinitionReader.loadBeanDefinitions(AbstractBeanDefinitionReader.java:178) at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanDefinitionReader.loadBeanDefinitions(AbstractBeanDefinitionReader.java:149) at org.springframework.web.context.support.XmlWebApplicationContext.loadBeanDefinitions(XmlWebApplicationContext.java:124) at org.springframework.web.context.support.XmlWebApplicationContext.loadBeanDefinitions(XmlWebApplicationContext.java:93) at org.springframework.context.support.AbstractRefreshableApplicationContext.refreshBeanFactory(AbstractRefreshableApplicationContext.java:130) at org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext.obtainFreshBeanFactory(AbstractApplicationContext.java:465) at org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext.refresh(AbstractApplicationContext.java:395) at org.springframework.web.context.ContextLoader.createWebApplicationContext(ContextLoader.java:272) at org.springframework.web.context.ContextLoader.initWebApplicationContext(ContextLoader.java:196) at org.springframework.web.context.ContextLoaderListener.contextInitialized(ContextLoaderListener.java:47) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.listenerStart(StandardContext.java:3972) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.start(StandardContext.java:4467) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.start(ContainerBase.java:1045) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost.start(StandardHost.java:722) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.start(ContainerBase.java:1045) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngine.start(StandardEngine.java:443) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardService.start(StandardService.java:516) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardServer.start(StandardServer.java:710) at org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.start(Catalina.java:593) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:592) at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.start(Bootstrap.java:289) at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.main(Bootstrap.java:414) Caused by: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: cvc-complex-type.2.4.c: The matching wildcard is strict, but no declaration can be found for element 'ldap-authentication-provider'. at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.util.ErrorHandlerWrapper.createSAXParseException(ErrorHandlerWrapper.java:236) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.util.ErrorHandlerWrapper.error(ErrorHandlerWrapper.java:172) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLErrorReporter.reportError(XMLErrorReporter.java:382) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLErrorReporter.reportError(XMLErrorReporter.java:316) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.xs.XMLSchemaValidator$XSIErrorReporter.reportError(XMLSchemaValidator.java:429) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.xs.XMLSchemaValidator.reportSchemaError(XMLSchemaValidator.java:3185) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.xs.XMLSchemaValidator.handleStartElement(XMLSchemaValidator.java:1955) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.xs.XMLSchemaValidator.emptyElement(XMLSchemaValidator.java:725) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLNSDocumentScannerImpl.scanStartElement(XMLNSDocumentScannerImpl.java:322) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl$FragmentContentDispatcher.dispatch(XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.java:1693) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.scanDocument(XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.java:368) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.XML11Configuration.parse(XML11Configuration.java:834) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.XML11Configuration.parse(XML11Configuration.java:764) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.XMLParser.parse(XMLParser.java:148) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.DOMParser.parse(DOMParser.java:250) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.jaxp.DocumentBuilderImpl.parse(DocumentBuilderImpl.java:292) at org.springframework.beans.factory.xml.DefaultDocumentLoader.loadDocument(DefaultDocumentLoader.java:75) at org.springframework.beans.factory.xml.XmlBeanDefinitionReader.doLoadBeanDefinitions(XmlBeanDefinitionReader.java:388) ... 28 more Can anyone see what im missing? Also, is that all I need to add to the security bean in order to authenticate against ldap?

    Read the article

  • XAMPP vs WAMP security and other on Windows XP

    - by typoknig
    Not long ago I found WAMP and thought it was a God send because it had all the things I wanted/needed (Apache, PHP, MySQL, and phpMyAdmin) all built into one installer. One thing about WAMP has been making me mad is an error I get in phpMyAdmin about the advanced features not working. I have tried to fix that error long enough on that error for long enough. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2688385/problem-with-phpmyadmin-advanced-features I now read that most people prefer XAMPP over WAMP, but I am a bit concerned that XAMPP might have some extra security holes with Mercury and Perl, two thing that I don't really need or want right now. Are my security concerns justified or not? Is there any other reasons to go with XAMPP over WAMP or vice versa?

    Read the article

  • Security Resources

    - by dr.pooter
    What types of sites do you visit, on a regular basis, to stay current on information security issues? Some examples from my list include: http://isc.sans.org/ http://www.kaspersky.com/viruswatch3 http://www.schneier.com/blog/ http://blog.fireeye.com/research/ As well as following the security heavyweights on twitter. I'm curious to hear what resources you recommend for daily monitoring. Anything specific to particular operating systems or other software. Are mailing lists still considered valuable. My goal would be to trim the cruft of all the things I'm currently subscribed to and focus on the essentials.

    Read the article

  • Security permissions for remote shared folders

    - by Tomas Lycken
    I have two servers running Windows Server 2003, and I want copy files from one server (A), programmatically with a windows service running under the Local System account, to a shared folder on the other (B). I keep getting "access denied" errors, and I can't figure out what security settings I need to set to open the shared folder for writing. This is what I've done on the recieving end: On A, right-click on the folder to share, choose the tab "Sharing" and select "Share this folder". Set a share name. Click "Permissions", add the group "Everyone" and give it full control. I tried choosing the "Security" tab to give some permissions there as well, but the "Add" dialog only finds local users, despite the fact that B shows up in the "Workgroup computers" dialog. After further inspection, this is the case also for the "Permissions" dialog under the "Sharing" tab (are they the same?).

    Read the article

  • IE8 Windows 7 (64bit) security certificate problem

    - by Steve
    Hi, We have just received some new computers for use in the office (Dell Vostro). They seem to work fine in the main. When we use IE8 to go to some web pages such as yahoo mail it tells us: “There is a problem with this websites security certificate” If we have a look at the details it says: “This certificate cannot be verified up to a trusted certification authority” This however works correctly in Firefox. I don't understand why I should get such an error message, should this not just work? I don't think its anything to do with the certificate itself as this is happening on www.yahoo.co.uk and other commercial (amazon I think?) sites. I think there is something off with the PCs setup. The PC has Windows 7 (64 bit) and Norton Internet Security installed. Any ideas as to why this is happening? Thanks

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17  | Next Page >