Search Results

Search found 258446 results on 10338 pages for 'stack memory'.

Page 156/10338 | < Previous Page | 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163  | Next Page >

• Static Analyzer says I have a leak....why?

  - by Walter

  I think this code should be fine but Static Analyzer doesn't like it. I can't figure out why and was hoping that someone could help me understand. The code works fine, the analyzer result just bugs me. Coin *tempCoin = [[Coin alloc] initalize]; self.myCoin = tempCoin; [tempCoin release]; Coin is a generic NSObject and it has an initalize method. myCoin is a property of the current view and is of type Coin. I assume it is telling me I am leaking tempCoin. In my view's .h I have set myCoin as a property with nonatomic,retain. I've tried to autorelease the code as well as this normal release but Static Analyzer continues to say: 1. Method returns an Objective-C object with a +1 retain count (owning reference) 2. Object allocated on line 97 is no longer referenced after this point and has a retain count of +1 (object leaked) Line 97 is the first line that I show.

  Read the article

• What collection object is appropriate for fixed ordering of values?

  - by makerofthings7

  Scenario: I am tracking several performance counters and have a CounterDescription[] correlate to DataSnapshot[]... where CounterDescription[n] describes the data loaded within DataSnapshot[n]. I want to expose an easy to use API within C# that will allow for the easy and efficient expansion of the arrays. For example CounterDescription[0] = Humidity; DataSnapshot[0] = .9; CounterDescription[1] = Temp; DataSnapshot[1] = 63; My upload object is defined like this: Note how my intent is to correlate many Datasnapshots with a dattime reference, and using the offset of the data to refer to its meaning. This was determined to be the most efficient way to store the data on the back-end, and has now reflected itself into the following structure: public class myDataObject { [DataMember] public SortedDictionary<DateTime, float[]> Pages { get; set; } /// <summary> /// An array that identifies what each position in the array is supposed to be /// </summary> [DataMember] public CounterDescription[] Counters { get; set; } } I will need to expand each of these arrays (float[] and CounterDescription[] ), but whatever data already exists must stay in that relative offset. Which .NET objects support this? I think Array[] , LinkedList<t>, and List<t> Are able to keep the data fixed in the right locations. What do you think?

  Read the article

• How can I share dynamic data array between Applications?

  - by Ehsan

  Hi, I use CreateFileMapping, but this method was not useful,because only static structure can be shared by this method. for example this method is good for following structure: struct MySharedData { unsigned char Flag; int Buff[10]; }; but it's not good for : struct MySharedData { unsigned char Flag; int *Buff; }; would be thankful if somebody guide me on this, Thanks in advance!

  Read the article

• Is the scope of what Xcode's "Build and Analyze" will catch as a leak supposed to be this limited?

  - by Ranking Stackingblocks

  It doesn't care about this: NSString* leaker() { return [[NSString alloc] init]; } I thought it would have been smart enough to check if any code paths could call that function without releasing its return value (I wouldn't normally code this way, I'm just testing the analyzer). It reports this as a leak: NSString* leaker() { NSString* s = [[NSString alloc] init]; [s retain]; return s; } but NOT this: NSString* leaker() { NSString* s = [[NSString alloc] init]; // [s retain]; return s; } which seems particularly weak to me. Does it only analyze within the local scope? If the tool can't pick up on things like this, how can I expect it to pick up on actual mistakes that I might make?

  Read the article

• Can I early-release an autorelease object?

  - by Ranking Stackingblocks

  i.e. would cause the object to be released immediately and not have to be released by the pool if I did this? [[NSArray arrayWithCapacity:100] release]; Can't find a clear explanation in the docs about this.

  Read the article

• Autorelease vs. Release

  - by Sheehan Alam

  Given the two scenarios, which code is best practice and why? Autorelease loginButton = [[[UIBarButtonItem alloc] initWithTitle:@"Login" style:UIBarButtonItemStylePlain target:self action:@selector(loginButtonClicked:)] autorelease]; self.navigationItem.rightBarButtonItem = loginButton; or Release loginButton = [[UIBarButtonItem alloc] initWithTitle:@"Login" style:UIBarButtonItemStylePlain target:self action:@selector(loginButtonClicked:)]; self.navigationItem.rightBarButtonItem = loginButton; [loginButton release];

  Read the article

• UI Thread .Invoke() causing handle leak?

  - by JYelton

  In what circumstances would updating a UI control from a non-UI thread could cause the processes' handles to continually increase, when using a delegate and .InvokeRequired? For example: public delegate void DelegateUIUpdate(); private void UIUpdate() { if (someControl.InvokeRequired) { someControl.Invoke(new DelegateUIUpdate(UIUpdate)); return; } // do something with someControl } When this is called in a loop or on timer intervals, the handles for the program consistently increase.

  Read the article

• object not getting released in iphone

  - by Jaimin

  i m writing this code in my code to store the data in database.. Search *objSearchDetail = [[Search alloc] init]; objSearchDetail = [xmlResponseDetail objectAtIndex:i]; sql = "INSERT INTO tblsearchdetail(tblrecentsearch_id,name,address,email,url,street,postcode,city,telephone,mobile) VALUES(?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?)"; returnValue = sqlite3_prepare_v2(database, sql, -1, &insertStatement, NULL); if(returnValue == SQLITE_OK){ sqlite3_bind_int(insertStatement, 1, intLastRecentSearchId); sqlite3_bind_text(insertStatement, 2, [objSearchDetail.strName UTF8String], -1,SQLITE_TRANSIENT); sqlite3_bind_text(insertStatement, 3, [objSearchDetail.strAddress UTF8String], -1,SQLITE_TRANSIENT); sqlite3_bind_text(insertStatement, 4, [objSearchDetail.strEmail UTF8String], -1,SQLITE_TRANSIENT); sqlite3_bind_text(insertStatement, 5, [objSearchDetail.strUrl UTF8String], -1,SQLITE_TRANSIENT); sqlite3_bind_text(insertStatement, 6, [objSearchDetail.strStreet UTF8String], -1,SQLITE_TRANSIENT); sqlite3_bind_text(insertStatement, 7, [objSearchDetail.strPostCode UTF8String], -1,SQLITE_TRANSIENT); sqlite3_bind_text(insertStatement, 8, [objSearchDetail.strPlace UTF8String], -1,SQLITE_TRANSIENT); sqlite3_bind_text(insertStatement, 9, [objSearchDetail.strTelephone UTF8String], -1,SQLITE_TRANSIENT); sqlite3_bind_text(insertStatement, 10, [objSearchDetail.strMobile UTF8String], -1,SQLITE_TRANSIENT); if(sqlite3_step(insertStatement)==SQLITE_DONE) { //Data; } } NSLog(@"count %d",[objSearchDetail retainCount]); [objSearchDetail release]; now the nslog shows refrence count as 2 so even if i release the refrence count will still be one and the object will not be destroyed.. plz help me....

  Read the article

• object not getting released in iphone

  - by mohsinpathan

  NSString *strSql = @"select tblrecentsearch_id,xmlrequest,company,postcode,city,kilometer,date from tblrecentsearch"; returnValue = sqlite3_prepare_v2(database, [strSql UTF8String], -1, &selectStatement, NULL); if(returnValue == SQLITE_OK) { arrRecentSearch=[[NSMutableArray alloc] init]; while(sqlite3_step(selectStatement)==SQLITE_ROW) { Search *ObjSearch = [[Search alloc]init]; ObjSearch.intRecentSearchId = sqlite3_column_int(selectStatement, 0); ObjSearch.xmlRequest = [NSString stringWithCString:(char *)sqlite3_column_text_check(selectStatement, 1) encoding:NSUTF8StringEncoding]; ObjSearch.strCompnay=[NSString stringWithCString:(char *)sqlite3_column_text_check(selectStatement, 2) encoding:NSUTF8StringEncoding]; ObjSearch.strPostCode=[NSString stringWithCString:(char *)sqlite3_column_text_check(selectStatement, 3) encoding:NSUTF8StringEncoding]; ObjSearch.strPlace = [NSString stringWithCString:(char *)sqlite3_column_text_check(selectStatement, 4) encoding:NSUTF8StringEncoding]; ObjSearch.strKilometer = [NSString stringWithCString:(char *)sqlite3_column_text_check(selectStatement, 5) encoding:NSUTF8StringEncoding]; ObjSearch.strDate = [NSString stringWithCString:(char *)sqlite3_column_text_check(selectStatement, 6) encoding:NSUTF8StringEncoding]; [arrRecentSearch addObject:ObjSearch]; [ObjSearch release]; } } sqlite3_finalize(selectStatement); I want release arrRecentSearch but it will return from function . How can i realese this array. Please help me.I am fetching data from databse.

  Read the article

• How to release a string created inside a method in iphone?

  - by Warrior

  I have declared a local string inside the method.I am releasing the string inside the same method.I found my code crashing if release that object.If i dont release the string,code runs successfully.I have called that method in viewdidappear so that method is called while pushing and poping.Nothing gets printed in the console. Here is my code -(void)appendString{ NSString *locStr = [[NSString alloc] initWithString:@""]; for (int i=0;i<[result count]; i++) { locStr=[locStr stringByAppendingFormat:@"%@",[result objectAtIndex:i]]; } [str setString:locStr]; [locStr release]; } I am calling the "appendString" method from "viewDidAppear"."str" is a NSMutable string declared in .h class.How should i release the "locStr" .Please help me out

  Read the article

• Should I always release self for failed init methods?

  - by leo

  Should I always release self when there is a failure inside init, or should I only do so if I have initialized instance variables first? To put it another way, is this pattern valid? Is there a time when I shouldn't release self inside an init method, or should I assume that if the control flow enters init, self has at least a retain count of 1? - (id)init { if ((self = [super init]) == nil) { [self release]; return nil; } //do some init stuff if (somethingFailed) { [self release]; return nil; } return self; }

  Read the article

• How to analyse Dalvik GC behaviour?

  - by HRJ

  I am developing an application on Android. It is a long running application that continuously processes sensor data. While running the application I see a lot of GC messages in the logcat; about one every second. This is most probably because of objects being created and immediately de-referenced in a loop. How do I find which objects are being created and released immediately? All the java heap analysis tools that I have tried(*) are bothered with the counts and sizes of objects on the heap. While they are useful, I am more interested in finding out the site where temporary short-lived objects get created the most. (*) I tried jcat and Eclipse MAT. I couldn't get hat to work on the Android heap-dumps; it complained of an unsupported dump file version.

  Read the article

• How to release audio properly? (AVAudioPlayer)

  - by Aluminum

  Hello everyone! I need help with my iOS application ^^,. I want to know if I'm releasing AVAudioPlayer correctly. MyViewController.h #import <UIKit/UIKit.h> @interface MyViewController : UIViewController { NSString *Path; } - (IBAction)Playsound; @end MyViewController.m #import <AVFoundation/AVAudioPlayer.h> #import "MyViewController.h" @implementation MyViewController AVAudioPlayer *Media; - (IBAction)Playsound { Path = [[NSBundle mainBundle] pathForResource:@"Sound" ofType:@"wav"]; Media = [[AVAudioPlayer alloc] initWithContentsOfURL:[NSURL fileURLWithPath:Path] error:NULL]; [Media play]; } - (void)dealloc { [Media release]; [super viewDidUnload]; } @end

  Read the article

• Compiler reordering around mutex boundaries?

  - by shojtsy

  Suppose I have my own non-inline functions LockMutex and UnlockMutex, which are using some proper mutex - such as boost - inside. How will the compiler know not to reorder other operations with regard to calls to the LockMutex and UnlockMutex? It can not possibly know how will I implement these functions in some other compilation unit. void SomeClass::store(int i) { LockMutex(_m); _field = i; // could the compiler move this around? UnlockMutex(_m); } ps: One is supposed to use instances of classes for holding locks to guarantee unlocking. I have left this out to simplify the example.

  Read the article

• How can CopyOnWriteArrayList be thread-safe?

  - by Shooshpanchick

  I've taken a look into OpenJDK's sources of CopyOnWriteArrayList and it seems that all write operations are protected by the same lock and read operations are not protected at all. As I understand, under JMM all accesses to a variable (both read and write) should be protected by lock or reordering effects may occur. For example, set(int, E) method contains these lines (under lock): /* 1 */ int len = elements.length; /* 2 */ Object[] newElements = Arrays.copyOf(elements, len); /* 3 */ newElements[index] = element; /* 4 */ setArray(newElements); The get(int) method, on the other hand, only does return get(getArray(), index);. In my understanding of JMM, this means that get may observe the array in an inconsistent state if statements 1-4 are reordered like 1-2(new)-4-2(copyOf)-3. Do I understand JMM incorrectly or is there any other explanations on why CopyOnWriteArrayList is thread-safe?

  Read the article

• Why doesn't the value in /proc/meminfo seem to map exactly to the system RAM?

  - by Eric Asberry

  The values in /proc/meminfo for MemTotal don't make sense. As a human, eyeballing it, it seems to roughly correspond to the installed RAM, but for using it to display the installed RAM from an automated utility it appears to be inexact, and inconsistent. For a system with 1G of RAM, I would expect the MemTotal line to have a value of 1048576 - 1024*1024. But instead, I'm seeing 1029392. On another 4G box, I'm seeing 3870172, which is not a multiple of 1024, and it's not even close to 1029392*4. On an 8G box, I get 8128204, which again seems to have no correlation to the other values, nor is it a multiple of 1024. I'm trying to use this information to report the RAM on a status web page. My work-around is to just "round" it to the nearest 1G multiple, but I'd like to understand why these values seem inconsistent and don't match my expectations. Can somebody fill me in on what I'm missing here? EDIT: To expand on the accepted answer below.... The reference can be found here. Also of interest to me from that page, which explains the inconsistency, is this bit: meminfo: Provides information about distribution and utilization of memory. This varies by architecture and compile options. ...

  Read the article

• network java program to know RAM

  - by swati

  how to know free RAM size through java program?

  Read the article

• Creating and releasing objects in the same method, while using self as delegate

  - by user200341

  In objective-c you are responsible for releasing objects you allocate, but what happens when you allocate an object in a method, assign self as the objects delegate, and then release the object. The callbacks from the newly created (and released) object fails at this point, or rather, doesn't happen. - (void)doSomething { MyObj *myObj = [[MyObj alloc] init]; myObj.delegate = self; [myObj performOperation]; [myObj release]; } - (void)callbackMethodFromMyObj:(NSString *)message { NSLog(message); } I can't release the object until the callback has occurred, and I can't avoid releasing the object in the same method that creates it (because it exists outside the scope). One way of doing it would be to pass the object along in the call-back and release it in the callback, but is this the right way to go about this?

  Read the article

• Why does this code leak? (simple codesnippet)

  - by Ela782

  Visual Studio shows me several leaks (a few hundred lines), in total more than a few MB. I traced it down to the following "helloWorld example". The leak disappears if I comment out the H5::DataSet.getSpace() line. #include "stdafx.h" #include <iostream> #include "cpp/H5Cpp.h" int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { _CrtSetDbgFlag ( _CRTDBG_ALLOC_MEM_DF | _CRTDBG_LEAK_CHECK_DF ); // dump leaks at return H5::H5File myfile; try { myfile = H5::H5File("C:\\Users\\yyy\\myfile.h5", H5F_ACC_RDONLY); } catch (H5::Exception& e) { std::string msg( std::string( "Could not open HDF5 file.\n" ) + e.getCDetailMsg() ); throw msg; } H5::Group myGroup = myfile.openGroup("/so/me/group"); H5::DataSet myDS = myGroup.openDataSet("./myfloatvec"); hsize_t dims[1]; //myDS.getSpace().getSimpleExtentDims(dims, NULL); // <-- here's the leak H5::DataSpace dsp = myDS.getSpace(); // The H5::DataSpace seems to leak dsp.getSimpleExtentDims(dims, NULL); //dsp.close(); // <-- doesn't help either std::cout << "Dims: " << dims[0] << std::endl; // <-- Works as expected return 0; } Any help would be appreciated. I've been on this for hours, I hate unclean code...

  Read the article

• Dereferencing deleted pointers always result in an Access Violation ??

  - by m3rLinEz

  I have a very simple C++ code here: char *s = new char[100]; strcpy(s, "HELLO"); delete [] s; int n = strlen(s); If I run this code from Visual C++ 2008 by pressing F5 (Start Debugging,) this always result in crash (Access Violation.) However, starting this executable outside the IDE, or using the IDE's Ctrl+F5 (Start without Debugging) doesn't result in any crash. What could be the difference? I also want to know if it's possible to stably reproduce the Access Violation crash caused from accessing deleted area? Is this kind of crash rare in real-life?

  Read the article

• Constructors for C++ objects

  - by sasquatch

  I have class Person as following : class Person { char* name; int age; }; Now I need to add two contructors. One taking no arguments, that inserts field values to dynamically allocated resources. Second taking (char*, int) arguments initialized by initialization list. Last part is to define a destructor showing information about destroying objects and deallocating dynamically allocated resources. How to perform this task ? That's what I already have : class Person { char* name; int age; public: Person(){ this->name = new *char; this->age = new int; } Person(char* c, int i){ } };

  Read the article

• Surprising IPhone leak

  - by Ethan

  Hey guys, So I'm running instruments on my app, and getting a leak that I could have sworn I was doing right. + (NSMutableArray *)decode:(NSDictionary *)encoded_faculty_array { NSArray *faculty_id_data = [encoded_faculty_array objectForKey:@"faculty_id"]; NSArray *faculty_first_name = [encoded_faculty_array objectForKey:@"first_name"]; NSArray *faculty_last_name = [encoded_faculty_array objectForKey:@"last_name"]; NSMutableArray* faculty_array = [[NSMutableArray alloc] init]; for(int a = 0; a < [faculty_id_data count]; a++) { Faculty *new_fac = [[Faculty alloc] initWithFacultyId:[Dearray clean:[faculty_id_data objectAtIndex:a] withDefault:@"0"] andFirstName:[Dearray clean:[faculty_first_name objectAtIndex:a] withDefault:@"Name not found"] andLastName:[Dearray clean:[faculty_last_name objectAtIndex:a] withDefault:@" "] andBio:nil andDegrees:nil andTitle:nil]; [faculty_array addObject:new_fac]; [new_fac release]; } [faculty_array autorelease]; return faculty_array; } It's reporting a leak on new_fac. I released it immediately after I called it though. Any idea what could be causing that problem? Thanks.

  Read the article

• how reference copy is handled in Objective-C?

  - by Cathy

  Object graph [Instance A] tree / \ / \ / \ ↓ ↓ [Instance B] [Instance C] apple bug Question Instance A has to reference copies to Instance B and Instance C. If I retain or release Instance A, which has references to the other two instances, what happens to the various reference counts?

  Read the article

• Assigning unsigned char* buffer to a string

  - by CPPChase

  This question might be asked before but I couldn't find exactly what I need. My problem is, I have a buffer loaded by data downloaded from a webservice. The buffer is in unsigned char* form in which there is no '\0' at the end. Then I have a poco xml parser needs a string. I tried assigning it to string but now I realized it would cause problem such as leaking. here is the code: DOMParser::DOMParser(unsigned char* consatData, int consatDataSize, unsigned char* lagData, int lagDataSize) { Poco::XML::DOMParser parser; std::string consat; consat.assign((const char*) consatData, consatDataSize); pDoc = parser.parseString(consat); ParseConsat(); } Poco xml parser does have a ParseMemory which need a const char* and size of data but for some reason it just gives me segmentation fault. So I think it's safer to turn it to string. Thanks in advance.

  Read the article

• FLVs on timeline are glitching out

  - by TandemAdam

  I have a Movieclip with about five FLV movies embedded on its timeline, one after another. I am loading multiple instances (about 5-10) of this movieclip onto the stage. Once added to the stage, they each play there timelines in a loop. The problem is that when one of the instances switch over to playing a new FLV, then some of the other instances "glitch out"! See this image for what the glitch looks like: This glitch also happens when they first start playing (first load). More details of Flash: 24fps FlashPlayer 10 Actionscript 3 More details of the FLVs: Encoded with On2 VP6 24fps transparent background (alpha channel) dimensions 640x480 filesize are about 150KB each FLVs are imported using option: "Embed video in SWF and play in timeline" Has anyone seen this before? Does anyone have a reason for why this might be happening? And any possibly ways to stop it from happening. EDIT* It seems to only "glitch" when an FLV is started from a random frame (a frame that is not the first frame). I don't think it always does it, but it does it quite often.

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163  | Next Page >