Search Results

Search found 18079 results on 724 pages for 'compiler options'.

Page 217/724 | < Previous Page | 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224  | Next Page >

• I want to know the behaviour of break statement in C. Does it work only for ';for-while-do-switch' o

  - by avanish

  Suppose, I have a 'if statement' inside a 'for-loop'. for( ; ; ) { ------- if( ) { printf(" inside if"); break; }//if printf("inside for"); }//for now, will the 'break-statement' cause the compiler to come out of the 'for-loop' or will it only come out of the if loop on the 'if-condition' being satisfied.

  Read the article

• how const keyword works in c

  - by mousey

  Hi, I want to know about const internals in c and c++ . How compiler imposes constantness ? Can some one help me please.

  Read the article

• sizeof float (3.0) vs (3.0f)

  - by kumar

  Hi, What is the difference between sizeof(3.0) and sizeof(3.0f) I was expecting both of them to give the same result (sizeof float)..but its different. In 32 bit machine,gcc compiler, sizeof(3.0f) =4 sizeof(3.0) = 8 Why so?

  Read the article

• crt0.o and crt1.o -- What's the difference?

  - by Earlz

  Hello, recently I've been trying to debug some low level work and I could not find the crt0.S for the compiler(avr-gcc) but I did find a crt1.S (and the same with the corresponding .o files) What is the difference between these two files? Is crt1 something completely different or what? They both seem to have to do with something for bootstrapping(setting up stack frame and such), but why the distinction?

  Read the article

• What is DEFAULT_CC in function declaration?

  - by humoeba

  I'm relatively new to C, and am curious what this syntax means in a function declaration: int DEFAULT_CC foo(void) where DEFAULT_CC is probably defined somewhere else as: #define DEFAULT_CC "cc" Is this a direction to use a certain compiler or something?

  Read the article

• How do I bit shift a long by more than 32 bits?

  - by mach7

  It seems like I should be able to perform bit shift in C/C++ by more than 32 bits provided the left operand of the shift is a long. But this doesn't seem to work, at least with the g++ compiler. Example: unsigned long A = (1L << 37) gives A = 0 which isn't what I want. Am I missing something or is this just not possible? -J

  Read the article

• What's wrong with this print-iterable method?

  - by Tom Brito

  private static void printIterable(Iterable iterable) { // ERROR: "Type mismatch: cannot convert from element type Object to Iterable" for (Iterable i : iterable) { System.out.println(i); } } What the compiler is talking about? Its an Iterable, not an Object.

  Read the article

• Declare a Dictionary inside a static class

  - by Ngu Soon Hui

  How to declare a static dictionary object inside a static class? I tried public static class ErrorCode { public const IDictionary<string , string > ErrorCodeDic =new Dictionary<string, string>() { {"1","User name or password problem"} }; } But the compiler complains that "A const field of a reference type other than string can only be initialized with null".

  Read the article

• How to kill a process from VC++

  - by Shreekanth

  Am using VC++ compiler i want to know how to kill a process. is there any functions. i tried with TerminateProcess(); but i couldn't do...

  Read the article

• [C++] Is it possible to roll a significantly faster version of sqrt

  - by John

  In an app I'm profiling, I found that in some scenarios this functions are able to take over 10% of total execution time. I've seen discussion over the years of faster sqrt implementations using sneaky floating-point trickery, but I don't know if such things are outdated on modern CPUs. MSVC++ 2008 compiler is being used, for reference... though I'd assume sqrt is not going to add much overhead though.

  Read the article

• Clang doesn't support the Lock Prefix. How shall I workaround?

  - by Niels P.

  Assume this code: static inline void inc(int64_t* atomic) { __asm__ __volatile__ ( "lock incq %0\n" : "=m" (*atomic) : "m" (*atomic) ); } The Clang compiler doesn't support the lock prefix (yet?). What shall I do now?

  Read the article

• When will this condition evaluate to False?

  - by a_m0d

  Under what circumstances will the "False" part of the following code be executed? x = 20; y = -30; if (x > y) { // True part } else { // False part } NB: Language is C, compiler is gcc (although some other compilers may also do the same thing).

  Read the article

• [game] How is it possible to legally write ::: in C++ and ??? in C#?

  - by daveny

  These questions are a kind of game, and I did not find the solution for them. It is possible to write ::: in C++ without using quotes or anything like this and the compiler will accept it (macros are prohibited too). And the same is true for C# too, but in C#, you have to write ???. I think C++ will use the :: scope operator and C# will use ? : , but I do not know the answers to them. Any idea?

  Read the article

• How can I check for unused import in many Python files?

  - by Thierry Lam

  I remember when I was developing in C++ or Java, the compiler usually complains for unused methods, functions or imports. In my Django project, I have a bunch of Python files which have gone through a number of iterations. Some of those files have a few lines of import statement at the top of the page and some of those imports are not used anymore. Is there a way to locate those unused imports besides eyeballing each one of them in each file? All my imports are explicit, I don't usually write from blah import *

  Read the article

• LINQ: How do I concatenate a list of integers into comma delimited string?

  - by Haoest

  It's probably something silly I missed, but I try to concatenate a list of integers instead of summing them with: integerArray.Aggregate((accumulator, piece) => accumulator+"," + piece) The compiler complained about argument error. Is there a slick way to do this without having to go through a loop?

  Read the article

• Why do we need break after case statements?

  - by kunjaan

  Why doesn't the compiler automatically put break statements after each code block in the switch? Is it for historical reasons? When would you want multiple code blocks to execute?

  Read the article

• Are 'const' variables precomputed by default in C++?

  - by Gunnar

  Suppose I have variables for positions like const float latitude = 51.+11./60.+33.0461/3600.; const float longitude = 12.+50./60.+31.9369/3600.; and use them frequently in the program. Does the compiler precompute that? (This example should not produce much overhead, but you get the point.) Bonus point for pointing out location. ;) TIA

  Read the article

• is const (c++) optional?

  - by Dr Deo

  according to some tutorials i read a while back, the "const" declaration makes a variable "constant" ie it cannot change later. But i find this const declaration abit inconveniencing since the compiler sometimes gives errors like "cannot convert const int to int" or something like that. and i find myself cheating by removing it anyway. question: assuming that i am careful about not changing a variable in my source code, can i happily forget about this const stuff? Thanks in advance

  Read the article

• What are the latest tools that I can use to write a DSL (Domain-specific language) in 2009 Sep?

  - by servicesxiaodai

  I looked into Logix and EasyExtend for Python. Logix hasn't been around for a while and it failed to install on Python 2.6. EasyExtend's tutorial is hopeless, the code in the tutorial doesn't even work. I am looking for something so I can write my DSL. My DSL will be used as a research tool. And I don't want to spend time learning all that parsing and compiler theory.

  Read the article

• Need a sample function implement for array interface member...

  - by Nano HE

  I have a interface member like this. AppInterface.cs ObjLocation[] ArrayLocations { get; } App.cs public ObjLocation[] ArrayLocations { get { return **something**; } } I dont know how to complete it, Or there is another way to implement the array members. Then It can pass the compiler. thank you.

  Read the article

• Any reason to clean up unused imports in Java, other than reducing clutter?

  - by Kip

  Is there any good reason to avoid unused import statements in Java? As I understand it, they are there for the compiler, so lots of unused imports won't have any impacts on the compiled code. Is it just to reduce clutter and to avoid naming conflicts down the line? (I ask because Eclipse gives a warning about unused imports, which is kind of annoying when I'm developing code because I don't want to remove the imports until I'm pretty sure I'm done designing the class.)

  Read the article

• Switching 2003 SRV to 2008 caused Asp.net application not to Import Dll

  - by Tom

  Switching aged 2003 SRV to 2008 caused my Asp.net 2 application fail: The application is no more loading the required library DLL from /bin/ folder anymore. What should I change in my code or web.config to make this webapp load OK also in new 2008 server? Now I receive this error when I access the application: This type is in IMPORTS ( Dll ). Compiler Error Message: BC30002: Type 'Facebook.Entity.User' is not defined.

  Read the article

• Creating an instance within the Class itself

  - by didxga

  What's going on when the assignment statement executed at Line 4, does compiler ignore the new operator and keep the foo variable being null or something else happen to handle this awkward moment? public class Foo { // creating an instance before its constructor has been invoked, suppose the "initializing" // gets printed in constructor as a result of the next line, of course it will not print it private Foo foo = new Foo();//Line 4 public Foo() { System.out.println("initializing"); } }

  Read the article

• how do i avoid this linking error ?

  - by Yogesh

  if i have defined a global variable(with initialization) in header file, and included this file in two file and try to compile and link, compiler gives linking error ----------------- >>headers.h #ifndef __HEADERS #define __HEADERS int x = 10; #endif >>1.c #include "headers.h" main () { } --------------------- >>2.c #include "headers.h" fun () {}

  Read the article

• AIX- Does not install shared lib

  - by kadeshpa

  I am able to build the shared object successfully using the holy native compiler "xlc" on AIX.It does build the shared object library but does not install the shared object library. Configure command is: ./configure --prefix=/PATH/to/install --exec-prefix=/PATH/to/install --enable-shared --enable-static=no --enable-module=so --build=powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0 --host=powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0 LDFLAGS="-G -shared" Any help would be appreciated?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224  | Next Page >