Search Results

Search found 328 results on 14 pages for 'recv'.

Page 2/14 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

• How to recive more than 65000 bytes in C++ socket using recv()

  - by Mr.Cool

  I am developing a client server application (TCP) in Linux using C++. I want to send more than 65,000 bytes at the same time. In TCP, the maximum packet size is 65,635 bytes only. How can I send the entire bytes without loss? Following is my code at server side. //Receive the message from client socket if((iByteCount = recv(GetSocketId(), buffer, MAXRECV, MSG_WAITALL)) > 0) { printf("\n Received bytes %d\n", iByteCount); SetReceivedMessage(buffer); return LS_RESULT_OK; } If I use MSG_WAITALL it takes a long time to receive the bytes so how can I set the flag to receive more than 10 lakhs bytes at time.

  Read the article

• C# equivalent of recv?

  - by mlh

  Hello, I have a portion of C code that I am trying to port over to C#. In my C code, I create a socket and then issue a receive command. The receive command is void receive(mysocket, char * command_buffer) { recv(mysocket, command_buffer, COMMAND_BUFFER_SIZE, 0); } now, the command buffer is returned with new values including command_buffer[8] being a pointer to a string. I'm really confused as to how to do this in C# because C# Read() command specifically takes in bytes and not char. The important part is that I get the pointer to the string. Any ideas?

  Read the article

• c unix- Select() send and receive with same socket descriptor

  - by RileyVanZeeland

  I am wanting to use select to receive and send on a client/server on the same socket descriptor (serverside). timestruct* myTime; sockfd = accept(listeningFd, 0, 0); while(1) FD_ZERO(&my_fd_set) maxFd = sockfd FD_ZERO(&my_fd_set); FD_SET(sockfd, &my_fd_set); select(maxFd+1, &my_fd_set, &my_fd_set, NULL, myTime); for (j=0; j<=maxFd; j++) if(FD_ISSET(j, &temp_fd_set)) if(j==sockfd) send() if(j==sockfd) recv() This is essentially what I want to do. Obviously this won't work because sockfd is going to be the same value for sending and receiving. Is there a way I can do this without using fork()?? Currently I have a blocking recv and send but the server could be required to recv multiple commands while another command is being processed to send back to the client. I am very knew to c and also 'select()'. Because select has the three fd_set options (read, write, execute) I thought maybe I could do this. Thank you.

  Read the article

• [Perl] Testing for EAGAIN / EWOULDBLOCK on a recv

  - by Robert S. Barnes

  I'm testing a socket to see if it's still open: my $dummy = ''; my $ret = recv($sock, $dummy, 1, MSG_DONTWAIT | MSG_PEEK); if (!defined $ret || (length($dummy) == 0 && $! != EAGAIN && $! != EWOULDBLOCK )) { logerr("Broken pipe? ".__LINE__." $!"); } else { # socket still connected, reuse logerr(__LINE__.": $!"); return $sock; } I'm passing this code a socket I know for certain is open and it's always going through the first branch and logging "Broken pipe? 149 Resource temporarily unavailable". I don't understand how this is happening since "Resource temporarily unavailable" is supposed to correspond to EAGAIN as far as I know. I'm sure there must be something simple I'm missing. And yes, I know this is not a full proof way to test and I account for that.

  Read the article

• Sockets and multithreading

  - by V0idExp

  Hi to all! I have an interesting (to me) problem... There are two threads, one for capturing data from std input and sending it through socket to server, and another one which receives data from blocking socket. So, when there's no reply from server, recv() call waits indefenitely, right? But instead of blocking only its calling thread, it blocks the overall process! Why this thing occurs?

  Read the article

• Problem reading hexadecimal buffer from C socket

  - by Olaseni

  I'm using the SDL_net sockets API to create a server and client. I can easily read a string buffer, but when I try to send hexadecimal data, recv gets the length, but I cannot seem to be a able to read the buffer contents. IPaddress ip; TCPsocket server,client; int bufSize = 1024; char message[bufSize]; int len; server = SDLNet_TCP_Open(&ip); client = SDLNet_TCP_Accept(server); len = SDLNet_TCP_Recv(client,message,bufSize); Here's a snippet. the buffer length "len" is set (i.e. message length) but I can't get to the data contents in the message buffer. Some sample bind_transmitter PDU data was sent by a random client to the server at that port. I can't read the PDU (SMPP).

  Read the article

• Receiving data with Winsock

  - by Tamir

  Right now, I'm programming the networking for my online game, and I'm not really sure what to do about receiving data. The problem is that I can't really guess the packet's size, so I thought of reading just 4 bytes from the packet and converting them to an int to know what's the packet's size. Then I'll just create a buffer in that size and receive the rest of the packet, is that a good idea? For your information, I'm using non-blocking i/o.

  Read the article

• How to set timeout on python's socket recv method?

  - by Thoreller

  I need to set timeout on python's socket recv method. How to do it?

  Read the article

• How to make socket.recv(500) not stop a while loop.

  - by ImTooStupidForThis

  I made an IRC bot which uses a while true loop to receive whatever is said. To receive I use recv(500), but that stops the loop if there isn't anything to receive, but i need the loop to continue even if there isn't anything to receive. I need a makeshift timer to continue running. Example code: /A lot of stuff/ timer=0 while 1: timer=timer+1 line=s.recv(500) #If there is nothing to receive, the loop and thus the timer stop. /A lot of stuff/ So either I need a way to stop it stopping the loop, or I need a better timer.

  Read the article

• Sending email to gmail account using c++ on windows error check

  - by LCD Fire

  I know this has been disscused a lot, but I I'm not asking how to do it, I'm just asking why it doesn't work. What I am doing wrong. It says that the email was sent succesfully but I don't see it in my inbox. I want to send an email to a gmail account, not through it. #include <iostream> #include <windows.h> #include <fstream> #include <conio.h> #pragma comment(lib, "ws2_32.lib") // Insist on at least Winsock v1.1 const int VERSION_MAJOR = 1; const int VERSION_MINOR = 1; #define CRLF "\r\n" // carriage-return/line feed pair using namespace std; // Basic error checking for send() and recv() functions void Check(int iStatus, char *szFunction) { if((iStatus != SOCKET_ERROR) && (iStatus)) return; cerr<< "Error during call to " << szFunction << ": " << iStatus << " - " << GetLastError() << endl; } int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { int iProtocolPort = 25; char szSmtpServerName[64] = ""; char szToAddr[64] = ""; char szFromAddr[64] = ""; char szBuffer[4096] = ""; char szLine[255] = ""; char szMsgLine[255] = ""; SOCKET hServer; WSADATA WSData; LPHOSTENT lpHostEntry; LPSERVENT lpServEntry; SOCKADDR_IN SockAddr; // Check for four command-line args //if(argc != 5) // ShowUsage(); // Load command-line args lstrcpy(szSmtpServerName, "smtp.gmail.com"); lstrcpy(szToAddr, "[email protected]"); lstrcpy(szFromAddr, "[email protected]"); // Create input stream for reading email message file ifstream MsgFile("D:\\d.txt"); // Attempt to intialize WinSock (1.1 or later) if(WSAStartup(MAKEWORD(VERSION_MAJOR, VERSION_MINOR), &WSData)) { cout << "Cannot find Winsock v" << VERSION_MAJOR << "." << VERSION_MINOR << " or later!" << endl; return 1; } // Lookup email server's IP address. lpHostEntry = gethostbyname(szSmtpServerName); if(!lpHostEntry) { cout << "Cannot find SMTP mail server " << szSmtpServerName << endl; return 1; } // Create a TCP/IP socket, no specific protocol hServer = socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0); if(hServer == INVALID_SOCKET) { cout << "Cannot open mail server socket" << endl; return 1; } // Get the mail service port lpServEntry = getservbyname("mail", 0); // Use the SMTP default port if no other port is specified if(!lpServEntry) iProtocolPort = htons(IPPORT_SMTP); else iProtocolPort = lpServEntry->s_port; // Setup a Socket Address structure SockAddr.sin_family = AF_INET; SockAddr.sin_port = iProtocolPort; SockAddr.sin_addr = *((LPIN_ADDR)*lpHostEntry->h_addr_list); // Connect the Socket if(connect(hServer, (PSOCKADDR) &SockAddr, sizeof(SockAddr))) { cout << "Error connecting to Server socket" << endl; return 1; } // Receive initial response from SMTP server Check(recv(hServer, szBuffer, sizeof(szBuffer), 0), "recv() Reply"); // Send HELO server.com sprintf(szMsgLine, "HELO %s%s", szSmtpServerName, CRLF); Check(send(hServer, szMsgLine, strlen(szMsgLine), 0), "send() HELO"); Check(recv(hServer, szBuffer, sizeof(szBuffer), 0), "recv() HELO"); // Send MAIL FROM: <[email protected]> sprintf(szMsgLine, "MAIL FROM:<%s>%s", szFromAddr, CRLF); Check(send(hServer, szMsgLine, strlen(szMsgLine), 0), "send() MAIL FROM"); Check(recv(hServer, szBuffer, sizeof(szBuffer), 0), "recv() MAIL FROM"); // Send RCPT TO: <[email protected]> sprintf(szMsgLine, "RCPT TO:<%s>%s", szToAddr, CRLF); Check(send(hServer, szMsgLine, strlen(szMsgLine), 0), "send() RCPT TO"); Check(recv(hServer, szBuffer, sizeof(szBuffer), 0), "recv() RCPT TO"); // Send DATA sprintf(szMsgLine, "DATA%s", CRLF); Check(send(hServer, szMsgLine, strlen(szMsgLine), 0), "send() DATA"); Check(recv(hServer, szBuffer, sizeof(szBuffer), 0), "recv() DATA"); //strat writing about the subject, end it with two CRLF chars and after that you can //write data to the body oif the message sprintf(szMsgLine, "Subject: My own subject %s%s", CRLF, CRLF); Check(send(hServer, szMsgLine, strlen(szMsgLine), 0), "send() DATA"); // Send all lines of message body (using supplied text file) MsgFile.getline(szLine, sizeof(szLine)); // Get first line do // for each line of message text... { sprintf(szMsgLine, "%s%s", szLine, CRLF); Check(send(hServer, szMsgLine, strlen(szMsgLine), 0), "send() message-line"); MsgFile.getline(szLine, sizeof(szLine)); // get next line. } while(!MsgFile.eof()); // Send blank line and a period sprintf(szMsgLine, "%s.%s", CRLF, CRLF); Check(send(hServer, szMsgLine, strlen(szMsgLine), 0), "send() end-message"); Check(recv(hServer, szBuffer, sizeof(szBuffer), 0), "recv() end-message"); // Send QUIT sprintf(szMsgLine, "QUIT%s", CRLF); Check(send(hServer, szMsgLine, strlen(szMsgLine), 0), "send() QUIT"); Check(recv(hServer, szBuffer, sizeof(szBuffer), 0), "recv() QUIT"); // Report message has been sent cout<< "Sent " << argv[4] << " as email message to " << szToAddr << endl; // Close server socket and prepare to exit. closesocket(hServer); WSACleanup(); _getch(); return 0; }

  Read the article

• 501 Error during Libjingle PCP on Amazone EC2 running Openfire

  - by AeroBuffalo

  I am trying to implement Google's Libjingle (version: 0.6.14) PCP example and I am getting a 501: feature not implemented error during execution. Specifically, the error occurs after each "account" has connected, been authenticated and began communicating with the other. An abbreviated log of the interaction is provided at the end. I have set up my own jabber server (using OpenFire on an Amazon EC2 server), have opened all of the necessary ports and have added each "account" to the other's roster. The server has been set to allow for file transfers. My being new to working with servers, I am not sure why this error is occur and how to go about fixing it. Thanks in advance, AeroBuffalo P.S. Let me know if there is any additional information needed (i.e. the full program log for either/both ends). Receiving End: [018:217] SEND >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : Thu Jul 5 14:17:15 2012 [018:217] <iq to="[email protected]/pcp" type="set" id="5"> [018:217] <jingle xmlns="urn:xmpp:jingle:1" action="session-initiate" sid="402024303" initiator="[email protected]/pcp"> [018:217] <content name="securetunnel" creator="initiator"> [018:217] <description xmlns="http://www.google.com/talk/securetunnel"> [018:217] <type>send:winein.jpeg</type> [018:217] <client-cert>--BEGIN CERTIFICATE--END CERTIFICATE--</client-cert> [018:217] </description> [018:217] <transport xmlns="http://www.google.com/transport/p2p"/> [018:217] </content> [018:217] </jingle> [018:217] <session xmlns="http://www.google.com/session" type="initiate" id="402024303" initiator="[email protected]/pcp"> [018:217] <description xmlns="http://www.google.com/talk/securetunnel"> [018:217] <type>send:winein.jpeg</type> [018:217] <client-cert>--BEGIN CERTIFICATE--END CERTIFICATE--</client-cert> [018:217] </description></session> [018:217] </iq> [018:217] RECV <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< : Thu Jul 5 14:17:15 2012 [018:217] <presence to="[email protected]/pcp" from="forgesend" type="error"> [018:217] <error code="404" type="cancel"> [018:217] <remote-server-not-found xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-stanzas"/> [018:217] </error></presence> [018:218] RECV <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< : Thu Jul 5 14:17:15 2012 [018:218] <presence to="[email protected]/pcp" from="forgesend" type="error"> [018:218] <error code="404" type="cancel"> [018:218] <remote-server-not-found xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-stanzas"/> [018:218] </error></presence> [018:264] RECV <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< : Thu Jul 5 14:17:15 2012 [018:264] <iq type="result" id="3" to="[email protected]/pcp"> [018:264] <query xmlns="google:jingleinfo"> [018:264] <stun> [018:264] <server host="stun.xten.net" udp="3478"/> [018:264] <server host="jivesoftware.com" udp="3478"/> [018:264] <server host="igniterealtime.org" udp="3478"/> [018:264] <server host="stun.fwdnet.net" udp="3478"/> [018:264] </stun> [018:264] <publicip ip="65.101.207.121"/> [018:264] </query></iq> [018:420] RECV <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< : Thu Jul 5 14:17:15 2012 [018:420] <iq to="[email protected]/pcp" type="set" id="5" from="[email protected]/pcp"> [018:420] <jingle xmlns="urn:xmpp:jingle:1" action="session-initiate" sid="3548650675" initiator="[email protected]/pcp"> [018:420] <content name="securetunnel" creator="initiator"> [018:420] <description xmlns="http://www.google.com/talk/securetunnel"> [018:420] <type>recv:wineout.jpeg</type> [018:420] <client-cert>--BEGIN CERTIFICATE--END CERTIFICATE--</client-cert> [018:420] </description> [018:420] <transport xmlns="http://www.google.com/transport/p2p"/> [018:420] </content></jingle> [018:420] <session xmlns="http://www.google.com/session" type="initiate" id="3548650675" initiator="[email protected]/pcp"> [018:420] <description xmlns="http://www.google.com/talk/securetunnel"> [018:420] <type>recv:wineout.jpeg</type> [018:420] <client-cert>--BEGIN CERTIFICATE--END CERTIFICATE--</client-cert> [018:420] </description></session></iq> [018:421] TunnelSessionClientBase::OnSessionCreate: received=1 [018:421] Session:3548650675 Old state:STATE_INIT New state:STATE_RECEIVEDINITIATE Type:http://www.google.com/talk/securetunnel Transport:http://www.google.com/transport/p2p [018:421] TunnelSession::OnSessionState(Session::STATE_RECEIVEDINITIATE) [018:421] SEND >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : Thu Jul 5 14:17:15 2012 [018:421] <iq to="[email protected]/pcp" id="5" type="result"/> [018:465] RECV <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< : Thu Jul 5 14:17:15 2012 [018:465] <iq to="[email protected]/pcp" id="5" type="result" from="[email protected]/pcp"/> [198:665] RECV <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< : Thu Jul 5 14:20:15 2012 [198:665] <iq type="get" id="162-10" from="forgejabber.com" to="[email protected]/pcp"> [198:665] <ping xmlns="urn:xmpp:ping"/> [198:665] /iq> [198:665] SEND >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : Thu Jul 5 14:20:15 2012 [198:665] <iq type="error" id="162-10" to="forgejabber.com"> [198:665] <ping xmlns="urn:xmpp:ping"/> [198:665] <error code="501" type="cancel"> [198:665] <feature-not-implemented xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-stanzas"/> [198:665] </error> [198:665] </iq> Sender: [019:043] SEND >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : Thu Jul 5 14:17:15 2012 [019:043] <iq type="get" id="3"> [019:043] <query xmlns="google:jingleinfo"/> [019:043] </iq> [019:043] SEND >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : Thu Jul 5 14:17:15 2012 [019:043] <iq to="[email protected]/pcp" type="set" id="5"> [019:043] <jingle xmlns="urn:xmpp:jingle:1" action="session-initiate" sid="3548650675" initiator="[email protected]/pcp"> [019:043] <content name="securetunnel" creator="initiator"> [019:043] <description xmlns="http://www.google.com/talk/securetunnel"> [019:043] <type>recv:wineout.jpeg</type> [019:043] <client-cert>--BEGIN CERTIFICATE----END CERTIFICATE--</client-cert> [019:043] </description> [019:043] <transport xmlns="http://www.google.com/transport/p2p"/> [019:043] </content> [019:043] </jingle> [019:043] <session xmlns="http://www.google.com/session" type="initiate" id="3548650675" initiator="[email protected]/pcp"> [019:043] <description xmlns="http://www.google.com/talk/securetunnel"> [019:043] <type>recv:wineout.jpeg</type> [019:043] <client-cert>--BEGIN CERTIFICATE--END CERTIFICATE--</client-cert> [019:043] </description></session></iq> [019:043] RECV <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< : Thu Jul 5 14:17:15 2012 [019:043] <presence to="[email protected]/pcp" from="forgereceive" type="error"> [019:043] <error code="404" type="cancel"> [019:043] <remote-server-not-found xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-stanzas"/> [019:043] </error></presence> [019:044] RECV <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< : Thu Jul 5 14:17:15 2012 [019:044] <presence to="[email protected]/pcp" from="forgereceive" type="error"> [019:044] <error code="404" type="cancel"> [019:044] <remote-server-not-found xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-stanzas"/> [019:044] </error></presence> [019:044] RECV <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< : Thu Jul 5 14:17:15 2012 [019:044] <iq to="[email protected]/pcp" type="set" id="5" from="[email protected]/pcp"> [019:044] <jingle xmlns="urn:xmpp:jingle:1" action="session-initiate" sid="402024303" initiator="[email protected]/pcp"> [019:044] <content name="securetunnel" creator="initiator"> [019:044] <description xmlns="http://www.google.com/talk/securetunnel"> [019:044] <type>send:winein.jpeg</type> [019:044] <client-cert>--BEGIN CERTIFICATE--END CERTIFICATE--</client-cert> [019:044] </description> [019:044] <transport xmlns="http://www.google.com/transport/p2p"/> [019:044] </content></jingle> [019:044] <session xmlns="http://www.google.com/session" type="initiate" id="402024303" initiator="[email protected]/pcp"> [019:044] <description xmlns="http://www.google.com/talk/securetunnel"> [019:044] <type>send:winein.jpeg</type> [019:044] <client-cert>--BEGIN CERTIFICATE--END CERTIFICATE--</client-cert> [019:044] </description></session></iq> [019:044] TunnelSessionClientBase::OnSessionCreate: received=1 [019:044] Session:402024303 Old state:STATE_INIT New state:STATE_RECEIVEDINITIATE Type:http://www.google.com/talk/securetunnel Transport:http://www.google.com/transport/p2p [019:044] TunnelSession::OnSessionState(Session::STATE_RECEIVEDINITIATE) [019:044] SEND >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : Thu Jul 5 14:17:15 2012 [019:044] <iq to="[email protected]/pcp" id="5" type="result"/> [019:088] RECV <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< : Thu Jul 5 14:17:15 2012 [019:088] <iq type="result" id="3" to="[email protected]/pcp"> [019:088] <query xmlns="google:jingleinfo"> [019:088] <stun> [019:088] <server host="stun.xten.net" udp="3478"/> [019:088] <server host="jivesoftware.com" udp="3478"/> [019:088] <server host="igniterealtime.org" udp="3478"/> [019:088] <server host="stun.fwdnet.net" udp="3478"/> [019:088] </stun> [019:088] <publicip ip="65.101.207.121"/> [019:088] </query> [019:088] </iq> [019:183] RECV <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< : Thu Jul 5 14:17:15 2012 [019:183] <iq to="[email protected]/pcp" id="5" type="result" from="[email protected]/pcp"/> [199:381] RECV <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< : Thu Jul 5 14:20:15 2012 [199:381] <iq type="get" id="474-11" from="forgejabber.com" to="[email protected]/pcp"> [199:381] <ping xmlns="urn:xmpp:ping"/> [199:381] </iq> [199:381] SEND >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : Thu Jul 5 14:20:15 2012 [199:381] <iq type="error" id="474-11" to="forgejabber.com"> [199:381] <ping xmlns="urn:xmpp:ping"/> [199:381] <error code="501" type="cancel"> [199:381] <feature-not-implemented xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-stanzas"/> [199:382] </error></iq>

  Read the article

• Linux: is here a read or recv from socket with timeout?

  - by osgx

  Hello How can I try to read data from socket with timeout? I know, select, pselect, poll, has a timeout field, but using of them disables "tcp fast-path" in tcp reno stack. The only idea I have is to use recv(fd, ..., MSG_DONTWAIT) in a loop

  Read the article

• Are parallel calls to send/recv on the same socket valid?

  - by Jay

  Can we call send from one thread and recv from another on the same socket? Can we call multiple sends parallely from different threads on the same socket? I know that a good design should avoid this, but I am not clear how these system APIs will behave. I am unable to find a good documentation also for the same. Any pointers in the direction will be helpful.

  Read the article

• java.net.SocketException: Software caused connection abort: recv failed; Causes and cures?

  - by IVR Avenger

  Hi, all. I've got an application running on Apache Tomcat 5.5 on a Win2k3 VM. The application serves up XML to be consumed by some telephony appliances as part of our IVR infrastructure. The application, in turn, receives its information from a handful of SOAP services. This morning, the SOAP services were timing out intermittently, causing all sorts of Exceptions. Once these stopped, I noticed that our application was still performing very slowly, in that it took it a long time to render and deliver pages. This sluggishness was noticed both on the appliances that consume the Tomcat output, and from a simple test of requesting some static documents from my web browser. Restarting Tomcat immediately resolved the issue. Cracking open the localhost log, I see a ton of these errors, right up until I restarted Tomcat: WARNING: Exception thrown whilst processing POSTed parameters java.net.SocketException: Software caused connection abort: recv failed After a big of Googling, my working theory is that the SOAP issue caused my users to get errors, which caused them to make more requests, which put an increased load on the application. This caused it to run out of available sockets to handle incoming requests. So, here's my quandary: 1. Is this a valid hypothesis, or am I just in over my head with HTTP and Tomcat? 2. If this is a valid hypothesis, is there a way to increase the size of the "socket queue", so that this doesn't happen in the future? Thanks! IVR Avenger

  Read the article

• Difference between tcp recv buffer and tcp receive window size?

  - by pradeepchhetri

  The command shows the tcp receive buffer size in bytes. $ cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_rmem 4096 87380 4001344 where the three values signifies the min, default and max values respectively. Then I tried to find the tcp window size using tcpdump command. $ sudo tcpdump -n -i eth0 'tcp[tcpflags] & (tcp-syn|tcp-ack) == tcp-syn and port 80 and host google.com' tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes 16:15:41.465037 IP 172.16.31.141.51614 > 74.125.236.73.80: Flags [S], seq 3661804272, win 14600, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 4452053 ecr 0,nop,wscale 6], length 0 I got the window size to be 14600 which is 10 times the size of MSS. Can anyone please tell me the relationship between the two.

  Read the article

• postfix takes 60-90ms to queue email -- normal?

  - by Jeff Atwood

  We're seeing some (maybe?) strange delays when submitting individual emails to our local Postfix server. To help diagnose the issue, I wrote a little test program which sends 5 emails: get smtp 1ms ( 1 ms) email 0 677ms (676 ms) email 1 802ms (125 ms) email 2 890ms ( 88 ms) email 3 973ms ( 83 ms) email 4 1088ms (115 ms) Discounting the handshaking in the first email, that's about 90ms per email. These timings have also been corroborated with another test app written by someone else using a different codepath, so it appears to be server related. I turned on detailed logging and I can see that the delay is between the end of message \r\n\r\n and the receive: [16:31:29.95] [SEND] \r\n.\r\n [16:31:30.05] [RECV] 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as B128E1E063\r\n [16:31:30.08] [SEND] \r\n.\r\n [16:31:30.17] [RECV] 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 4A7DE1E06E\r\n [16:31:30.19] [SEND] \r\n.\r\n [16:31:30.27] [RECV] 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 68ACC1E072\r\n [16:31:30.28] [SEND] \r\n.\r\n [16:31:30.34] [RECV] 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 7EFFE1E079\r\n [16:31:30.39] [SEND] \r\n.\r\n [16:31:30.45] [RECV] 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 9793C1E07A\r\n The time intervals tell the story (discounting the handshaking required for the initial email) -- each email is waiting about 60-90 milliseconds for postfix to queue! This seems .. excessive .. to me. Is it "normal" for postfix to take 60-90 ms for every email you send it? Or do I just have unreasonable expectations? I would expect the local postfix server to queue the email in about 20ms, tops!

  Read the article

• IPSec VPN using ZyWALL IPSec VPN Client: unable to connect from some providers

  - by Reshi

  I'm trying to configure an IPSec VPN to one company from my home. The company has SANET internet service provider. I was able to create a VPN connection from another company that has the same internet service provider. The problem begins when I'm trying to connect from another ISP like Orange or Telekom. Here is the log from ZyWall: 20120816 10:06:18:359 Default (SA Gateway-P1) SEND phase 1 Main Mode [SA] [VID] [VID] [VID] [VID] [VID] 20120816 10:06:18:375 Default (SA Gateway-P1) RECV phase 1 Main Mode [SA] [VID] [VID] [VID] [VID] [VID] [VID] [VID] [VID] 20120816 10:06:18:390 Default (SA Gateway-P1) SEND phase 1 Main Mode [KEY_EXCH] [NONCE] [NAT_D] [NAT_D] 20120816 10:06:18:718 Default (SA Gateway-P1) RECV phase 1 Main Mode [KEY_EXCH] [NONCE] [NAT_D] [NAT_D] 20120816 10:06:18:734 Default (SA Gateway-P1) SEND phase 1 Main Mode [HASH] [ID] 20120816 10:06:18:750 Default (SA Gateway-P1) RECV phase 1 Main Mode [HASH] [ID] 20120816 10:06:18:750 Default phase 1 done: initiator id [email protected], responder id 111.112.113.114 20120816 10:06:18:765 Default (SA Gateway-Tunnel-P2) SEND phase 2 Quick Mode [HASH] [SA] [KEY_EXCH] [NONCE] [ID] [ID] 20120816 10:06:18:953 Default (SA Gateway-Tunnel-P2) RECV phase 2 Quick Mode [HASH] [SA] [KEY_EXCH] [NONCE] [ID] [ID] 20120816 10:06:18:953 Default (SA Gateway-Tunnel-P2) SEND phase 2 Quick Mode [HASH] 20120816 10:06:48:968 Default (SA Gateway-P1) SEND Informational [HASH] [NOTIFY] type DPD_R_U_THERE 20120816 10:06:48:984 Default (SA Gateway-P1) RECV Informational [HASH] [NOTIFY] type DPD_R_U_THERE_ACK ZyWall informs me that the tunnel was opened. But I can't ping or access any computer in the network. My configuration at home: ISP: Orange Optical connection Terminal: GPON OPTICAL NETWORK TERMINAL G-25E Router: TPLink TL-WR941N --> SPI Firewall Enabled --> VPN - IPSEC Passthrough Enabled I was wondering if the problem could not be on ISP side (that he blocks somehow this connection because in SANET ISP it worked fine) or even in my terminal or router. What could I check? Where could be the problem ?

  Read the article

• Spikes in Socket Performance

  - by Harun Prasad

  We are facing random spikes in high throughput transaction processing system using sockets for IPC. Below is the setup used for the run: The client opens and closes new connection for every transaction, and there are 4 exchanges between the server and the client. We have disabled the TIME_WAIT, by setting the socket linger (SO_LINGER) option via getsockopt as we thought that the spikes were caused due to the sockets waiting in TIME_WAIT. There is no processing done for the transaction. Only messages are passed. OS used Centos 5.4 The average round trip time is around 3 milli seconds, but some times the round trip time ranges from 100 milli seconds to couple of seconds. Steps used for Execution and Measurement and output Starting the server $ python sockServerLinger.py /dev/null & Starting the client to post 1 million transactions to the server. And logs the time for a transaction in the client.log file. $ python sockClient.py 1000000 client.log Once the execution finishes the following command will show the execution time greater than 100 milliseconds in the format <line_number>:<execution_time>. $ grep -n "0.[1-9]" client.log | less Below is the example code for Server and Client. Server # File: sockServerLinger.py import socket, traceback,time import struct host = '' port = 9999 l_onoff = 1 l_linger = 0 lingeropt = struct.pack('ii', l_onoff, l_linger) s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) s.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET, socket.SO_REUSEADDR, 1) s.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET, socket.SO_LINGER, lingeropt) s.bind((host, port)) s.listen(1) while 1: try: clientsock, clientaddr = s.accept() print "Got connection from", clientsock.getpeername() data = clientsock.recv(1024*1024*10) #print "asdasd",data numsent=clientsock.send(data) data1 = clientsock.recv(1024*1024*10) numsent=clientsock.send(data) ret = 1 while(ret>0): data1 = clientsock.recv(1024*1024*10) ret = len(data) clientsock.close() except KeyboardInterrupt: raise except: print traceback.print_exc() continue Client # File: sockClient.py import socket, traceback,sys import time i = 0 while 1: try: st = time.time() s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET,socket.SOCK_STREAM) while (s.connect_ex(('127.0.0.1',9999)) != 0): continue numsent=s.send("asd"*1000) response = s.recv(6000) numsent=s.send("asd"*1000) response = s.recv(6000) i+=1 if i == int(sys.argv[1]): break except KeyboardInterrupt: raise except: print "in exec:::::::::::::",traceback.print_exc() continue print time.time() -st

  Read the article

• How can I implement JMS MessageListener?

  - by newbie

  I tried to implement MessageListener, but it dosen't work, but when I use MessageListner, it doesn't work. So what should I do that MessageListener starts working, I'm using jboss 4.02. recv.receive(); // This works recv.setMessageListener(new ExListener()); // This doesn't work public static class ExListener implements MessageListener { public void onMessage(Message msg) { TextMessage tm = (TextMessage) msg; try { System.out.println("onMessage, recv text="+tm.getText()); } catch(Throwable t) { t.printStackTrace(); } } }

  Read the article

• POSIX Sockets: How to detect Ctrl-C sent over Telnet?

  - by ogott

  Short Question What's the right way to handle a Ctrl-C event sent over Telnet on the server side? Long Question After calling recv() on a socket, I'd like to handle some situations appropriately. One of them is to return a certain error code when Ctrl-C was received. What's the correct way to detect this? The following works, but it just doesn't seem right: size_t recv_count; static char ctrl_c[5] = {0xff, 0xf4, 0xff, 0xfd, 0x06}; recv_count = recv(socket, buffer, buffer_size, 0); if (recv_count == sizeof(ctrl_c) && memcmp(buffer, ctrl_c, sizeof(ctrl_c) == 0) { return CTRL_C_RECEIVED; } I found a comment on Ctrl-C in a side-note in this UNIX Socket FAQ: [...] (by the way, out-of-band is often used for that ctrl-C, too). As I understand, receiving out-of-band data is done using recv() with a certain flag as the last parameter. But when I'm waiting for data using recv() as I do in the code above, I can't read out-of-band data at the same time. Apart from that, I'm getting something using recv() without that oob-flag.

  Read the article

• Varnish 3.0.2 to Apache2 sometimes return error 503

  - by Ronnie Jespersen

  Hey guys I hope you can help me out here. I have an Ngingx parsing http and https to a varnish cache(3.0.2). From the varnish it is sent to apache2. Now I have for some time been tracking some strange 503 errors. But I cant seem to find the silver bullet. Currently I am logging the 503 errors through varnish this way: sudo varnishlog -c -m TxStatus:503 >> /home/rj/varnishlog503.log and then referring to the apache access log to see if any 503 requests have been handled. Today I had a health check from the firewall that failed: 20 SessionOpen c 127.0.0.1 34319 :8081 20 ReqStart c 127.0.0.1 34319 607335635 20 RxRequest c HEAD 20 RxURL c /health-check 20 RxProtocol c HTTP/1.0 20 RxHeader c X-Real-IP: 192.168.3.254 20 RxHeader c Host: 192.168.3.189 20 RxHeader c X-Forwarded-For: 192.168.3.254 20 RxHeader c Connection: close 20 RxHeader c User-Agent: Astaro Service Monitor 0.9 20 RxHeader c Accept: */* 20 VCL_call c recv lookup 20 VCL_call c hash 20 Hash c /health-check 20 VCL_return c hash 20 VCL_call c miss fetch 20 Backend c 33 aurum aurum 20 FetchError c http first read error: -1 11 (No error recorded) 20 VCL_call c error deliver 20 VCL_call c deliver deliver 20 TxProtocol c HTTP/1.1 20 TxStatus c 503 20 TxResponse c Service Unavailable 20 TxHeader c Server: Varnish 20 TxHeader c Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 20 TxHeader c Retry-After: 5 20 TxHeader c Content-Length: 879 20 TxHeader c Accept-Ranges: bytes 20 TxHeader c Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 12:35:12 GMT 20 TxHeader c X-Varnish: 607335635 20 TxHeader c Age: 60 20 TxHeader c Via: 1.1 varnish 20 TxHeader c Connection: close 20 Length c 879 20 ReqEnd c 607335635 1338986052.649786949 1338986112.648169994 0.000160217 59.997980356 0.000402689 Now the backend server (apache) does not have any 503 error in the access log at this point. So I am confused. Is this varnish throwing a 503 because it thinks apache is to slow? There is a lot traffic coming through at this point so I know the server is up and running. I do have other 503 error codes with posts and gets so there is really no pattern. It seems to be at random times and random requests. Even in the morning when the server dosen't seem to be doing anything. I do see another pattern in the log: 4 VCL_call c recv pass 4 VCL_call c hash 4 Hash c /?id=412 4 VCL_return c hash 4 VCL_call c pass pass 4 FetchError c no backend connection 4 VCL_call c error deliver 4 VCL_call c deliver deliver Here fetcherror says "no backend connection". A summery of the FetchErrors in todays log: 16 FetchError c http first read error: -1 11 (No error recorded) 5 FetchError c http first read error: -1 11 (No error recorded) 4 FetchError c http first read error: -1 11 (No error recorded) 19 FetchError c http first read error: -1 11 (No error recorded) 5 FetchError c http first read error: -1 11 (No error recorded) 23 FetchError c http first read error: -1 11 (No error recorded) 24 FetchError c http first read error: -1 11 (No error recorded) 16 FetchError c http first read error: -1 11 (No error recorded) 6 FetchError c http first read error: -1 11 (No error recorded) 4 FetchError c http first read error: -1 11 (No error recorded) 5 FetchError c http first read error: -1 11 (No error recorded) 4 FetchError c http first read error: -1 11 (No error recorded) 4 FetchError c http first read error: -1 11 (No error recorded) 22 FetchError c http first read error: -1 11 (No error recorded) 6 FetchError c http first read error: -1 11 (No error recorded) 21 FetchError c http first read error: -1 11 (No error recorded) 26 FetchError c no backend connection 4 FetchError c no backend connection 20 FetchError c http first read error: -1 11 (No error recorded) 39 FetchError c http first read error: -1 11 (No error recorded) I haven't changed the default timeout values for varnish. This is my configuration for one of the backend servers. backend xenon { .host = "192.168.3.187"; .port = "80"; .probe = { .url = "/health-check/"; .interval = 3s; .window = 5; .threshold = 2; } } I'm running prefork module on apache2 with this configuration <IfModule mpm_prefork_module> StartServers 1 MinSpareServers 2 MaxSpareServers 5 MaxClients 200 MaxRequestsPerChild 75 </IfModule> and only PHP files is sent to the server. Every other static file is handled by Nginx. Any ideas? ------- EDIT -------------- Some more debuging information I have run a varnishadm debug.health Backend radon is Healthy Current states good: 5 threshold: 2 window: 5 Average responsetime of good probes: 0.002560 Oldest Newest ================================================================ 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 Good IPv4 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Good Xmit RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Good Recv HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH Happy Backend xenon is Healthy Current states good: 5 threshold: 2 window: 5 Average responsetime of good probes: 0.002760 Oldest Newest ================================================================ 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 Good IPv4 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Good Xmit RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Good Recv HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH Happy Backend iridium is Healthy Current states good: 5 threshold: 2 window: 5 Average responsetime of good probes: 0.000849 Oldest Newest ================================================================ 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 Good IPv4 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Good Xmit RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Good Recv HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH Happy Backend aurum is Healthy Current states good: 5 threshold: 2 window: 5 Average responsetime of good probes: 0.002100 Oldest Newest ================================================================ 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 Good IPv4 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Good Xmit RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Good Recv HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH Happy And I have been monitoring varnishstat from the two load balancers 3224774 3.99 2.61 backend_conn - Backend conn. success 27 0.00 0.00 backend_unhealthy - Backend conn. not attempted 63 0.00 0.00 backend_fail - Backend conn. failures 358798 0.00 0.29 backend_reuse - Backend conn. reuses 21035 0.00 0.02 backend_toolate - Backend conn. was closed 379834 0.00 0.31 backend_recycle - Backend conn. recycles 26 0.00 0.00 backend_retry - Backend conn. retry 3217751 5.99 2.61 backend_conn - Backend conn. success 32 0.00 0.00 backend_fail - Backend conn. failures 364185 0.00 0.30 backend_reuse - Backend conn. reuses 27077 0.00 0.02 backend_toolate - Backend conn. was closed 391263 0.00 0.32 backend_recycle - Backend conn. recycles 36 0.00 0.00 backend_retry - Backend conn. retry Notice that none of them have reported backend_fail. /Ronnie

  Read the article

• Using multiple sockets, is non-blocking or blocking with select better?

  - by JPhi1618

  Lets say I have a server program that can accept connections from 10 (or more) different clients. The clients send data at random which is received by the server, but it is certain that at least one client will be sending data every update. The server cannot wait for information to arrive because it has other processing to do. Aside from using asynchronous sockets, I see two options: Make all sockets non-blocking. In a loop, call recv on each socket and allow it to fail with WSAEWOULDBLOCK if there is no data available and if I happen to get some data, then keep it. Leave the sockets as blocking. Add all sockets to a fd_set and call select(). If the return value is non-zero (which it will be most of the time), loop through all the sockets to find the appropriate number of readable sockets with FD_ISSET() and only call recv on the readable sockets. The first option will create a lot more calls to the recv function. The second method is a bigger pain from a programming perspective because of all the FD_SET and FD_ISSET looping. Which method (or another method) is preferred? Is avoiding the overhead on letting recv fail on a non-blocking socket worth the hassle of calling select()? I think I understand both methods and I have tried both with success, but I don't know if one way is considered better or optimal. Only knowledgeable replies please!

  Read the article

• python blocking sockets, send returns immediately

  - by Mark

  Hi, I am writing a multithreaded socket application in Python using the socket module. the server listens for connections and when it gets one it spawns a thread for that socket. the server thread sends some data to the client. but the client is not yet ready to receive it. I thought this would have caused the server to wait until the client starts recv but instead returns immediately the client then calls recv which is blocking and no data is ever received. client socket constructor self.__clientSocket = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) self.__clientSocket.connect((server, port)) server socket constructor self.servSock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) self.servSock.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET, socket.SO_REUSEADDR, 1) #self.servSock.settimeout(None) self.servSock.setblocking(1) self.servSock.bind((self.addr,self.port)) self.servSock.listen(5) listening accept thread try: (cs, address) = self.servSock.accept() except socket.timeout: return threadName = '\r\nClient %s:%s\r\n' % (cs, address) print threadName clientSocketHandler = ClientSocket() clientSocketHandler.setClientSocket(cs) self.clients.newThread(self.clientFunc, {clientSocketHandler : "1"}, threadName).start() server and clients send/rec methods from inside ClientSocket receivedData = self.__clientSocket.recv(1024*1024) self.__clientSocket.send(s) any ideas why send() is returning straight away?

  Read the article

• c windows connect() fails. error 10049

  - by Joshua Moore

  The following two pieces of code compile, but I get a connect() failed error on the client side. (compiled with MinGW). Client Code: // thanks to cs.baylor.edu/~donahoo/practical/CSockets/code/TCPEchoClientWS.c #include <stdio.h> #include <winsock.h> #include <stdlib.h> #define RCVBUFSIZE 32 // size of receive buffer void DieWithError(char *errorMessage); int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { int sock; struct sockaddr_in echoServAddr; unsigned short echoServPort; char *servIP; char *echoString; char echoBuffer[RCVBUFSIZE]; int echoStringLen; int bytesRcvd, totalBytesRcvd; WSAData wsaData; if((argc < 3) || (argc > 4)){ fprintf(stderr, "Usage: %s <Sever IP> <Echo Word> [<Echo Port>]\n", argv[0]); exit(1); } if (argc==4) echoServPort = atoi(argv[3]); // use given port if any else echoServPort = 7; // echo is well-known port for echo service if(WSAStartup(MAKEWORD(2, 0), &wsaData) != 0){ // load winsock 2.0 dll fprintf(stderr, "WSAStartup() failed"); exit(1); } // create reliable, stream socket using tcp if((sock=socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP)) < 0) DieWithError("socket() failed"); // construct the server address structure memset(&echoServAddr, 0, sizeof(echoServAddr)); echoServAddr.sin_family = AF_INET; echoServAddr.sin_addr.s_addr = inet_addr(servIP); // server IP address echoServAddr.sin_port = htons(echoServPort); // establish connection to the echo server if(connect(sock, (struct sockaddr*)&echoServAddr, sizeof(echoServAddr)) < 0) DieWithError("connect() failed"); echoStringLen = strlen(echoString); // determine input length // send the string, includeing the null terminator to the server if(send(sock, echoString, echoStringLen, 0)!= echoStringLen) DieWithError("send() sent a different number of bytes than expected"); totalBytesRcvd = 0; printf("Received: "); // setup to print the echoed string while(totalBytesRcvd < echoStringLen){ // receive up to the buffer size (minus 1 to leave space for a null terminator) bytes from the sender if(bytesRcvd = recv(sock, echoBuffer, RCVBUFSIZE-1, 0) <= 0) DieWithError("recv() failed or connection closed prematurely"); totalBytesRcvd += bytesRcvd; // keep tally of total bytes echoBuffer[bytesRcvd] = '\0'; printf("%s", echoBuffer); // print the echo buffer } printf("\n"); closesocket(sock); WSACleanup(); exit(0); } void DieWithError(char *errorMessage) { fprintf(stderr, "%s: %d\n", errorMessage, WSAGetLastError()); exit(1); } Server Code: // thanks cs.baylor.edu/~donahoo/practical/CSockets/code/TCPEchoServerWS.c #include <stdio.h> #include <winsock.h> #include <stdlib.h> #define MAXPENDING 5 // maximum outstanding connection requests #define RCVBUFSIZE 1000 void DieWithError(char *errorMessage); void HandleTCPClient(int clntSocket); // tcp client handling function int main(int argc, char **argv) { int serverSock; int clientSock; struct sockaddr_in echoServerAddr; struct sockaddr_in echoClientAddr; unsigned short echoServerPort; int clientLen; // length of client address data structure WSAData wsaData; if (argc!=2){ fprintf(stderr, "Usage: %s <Server Port>\n", argv[0]); exit(1); } echoServerPort = atoi(argv[1]); if(WSAStartup(MAKEWORD(2, 0), &wsaData)!=0){ fprintf(stderr, "WSAStartup() failed"); exit(1); } // create socket for incoming connections if((serverSock=socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP))<0) DieWithError("socket() failed"); // construct local address structure memset(&echoServerAddr, 0, sizeof(echoServerAddr)); echoServerAddr.sin_family = AF_INET; echoServerAddr.sin_addr.s_addr = htonl(INADDR_ANY); // any incoming interface echoServerAddr.sin_port = htons(echoServerPort); // local port // bind to the local address if(bind(serverSock, (struct sockaddr*)&echoServerAddr, sizeof(echoServerAddr) )<0) DieWithError("bind() failed"); // mark the socket so it will listen for incoming connections if(listen(serverSock, MAXPENDING)<0) DieWithError("listen() failed"); for (;;){ // run forever // set the size of the in-out parameter clientLen = sizeof(echoClientAddr); // wait for a client to connect if((clientSock = accept(serverSock, (struct sockaddr*)&echoClientAddr, &clientLen)) < 0) DieWithError("accept() failed"); // clientSock is connected to a client printf("Handling client %s\n", inet_ntoa(echoClientAddr.sin_addr)); HandleTCPClient(clientSock); } // NOT REACHED } void DieWithError(char *errorMessage) { fprintf(stderr, "%s: %d\n", errorMessage, WSAGetLastError()); exit(1); } void HandleTCPClient(int clientSocket) { char echoBuffer[RCVBUFSIZE]; // buffer for echostring int recvMsgSize; // size of received message // receive message from client if((recvMsgSize = recv(clientSocket, echoBuffer, RCVBUFSIZE, 0) <0)) DieWithError("recv() failed"); // send received string and receive again until end of transmission while(recvMsgSize > 0){ // echo message back to client if(send(clientSocket, echoBuffer, recvMsgSize, 0)!=recvMsgSize) DieWithError("send() failed"); // see if there's more data to receive if((recvMsgSize = recv(clientSocket, echoBuffer, RCVBUFSIZE, 0)) <0) DieWithError("recv() failed"); } closesocket(clientSocket); // close client socket } How can I fix this?

  Read the article

• socket.error: [Errno 10054]

  - by C0d3r

  import socket, sys if len(sys.argv) !=3 : print "Usage: ./supabot.py <host> <port>" sys.exit(1) irc = sys.argv[1] port = int(sys.argv[2]) sck = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) sck.connect((irc, port)) sck.send('NICK supaBOT\r\n') sck.send('USER supaBOT supaBOT supaBOT :supaBOT Script\r\n') sck.send('JOIN #darkunderground' + '\r\n') data = '' while True: data = sck.recv(1024) if data.find('PING') != -1: sck.send('PONG ' + data.split() [1] + '\r\n') print data elif data.find('!info') != -1: sck.send('PRIVMSG #darkunderground supaBOT v1.0 by sourD' + '\r\n') print sck.recv(1024) when I run this code I get this error.. socket.error: [Errno 10054] An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host it says that the error is in line 16, in data = sck.recv(1024)

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >