Search Results

Search found 328 results on 14 pages for 'recv'.

Page 8/14 | < Previous Page | 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14  | Next Page >

  • not getting output from parmiko/ssh command

    - by Matt
    I am using paramiko/ssh/python to attempt to run a command on a remote server. When I ssh manually and run the command in question, I get the results I want. But if I use the python (co-opted from another thread on this site) below, there is no returned data. If I modify the command to be something more basic like 'pwd' or 'ls' I can then get the output. Any help is appreciated. Thanks, Matt import paramiko import time import sys, os, select import select username='medelman' password='Ru5h21iz' hostname='10.15.27.166' hostport=22 cmd='tail -f /x/web/mlog.txt' #works cmd='' #doesn't work client = paramiko.SSHClient() client.load_system_host_keys() client.connect(hostname=hostname, username=username, password=password) transport = client.get_transport() channel = transport.open_session() channel.exec_command(cmd) while True: rl, wl, xl = select.select([channel],[],[],0.0) if len(rl) 0: # Must be stdout print channel.recv(1024) time.sleep(1)

    Read the article

  • How to migrate existing udp application to raw sockets

    - by osgx
    Hello Is there a tutorial for migration from plain udp sockets (linux, C99/C++, recv syscall is used) to the raw sockets? According to http://aschauf.landshut.org/fh/linux/udp_vs_raw/ch03s04.html raw socket is much faster than udp. Application is client-server. client is proprietary and must use exactly same procotol as it was with udp server. But server can be a bit faster with raw sockets. What parts of udp I must to implement in server? Is there a "quick migration" libraries?

    Read the article

  • Lua Programming for PSP: Sending a string, then spliting that string

    - by Trey Andrews
    How do I send a string between 2 PSPs? Here is a test script: Script A Adhoc.init() Adhoc.connect() data1 = "Trey777" data2 = "This is a test!!..." Outdata = "Name"..data1.."text"..data2 function senddata() Adhoc.send(Outdata) end While true do screen.waitVblankStart() screen:flip() end Script B red = Color.new(255,0,0) Adhoc.init() Adhoc.connect() function recevmsg() data = Adhoc.recv() ----What do I here to split the text? ----print name to line '0,10' ----print text to line'0,20' end While true do screen.waitVblankStart() screen:flip() end Each script will be loaded onto a different PSP. One will send and one will receive. I need to know how does it split a string? string.find and sub return numbers, not text

    Read the article

  • some OVERLAPS using WSASend not returning in a timely manner using GetQueuedCompletionStatus?

    - by Geoffrey
    Background: I'm using CreateIoCompletionPort, WSASend/Recv, and GetQueuedCompletionStatus to do overlapped socket io on my server. For flow control, when sending to the client, I only allow several WSASend() to be called when all pending OVERLAPs have popped off the IOCP. Problem: Recently, there are occassions when the OVERLAPs do not get returned to the IOCP. The thread calling GetQueuedCompletionStatus does not get them and they remain in my local pending queue. I've verified that the client DOES receive the data off the socket and the socket is connected. No errors were returned when the WSASend() calls were made. The OVERLAPs simply "never" come back without an external stimulus like the following: Disconnecting the socket from the client or server, immediately allows the GetQueuedCompletionStatus thread to retrieve the OVERLAPs Making additional calls to WSASend(), sometimes several are needed, before all the OVERLAPs suddenly pop off the queue. Question: Has anyone seen this type of behavior? Any ideas on what is causing this? Thanks, Geoffrey

    Read the article

  • crashing out in a while loop python

    - by Edward
    How to solve this error? i want to pass the values from get_robotxya() and get_ballxya() and use it in a loop but it seems that it will crash after awhile how do i fix this? i want to get the values whithout it crashing out of the while loop import socket import os,sys import time from threading import Thread HOST = '59.191.193.59' PORT = 5555 COORDINATES = [] def connect(): globals()['client_socket'] = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) client_socket.connect((HOST,PORT)) def update_coordinates(): connect() screen_width = 0 screen_height = 0 while True: try: client_socket.send("loc\n") data = client_socket.recv(8192) except: connect(); continue; globals()['COORDINATES'] = data.split() if(not(COORDINATES[-1] == "eom" and COORDINATES[0] == "start")): continue if (screen_width != int(COORDINATES[2])): screen_width = int(COORDINATES[2]) screen_height = int(COORDINATES[3]) return def get_ballxy(): update_coordinates() ballx = int(COORDINATES[8]) bally = int(COORDINATES[9]) return ballx,bally def get_robotxya(): update_coordinates() robotx = int(COORDINATES[12]) roboty = int(COORDINATES[13]) angle = int(COORDINATES[14]) return robotx,roboty,angle def print_ballxy(bx,by): print bx print by def print_robotxya(rx,ry,a): print rx print ry print a def activate(): bx,by = get_ballxy() rx,ry,a = get_robotxya() print_ballxy(bx,by) print_robotxya(rx,ry,a) Thread(target=update_coordinates).start() while True: activate() this is the error i get:

    Read the article

  • Socket programming question

    - by dfddf
    I am given the following declaration: char inbuff[500], *ptr; int n, bufferlen; Write a program segement to receive a message having 500 bits from the TCP socket sock and store this message in inbuff. My answer is: n = recv( sock, inbuff, strlen( inbuff ), 0 ); However, I am not sure why *ptr is given in the declaration. So, I would like ask, what is the purpose of the pointer in this question?? Or my program segement is wrong? Thank you for all of yours help first!

    Read the article

  • MPI C fprintf() output not showing up if the process hangs on MPI_Recv

    - by Karolis
    I'm writing an MPI C program. I have troubles debugging it, because whenever I use fprintf, like this: fprintf(stdout, "worker: %d", worker); if the program hangs, because of some blocking MPI_Recv, I can't see any output. I'm sure the line of code is reached, because I can put a return statement after the fprintf statement, in which case the process finishes execution and the output is printed. Any ideas, on how to print (see the output) even though the process gets blocked later by Recv? I hope this makes sense.

    Read the article

  • getting global name not defined error

    - by nashr rafeeg
    i have the following class class notify(): def __init__(self,server="localhost", port=23053): self.host = server self.port = port register = gntp.GNTPRegister() register.add_header('Application-Name',"SVN Monitor") register.add_notification("svnupdate",True) growl(register) def svn_update(self, author="Unknown", files=0): notice = gntp.GNTPNotice() notice.add_header('Application-Name',"SVN Monitor") notice.add_header('Notification-Name', "svnupdate") notice.add_header('Notification-Title',"SVN Commit") # notice.add_header('Notification-Icon',"") notice.add_header('Notification-Text',Msg) growl(notice) def growl(data): s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) s.connect((self.host,self.port)) s.send(data) response = gntp.parse_gntp(s.recv(1024)) print response s.close() but when ever i try to use this class via the follwoing code i get 'NameError: global name 'growl' is not defined' from growlnotify import * n = notify() n.svn_update() any one has an idea what is going on here ? cheers nash

    Read the article

  • C# socket blocking behavior

    - by Gearoid Murphy
    My situation is this : I have a C# tcp socket through which I receive structured messages consisting of a 3 byte header and a variable size payload. The tcp data is routed through a network of tunnels and is occasionally susceptible to fragmentation. The solution to this is to perform a blocking read of 3 bytes for the header and a blocking read of N bytes for the variable size payload (the value of N is in the header). The problem I'm experiencing is that occasionally, the blocking receive operation returns a partial packet. That is, it reads a volume of bytes less than the number I explicitly set in the receive call. After some debugging, it appears that the number of bytes it returns is equal to the number of bytes in the Available property of the socket before the receive op. This behavior is contrary to my expectation. If the socket is blocking and I explicitly set the number of bytes to receive, shouldn't the socket block until it recv's those bytes?, any help, pointers, etc would be much appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Sending file over socket

    - by johannix
    I'm have a problem sending data as a file from one end of a socket to the other. What's happening is that both the server and client are trying to read the file so the file never gets sent. I was wondering how to have the client block until the server's completed reading the file sent from the client. I have this working with raw packets using send and recv, but figured this was a cleaner solution... Client: connects to server creating socket connection creates a file on socket and sends data waits for file from server Server: waits for file from client Complete interraction: client sends data to server server sends data to client

    Read the article

  • Sending http headers with python

    - by Niklas R
    I've set up a little script that should feed a client with html. import socket sock = socket.socket() sock.bind(('', 8080)) sock.listen(5) client, adress = sock.accept() print "Incoming:", adress print client.recv(1024) print client.send("Content-Type: text/html\n\n") client.send('<html><body></body></html>') print "Answering ..." print "Finished." import os os.system("pause") But it is shown as plain text in the browser. Can you please tell what I need to do ? I just can't find something in google that helps me.. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Help to run it in the background

    - by AlexPolo
    Here's a simple python daemon I can't manage to run as a background process: #!/usr/bin/env python import socket host = '' port = 843 backlog = 5 size = 1024 s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) s.bind((host,port)) s.listen(backlog) while 1: client, address = s.accept() data = client.recv(size) if data == '<policy-file-request/>\0': client.send('<?xml version="1.0"?><cross-domain-policy><allow-access-from domain="*" to-ports="*"/></cross-domain-policy>') client.close() It's a socket policy file server (you may have heard of the restiction Adope put on socket connection - http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flashplayer/articles/socket_policy_files.html); that works well when gets run like an "ordinary" process - "python that_server.py", - but I get problem to run it in the background. Running like so: "that_server.py &", - does not work.

    Read the article

  • yet another confusion with multiprocessing error, 'module' object has no attribute 'f'

    - by gatoatigrado
    I know this has been answered before, but it seems that executing the script directly "python filename.py" does not work. I have Python 2.6.2 on SuSE Linux. Code: #!/usr/bin/python # -*- coding: utf-8 -*- from multiprocessing import Pool p = Pool(1) def f(x): return x*x p.map(f, [1, 2, 3]) Command line: > python example.py Process PoolWorker-1: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.6/multiprocessing/process.py", line 231, in _bootstrap self.run() File "/usr/lib/python2.6/multiprocessing/process.py", line 88, in run self._target(*self._args, **self._kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/multiprocessing/pool.py", line 57, in worker task = get() File "/usr/lib/python2.6/multiprocessing/queues.py", line 339, in get return recv() AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'f'

    Read the article

  • Reason for not properly closed socket?

    - by gc
    Here is what I am trying to do: The server sends message to connected clients when new messages are available. The client, on the other hand, when connected, tries to send a message to the server using send() and then receive message using recv(), right after that, the client calls close() to close the connection. Sometimes, after the client finishes, the server tries to receive message from client will result in a 104 - "connection reset by peer" error. When this happens, Wireshark reveals that the last two segments sent by the client is: 1. an ACK acknowledging the receipt of the message sent by the server 2. a RST/ACK No FIN is sent by the client. Why is this happening and how can I close the socket "properly" at the client?

    Read the article

  • C++ networking simple send and receive

    - by Wallter
    I'm trying to link 10 computers together, the program i would like to write would have one 'control' computer. From what I've looked up this computer would take all the packets sent over the network and do a echo with them... right? The other computers would need to be able to send information (then echoed to the others) to the 'control' ... is there a easy! or simple way to do this? From what I've seen i want a non-blocking socket? I have looked into sockets and such but for an armature programmer like me, this seems like a daunting task :) I'm kind-of looking for an easy class implication that has a send() and an event driven recv(). I'm not going to be sending that much information over the network.

    Read the article

  • Select calls seems to not time out.

    - by martsbradley
    HI Folks, I have a threaded C++ program where up to three threads are calling select on a three separate socket descriptors waiting for data to become available. Each thread handles one socket and adds it to the readfds with a timeout of 300 seconds. After select returns if there is data available I'm calling recv to read it. Is there anything that I need to be aware of with winsock and threads because for some reason after a number of hours the select calls all seem to be not timing out. Can a multi threaded program select from a number of threads without issue? I know that I should have one thread listening to all three sockets however that would be a large change for this app and I'm only looking to apply a bug fix. cheers, Martin.

    Read the article

  • AS3 / Java - Socket Connection from live Flash to local java

    - by PitchBlackCat
    Hey guys, I'm trying to get a live flash that lives on a webserver to talk to a local java server, that will live on the clients PC. I'm trying to achieve this with a socket connection. (port 6000) Now, at first flash was able to connect, but it just sends <policy-file-request/>. After this nothing happens. Now, some people at Kirupa suggested to send an cross-domain-policy xml as soon as any connection is established from the java side. http://www.kirupa.com/forum/showthread.php?t=301625 However, my java server just throws the following: End Exception: java.net.SocketException: Software caused connection abort: recv failed I've already spend a great amount of time on this subject, and was wondering if anyone here knows what to do?

    Read the article

  • check whether fgets would block

    - by lv
    Hi, I was just wondering whether in C is it possible to peek in the input buffer or perform similar trickery to know whether a call to fgets would block at a later time. Java allows to do something like that by calling BufferedReader.ready(), this way I can implement console input something like this: while (on && in.ready()) { line = in.readLine(); /* do something with line */ if (!in.ready()) Thread.sleep(100); } this allows an external thread to gracefully shutdown the input loop by setting on to false; I'd like to perform a similar implementation in C without resorting to non portable tricks, I already know I can make a "timed out fgets" under unix by resorting to signals or (better, even though requering to take care of buffering) reimplement it on top of recv/select, but I'd prefer something that would work on windows too. TIA

    Read the article

  • stuck in while loop python

    - by user1717330
    I am creating a chat server in python and got quite far as a noob in the language. I am having 1 problem at the moment which I want to solve before I go further, but I cannot seem to find how to get the problem solved. It is about a while loop that continues.. in the below code is where it goes wrong while 1: try: data = self.channel.recv ( 1024 ) print "Message from client: ", data if "exit" in data: self.channel.send("You have closed youre connection.\n") break except KeyboardInterrupt: break except: raise When this piece of code get executed, on my client I need to enter "exit" to quit the connection. This works as a charm, but when I use CTRL+C to exit the connection, my server prints "Message from client: " a couple of thousand times. where am I going wrong?

    Read the article

  • Sending while recieving in C

    - by Spidfire
    Ive made a piece of code in whats on my server, the problem is that it doesnt send while im recieving? so if i send something to client 1 to client 2, client2 only recieves if he sends something himself.. how can i solve this ? /* Thread*/ while (! stop_received) { nr_bytes_recv = recv(s, buffer, BUFFSIZE, 0); if(strncmp(buffer, "SEND", 4) == 0) { char *message = "Text asads \n"; rv = send(users[0].s, message, strlen(message), 0); rv = send(users[1].s, message, strlen(message), 0); if (rv < 0) { perror("Error sending"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } }else{ char *message = "Unknown command \n"; rv = send(s, message, strlen(message), 0); if (rv < 0) { perror("Error sending"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } } }

    Read the article

  • Chat Server with sockets in C

    - by Andrew
    I'm trying to write a chat server in C that allows communication between two clients using POSIX sockets. I'm not sure I have a good grasp on this concept or how I should set up the communication protocol between the clients and the server. I know I need one socket to bind() the server port to so I can accept incoming connections from clients, but in order to have two clients connected at the same time do I need to create a socket for each of these clients when I accept() or should I accept() a client and then fork() so I can have another client accept? I'm not worried about concurrent chatting yet, it's more of a ping-pong approach where the clients need to wait for a recv() after they send() before they can type a new message.

    Read the article

  • Does writing program using global variables is safer?

    - by ZoZo123
    I was reading about buffer, stack and heap overflows. I read this post as well. my question is like that: if I use only global variables in my code, can I say it prevents all the exploits of overflow? let's say I have this buffers in code declared in the global scope: char buf1[10]; char buf2[100]; If I send buf1 as the buffer to recv(int s, char *buf, int len,int flags); I will overwrite the data segment and may ruin the buf2 content, right? Would I be able to run a code from it because as I know it is not a code segment and data segment is not executable. Can we conclude that using Globals is the safest way?

    Read the article

  • Talking to a server in Win32; how do I see the server's response?

    - by Vinod K
    I am new to Win32 programming. sprintf(lpszBuff,"HELO Mail-Server\r\n"); send(s,lpszBuff,strlen(lpszBuff),0); recv(s,lpszBuff,100,0); cout << lpszBuff; In here I connect to a local mail server. The buffer contains the request I send, the same buffer contains the reply send by the browser. How do I see the reply? cout <<buffer doesn't show any output. I am doing this on VC++ 2008.

    Read the article

  • How it is called when write or read return less that requested?

    - by Vi
    What term should I use to describe situations (or bugs in software) caused by read, write, send, recv doing less work than expected? For example, write(fd, "123456", 6); may return 3 and we need to write "456" to finish our work. I expect any good program should do all their reads and writes in a loop until without relying that write will write everything. Am I right? /* Implemented simple FUSE filesystem which only allows reading and writing with small buffers, very often returning that it is written less bytes that in a buffer. Some programs work, some not. Are them buggy? */

    Read the article

  • Sending while receiving in C

    - by Spidfire
    I've made a piece of code in what's on my server, the problem is that it doesn't send while im receiving. so if i send something to client 1 to client 2, client2 only receives if he sends something himself.. how can i solve this ? /* Thread*/ while (! stop_received) { nr_bytes_recv = recv(s, buffer, BUFFSIZE, 0); if(strncmp(buffer, "SEND", 4) == 0) { char *message = "Text asads \n"; rv = send(users[0].s, message, strlen(message), 0); rv = send(users[1].s, message, strlen(message), 0); if (rv < 0) { perror("Error sending"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } }else{ char *message = "Unknown command \n"; rv = send(s, message, strlen(message), 0); if (rv < 0) { perror("Error sending"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } } }

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14  | Next Page >