Search Results

Search found 21054 results on 843 pages for 'void'.

Page 264/843 | < Previous Page | 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271  | Next Page >

  • How to make a rectangle on screen invisible to screen capture ?

    - by Kesarion
    How can I create a rectangle on the screen that is invisible to any sort of screen capture(printscreen or aplications) ? By create a rectangle on screen I mean something like this: #include <Windows.h> #include <iostream> void drawRect(){ HDC screenDC = ::GetDC(0); ::Rectangle(screenDC, 200, 200, 300, 300); ::ReleaseDC(0, screenDC); } int main(void){ char c; std::cin >> c; if (c == 'd') drawRect(); std::cin >> c; return 0; } I'm using Visual Studio 2010 on Windows XP

    Read the article

  • New to threading in C#, can you make thread methods generic and what are the dangers?

    - by ibarczewski
    Hey all, I'm just now starting to get into the idea of threading, and wanted to know if I could make this more abstract. Both foo and bar derive methods from a base class, so I'd like to pass in one or the other and be able to do work using a method that was derived. I'd also like to know how you properly name threads and the methods inside threads. if (ChkFoo.Checked) { Thread fooThread = new Thread(new ThreadStart(this.ThreadedFooMethod)); fooThread.Start(); } if (ChkBar.Checked) { Thread barThread = new Thread(new ThreadStart(this.ThreadedBarMethod)); barThread.Start(); } . . . public void ThreadedFooMethod() { Foo newFoo = new Foo(); //Do work on newFoo } public void ThreadedBarMethod() { Bar newBar = new Bar(); //Do similar work } Thanks all!

    Read the article

  • AS3: Performance question calling an event function with null param

    - by adehaas
    Lately I needed to call a listener function without an actual listener like so: foo(null); private function foo(event:Event):void { //do something } So I was wondering if there is a significant difference regarding performance between this and using the following, in which I can prevent the null in calling the function without the listener, but am still able to call it with a listener as well: foo(); private function foo(event:Event = null):void { } I am not sure wether it is just a question of style, or actually bad practice and I should write two similar functions, one with and one without the event param (which seems cumbersome to me). Looking forward to your opinions, thx.

    Read the article

  • Help moving multiple images at once with touches

    - by daveMac
    Here is my problem: I am trying to move a puzzle piece around the screen and then connect to the other piece if they are in close proximity. I have achieved this, though it is perhaps a little odd the way I did. My problem though is that once they have connected, I can't figure out how to move them as one image, instead of two separate entities. I would really appreciate any help or suggestions. Here is a sample of what I have been doing: (void)touchesMovedNSSet *)touches withEventUIEvent *)event{ UITouch *touch = [touches anyObject]; [self dispatchTouchEvent:[touch view] toPosition:[touch locationInView:self.view]]; } -(void)dispatchTouchEventUIView *)theView toPositionCGPoint)position{ if ((CGRectContainsPoint([picture frame], position))) { picture.center = position; } if (CGRectContainsPoint([picture2 frame], position)) { picture2.center = position; } }

    Read the article

  • Subtype polymorphism and arrays

    - by user133466
    Computer[] labComputers = new Computer[10]; with public class Computer { ... void toString(){ // print computer specs } } public class Notebook extends Computer{ ... void toString(){ // print computer specs + laptop color } } each subscripted variable labComputers[i] can reference either a Computer object or a Notebook object because Notebook is a subclass of Computer. For the method call labComputers[i].toString(), polymorphism ensures that the correct toString method is called. I wonder what if we do Notebook[] labComputers = new Notebook[10]; what kind or error would I get if I reference with Computer object and a Notebook object

    Read the article

  • Strange C++ thread function invocation

    - by Tony
    I have the following: class DThread { virtual void run()=0; _beginthreadex(NULL,0,tfunc,this,0,&m_UIThreadID); // class itself being passed as param to thread function... static unsigned int __stdcall tfunc(void* thisptr) { static_cast<DThread*>(thisptr)->run(); return 0; } //other stuff } The run function is implemented in a derived class. Why is the function that's being called in the thread being called through a cast this pointer? Is this good practise? Can't it just be called directly? The actual function needing to run is in the derived class. My question is

    Read the article

  • Thread won't stop when I want it to? (Java)

    - by Stuart
    I have a thread in my screen recording application that won't cooperate: package recorder; import java.awt.AWTException; import java.awt.Insets; import java.io.IOException; import javax.swing.JFrame; public class RepeatThread extends Thread { boolean stop; public volatile Thread recordingThread; JFrame frame; int count = 0; RepeatThread( JFrame myFrame ) { stop = false; frame = myFrame; } public void run() { while( stop == false ) { int loopDelay = 33; // 33 is approx. 1000/30, or 30 fps long loopStartTime = System.currentTimeMillis(); Insets insets = frame.getInsets(); // Get the shape we're recording try { ScreenRecorder.capture( frame.getX() + insets.left, frame.getY() + insets.top, frame.getWidth() - ( insets.left + insets.right ), frame.getHeight() - ( insets.top + insets.bottom ) ); } catch( AWTException e1 ) { // TODO Auto-generated catch block e1.printStackTrace(); } catch( IOException e1 ) { // TODO Auto-generated catch block e1.printStackTrace(); } // Add another picture long loopEndTime = System.currentTimeMillis(); int loopTime = (int )( loopEndTime - loopStartTime ); if( loopTime < loopDelay ) { try { sleep( loopDelay - loopTime ); // If we have extra time, // sleep } catch( Exception e ) { } // If something interrupts it, I don't give a crap; just // ignore it } } } public void endThread() { stop = true; count = 0; ScreenRecorder.reset(); // Once I get this annoying thread to work, I have to make the pictures // into a video here! } } It's been bugging me for ages. It periodically takes screenshots to the specified area. When you start recording, it hides (decativates) the window. On a Mac, when you give an application focus, any hidden windows will activate. In my class WListener (which I have confirmed to work), I have: public void windowActivated(WindowEvent e) { if(ScreenRecorder.recordingThread != null) { ScreenRecorder.recordingThread.endThread(); } } So what SHOULD happen is, the screenshot-taking thread stops when he clicks on the application. However, I must be brutally screwing something up, because when the thread is running, it won't even let the window reappear. This is my first thread, so I expected a weird problem like this. Do you know what's wrong?

    Read the article

  • Why does GC.GetTotalMemory() report huge memory allocations?

    - by Seventh Element
    I have been playing around with GC.GetTotalMemory(). When I create a local variable of type Titles in the example below, the consumed amount of memory increases by 6276 bytes. What's going on here? class Program { enum Titles { Mr, Ms, Mrs, Dr }; static void Main(string[] args) { GetTotalMemory(); Titles t = Titles.Dr; GetTotalMemory(); } static void GetTotalMemory() { long bytes = GC.GetTotalMemory(true); Console.WriteLine("{0}", bytes); } }

    Read the article

  • How to address thread-safety of service data used for maintaining static local variables in C++?

    - by sharptooth
    Consider the following scenario. We have a C++ function with a static local variable: void function() { static int variable = obtain(); //blahblablah } the function needs to be called from multiple threads concurrently, so we add a critical section to avoid concurrent access to the static local: void functionThreadSafe() { CriticalSectionLockClass lock( criticalSection ); static int variable = obtain(); //blahblablah } but will this be enough? I mean there's some magic that makes the variable being initialized no more than once. So there's some service data maintained by the runtime that indicates whether each static local has already been initialized. Will the critical section in the above code protect that service data as well? Is any extra protection required for this scenario?

    Read the article

  • Question about r-value in C++0x

    - by Goofy
    Rvalues IMHO are great improvement in C++, but at the beginning the're seems quite. Please look at code below: #include <string> std::string && foo (void) { std::string message ("Hello!"); return std::move (message); } void bar (const std::string &message2) { if (message == "Bye Bye!") return; } int main () { bar (foo ()); } Reference message2 is last owner of original message object returned by foo(), right?

    Read the article

  • how to specify a pointer to an overloaded function?

    - by davka
    I want to pass an overloaded function to the std::for_each() algorithm. e.g.: void f(char c); void f(int i); std::string s("example"); std::for_each(s.begin(), s.end(), f); I'd expect the compiler to resolve f() by the iterator type. Apparently, it (gcc 4.1.2) doesn't do it. So, how can I specify which f() I want? thanks a lot

    Read the article

  • Operation Problems in Java Generic

    - by alantheweasel
    I got some problem when i was learning Java Generic : interface calculator<T, R> { public void execute(T t, R r); } class executeAdd<T, R> implements calculator<T, R> { private T first; private R second; public executeAdd(T first, R second) { super(); this.first = first; this.second = second; } @Override public void execute(T t, R r) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub Object o = t + r // ERROR ! What i could do it ? } }

    Read the article

  • Break the limit of threading, segmentation fault

    - by user353573
    use pthread_create to create limited number of threads running concurrently Successfully compile and run However, after adding function pointer array to run the function, Segmentation fault Where is wrong? workserver number: 0 Segmentation fault void* workserver(void arg) { int status; while(true) { printf("workserver number: %d\n", (int)arg); ( job_queue[(int)arg])(); sleep(3); status = pthread_mutex_lock(&data.mutex); if(status != 0) printf("%d lock mutex", status); data.value = 1; status = pthread_cond_signal(&data.cond); if(status != 0) printf("%d signal condition", status); status = pthread_mutex_unlock(&data.mutex); if(status != 0) printf("%d unlock mutex", status); } }

    Read the article

  • doubt in - Function Objects - c++

    - by Eternal Learner
    I have a class class fobj{ public: fobj(int i):id(i) {} void operator()() { std::cout<<"Prints"<<std::endl; } private: int id; }; template<typename T> void func(T type) { type(); } My Doubt is if I invoke func like Method 1: func(fobj(1); the message I wanted to print is printed. I was always thinking I needed to do something like Method 2: fobj Iobj(1); // create an instance of the fobj class func(Iobj); //call func by passing Iobj(which is a function object) How does Method 1 work? I mean what exactly happens? and how is a call made to the operator() in class fobj ?

    Read the article

  • Spring @Transactional - Can I Override rollbackFor

    - by user475039
    Hi all, I am calling a service which has the following annotation: @Transactional(rollbackFor=ExceptionA.class) public void myMethodA(....) throws ExceptionA { . . } I am calling this method from an other method in another Spring Bean. @Transactional(rollbackFor=ExceptionB.class) public void mainEntryPointMethod(....) throws ExceptionB { . try { myMethodA() } catch (ExceptionA exp) { . } . } My problem is that if myMethodA throws an exception, my transaction (which is passed from mainEntryPointMethod - myMethodA by default propagation) will be marked for rollback. Is there a way in which the 'rollbackFor' for the inner method can be overriden? Thanks in advance Chris

    Read the article

  • Android - How can I access a View object instantiated in onCreate in onResume?

    - by Chris
    In my onCreate() method, I'm instantiating an ImageButton View: public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { Log.d(AntengoApplication.LOG_TAG, "BrowsePicture onCreate"); super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); setContentView(R.layout.layout_post); final ImageButton ib = (ImageButton) findViewById(R.id.post_image); ... In onResume, I want to be able to change the properties of the ImageButton with something like: @Override protected void onResume() { super.onResume(); ib.setImageURI(selectedImageUri); } //END onResume But onResume doesn't have access to the ib ImageButton object. If this were a variable, I'd simple make it a class variable, but Android does not allow you to define View object in the class. Any suggestions on how to do this?

    Read the article

  • AS3: How to get all XML-Nodes with a special attribute? (With sourch)

    - by insnet
    Hi there The Challenge: i d like to collect all nodes with the attribute "id". The Problem: The code doenst work with nested nodes. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><contentmap><fonts id="fonts"> fonts/Arial.swf swf/library_main.swf private function onXMLLoader(event : Event) : void { _xml = _loader.getXML(event.target.url.url); var searchTerms : XMLList = _xml.*.(hasOwnProperty('@id')); if (searchTerms.length() 0 ) { _NodeArray = new Array(); _parseNode(searchTerms); } private function _parseNode(xml : XMLList) : void { for each (var node: XML in xml) { if(!node.hasSimpleContent()) { _parseNode(node.children()); } else { var nodeObject : Object = new Object(); nodeObject['value'] = node.text(); for each(var a:XML in node.@*) { var name : String = String(a.name()); nodeObject[name] = a.toXMLString(); } _NodeArray.push(nodeObject); } } }

    Read the article

  • Junit | How to test parameters in a method

    - by MMRUser
    How do I test parameters inside a method itself. For example class TestClass { public void paraMethod(String para1, String para2) { String testPara1 = para1; String testPara2 = para2; } } class TestingClass { @Test public void testParaMethod () throws Exception { String myPara1 = "MyPara1"; String myPara2 = "MyPara2"; new TestClass().paraMethod(myPara1, myPara2); } } Ok, so is it possible to test if the testPara1 and testPara2 are properly set to the values that I have passed? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • How do I setup Eclipse to stop on the line an exception occured?

    - by Chris Persichetti
    Hi, How can I setup Eclipse to stop at the point an exception occurred. I have an Eclipse breakpoint setup to break on an exception. In the code example below, the problem I'm having is Eclipse tries to open the Integer source code. Is there any way to just have debugger break at the point shown in my code example? If I move down the stack trace, I will get to this line, it'd be nice if there's a way to do this without the "Source not found" window coming up. This can be done in Visual Studio, so it's driving me crazy not being able to find a way to do this in Eclipse. package com.test; public class QuickTest { public static void main(String[] args) { try { test(); } catch(NumberFormatException e) { System.out.println(e.getMessage()); } } private static void test() { String str = "notAnumber"; Integer.parseInt(str);//<----I want debugger to stop here } }

    Read the article

  • C++ rvalue temporaries in template

    - by aaa
    hello. Can you please explain me the difference between mechanism of the following: int function(); template<class T> void function2(T&); void main() { function2(function()); // compiler error, instantiated as int & const int& v = function(); function2(v); // okay, instantiated as const int& } is my reasoning correct with respect to instantiation? why is not first instantiated as const T&? Thank you

    Read the article

  • Grid View selected index

    - by user2924573
    I have a grid which contains a edit button . When i click the edit button and debug it does not hit to the selected index change event . There are no build errors code behind the grid public void btnModemDetailsEdit_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { isEdit = true; } protected void gridModemDetails_SelectedIndexChanged(object sender, EventArgs e) { int id = Convert.ToInt32(GridModemDetails.DataKeys[GridModemDetails.SelectedIndex].Values["gridModemDetails_SelectedIndexChanged"].ToString()); } <asp:GridView ID="GridModemDetails" runat="server" Width="435px" DataKeyNames="ModemId" AllowPaging="True" OnSelectedIndexChanged="gridModemDetails_SelectedIndexChanged" AutoGenerateColumns="False"> <Columns> <asp:TemplateField HeaderText="Edit" Visible="True" > <ItemTemplate> <asp:LinkButton ID="btnModemDetailsEdit" AccessibleHeaderText="Edit" ButtonType="Button" Text="Edit" HeaderText="Edit" runat="server" OnClick="btnModemDetailsEdit_Click" runat="server"/> </ItemTemplate> </asp:TemplateField>

    Read the article

  • How do I return an object that is able to execute on the server?

    - by mafutrct
    Coming from a Java background, this is the way I'm thinking: The server provides an object to the client. This object should be able to execute on the server. Server: private string _S = "A"; public interface IFoo { void Bar(); } private class Foo : IFoo { void Bar() { _S = "B";} } public IFoo GetFoo() { return new Foo(); } Client: IFoo foo = serverChannel.GetFoo(); foo.Bar(); Remoting is legacy (everyone keeps pointing to WCF instead) and WCF does not support this at all basically ( http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2431510 ), so how should I implement this kind of behavior? Using 3rd party components is possible iff required. I searched on SO but found no similar question. If this has indeed been answered before, just let me know and I'll delete.

    Read the article

  • Two phase Construction in C++

    - by tommieb75
    I have as part of assignment to look into a development kit that uses the "two-phase" construction for C++ classes: // Include Header class someFubar{ public: someFubar(); bool Construction(void); ~someFubar(); private: fooObject _fooObj; } In the source // someFubar.cpp someFubar::someFubar : _fooObj(null){ } bool someFubar::Construction(void){ bool rv = false; this->_fooObj = new fooObject(); if (this->_fooObj != null) rv = true; return rv; } someFubar::~someFubar(){ if (this->_fooObj != null) delete this->_fooObj; } Why would this "two-phase" be used and what benefits are there? Why not just instantiate the object initialization within the actual constructor?

    Read the article

  • this pointer to base class constructor?

    - by Rolle
    I want to implement a derived class that should also implement an interface, that have a function that the base class can call. The following gives a warning as it is not safe to pass a this pointer to the base class constructor: struct IInterface { void FuncToCall() = 0; }; struct Base { Base(IInterface* inter) { m_inter = inter; } void SomeFunc() { inter->FuncToCall(); } IInterface* m_inter; }; struct Derived : Base, IInterface { Derived() : Base(this) {} FuncToCall() {} }; What is the best way around this? I need to supply the interface as an argument to the base constructor, as it is not always the dervied class that is the interface; sometimes it may be a totally different class. I could add a function to the base class, SetInterface(IInterface* inter), but I would like to avoid that.

    Read the article

  • Progress Dialog on open activity

    - by GeeXor
    hey guys, i've a problem with progress dialog on opening an activity (called activity 2 in example). The activity 2 has a lot of code to execute in this OnCreate event. final ProgressDialog myProgressDialog = ProgressDialog.show(MyApp.this,getString(R.string.lstAppWait), getString(R.string.lstAppLoading), true); new Thread() { public void run() { runOnUiThread(new Runnable() { @Override public void run() { showApps(); } }); myProgressDialog.dismiss(); } }.start(); The showApps function launch activity 2. if i execute this code on my button click event on activity 1, i see the progress, but she doesn't move and afeter i have a black screen during 2 or 3 seconds the time for android to show the activity. If i execute this code in the OnCreate of Activity2 and if i replace the showApps by the code on OnCreate, Activity1 freeze 2 seconds, i don't see the progress dialog, and freeze again 2 seconds on activity 2 before seeing the result. An idea ?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271  | Next Page >