Search Results

Search found 5995 results on 240 pages for 'compiler flags'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 5/240 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • Is ToString() optimized by compiler?

    - by TheVillageIdiot
    Suppose I've following Code: Console.WriteLine("Value1: " + SomeEnum.Value1.ToString() + "\r\nValue2: " + SomeOtherEnum.Value2.ToString()); Will Compiler Optimize this to: Console.WriteLine("Value1: " + SomeEnum.Value1 + "\r\nValue2: " + SomeOtherEnum.Value2); I've checked it with IL Disassembler and there are calls to IL_005a: callvirt instance string [mscorlib]System.Object::ToString() I don't know if JIT optimizes this.

    Read the article

  • C compiler for iPhone?

    - by thyrgle
    If you want to see why I am asking this look at my other question: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2894615/how-to-display-console-text-in-uitextview So basically, I need to know if there is an iPhone C compiler that can be installed on the iPhone... Then I need to know what parameter I would put in the system("compile Foo") function. Thanks for the help in advanced.

    Read the article

  • CSharp Compiler and Windows.Forms

    - by j-t-s
    Hi All I've just created a little app that programmatically compiles code using the C# Compiler, and it works brilliantly. But, one thing that I need it to do is compile Windows.Forms code. Like, I can create a console app with it, but I can't create a GUI-based form. Here's the link that got me started: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/304655 Can somebody please help? Thank you :)

    Read the article

  • How does compiler understand the pointer type?

    - by Narek
    How c++ compiler understands the pointer type? As I know pointer has a size equal to WORD of the OS (32 or 64). So does it store dome info in that 32(or 64) bits about type? Just because you can not have a pointer on one type and assign to that pointer another pointer with a different type.

    Read the article

  • #Define Compiler Directive in C#

    - by pm_2
    In C, I could declare a compiler directive as follows: #define MY_NUMBER 10 However, in C#, I only appear to be able to do this: #define MY_NUMBER Which is obviously useless in this case. Is this correct, or am I doing something wrong? If not, can anyone suggest a way of doing this, either at namespace or solution level? I thought of maybe creating a static class, but that seems to be overkill for one value.

    Read the article

  • cl.exe Difference in object files when /E output is the same and flags are the same

    - by madiyaan damha
    Hello: I am using Visual Studio 2005's cl.exe compiler. I call it with a bunch of /I /D and some compilation/optimization flags (example: /Ehsc). I have two compilation scripts, and both differ only in the /I flags (include directories are different). All other flags are the same. These scripts produce different object files (and not just a timestamp difference as noted below). The strange thing is that the /E output of both scripts is the same. That means that the include files are not causing the difference in object files, but then again, where is the difference coming from? Can anyone elucidate on how I am seeing two different object files in my situation. If the include files are causing the difference, how come I see identical /E output? PS. The object files are different not only in the timestamp, but in the code sections also. In fact the behavior of my final executable is different in both cases. Edit: PSS: I even looked at the /includeFiles output of cl.exe and that output is identical. The object files, however, differ in more than just the timestamp (in fact, one is 1KB bigger than another!)

    Read the article

  • Millions of SYN_RECV connections, no DDoS

    - by ThomK
    We have such server structure: reverse proxy (nginx) - worker (uwsgi) - postgresql / memcached. All servers are in local network behind router, with NATed external ip:ports (http/s 80/443 to proxy, and ssh 22 to all servers). Problem is, that sometimes proxy server netstat reports MILLIONS of SYN_RECV connections. From same IP / same ports. Like that: nginx ~ # netstat -n | grep 83.238.153.195 tcp 0 0 192.168.1.1:80 83.238.153.195:3107 SYN_RECV tcp 0 0 192.168.1.1:80 83.238.153.195:3107 SYN_RECV tcp 0 0 192.168.1.1:80 83.238.153.195:3107 SYN_RECV tcp 0 0 192.168.1.1:80 83.238.153.195:3107 SYN_RECV tcp 0 0 192.168.1.1:80 83.238.153.195:3107 SYN_RECV tcp 0 0 192.168.1.1:80 83.238.153.195:3107 SYN_RECV tcp 0 0 192.168.1.1:80 83.238.153.195:3107 SYN_RECV tcp 0 0 192.168.1.1:80 83.238.153.195:3107 SYN_RECV tcp 0 0 192.168.1.1:80 83.238.153.195:3107 SYN_RECV tcp 0 0 192.168.1.1:80 83.238.153.195:3107 SYN_RECV [...] And this is not DDoS, because all IPs affected belongs to our website users. On side note, users says that it's not affecting them. Website is online and working, but... that particular one (from example above) told me that website is down and Firefox can't connect. I've done tcpdump. 19:42:14.826011 IP 83.238.153.195.zephyr-srv > 192.168.1.1.http: Flags [S], seq 1845850583, win 65535, options [mss 1412,nop,wscale 0,nop,nop,sackOK], length 0 19:42:14.826042 IP 192.168.1.1.http > 83.238.153.195.zephyr-srv: Flags [S.], seq 2835837547, ack 1845850584, win 5840, options [mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7], length 0 19:42:17.887331 IP 83.238.153.195.zephyr-srv > 192.168.1.1.http: Flags [S], seq 1845850583, win 65535, options [mss 1412,nop,wscale 0,nop,nop,sackOK], length 0 19:42:17.887343 IP 192.168.1.1.http > 83.238.153.195.zephyr-srv: Flags [S.], seq 2835837547, ack 1845850584, win 5840, options [mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7], length 0 19:42:19.065497 IP 192.168.1.1.http > 83.238.153.195.zephyr-srv: Flags [S.], seq 2835837547, ack 1845850584, win 5840, options [mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7], length 0 19:42:23.918064 IP 83.238.153.195.zephyr-srv > 192.168.1.1.http: Flags [S], seq 1845850583, win 65535, options [mss 1412,nop,wscale 0,nop,nop,sackOK], length 0 19:42:23.918076 IP 192.168.1.1.http > 83.238.153.195.zephyr-srv: Flags [S.], seq 2835837547, ack 1845850584, win 5840, options [mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7], length 0 19:42:25.265499 IP 192.168.1.1.http > 83.238.153.195.zephyr-srv: Flags [S.], seq 2835837547, ack 1845850584, win 5840, options [mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7], length 0 19:42:37.265501 IP 192.168.1.1.http > 83.238.153.195.zephyr-srv: Flags [S.], seq 2835837547, ack 1845850584, win 5840, options [mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7], length 0 19:42:37.758051 IP 83.238.153.195.2107 > 192.168.1.1.http: Flags [S], seq 564208067, win 65535, options [mss 1412,nop,wscale 0,nop,nop,sackOK], length 0 19:42:37.758069 IP 192.168.1.1.http > 83.238.153.195.2107: Flags [S.], seq 3188568660, ack 564208068, win 5840, options [mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7], length 0 19:42:40.714360 IP 83.238.153.195.2107 > 192.168.1.1.http: Flags [S], seq 564208067, win 65535, options [mss 1412,nop,wscale 0,nop,nop,sackOK], length 0 19:42:40.714374 IP 192.168.1.1.http > 83.238.153.195.2107: Flags [S.], seq 3188568660, ack 564208068, win 5840, options [mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7], length 0 19:42:41.665503 IP 192.168.1.1.http > 83.238.153.195.2107: Flags [S.], seq 3188568660, ack 564208068, win 5840, options [mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7], length 0 19:42:46.751073 IP 83.238.153.195.2107 > 192.168.1.1.http: Flags [S], seq 564208067, win 65535, options [mss 1412,nop,wscale 0,nop,nop,sackOK], length 0 19:42:46.751087 IP 192.168.1.1.http > 83.238.153.195.2107: Flags [S.], seq 3188568660, ack 564208068, win 5840, options [mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7], length 0 19:42:47.665498 IP 192.168.1.1.http > 83.238.153.195.2107: Flags [S.], seq 3188568660, ack 564208068, win 5840, options [mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7], length 0 19:42:59.865499 IP 192.168.1.1.http > 83.238.153.195.2107: Flags [S.], seq 3188568660, ack 564208068, win 5840, options [mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7], length 0 19:43:01.265500 IP 192.168.1.1.http > 83.238.153.195.zephyr-srv: Flags [S.], seq 2835837547, ack 1845850584, win 5840, options [mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7], length 0 19:43:13.320382 IP 83.238.153.195.2114 > 192.168.1.1.http: Flags [S], seq 2136055006, win 65535, options [mss 1412,nop,wscale 0,nop,nop,sackOK], length 0 19:43:13.320399 IP 192.168.1.1.http > 83.238.153.195.2114: Flags [S.], seq 3754336171, ack 2136055007, win 5840, options [mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7], length 0 19:43:16.320556 IP 83.238.153.195.2114 > 192.168.1.1.http: Flags [S], seq 2136055006, win 65535, options [mss 1412,nop,wscale 0,nop,nop,sackOK], length 0 19:43:16.320569 IP 192.168.1.1.http > 83.238.153.195.2114: Flags [S.], seq 3754336171, ack 2136055007, win 5840, options [mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7], length 0 19:43:17.665498 IP 192.168.1.1.http > 83.238.153.195.2114: Flags [S.], seq 3754336171, ack 2136055007, win 5840, options [mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7], length 0 19:43:22.250069 IP 83.238.153.195.2114 > 192.168.1.1.http: Flags [S], seq 2136055006, win 65535, options [mss 1412,nop,wscale 0,nop,nop,sackOK], length 0 19:43:22.250080 IP 192.168.1.1.http > 83.238.153.195.2114: Flags [S.], seq 3754336171, ack 2136055007, win 5840, options [mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7], length 0 19:43:23.665500 IP 192.168.1.1.http > 83.238.153.195.2114: Flags [S.], seq 3754336171, ack 2136055007, win 5840, options [mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7], length 0 19:43:23.865501 IP 192.168.1.1.http > 83.238.153.195.2107: Flags [S.], seq 3188568660, ack 564208068, win 5840, options [mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7], length 0 19:43:35.665498 IP 192.168.1.1.http > 83.238.153.195.2114: Flags [S.], seq 3754336171, ack 2136055007, win 5840, options [mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7], length 0 19:43:37.903038 IP 83.238.153.195.2213 > 192.168.1.1.http: Flags [S], seq 2918118729, win 65535, options [mss 1412,nop,wscale 0,nop,nop,sackOK], length 0 19:43:37.903054 IP 192.168.1.1.http > 83.238.153.195.2213: Flags [S.], seq 4145523337, ack 2918118730, win 5840, options [mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7], length 0 19:43:40.772899 IP 83.238.153.195.2213 > 192.168.1.1.http: Flags [S], seq 2918118729, win 65535, options [mss 1412,nop,wscale 0,nop,nop,sackOK], length 0 19:43:40.772912 IP 192.168.1.1.http > 83.238.153.195.2213: Flags [S.], seq 4145523337, ack 2918118730, win 5840, options [mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7], length 0 19:43:41.865500 IP 192.168.1.1.http > 83.238.153.195.2213: Flags [S.], seq 4145523337, ack 2918118730, win 5840, options [mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7], length 0 19:43:46.793057 IP 83.238.153.195.2213 > 192.168.1.1.http: Flags [S], seq 2918118729, win 65535, options [mss 1412,nop,wscale 0,nop,nop,sackOK], length 0 19:43:46.793069 IP 192.168.1.1.http > 83.238.153.195.2213: Flags [S.], seq 4145523337, ack 2918118730, win 5840, options [mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7], length 0 19:43:47.865500 IP 192.168.1.1.http > 83.238.153.195.2213: Flags [S.], seq 4145523337, ack 2918118730, win 5840, options [mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7], length 0 19:43:49.465503 IP 192.168.1.1.http > 83.238.153.195.zephyr-srv: Flags [S.], seq 2835837547, ack 1845850584, win 5840, options [mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7], length 0 Anyone have some thoughts on that?

    Read the article

  • Is comparing an OO compiler to a SQL compiler/optimizer valid?

    - by Brad
    I'm now doing a lot of SQL development at my new job where as before I was doing Object Oriented desktop app stuff. I keep running across very large scripts (thousands of lines) and wanting to refactor in some way. I am seeing that SQL is a different sort of beast and it's probably fine to have these big scripts for the most part but while explaining this to me people are also insisting that the whole idea of refactoring is bad. That stuff like the .NET compiler are actually burdened by refactored code and that a big wall of code is more efficient and better design than code designed for reuse, readability and scalability. The other argument is that OO compilers are almost dangerously inefficient and don't have efficient memory management or runs too many CPU instructions compared to older "simpler" compilers and compared to SQL. Are these valid complaints? Even if some compiler like a C compiler is modestly more "efficient" (whatever that means on this high of a level without seeing code) would you want to write applications in C over C# or Java? Is comparing an OO compiler to a SQL compiler/optimizer even valid?

    Read the article

  • Alternatives for the Snippet Compiler

    - by Marko Apfel
    It seems that the Snippet Compiler is not maintained anymore. So I need an alternative – also for getting syntax highlighting for code in publications. Preferable with the possibility to conserve this highlighting by copying selections to clipboard. Snippet Compiler does not allows this for selections – only by exporting the whole file content to clipboard with HTML- or RTF-formatting (File > Export > HTML to clipboard respectively RTF to clipboard). Today I switched to LINQPad. This application offers constructing LINQ-statements as well as compiling arbitrary code snippets. But there are some other alternatives too: CS-Script - The C# Script Engine CS-Script is a CLR (Common Language Runtime) based scripting system which uses ECMA-compliant C# as a programming language. CS-Script currently targets Microsoft implementation of CLR (.NET 2.0/3.0/3.5. sharpsnippetcompiler C# Snippet Compiler is a tiny IDE to create, debug and run your C# programs CsharpRepl C# interactive shell that is part of Mono's C# compiler. An interactive shell is usually referred to as a read eval print loop or repl. The C# interactive shell is built on top of the Mono.CSharp library, a library that provides a C# compiler service that can be used to evaluate expressions and statements on the flight. What I miss is an alternative with syntax highlighting like in my Visual Studio: Instead of:

    Read the article

  • Google I/O 2010 - Optimizing apps with the GWT Compiler

    Google I/O 2010 - Optimizing apps with the GWT Compiler Google I/O 2010 - Faster apps faster - Optimizing apps with the GWT Compiler GWT 201 Ray Cromwell The GWT compiler isn't just a Java to JavaScript transliterator. It performs many optimizations along the way. In this session, we'll show you not only the optimizations performed, but how you can get more out of the compiler itself. Learn how to speed up compiles, use -draftCompile, compile for only one locale/browser permutation, and more. For all I/O 2010 sessions, please go to code.google.com From: GoogleDevelopers Views: 7 0 ratings Time: 56:17 More in Science & Technology

    Read the article

  • Google I/O 2010 - A JIT Compiler for Android's Dalvik VM

    Google I/O 2010 - A JIT Compiler for Android's Dalvik VM Google I/O 2010 - A JIT Compiler for Android's Dalvik VM Android 301 Ben Cheng, Bill Buzbee In this session we will outline the design of a JIT Compiler suitable for embedded Android devices. Topics will include an architectural overview, the rationale for design decisions and the special support for JIT verification, testing and tuning. For all I/O 2010 sessions, please go to code.google.com From: GoogleDevelopers Views: 3 0 ratings Time: 01:00:14 More in Science & Technology

    Read the article

  • Could not resolve <fx:Script> to a component implementation.

    - by seref
    Hi, i created project with flexmojos maven archtype..i used flexmojos:flexbuilder and compile/run with FlashBuilder 4 everything is okay but when i try to compile project with flexmojos i got following error: [ERROR] Z:....\src\main\flex\Main.mxml:[6,-1] Could not resolve < fx:Script to a component implementation. [INFO] BUILD FAILURE my mxml: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <s:Application xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009" xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark" xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx" width="100%" height="100%" creationComplete="application1_creationCompleteHandler(event)"> <fx:Script> <![CDATA[ import mx.controls.Alert; import mx.events.FlexEvent; protected function application1_creationCompleteHandler(event:FlexEvent):void { Alert.show("success!!!!") } ]]></fx:Script> </s:Application> pom.xml like: ...... <packaging>swf</packaging> ...... <properties> <flex-sdk.version>4.1.0.16076</flex-sdk.version> <flexmojos.version>3.8</flexmojos.version> </properties> ...... <build> <sourceDirectory>src/main/flex</sourceDirectory> <testSourceDirectory>src/test/flex</testSourceDirectory> <plugins> <plugin> <groupId>org.sonatype.flexmojos</groupId> <artifactId>flexmojos-maven-plugin</artifactId> <version>${flexmojos.version}</version> <extensions>true</extensions> <dependencies> <dependency> <groupId>com.adobe.flex</groupId> <artifactId>compiler</artifactId> <version>${flex-sdk.version}</version> <type>pom</type> </dependency> </dependencies> <configuration> <compiledLocales> <locale>en_US</locale> </compiledLocales> <mergeResourceBundle>true</mergeResourceBundle> <accessible>true</accessible> <optimize>true</optimize> <targetPlayer>10.0.0</targetPlayer> <showWarnings>true</showWarnings> <linkReport>true</linkReport> </configuration> </plugin> </plugins> </build> <dependencies> <!-- Flex framework resource bundles --> <dependency> <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> <artifactId>flex-framework</artifactId> <version>${flex-sdk.version}</version> <type>pom</type> </dependency> <!-- Include unit test dependencies. --> <dependency> <groupId>com.adobe.flexunit</groupId> <artifactId>flexunit</artifactId> <version>4.0-rc-1</version> <type>swc</type> <scope>test</scope> </dependency> </dependencies> ....... maven output compiler config : INFO] Flex compiler configurations: -compiler.external-library-path C:\...\.m2\repository\com\adobe\flex \framework\playerglobal\4.1.0.16076\10.0\playerglobal.swc -compiler.include-libraries= -compiler.library-path C:\...\.m2\repository\com\adobe\flex\framework \datavisualization\4.1.0.16076\datavisualization-4.1.0.16076.swc C:\... \.m2\repository\com\adobe\flex\framework\flash-integration \4.1.0.16076\flash-integration-4.1.0.16076.swc C:\...\.m2\repository \com\adobe\flex\framework\flex\4.1.0.16076\flex-4.1.0.16076.swc C:\... \.m2\repository\com\adobe\flex\framework\framework \4.1.0.16076\framework-4.1.0.16076.swc C:\...\.m2\repository\com\adobe \flex\framework\osmf\4.1.0.16076\osmf-4.1.0.16076.swc C:\... \.m2\repository\com\adobe\flex\framework\rpc \4.1.0.16076\rpc-4.1.0.16076.swc C:\...\.m2\repository\com\adobe\flex \framework\spark\4.1.0.16076\spark-4.1.0.16076.swc C:\... \.m2\repository\com\adobe\flex\framework\sparkskins \4.1.0.16076\sparkskins-4.1.0.16076.swc C:\...\.m2\repository\com\adobe \flex\framework\textLayout\4.1.0.16076\textLayout-4.1.0.16076.swc C: \...\.m2\repository\com\adobe\flex\framework\utilities \4.1.0.16076\utilities-4.1.0.16076.swc C:\...\.m2\repository\com\adobe \flex\framework\datavisualization \4.1.0.16076\datavisualization-4.1.0.16076-en_US.rb.swc C:\... \.m2\repository\com\adobe\flex\framework\framework \4.1.0.16076\framework-4.1.0.16076-en_US.rb.swc C:\...\.m2\repository \com\adobe\flex\framework\osmf\4.1.0.16076\osmf-4.1.0.16076- en_US.rb.swc C:\...\.m2\repository\com\adobe\flex\framework\rpc \4.1.0.16076\rpc-4.1.0.16076-en_US.rb.swc C:\...\.m2\repository\com \adobe\flex\framework\spark\4.1.0.16076\spark-4.1.0.16076-en_US.rb.swc C:\...\.m2\repository\com\adobe\flex\framework\textLayout \4.1.0.16076\textLayout-4.1.0.16076-en_US.rb.swc C:\...\.m2\repository \com\adobe\flex\framework\flash-integration\4.1.0.16076\flash- integration-4.1.0.16076-en_US.rb.swc C:\...\.m2\repository\com\adobe \flex\framework\playerglobal\4.1.0.16076\playerglobal-4.1.0.16076- en_US.rb.swc -compiler.theme Z:\.....\target\classes\configs\themes\Spark \spark.css -compiler.accessible=true -compiler.allow-source-path-overlap=false -compiler.as3=true -compiler.debug=false -compiler.es=false -compiler.fonts.managers flash.fonts.JREFontManager flash.fonts.BatikFontManager flash.fonts.AFEFontManager flash.fonts.CFFFontManager -compiler.fonts.local-fonts-snapshot Z:\.....\target\classes \fonts.ser -compiler.keep-generated-actionscript=false -licenses.license flashbuilder4 952309948800588759250406 -licenses.license flexbuilder4.displayedStartPageAtLeastOneTime true -compiler.locale en_US -compiler.optimize=true -compiler.source-path Z:\.....\src\main\flex -compiler.strict=true -use-network=true -compiler.verbose-stacktraces=false -compiler.actionscript-file-encoding UTF-8 -target-player 10.0.0 -default-background-color 8821927 -default-frame-rate 24 -default-script-limits 1000 60 -default-size 500 375 -compiler.headless-server=false -compiler.keep-all-type-selectors=false -compiler.use-resource-bundle-metadata=true -metadata.date Fri Mar 04 14:04:37 EET 2011 -metadata.localized-title Main x-default -verify-digests=true -compiler.namespaces.namespace+=http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009,Z:\..... \target\classes\config-4.1.0.16076\mxml-2009-manifest.xml -compiler.namespaces.namespace+=library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark,Z: \.....\target\classes\config-4.1.0.16076\spark-manifest.xml -compiler.namespaces.namespace+=library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx,Z:\..... \target\classes\config-4.1.0.16076\mx-manifest.xml -compiler.namespaces.namespace+=http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml,Z:\..... \PozitronUI\target\classes\config-4.1.0.16076\mxml-manifest.xml - static-link-runtime-shared-libraries=false -load-config= -metadata.language+=en_US any help... regards,

    Read the article

  • Suppressing line specific XCode compiler warnings

    - by MrHen
    Similar to Ben Gottlieb's question, I have a handful of deprecated calls that are bugging me. Is there a way to suppress warnings by line? For instance: if([[UIApplication sharedApplication] respondsToSelector:@selector(setStatusBarHidden:withAnimation:)]) { [[UIApplication sharedApplication] setStatusBarHidden:YES withAnimation:UIStatusBarAnimationSlide]; } else { [[UIApplication sharedApplication] setStatusBarHidden:YES animated:NO]; //causes deprecation warning } All I care about is that line. I don't want to turn off all deprecation warnings. I would also rather not do something like suppress specific warnings by file. There have been a few other circumstances where I wanted to flag a specific line as okay even though the compiler generates a warning. I essentially want to let my team know that the problem has been handled and stop getting bugged about the same line over and over.

    Read the article

  • Java generics: What is the compiler's issue here?

    - by Epaga
    I have the following methods: public <T> T fromJson( Reader jsonData, Class<T> clazz ) { return fromJson( jsonData, (Type)clazz ); } public <T> T fromJson( Reader jsonData, Type clazz ) { ... } The compiler is saying about the first method: type parameters of <T>T cannot be determined; no unique maximal instance exists for type variable T with upper bounds T,java.lang.Object return fromJson( jsonData, (Type)clazz ); ^ What is the problem?

    Read the article

  • Help with a compiler warning: Initialization from distinct Objective-C type when types match

    - by Alex Gosselin
    Here is the function where I get the compiler warning, I can't seem to figure out what is causing it. Any help is appreciated. -(void)displaySelector{ //warning on the following line: InstanceSelectorViewController *controller = [[InstanceSelectorViewController alloc] initWithCreator:self]; [self.navController pushViewController:controller animated:YES]; [controller release]; } Interface and implementation for the initWithCreator: method -(InstanceSelectorViewController*)initWithCreator:(InstanceCreator*)creator; -(InstanceSelectorViewController*)initWithCreator:(InstanceCreator*)crt{ if (self = [self initWithNibName:@"InstanceSelectorViewController" bundle:nil]) { creator = crt; } return self; }

    Read the article

  • Compiler optimization of repeated accessor calls

    - by apocalypse9
    I've found recently that for some types of financial calculations that the following pattern is much easier to follow and test especially in situations where we may need to get numbers from various stages of the computation. public class nonsensical_calculator { ... double _rate; int _term; int _days; double monthlyRate { get { return _rate / 12; }} public double days { get { return (1 - i); }} double ar { get { return (1+ days) /(monthlyRate * days) double bleh { get { return Math.Pow(ar - days, _term) public double raar { get { return bleh * ar/2 * ar / days; }} .... } Obviously this often results in multiple calls to the same accessor within a given formula. I was curious as to whether or not the compiler is smart enough to optimize away these repeated calls with no intervening change in state, or whether this style is causing a decent performance hit. Further reading suggestions are always appreciated

    Read the article

  • A/UX cc compiler errors on trivial code: "declared argument argc is missing"

    - by Fzn
    On a quite ancient UNIX (Apple A/UX 3.0.1 for 680x0 processors) using the built-in c compiler (cc), this issue arrises. Here is the code I'm trying to compile: #include <stdlib.h> #include <stdio.h> int main() int argc; char **argv; { if (argc > 1) puts(argv[1]); return (EXIT_SUCCESS); } And here is the output I get: pigeonz.root # cc -c test.c "test.c", line 5: declared argument argc is missing "test.c", line 6: declared argument argv is missing Using a more modern prototype did not help, nor did the manual page, nor a quick google search. What am I doing wrong?

    Read the article

  • Odd compiler error on if-clause without braces

    - by DisgruntledGoat
    The following Java code is throwing a compiler error: if ( checkGameTitle(currGame) ) ArrayList<String> items = parseColumns( tRows.get(rowOffset+1), currGame, time, method ); checkGameTitle is a public static function, returning a boolean. The errors are all of the type "cannot find symbol" with the symbols being variable ArrayList, variable String and variable items. However, if I add {curly braces} then the code compiles with no errors. Why might this be? Is there some ambiguity on the if clause without them?

    Read the article

  • Java assert nasty side-effect - compiler bug?

    - by Alex
    This public class test { public static void main(String[] args) { Object o = null; assert o != null; if(o != null) System.out.println("o != null"); } } prints out "o != null"; both 1.5_22 and 1.6_18. Compiler bug? Commenting out the assert fixes it. The byte code appears to jump directly to the print statement when assertions are disabled: public static main(String[]) : void L0 LINENUMBER 5 L0 ACONST_NULL ASTORE 1 L1 LINENUMBER 6 L1 GETSTATIC test.$assertionsDisabled : boolean IFNE L2 ALOAD 1: o IFNONNULL L2 NEW AssertionError DUP INVOKESPECIAL AssertionError.<init>() : void ATHROW L2 LINENUMBER 8 L2 GETSTATIC System.out : PrintStream LDC "o != null" INVOKEVIRTUAL PrintStream.println(String) : void L3 LINENUMBER 9 L3 RETURN L4

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >