Search Results

Search found 83746 results on 3350 pages for 'javascript open a window full size (mazimized)'.

Page 355/3350 | < Previous Page | 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362  | Next Page >

  • Howto get iframe linking to internal document source using javascript/jQuery?

    - by Tom
    Hi there, I have an iframe with id "appframe", the source is page.html and it's on the same server. I want to get the source of the page using jQuery. alert($("#appframe").contents().find("html").html()); returns <head></head><body></body> even though the document does not contain those tags, it only contains "Default page", so that is exactly what it should return. Any idea how to get the right source script of the whole document using jQuery? Eg. if the document would be "test" then that is exactly what it should return. Please note: I did ask this before a few weeks ago. Unfortunately, I got no solving answer. Because of my lower reputation (~85), I can not request a bounty... This doesn't make much sense to me. Anyway, it forced me to repost this question.

    Read the article

  • How do I use jQuery in my Greasemonkey Javascript scripts?

    - by tladuke
    I saw a question here and many blog posts about getting jquery into greasemonkey, but I can't get anything to work. Here's my script: // ==UserScript== // @name Hello jQuery // @namespace http://foo.bar // @description jQuery test script // @include * // ==/UserScript== #{contents of jquery.latest.js pasted in} unsafeWindow.jQuery = jQuery; $(document).ready(function() { alert('Hello world!'); }); I'm hoping to see an alert when I refresh a page, so I can start actually programming something. I've tried a bunch of other things and so far nothing works. The script is enabled in the little monkey menu... edit: the script part now looks like this: foo(); function foo() { $ = unsafeWindow.jQuery; $('tr td.row2:nth-child(4)').css("background-color", "#999"); } it doesn't work. I know the jQuery is good because I can run it from outside of greasemonkey. If instead of a jQuery function is just say alert('hello'); that works fine; I get the alert on page-load.

    Read the article

  • Why does this javascript code have an infinite loop?

    - by asdas
    optionElements is a 2d array. Each element has an array of length 2. These are an integer number and an element. I have a select list called linkbox, and i want to add all of the elements to the select list. The order I want them to go in is important, and is determined by the number each element has. It should be smallest to highest. So think of it like this: optionElements is: [ [5, <option>], [3, <option], [4, <option], [1, <option], [2, <option]] and it would add them to link box in order of those numbers. BUT that is not what happens. It is an infinite loop after the first time. I added the x constraint just to stop it from freezing my browser but you can ignore it. var b; var smallest; var samllestIndex; var x = 0; while(optionElements.length > 0 && ++x < 100) { smallestIndex = 0; smallest = optionElements[0][0]; b = 0; while( ++b < optionElements.length) { if(optionElements[b][0] > smallest) { smallestIndex = b; smallest = optionElements[b][0]; } } linkbox.appendChild(optionElements[smallestIndex][1]); optionElements.unshift(optionElements[smallestIndex]); } can someone point out to me where my problem is?

    Read the article

  • How can I use a value of JSP in Javascript code?

    - by novellino
    Hello, I have a list of elements, each of them appeared in my page through jsp. So I have this: <div id="title"><%= list.get(ind).getTitle() %></div> When I display the elements, as this tag is in for loop, I get everything right. Now I what to place a button for deleting each of this elements. What I have done is: <input type="submit" name="submit" onclick="deleteNewsFunction();" id="submit_btn"/> In the deleteNewsFunction() I just want to print the data. <script> function deleteNewsFunction(){ var item = $('#title').val(); alert(item); } </script> The problem is that the title var gets always the first item even if I am clicking on the button of the second item. I was thinking that maybe a solution is to add the "list.get(ind).getTitle()" as a parameter in the function like deleteNewsFunction(<%=list.get(ind).getTitle()%) but then it did not work at all. Does anyone know how to help me? Thanks a lot!

    Read the article

  • How do i hide html until its processed with javascript?

    - by acidzombie24
    I am using some JS code to transform my menu into a drilldown menu. The problem is before it runs the JS you see a BIG UGLY mess of links. On their site its solved by putting the js at the top. Using recommendations by yahoo/YSlow i am keeping the JS files at the bottom. I tried hiding the menu with display:none then using jquery to .show(), .css('display', ''), .css('display', 'block') and they all lead up to a messsed up looking menu (i get the title but not the title background color or any links of the menu) How do i properly hide a div/menu and show it after being rendered?

    Read the article

  • Is there any difference between var name = function() {} & function name() {} in Javascript?

    - by Fletcher Moore
    Suppose we are inside a function and not in the global namespace. function someGlobalFunction() { var utilFunction1 = function() { } function utilFunction2 () { } utilFunction1(); utilFunction2(); } Are these synonymous? And do these functions completely cease to exist when someGlobalFunction returns? Should I prefer one or the other for readability or some other reason?

    Read the article

  • My javascript doesn't work on IE. What should I change?

    - by klm
    I'm making simple site for my school project. My code doesn't work on my teacher's PC (he has IE 6 or 7 - I don't remember). I use it to change content on site (kind of menu). html: <ul> <li onclick="run(1)"> ... </li> <li onclick="run(2)"> ... </li> <li onclick="run(3)"> ... </li> <li onclick="run(4)"> .... </li> <li onclick="run(5)"> .... </li> <li onclick="run(6)"> .... </li> </ul> Script: function run(x) { ///New Content: var a = ... var e = "<a href='xxxx'> aaaaaa</a>" //example ///////////////////// var p = document.getElementById("content"); if(x === 1) { p.innerHTML=a; } else if(x === 2) { p.innerHTML=b; } else if(x === 3) { p.innerHTML=c; } else if(x === 4) { p.innerHTML=d; } else if(x === 5) { p.innerHTML=e; } else { p.innerHTML=f; } };

    Read the article

  • How to understand "if ( obj.length === +obj.length )" Javascript condition statement?

    - by humanityANDpeace
    I have run across a condition statement which I have some difficulties to understand. It looks like (please note the +-sign on the right-hand-side) this: obj.length === +obj.length. Can this condition and its purpose/syntax be explained? Looking at the statement (without knowing it) provokes the impression that it is a dirty hack of some sort, but I am almost certain that underscore.js is rather a well designed library, so there must be a better explanation. Background I found this statement used in some functions of the underscore.js library (underscore.js annotated source). My guesswork is that this condition statement is somehow related to testing for a variable obj to be of Array type? (but I am totally unsure). I have tried to test this using this code. var myArray = [1,2,3]; testResult1 = myArray.length === +myArray.length; console.log( testResult1 ); //prints true var myObject = { foo : "somestring", bar : 123 }; testResult2 = myObject.length === +myObject.length; console.log( testResult2 ); //prints false

    Read the article

  • How to replace href using javascript regex in Firefox?

    - by Andrei
    I try to change some links on a webpage using the following code for jQuery on Rails $(function () { $('#lesson a').live('click', function () { $.getScript(this.href.replace(/^(http...[^\/]+)?\/+(.*)$/,'/ajax/\\$2')); return false; }); }) This trick works for Chrome and Safari, but fails (nothing happens on click) for Firefox and Opera. What can be wrong with the code? EDIT1: The webpage contains: <div id="lesson"> <a href="/subj1">Subject 1</a> ... </div> On click, a browser (i.e. Firefox and Opera) should make an ajax-request of /ajax/subj1.

    Read the article

  • Do I need to specify a return type for an anonymous function in javascript / typescript?

    - by Anne
    I have the following function: $('td:eq(' + iColumn + ') input', oSettings.oApi._fnGetTrNodes(oSettings)) .each(function () { aData.push(this.value); }); In typescript I am getting a message saying: Error 3 Function declared a non-void return type, but has no return expression Why am I getting this message? I can resolve the message by saying "return true". Should I always specify a return type for this?

    Read the article

  • What is the difference between an object's scope and it's context in javascript?

    - by DKinzer
    In the vernacular, scope and context have a lot in common. Which is why I get confused when I read references to both, such as in the quote below from an article on closures: Scope refers to where variables and functions are accessible, and in what context it is being executed. (@robertnyman) As far as I can tell, context is just a reference to an object. Can someone please explain what exactly is context, as used, for instance, in the jQuery syntax, $(selector, context). And is an object's scope the same at it's context?

    Read the article

  • What is the best way to pass server side variables to JavaScript on the client side?

    - by steve_c
    Our application uses a lot of configuration options. Those options need to be reflected on the client side in the form of User preferences, site wide preferences, etc. Currently, we pass server side settings down to the client side in the form of JSON that is stored in custom attributes in the markup for a specific element (and no, our application currently doesn't worry about W3C validation). We then retrieve the data from the custom attribute, and parse it into a JSON object for use in script using jQuery. One drawback to this is referencing attributes on elements from within event handlers. I know this is frowned upon, as it can create circular references, and subsequently memory leaks. I would much prefer to use jQuery's data function, but you can't invoke this from the server side at page render time. What does everyone else do in this type of scenario?

    Read the article

  • How to enable a linkbutton server control using javascript?

    - by satyaj
    I have a linkbutton server control in my page whose Enabled attribute is initially set to "false". When a text box's text changes I would like to enable the linkbutton. I tried the following but it does not work. Could you let me know if i am missing something. function TextBox_TextChanged() { var control = $get("<%= linkButtonSave.ClientID%>"); if(control != null) control.enabled = true; } Thanks

    Read the article

  • How do I clear the text contents of a div in javascript?

    - by Ben
    I'm temporarily adding contents to a div,tempDiv, and adding that to a link which is appended to a div, #contentHere, that's displayed. I need to clear the contents of tempDiv so that the links aren't appended to each other, creating a string of urls that don't link to anywhere. $(document).ready(function(){ $.getJSON("data.php", function(data){ for(i = 0; i < 5; i++){ $("#tempDiv").append(data.justIn[i].dataLink+ ' '); $("#contentHere").append("<a href=\"#tempDiv\">Click to go to the div link</a>"); //I need to clear the contents of tempDiv here } }); }); Solutions to clearing the temporary contents of the div as I go?

    Read the article

  • Best way to set a default button (or trigger its event in javascript) for an input field, not part of a form

    - by Sheldon Pinkman
    I've got a stand-alone input field, not part of any form. I also got a button, that has some onclick event. When I type something in the input field, and press the Enter key, I want it do effectively press the button, or trigger its onclick event. So that the button is "the input field's default button" so to speak. <input id='myText' type='text' /> <button id='myButton' onclick='DoSomething()'>Do it!</button> I guess I can mess around with the input field's onkeypress or onkeydown events and check for the Enter key, etc. But is there a more 'clean' way, I mean something that associated the button with that input field, so that the button is the 'default action' or something for that field? Note that I'm not inside a form, I am not sending, posting, or submitting something. The DoSomething() function just changes some of the HTML content locally, depending on the text input.

    Read the article

  • [jquery/javascript] How select all checkboxes with class "xxx" ?

    - by marc
    Welcome, It it possible to select all checkboxes / uncheck all checkboxes what have class "xxx" ? I can't use "name" and "ID" because there are generated dynamical via PHP and i don't know their name. So maybye i can add class "xxx" for these what i wan't control ? Is is possible ? Or, if not possible. Maybye i can select all / unselect what are inside table with id "selectall" ? Regards

    Read the article

  • How to pass a reference to a string in JavaScript?

    - by ijjo
    Maybe a closure is my solution? Not exactly sure how to pull it off though. The code is set up like so: var globalVar = ''; var globalVar2 = ''; function func() { if (condition) func2(globalVar) else func2(globalVar2) } In func2() I cache some HTML in a main container into the appropriate global variable that I pass to it. Basically I have a main container that holds different pages depending on what tab they choose. For performance I want to cache the page into global vars so I need to know what tab is active to figure out which global var to assign the HTML to.

    Read the article

  • javascript for (i = 0; i < XXX.length; i++) -> length question

    - by Fernando SBS
    for (m = 0; m < troopsCount.length; m++) { //FM_log(7,"i="+i+" m="+m); //FM_log(7,"tipoTropaPrioritaria[m] = "+tipoTropaPrioritaria[m]); //FM_log(7,"troopsCount[m] = "+troopsCount[m]); //FM_log(7,"availableTroops[m] = "+availableTroops[m]); if ((tipoTropaPrioritaria[m] == null || tipoTropaPrioritaria[m] == "undefined") || (troopsCount[m] == null || troopsCount[m] == "undefined") || (availableTroops[m] == null || availableTroops[m] == "undefined")) return "alternaTropas(): ERRO - tipoTropaPrioritaria[m] || troopsCount[m] || availableTroops[m] null ou undefined"; if ((parseInt(tipoTropaPrioritaria[m]) != 0) && (parseInt(troopsCount[m]) != 0)) { naoServe = true; break; } else { if ((parseInt(availableTroops[m])) < (parseInt(troopsCount[m]))) { naoServe = true; break; } else if (m < troopsCount.length) { naoServe = true; } else { //means m >= troopsCount.length naoServe = false; } } } my question is: the last statement else { //means m >= troopsCount.length naoServe = false; } will it ever be evaluated since for (m = 0; m < troopsCount.length; m++) ???

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362  | Next Page >