Search Results

Search found 93727 results on 3750 pages for 'code documentation'.

Page 613/3750 | < Previous Page | 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620  | Next Page >

  • Display system information

    - by Robottinosino
    I would like output akin to that of OSX's system_profiler (https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#documentation/Darwin/Reference/ManPages/man8/system_profiler.8.html) On Ubuntu, I have to string a few utilities togeter: uname -a, lshw, ifconfig, etc... and then extract the list of installed software packages... Is there a single, simple facade to getting human readable system info from the CLI?

    Read the article

  • Experiments in Big Data Visualization on Maps

    Experiments in Big Data Visualization on Maps Brendan Kenny and Mano Marks continue their series on using the CanvasLayer library and HTML5 APIs to visualize large amounts of data on top of Google maps. This week they look at loading Shapefiles and KML directly in the browser and using WebGL to render their content over a map. From: GoogleDevelopers Views: 0 1 ratings Time: 00:00 More in Science & Technology

    Read the article

  • Pull Request Conversations, Inline Diff Enhancements

    [Do you tweet? Follow us on Twitter @matthawley and @adacole_msft] We deployed a new version of the CodePlex website today. Pull Request Conversations Previously, the only way for project members and users who submitted pull requests to converse was via e-mail. This complicated the review process and made conversations isolated and difficult to track. For this release, we’ve added functionality that enables you to have those same conversations within the pull request page. When you view a pull request, you’ll now see “Comments” and “Changes” tabs, with current comments displayed. Inline Diff Enhancements We tweaked the inline diff experience to make it easier to traverse diff blocks. When you open up the inline diff experience, you’ll now see up and down arrows. To move between the diff blocks, you can use those arrows or utilize the available keyboard shortcuts. Lastly, we have also brought the inline diff experience to the source control changes page for project and fork changesets. You can see both enhancements live by viewing the associated pull request or changeset changes on WikiPlex. The CodePlex team values your feedback. We are frequently monitoring Twitter, our Discussions, and Issue Tracker. If you have not visited the Issue Tracker recently, please take a few minutes to suggest or vote on a feature you would like to see implemented.

    Read the article

  • Custom data rendering in results

    Since the launch of Custom Search, we've been constantly pushing the customization envelope -- allowing users to tweak ranking, provide refinements, add promotions above results, change the look...

    Read the article

  • Blogging Round the World

    It seems that once or twice a week, I run across an Android-developer-oriented site that I hadn’t previously noticed. There are already a few aggregators and directories, and...

    Read the article

  • Debunking Dart Myths For Web Developers

    Debunking Dart Myths For Web Developers Addy Osmani interviews Seth Ladd to learn more about Dart. Join this episode to discover how Dart relates to JavaScript, who the intended audience for Dart is, and what Dart's motivations are. If you're curious what Dart is all about, and if it wants to replace JavaScript, this is the episode for you! From: GoogleDevelopers Views: 0 1 ratings Time: 00:00 More in Science & Technology

    Read the article

  • Problem with 'insert_at_cursor' attribute

    - by mivoligo
    I made something, so after clicking a button, some text should appear in the TextView. Part of my code: def on_button1_clicked(self, builer): self.writetest = self.builder.get_object("textview1") self.writetest.insert_at_cursor("something") Unfortunately, when I click the button I get: AttributeError: 'TextView' object has no attribute 'insert_at_cursor' According to GTK Documentation there is such attribute: http://developer.gnome.org/gtk3/stable/GtkTextView.html#GtkTextView-insert-at-cursor I have the same problem with Entry as well, if I change TextView to Entry. But if I use set_text instead of insert_at_cursor in my code, it works.

    Read the article

  • Notes from SambaXP 2010

    Hello, I’m Jeremy Allison , a Google engineer in the Open Source Programs Office and a Samba Team member. I recently returned from SambaXP , the annual Samba...

    Read the article

  • How to refactor a method which breaks "The law of Demeter" principle?

    - by dreza
    I often find myself breaking this principle (not intentially, just through bad design). However recently I've seen a bit of code that I'm not sure of the best approach. I have a number of classes. For simplicity I've taken out the bulk of the classes methods etc public class Paddock { public SoilType Soil { get; private set; } // a whole bunch of other properties around paddock information } public class SoilType { public SoilDrainageType Drainage { get; private set; } // a whole bunch of other properties around soil types } public class SoilDrainageType { // a whole bunch of public properties that expose soil drainage values public double GetProportionOfDrainage(SoilType soil, double blockRatio) { // This method does a number of calculations using public properties // exposed off SoilType as well as the blockRatio value in some conditions } } In the code I have seen in a number of places calls like so paddock.Soil.Drainage.GetProportionOfDrainage(paddock.Soil, paddock.GetBlockRatio()); or within the block object itself in places it's Soil.Drainage.GetProportionOfDrainage(this.Soil, this.GetBlockRatio()); Upon reading this seems to break "The Law of Demeter" in that I'm chaining together these properties to access the method I want. So my thought in order to adjust this was to create public methods on SoilType and Paddock that contains wrappers i.e. on paddock it would be public class Paddock { public double GetProportionOfDrainage() { return Soil.GetProportionOfDrainage(this.GetBlockRatio()); } } on the SoilType it would be public class SoilType { public double GetProportionOfDrainage(double blockRatio) { return Drainage.GetProportionOfDrainage(this, blockRatio); } } so now calls where it used would be simply // used outside of paddock class where we can access instances of Paddock paddock.GetProportionofDrainage() or this.GetProportionOfDrainage(); // if used within Paddock class This seemed like a nice alternative. However now I have a concern over how would I enforce this usage and stop anyone else from writing code such as paddock.Soil.Drainage.GetProportionOfDrainage(paddock.Soil, paddock.GetBlockRatio()); rather than just paddock.GetProportionOfDrainage(); I need the properties to remain public at this stage as they are too ingrained in usage throughout the code block. However I don't really want a mixture of accessing the method on DrainageType directly as that seems to defeat the purpose altogether. What would be the appropiate design approach in this situation? I can provide more information as required to better help in answers. Is my thoughts on refactoring this even appropiate or should is it best to leave it as is and use the property chaining to access the method as and when required?

    Read the article

  • IdentityServer v1.0.1 On-Premise and Azure Edition

    - by Your DisplayName here!
    I just uploaded the final Azure Edition as well as a combined Azure and on-premise source package to Codeplex. http://identityserver.codeplex.com/releases I am also in the process of building a wiki for documentation – it is not done yet – but can be browsed here: http://wiki.thinktecture.com/IdentityServer.MainPage.ashx Any feedback, bug reports, volunteers (coding, setup, wiki) – please DM me. Have fun!

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620  | Next Page >