Search Results

Search found 30511 results on 1221 pages for 'linux networking'.

Page 287/1221 | < Previous Page | 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294  | Next Page >

• Import PCF file in Windows 7 VPN connection

  - by Prashant

  I have got PCF file for VPN connection from my client to login into there network. I can able to us it with Cisco client without any problem, but I noticed there is option in Window 7 for connection to VPN natively and I'm could not able figure out how to import PCF file content to it. I really appreciate if any one can help with this...

  Read the article

• DD-WRT Linksys WRT320N Max Tx Power

  - by Peter Stegnar

  What is the save max Tx Power setting for WRT320N?

  Read the article

• Testing radius server from Mac OS X client

  - by Calvin Froedge

  I have a radius server set up on a server running Ubuntu 11.04. I have configured my switch to use the authentication server's IP (192.168.1.2) for RADIUS / 802.1x authentication, and I created a connection to test connecting from my Mac OSX client. Here is my radius configuration for the client: client 192.168.1.0/16 { secret = testing123 } I can successfully authenticate using both 127.0.0.1 (localhost) and 192.168.1.2 (ip of eth1), so I know radius is getting those requests. I set up a connection to test from my macbook, and my requests are timing out. http://screencast.com/t/tMhRLS3H7 Is there a better way to test the radius connection from my macbook? Thanks! UPDATE: I was able to successfully test on Mac OSX client using RadPerf. This is available as a cross-platform command line tool.

  Read the article

• Buffalo TeraStation Firmware Upgrade

  - by jason

  Hi All, I was given a TeraStation HS-DH0.0TGL/R5 It came to me working with 4x250gb. I added 4 x 1TB, TFTP booted and data was copied. How do I load firmware and software now to get it running? I was going based upon this article: http://forums.buffalotech.com/t5/Storage/FAQ-3-of-3-TFTP-boot-procedure-please-read-this/m-p/11015 I downloaded TFTP Boot Recovery HS-DHTGL-R5 2.13.exe and Terastation_112-104.zip Advice is appreciated.

  Read the article

• Error 0x6ba (RPC server is unavailable) when running sfc /scannow on Windows XP in Safe Mode

  - by leeand00

  I think that my mup.sys file is corrupt. I received the following error when trying to access a network share that was located on my Windows 7 box, from my Windows XP box: No network provider accepted the given network path. After reading this I attempted to follow the directions by rebooting my computer into safe mode. After I run "sfc /scannow" I receive the following error message: The specific error code is 0x000006ba [The RPC server is unavailable]. When I go into Services, it says that the Remote Procedure Call (RPC) service is running but that the Remote Procedure Call (RPC) Locator is not running. When I try to start the Remote Procedure Call (RPC) Locator, it gives me an error saying: Error 1084: This service cannot be started in Safe Mode What can I do about this? If it can't find the Remote Procedure Call service in safe mode?

  Read the article

• MS Windows Server 2008R2 slow file copy, slow network connection

  - by MattrixHax

  i just setup a windows 2008R2 standard server, with the only installed app being Hyper-V, and only 1 windows XP VM is running. Whenever i try to copy a file from my windows 7 laptop over to the 2008R2 server machine's admin shares ( \\servername\c$ ) the files start transferring around 60mb/s and then drop to around 5mb/s. My windows 7 machine and the server 2008 machine are both in WORKGROUP (no domain here). when i try the same transfer to our server 2003 box the transfer speeds are fine. tried disabling autotuning (netsh interface tcp set global autotuninglevel=disabled) as well as turning off the checksum offload to the adapter (tx and rx) - i still see strange packet errors (bad header checksum) using wireshark and just cannot seem to track down what the issue is - over 1 hour to transfer 4gb of files from 1 server to another that are on the same GB switch is just crazy.... any ideas would be greatly appreciated!

  Read the article

• Changing network type from Unidentified network to Private network on an OpenVPN connection

  - by Filip Ekberg

  Is it possible to change the connection type in Windows 7? I have a OpenVPN connection which is identified as "unidentified network" and I do not want to apply certain rules to all unidentified networks in the firewall. How does one conquer this?

  Read the article

• Wireless not working on XP (with Intel® PRO/Wireless 2200BG Network Connection card and Zyxel router

  - by JohnIdol

  Hi all, I just got a new router, cant' get my old xp laptop (Toshiba Satellite) to connect to it, no matter if it's WPA-PSK or WEP (I was kind of thinking with WEP it would've worked but it doesn't). When I go connect and put in credentials the dialog stays up for a few minutes then disappears with no message and no connection is established. Here's the spec of router and wireless card: Wilreless card: Intel® PRO/Wireless 2200BG Network Connection Router: Zyxel P-660-HW-T1 v3 Everything works fine on my Vista machine (for once). Any help appreciated!

  Read the article

• Watchguard config, drop-in or mixed-routing mode?

  - by vfilby

  I have a Watchguard XTM 2 that is currently acting as a firewall and a router for my business network, I currently have the WG setup in mixed-routing mode and am happy with the current configuration. The reason I am curious about drop-in mode is because I would like to use all the interfaces on the back of the watchguard for the same subnet. My understanding is that drop-in mode will put them all on the same subnet, but it is unclear from the manual that the routing/firewall/vpn will still work as expected. This WG is right behind a DSL modem that is setup in bridge mode, so the WG is handling all PPPoE auth and routing for the network.

  Read the article

• better tool than netstat

  - by Stan

  OS: Windows server/ Windows XP Is there any port scan tool that can do what netstat does and also has a filter feature? So unnecessary connections can be hide. Thanks.

  Read the article

• Windows Server 2003 can't see Vista machine

  - by Django Reinhardt

  Hi there, I've got a real PITA problem that I'm sure has a really simple solution. I have a Windows Server 2003 machine that needs to be able to see the network name of a Vista box - but refuses to. It can see the Vista box (and even access its shared folder) if I enter the Vista box's IP address. Problem is: SQL Server refuses to do Replication with anything other than the "actual server name". That means that the 2003 machine needs to be able to connect through the Vista machines network name... not just its IP address. I'm guessing it's a simple incompatibility between OS's, but I'm sure there's got to be a simple way of fixing it. Note: Yes, the Vista machine can connect to 2003 machine, no problem. And other machines in the office can connect to both the Vista machine and 2003 (they have more recent OS's). Thanks for any help!

  Read the article

• SSL / HTTP / No Response to Curl

  - by Alex McHale

  I am trying to send commands to a SOAP service, and getting nothing in reply. The SOAP service is at a completely separate site from either server I am testing with. I have written a dummy script with the SOAP XML embedded. When I run it at my local site, on any of three machines -- OSX, Ubuntu, or CentOS 5.3 -- it completes successfully with a good response. I then sent the script to our public host at Slicehost, where I fail to get the response back from the SOAP service. It accepts the TCP socket and proceeds with the SSL handshake. I do not however receive any valid HTTP response. This is the case whether I use my script or curl on the command line. I have rewritten the script using SOAP4R, Net::HTTP and Curb. All of which work at my local site, none of which work at the Slicehost site. I have tried to assemble the CentOS box as closely to match my Slicehost server as possible. I rebuilt the Slice to be a stock CentOS 5.3 and stock CentOS 5.4 with the same results. When I look at a tcpdump of the bad sessions on Slicehost, I see my script or curl send the XML to the remote server, and nothing comes back. When I look at the tcpdump at my local site, I see the response just fine. I have entirely disabled iptables on the Slice. Does anyone have any ideas what could be causing these results? Please let me know what additional information I can furnish. Thank you! Below is a wire trace of a sample session. The IP that starts with 173 is my server while the IP that starts with 12 is the SOAP server's. No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 1 0.000000 173.45.x.x 12.36.x.x TCP 36872 > https [SYN] Seq=0 Win=5840 Len=0 MSS=1460 TSV=137633469 TSER=0 WS=6 Frame 1 (74 bytes on wire, 74 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6), Dst: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1) Internet Protocol, Src: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x), Dst: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: 36872 (36872), Dst Port: https (443), Seq: 0, Len: 0 No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 2 0.040000 12.36.x.x 173.45.x.x TCP https > 36872 [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=8760 Len=0 MSS=1460 Frame 2 (62 bytes on wire, 62 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1), Dst: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6) Internet Protocol, Src: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x), Dst: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: https (443), Dst Port: 36872 (36872), Seq: 0, Ack: 1, Len: 0 No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 3 0.040000 173.45.x.x 12.36.x.x TCP 36872 > https [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=5840 Len=0 Frame 3 (54 bytes on wire, 54 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6), Dst: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1) Internet Protocol, Src: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x), Dst: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: 36872 (36872), Dst Port: https (443), Seq: 1, Ack: 1, Len: 0 No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 4 0.050000 173.45.x.x 12.36.x.x SSLv2 Client Hello Frame 4 (156 bytes on wire, 156 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6), Dst: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1) Internet Protocol, Src: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x), Dst: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: 36872 (36872), Dst Port: https (443), Seq: 1, Ack: 1, Len: 102 Secure Socket Layer No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 5 0.130000 12.36.x.x 173.45.x.x TCP [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] Frame 5 (1434 bytes on wire, 1434 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1), Dst: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6) Internet Protocol, Src: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x), Dst: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: https (443), Dst Port: 36872 (36872), Seq: 1, Ack: 103, Len: 1380 Secure Socket Layer No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 6 0.130000 173.45.x.x 12.36.x.x TCP 36872 > https [ACK] Seq=103 Ack=1381 Win=8280 Len=0 Frame 6 (54 bytes on wire, 54 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6), Dst: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1) Internet Protocol, Src: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x), Dst: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: 36872 (36872), Dst Port: https (443), Seq: 103, Ack: 1381, Len: 0 No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 7 0.130000 12.36.x.x 173.45.x.x TLSv1 Server Hello, Certificate, Server Hello Done Frame 7 (1280 bytes on wire, 1280 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1), Dst: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6) Internet Protocol, Src: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x), Dst: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: https (443), Dst Port: 36872 (36872), Seq: 1381, Ack: 103, Len: 1226 [Reassembled TCP Segments (2606 bytes): #5(1380), #7(1226)] Secure Socket Layer No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 8 0.130000 173.45.x.x 12.36.x.x TCP 36872 > https [ACK] Seq=103 Ack=2607 Win=11040 Len=0 Frame 8 (54 bytes on wire, 54 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6), Dst: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1) Internet Protocol, Src: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x), Dst: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: 36872 (36872), Dst Port: https (443), Seq: 103, Ack: 2607, Len: 0 No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 9 0.130000 173.45.x.x 12.36.x.x TLSv1 Client Key Exchange, Change Cipher Spec, Encrypted Handshake Message Frame 9 (236 bytes on wire, 236 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6), Dst: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1) Internet Protocol, Src: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x), Dst: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: 36872 (36872), Dst Port: https (443), Seq: 103, Ack: 2607, Len: 182 Secure Socket Layer No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 10 0.190000 12.36.x.x 173.45.x.x TLSv1 Change Cipher Spec, Encrypted Handshake Message Frame 10 (97 bytes on wire, 97 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1), Dst: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6) Internet Protocol, Src: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x), Dst: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: https (443), Dst Port: 36872 (36872), Seq: 2607, Ack: 285, Len: 43 Secure Socket Layer No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 11 0.190000 173.45.x.x 12.36.x.x TLSv1 Application Data Frame 11 (347 bytes on wire, 347 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6), Dst: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1) Internet Protocol, Src: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x), Dst: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: 36872 (36872), Dst Port: https (443), Seq: 285, Ack: 2650, Len: 293 Secure Socket Layer No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 12 0.190000 173.45.x.x 12.36.x.x TCP [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] Frame 12 (1514 bytes on wire, 1514 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6), Dst: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1) Internet Protocol, Src: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x), Dst: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: 36872 (36872), Dst Port: https (443), Seq: 578, Ack: 2650, Len: 1460 Secure Socket Layer No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 13 0.450000 12.36.x.x 173.45.x.x TCP https > 36872 [ACK] Seq=2650 Ack=578 Win=64958 Len=0 Frame 13 (54 bytes on wire, 54 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1), Dst: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6) Internet Protocol, Src: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x), Dst: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: https (443), Dst Port: 36872 (36872), Seq: 2650, Ack: 578, Len: 0 No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 14 0.450000 173.45.x.x 12.36.x.x TCP [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] Frame 14 (206 bytes on wire, 206 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6), Dst: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1) Internet Protocol, Src: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x), Dst: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: 36872 (36872), Dst Port: https (443), Seq: 2038, Ack: 2650, Len: 152 No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 15 0.510000 12.36.x.x 173.45.x.x TCP [TCP Dup ACK 13#1] https > 36872 [ACK] Seq=2650 Ack=578 Win=64958 Len=0 Frame 15 (54 bytes on wire, 54 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1), Dst: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6) Internet Protocol, Src: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x), Dst: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: https (443), Dst Port: 36872 (36872), Seq: 2650, Ack: 578, Len: 0 No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 16 0.850000 173.45.x.x 12.36.x.x TCP [TCP Retransmission] [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] Frame 16 (1514 bytes on wire, 1514 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6), Dst: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1) Internet Protocol, Src: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x), Dst: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: 36872 (36872), Dst Port: https (443), Seq: 578, Ack: 2650, Len: 1460 Secure Socket Layer No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 17 1.650000 173.45.x.x 12.36.x.x TCP [TCP Retransmission] [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] Frame 17 (1514 bytes on wire, 1514 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6), Dst: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1) Internet Protocol, Src: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x), Dst: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: 36872 (36872), Dst Port: https (443), Seq: 578, Ack: 2650, Len: 1460 Secure Socket Layer No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 18 3.250000 173.45.x.x 12.36.x.x TCP [TCP Retransmission] [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] Frame 18 (1514 bytes on wire, 1514 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6), Dst: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1) Internet Protocol, Src: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x), Dst: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: 36872 (36872), Dst Port: https (443), Seq: 578, Ack: 2650, Len: 1460 Secure Socket Layer No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 19 6.450000 173.45.x.x 12.36.x.x TCP [TCP Retransmission] [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] Frame 19 (1514 bytes on wire, 1514 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6), Dst: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1) Internet Protocol, Src: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x), Dst: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: 36872 (36872), Dst Port: https (443), Seq: 578, Ack: 2650, Len: 1460 Secure Socket Layer

  Read the article

• How to blacklist a problem Wi-Fi access point by MAC address in Mac OS X

  - by Sam Alexander

  So I am a small Mac-user cog in a larger Windows-based network machine. The network here works fine for most everyone else (on PCs), but I have random timeouts and issues with the Wi-Fi. Luckily, I have identified a few problem access points by MAC address (via their log messages in Console.app). Is it possible to tell my AirPort on my Macbook to avoid those access points, and only speak with the access points who are far less touchy about me drinking the Apple kool-aid? All of the points are on the same network SSID.

  Read the article

• IIS7 Network Bios command limit and disabling file change notifications.

  - by meandmycode

  Having experienced IIS for many years I've hit this error various times in the past, and understand it, the gist being IIS is attempting to setup so many file change notifications over a UNC share that it is hitting a specified limit of active commands. However, whilst I understand this is a registry change on the endpoints, in our internal network we're starting to hit this when running certain domains that have large content (and the content is then stored out of source control and instead on a dumb network store). Given this is a testing environment and rather than changing registry settings (which may not even work for client (dev) machines that run Vista IIS), I'd like to stop IIS setting up all these file change notifications. Is this possible to do on a per site basis? additionally the configuration can't be in the web.config, if this means having to disable FCN's for the entire IIS server this would be preferred. Thanks in advance.

  Read the article

• Let other computer view my localhost over a network...

  - by Smickie

  Hi, I have apache and what not running on my local machine (mac), there also another mac on the local network. How does this other machine access my localhost? For example I have a local website at example.local.net in my vhost. How can another computer on the network navigate to this site? Cheers!

  Read the article

• System error 1219 has occurred

  - by khebbie

  I am trying to connect to a remote server and deploy a service there, through a deploy script. I start by stating "Net use" and send the credentials for the server. But here I get system 1219 error: Multiple connections to a server or shared resource by the same user, using more than one user name, are not allowed. Disconnect all previous connections to the server or shared resource and try again. I am not aware that I have any connections other than this one to the server. I have tried net "use /delete" but was told that no connections were open to the server. What gives?

  Read the article

• Monitor Mode on the Intel Centrino(R) Advanced-N 6205 (WEP Penetration) On Windows

  - by WindowsEscapist

  Can anyone tell me a way to do WEP hacking (legal, of course) (on my own wireless connection, for the purposes of this question) with Wireshark or similar programs on an Intel Centrino Advanced-N 6205? (Laptop is Acer Aspire 5750-6866.) According to the programs, I cannot accomplish this (monitor mode) but seeing as it is a fairly recent wireless card (should be able to support this) are there any cracked drivers available or does anyone have the knowledge to make one? Much appreciated! Thanks.

  Read the article

• Windows Server: specifying the default IP address when NIC has multiple addresses

  - by Cédric Boivin

  I have a Windows Server which has ~10 IP addresses statically bound. The problem is I don't know how to specify the default IP address. Sometimes when I assign a new address to the NIC, the default IP address changes with the last IP entered in the advanced IP configuration on the NIC. This has the effect (since I use NAT) that the outgoing public IP changes too. Even though this problem is currently on Windows Server 2008, I've had the same problem with a Windows Server 2003. How can you set the default IP address on a NIC when it has multiple IP addresses bound? I remark something. When i check route print i see is it there the problem ? 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.x.x 192.168.99.49 261 if i want the default ip be example : 192.168.99.100 There is my route. Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.99.1 192.168.99.49 261 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 On-link 10.10.10.10 261 10.10.10.10 255.255.255.255 On-link 10.10.10.10 261 10.10.10.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 10.10.10.10 261 192.168.99.0 255.255.255.0 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.49 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.51 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.52 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.53 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.54 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.55 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.56 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.57 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.58 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.59 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.60 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.61 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.62 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.64 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.65 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.66 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.67 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.68 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.70 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.71 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.100 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.108 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.109 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.112 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 10.10.10.10 261 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 10.10.10.10 261 I need to be certain, when i go on internet i go with the 192.168.99.100 how i do that ?

  Read the article

• Windows Server: specifying the default IP address when NIC has multiple addresses

  - by Cédric Boivin

  I have a Windows Server which has ~10 IP addresses statically bound. The problem is I don't know how to specify the default IP address. Sometimes when I assign a new address to the NIC, the default IP address changes with the last IP entered in the advanced IP configuration on the NIC. This has the effect (since I use NAT) that the outgoing public IP changes too. Even though this problem is currently on Windows Server 2008, I've had the same problem with a Windows Server 2003. How can you set the default IP address on a NIC when it has multiple IP addresses bound? I remark something. When i check route print i see is it there the problem ? 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.x.x 192.168.99.49 261 if i want the default ip be example : 192.168.99.100 There is my route. Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.99.1 192.168.99.49 261 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 On-link 10.10.10.10 261 10.10.10.10 255.255.255.255 On-link 10.10.10.10 261 10.10.10.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 10.10.10.10 261 192.168.99.0 255.255.255.0 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.49 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.51 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.52 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.53 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.54 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.55 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.56 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.57 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.58 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.59 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.60 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.61 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.62 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.64 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.65 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.66 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.67 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.68 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.70 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.71 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.100 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.108 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.109 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.112 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 10.10.10.10 261 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 10.10.10.10 261 I need to be certain, when i go on internet i go with the 192.168.99.100 how i do that ?

  Read the article

• Connecting Wii to router to Proxy Server via VPN to BBC iPlayer

  - by nkimber

  I live in the USA and want to be able to watch UK TV streamed over the web. The relevant services are geographically crippled. I can do this by using a VPN proxy server in the UK, connecting to the VPN service using a straight Windows VPN connection. However, this means I have to watch everything on my PC. The BBC iPlayer works on the Wii in the UK. So, I'd like to connect my Wii to a wireless router (LinkSys WRT54G2) and have that be automatically connected via VPN to my proxy service in the UK. If I can do this then I'd be able to stream UK TV direct to my TV via the Wii. I thought I could have one router act as my VPN connection, connected to a 2nd router that connects to my Cable internet access. But this bit isn't working, any thoughts?

  Read the article

• Windows7 - “The specified network password is not correct.” when the password is in fact correct.

  - by Win7 Home User

  I have a samba server setup for some time now. It is a Hardware NAS - which unfortunately does not provide access to the Samba logs. (the exact model of the NAS is called Addonics NAS Adapter ) I also have a Windows Vista and a Windows XP machine - from both I am able to map \\192.168.0.20\Smd with no errors ( net use l: \\192.168.0.20\Smd works, after asking for my username and password). I also bought a brand new computer, with Windows 7, and when I try to execute the same exact net use command on it - using the exact same username/password pair, I get a "The specified network password is not correct." message. I also tried mapping from the Windows explorer menu, and got the same error. I synchronized the clocks of the two machines, tried again... and yet the same error persists. So what is really surprising here is that mapping works from WindowXP and Windows Vista machines, but fails from a Windows7 machine using the exact same command and username/password - Anyone has any idea of what could be causing this or how to solve the problem? Thanks

  Read the article

• Using pfSense, OpenVPN Connects but Still Can't See the Network

  - by nicorellius

  I am having an OpenVPN issue. I have a pfSense box at home configured to allow traffic through a VPN tunnel. The client computer is Windows XP Home, behind a standard Comcast connection and a Netgear wireless router. I use OpenVPN to access my work network (from where I am trying to get out of in this post) from home (with an XP Pro machine behind pfSense), and this works fine. The client config is similar but has the changes specific to my setup... Here is my XP Home config: client dev tun proto tcp remote pfsense.*.org 1194 (starred out by me) resolv-retry infinite nobind persist-key persist-tun ca ca.crt cert client.crt key client.key ns-cert-type server comp-lzo verb 3 When I launch the OpenVPN GUI, the Tunnel TAP network connection turns red, and I can right-click that to connect to the server. Everything seems to work fine until I browse for the actual network. The Tunnel TAP connection turns green and it says connected to 10.1.1.6 (I have tried different IP pools here too with no luck). I can see the internal network fine, but my home network behind pfSense is not there. I have tried browsing there by using Tools Map Network Drive, using the browser, with no success. When I open the command line on the client and use the ipconfig -all command, I get the following: Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : Description . . . . . . . . . . . : TAP-Win32 Adapter V9 Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : *** (starred out by me) Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.1.1.6 Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.252 Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.1.1.5 Lease Obtained. . . . . . . . . . : Monday, March 15, 2010 1:18:37 PM Lease Expires . . . . . . . . . . : Tuesday, March 15, 2011 1:18:37 PM I noticed that the default gateway is not present. Could this be my problem? I am still relatively new to firewalls, VPN, and network configuration so I'm sure I am messing up something simple. Oh yah, I should note that I have firewall rules configured for pfSense to allow traffic through the WAN and the LAN. At first there was just the WAN firewall rule, because that is what I got from the literature I was reading. I then created a LAN rule as well, but I'm not sure if this was correct. Neither way works, though. Screen shots below: Any help is much appreciated.

  Read the article

• Intel Centrino Ultimate-N 6300 vs Advanced-N 6200 2x2

  - by wag2639

  Does the Ultimate-N 6300 actually offer better performance than the 6200? Are there any stats or benchmarks to show the difference? Also, what about battery performance? Does using the extra stream consume significantly more battery?

  Read the article

• Network Logon Issues with Group Policy and Network

  - by bobloki

  I am gravely in need of your help and assistance. We have a problem with our logon and startup to our Windows 7 Enterprise system. We have more than 3000 Windows Desktops situated in roughly 20+ buildings around campus. Almost every computer on campus has the problem that I will be describing. I have spent over one month peering over etl files from Windows Performance Analyzer (A great product) and hundreds of thousands of event logs. I come to you today humbled that I could not figure this out. The problem as simply put our logon times are extremely long. An average first time logon is roughly 2-10 minutes depending on the software installed. All computers are Windows 7, the oldest computers being 5 years old. Startup times on various computers range from good (1-2 minutes) to very bad (5-60). Our second time logons range from 30 seconds to 4 minutes. We have a gigabit connection between each computer on the network. We have 5 domain controllers which also double as our DNS servers. Initial testing led us to believe that this was a software problem. So I spent a few days testing machines only to find inconsistent results from the etl files from xperfview. Each subset of computers on campus had a different subset of software issues, none seeming to interfere with logon just startup. So I started looking at our group policy and located some very interesting event ID’s. Group Policy 1129: The processing of Group Policy failed because of lack of network connectivity to a domain controller. Group Policy 1055: The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not resolve the computer name. This could be caused by one of more of the following: a) Name Resolution failure on the current domain controller. b) Active Directory Replication Latency (an account created on another domain controller has not replicated to the current domain controller). NETLOGON 5719 : This computer was not able to set up a secure session with a domain controller in domain OURDOMAIN due to the following: There are currently no logon servers available to service the logon request. This may lead to authentication problems. Make sure that this computer is connected to the network. If the problem persists, please contact your domain administrator. E1kexpress 27: Intel®82567LM-3 Gigabit Network Connection – Network link is disconnected. NetBT 4300 – The driver could not be created. WMI 10 - Event filter with query "SELECT * FROM __InstanceModificationEvent WITHIN 60 WHERE TargetInstance ISA "Win32_Processor" AND TargetInstance.LoadPercentage 99" could not be reactivated in namespace "//./root/CIMV2" because of error 0x80041003. Events cannot be delivered through this filter until the problem is corrected. More or less with timestamps it becomes apparent that the network maybe the issue. 1:25:57 - Group Policy is trying to discover the domain controller information 1:25:57 - The network link has been disconnected 1:25:58 - The processing of Group Policy failed because of lack of network connectivity to a domain controller. This may be a transient condition. A success message would be generated once the machine gets connected to the domain controller and Group Policy has successfully processed. If you do not see a success message for several hours, then contact your administrator. 1:25:58 - Making LDAP calls to connect and bind to active directory. DC1.ourdomain.edu 1:25:58 - Call failed after 0 milliseconds. 1:25:58 - Forcing rediscovery of domain controller details. 1:25:58 - Group policy failed to discover the domain controller in 1030 milliseconds 1:25:58 - Periodic policy processing failed for computer OURDOMAIN\%name%$ in 1 seconds. 1:25:59 - A network link has been established at 1Gbps at full duplex 1:26:00 - The network link has been disconnected 1:26:02 - NtpClient was unable to set a domain peer to use as a time source because of discovery error. NtpClient will try again in 3473457 minutes and DOUBLE THE REATTEMPT INTERVAL thereafter. 1:26:05 - A network link has been established at 1Gbps at full duplex 1:26:08 - Name resolution for the name %Name% timed out after none of the configured DNS servers responded. 1:26:10 – The TCP/IP NetBIOS Helper service entered the running state. 1:26:11 - The time provider NtpClient is currently receiving valid time data at dc4.ourdomain.edu 1:26:14 – User Logon Notification for Customer Experience Improvement Program 1:26:15 - Group Policy received the notification Logon from Winlogon for session 1. 1:26:15 - Making LDAP calls to connect and bind to Active Directory. dc4.ourdomain.edu 1:26:18 - The LDAP call to connect and bind to Active Directory completed. dc4. ourdomain.edu. The call completed in 2309 milliseconds. 1:26:18 - Group Policy successfully discovered the Domain Controller in 2918 milliseconds. 1:26:18 - Computer details: Computer role : 2 Network name : (Blank) 1:26:18 - The LDAP call to connect and bind to Active Directory completed. dc4.ourdomain.edu. The call completed in 2309 milliseconds. 1:26:18 - Group Policy successfully discovered the Domain Controller in 2918 milliseconds. 1:26:19 - The WinHTTP Web Proxy Auto-Discovery Service service entered the running state. 1:26:46 - The Network Connections service entered the running state. 1:27:10 – Retrieved account information 1:27:10 – The system call to get account information completed. 1:27:10 - Starting policy processing due to network state change for computer OURDOMAIN\%name%$ 1:27:10 – Network state change detected 1:27:10 - Making system call to get account information. 1:27:11 - Making LDAP calls to connect and bind to Active Directory. dc4.ourdomain.edu 1:27:13 - Computer details: Computer role : 2 Network name : ourdomain.edu (Now not blank) 1:27:13 - Group Policy successfully discovered the Domain Controller in 2886 milliseconds. 1:27:13 - The LDAP call to connect and bind to Active Directory completed. dc4.ourdomain.edu The call completed in 2371 milliseconds. 1:27:15 - Estimated network bandwidth on one of the connections: 0 kbps. 1:27:15 - Estimated network bandwidth on one of the connections: 8545 kbps. 1:27:15 - A fast link was detected. The Estimated bandwidth is 8545 kbps. The slow link threshold is 500 kbps. 1:27:17 – Powershell - Engine state is changed from Available to Stopped. 1:27:20 - Completed Group Policy Local Users and Groups Extension Processing in 4539 milliseconds. 1:27:25 - Completed Group Policy Scheduled Tasks Extension Processing in 5210 milliseconds. 1:27:27 - Completed Group Policy Registry Extension Processing in 1529 milliseconds. 1:27:27 - Completed policy processing due to network state change for computer OURDOMAIN\%name%$ in 16 seconds. 1:27:27 – The Group Policy settings for the computer were processed successfully. There were no changes detected since the last successful processing of Group Policy. Any help would be appreciated. Please ask for any relevant information and it will be provided as soon as possible.

  Read the article

• Intranet Video-streaming

  - by Jonathan Sampson

  What's a good option for home-video-streaming. For example, somebody may use a laptop webcam to stream their baby's crib allowing them to monitor it from the main home PC. In this case, I wouldn't want to do it across the wire with skype, but instead keep it on my local network. What options exist to make this easy to achieve?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294  | Next Page >