Search Results

Search found 9047 results on 362 pages for 'double math'.

Page 63/362 | < Previous Page | 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70  | Next Page >

  • Runge-Kutta Method with adaptive step

    - by infoholic_anonymous
    I am implementing Runge-Kutta method with adaptive step in matlab. I get different results as compared to matlab's own ode45 and my own implementation of Runge-Kutta method with fixed step. What am I doing wrong in my code? Is it possible? function [ result ] = rk4_modh( f, int, init, h, h_min ) % % f - function handle % int - interval - pair (x_min, x_max) % init - initial conditions - pair (y1(0),y2(0)) % h_min - lower limit for h (step length) % h - initial step length % x - independent variable ( for example time ) % y - dependent variable - vertical vector - in our case ( y1, y2 ) function [ k1, k2, k3, k4, ka, y ] = iteration( f, h, x, y ) % core functionality performed within loop k1 = h * f(x,y); k2 = h * f(x+h/2, y+k1/2); k3 = h * f(x+h/2, y+k2/2); k4 = h * f(x+h, y+k3); ka = (k1 + 2*k2 + 2*k3 + k4)/6; y = y + ka; end % constants % relative error eW = 1e-10; % absolute error eB = 1e-10; s = 0.9; b = 5; % initialization i = 1; x = int(1); y = init; while true hy = y; hx = x; %algorithm [ k1, k2, k3, k4, ka, y ] = iteration( f, h, x, y ); % error estimation for j=1:2 [ hk1, hk2, hk3, hk4, hka, hy ] = iteration( f, h/2, hx, hy ); hx = hx + h/2; end err(:,i) = abs(hy - y); % step adjustment e = abs( hy ) * eW + eB; a = min( e ./ err(:,i) )^(0.2); mul = a * s; if mul >= 1 % step length admitted keepH(i) = h; k(:,:,i) = [ k1, k2, k3, k4, ka ]; previous(i,:) = [ x+h, y' ]; %' i = i + 1; if floor( x + h + eB ) == int(2) break; else h = min( [mul*h, b*h, int(2)-x] ); x = x + keepH(i-1); end else % step length requires further adjustments h = mul * h; if ( h < h_min ) error('Computation with given precision impossible'); end end end result = struct( 'val', previous, 'k', k, 'err', err, 'h', keepH ); end The function in question is: function [ res ] = fun( x, y ) % res(1) = y(2) + y(1) * ( 0.9 - y(1)^2 - y(2)^2 ); res(2) = -y(1) + y(2) * ( 0.9 - y(1)^2 - y(2)^2 ); res = res'; %' end The call is: res = rk4( @fun, [0,20], [0.001; 0.001], 0.008 ); The resulting plot for x1 : The result of ode45( @fun, [0, 20], [0.001, 0.001] ) is:

    Read the article

  • Java Polynomial Multiplication with ArrayList

    - by user1506919
    I am having a problem with one of my methods in my program. The method is designed to take 2 arraylists and the perform multiplication between the two like a polynomial. For example, if I was to say list1={3,2,1} and list2={5,6,7}; I am trying to get a return value of 15,28,38,20,7. However, all I can get is an error message that says: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Index: 0, Size: 0. I have provided the method below: private static ArrayList<Integer> multiply(ArrayList<Integer> list1,ArrayList<Integer> list2) { ArrayList<Integer> array =new ArrayList<Integer>(list1.size()+list2.size()); for (int i=0;i<array.size();i++) array.add(i, 0); for (int i = 0; i < list1.size(); i++) for (int j = 0; j < list2.size(); j++) array.set(i+j, ((list1.get(i) * list2.get(j))+array.get(i+j))); return array; } Any help with solving this problem is greatly appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Is there any sense in performing binary AND with a number where all bits are set to 1

    - by n535
    Greetings everybody. I have seen examples of such operations for so many times that I begin to think that I am getting something wrong with binary arithmetic. Is there any sense to perform the following: byte value = someAnotherByteValue & 0xFF; I don't really understand this, because it does not change anything anyway. Thanks for help. P.S. I was trying to search for information both elsewhere and here, but unsuccessfully. EDIT: Well, off course i assume that someAnotherByteValue is 8 bits long, the problem is that i don't get why so many people ( i mean professionals ) use such things in their code. For example in Jon Skeet's MiscUtil there is: uint s1 = (uint)(initial & 0xffff); where initial is int.

    Read the article

  • Does Python/Scipy have a firls( ) replacement (i.e. a weighted, least squares, FIR filter design)?

    - by delicasso
    I am porting code from Matlab to Python and am having trouble finding a replacement for the firls( ) routine. It is used for, least-squares linear-phase Finite Impulse Response (FIR) filter design. I looked at scipy.signal and nothing there looked like it would do the trick. Of course I was able to replace my remez and freqz algorithsm, so that's good. On one blog I found an algorithm that implemented this filter without weighting, but I need one with weights. Thanks, David

    Read the article

  • calculate intersection between two segments in a symmetric way

    - by Elazar Leibovich
    When using the usual formulas to calculate intersection between two 2D segments, ie here, if you round the result to an integer, you get non-symmetric results. That is, sometimes, due to rounding errors, I get that intersection(A,B)!=intersection(B,A). The best solution is to keep working with floats, and compare the results up to a certain precision. However, I must round the results to integers after calculating the intersection, I cannot keep working with floats. My best solution so far was to use some full order on the segments in the plane, and have intersection to always compare the smaller segment to the larger segment. Is there a better method? Am I missing something?

    Read the article

  • posmax: like argmax but gives the position(s) of the element x for which f[x] is maximal

    - by dreeves
    Mathematica has a built-in function ArgMax for functions over infinite domains, based on the standard mathematical definition. The analog for finite domains is a handy utility function. Given a function and a list (call it the domain of the function), return the element(s) of the list that maximize the function. Here's an example of finite argmax in action: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/471029/canonicalize-nfl-team-names/472213#472213 And here's my implementation of it (along with argmin for good measure): (* argmax[f, domain] returns the element of domain for which f of that element is maximal -- breaks ties in favor of first occurrence. *) SetAttributes[{argmax, argmin}, HoldFirst]; argmax[f_, dom_List] := Fold[If[f[#1]>=f[#2], #1, #2]&, First[dom], Rest[dom]] argmin[f_, dom_List] := argmax[-f[#]&, dom] First, is that the most efficient way to implement argmax? What if you want the list of all maximal elements instead of just the first one? Second, how about the related function posmax that, instead of returning the maximal element(s), returns the position(s) of the maximal elements?

    Read the article

  • How can I transform latitude and longitude to x,y in Java?

    - by hory.incpp
    Hello, I am working on a geographic project in Java. The input are coordinates : 24.4444 N etc Output: a PLAIN map (not round) showing the point of the coordinates. I don't know the algorithm to transform from coordinates to x,y on a JComponent, can somebody help me? The map looks like this: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/74/Mercator-projection.jpg Thank you

    Read the article

  • PHP Code to Generate Simple Flowchart

    - by revbackup
    I am making a flowchart out the subjects in the curriculum of our school. a flowchart is generated through its preRequisite.... for example FIRST YEAR FIRST SEMESTER SUBJECTS ---- PREREQUISITE MATH 1 ---- NONE MATH 2 ---- NONE ENGL 1 ---- NONE SOCIO 1 ----- NONE POLSCI 1 ----- NONE FIRSTE YEAR SECOND SEMESTER SUBJECTS ---- PREREQUISITE MATH 3 ----- MATH 1 MATH 4 ----- MATH 2, MATH 1 ENGL 2 ----- ENGL 1 POLSCI 2 ----- POLSCI 1 So, I must print it this way, just using simple PHP but difficult Logic.: MATH1 -----> MATH3 -----> MATH4 MATH 2 ----->MATH 4 ENGL1 -----> ENGL 2 SOCIO 1 POLSCI 1 -----> POLSCI 2 Can anyone give me a good algorithm for this, because this is really difficult. I am planning to echo the results in an HTML table, and it makes it more complicated. Do you have suggestions how to solve this problem properly and display the results also properly???? Thank you in advance!

    Read the article

  • PHP Find Coordinates between two points

    - by Ozzy
    Hi all, simple question here. Lets say I have two points: point 1 x = 0 y = 0 point 2 x = 10 y = 10 How would i find out all the coordinates inbetween that programmatically, assuming there is a strait line between two points... so the above example would return: 0,0 1,1 2,2 3,3 ... 8,8 9,9 10,10 Thanks :)

    Read the article

  • Linear regression confidence intervals in SQL

    - by Matt Howells
    I'm using some fairly straight-forward SQL code to calculate the coefficients of regression (intercept and slope) of some (x,y) data points, using least-squares. This gives me a nice best-fit line through the data. However we would like to be able to see the 95% and 5% confidence intervals for the line of best-fit (the curves below). What these mean is that the true line has 95% probability of being below the upper curve and 95% probability of being above the lower curve. How can I calculate these curves? I have already read wikipedia etc. and done some googling but I haven't found understandable mathematical equations to be able to calculate this. Edit: here is the essence of what I have right now. --sample data create table #lr (x real not null, y real not null) insert into #lr values (0,1) insert into #lr values (4,9) insert into #lr values (2,5) insert into #lr values (3,7) declare @slope real declare @intercept real --calculate slope and intercept select @slope = ((count(*) * sum(x*y)) - (sum(x)*sum(y)))/ ((count(*) * sum(Power(x,2)))-Power(Sum(x),2)), @intercept = avg(y) - ((count(*) * sum(x*y)) - (sum(x)*sum(y)))/ ((count(*) * sum(Power(x,2)))-Power(Sum(x),2)) * avg(x) from #lr Thank you in advance.

    Read the article

  • Fastest primality test

    - by Grigory Javadyan
    Hi. Could you suggest a fast, deterministic method that is usable in practice, for testing if a large number is prime or not? Also, I would like to know how to use non-deterministic primality tests correctly. For example, if I'm using such a method, I can be sure that a number is not prime if the output is "no", but what about the other case, when the output is "probably"? Do I have to test for primality manually in this case? Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • mod,prime -> inverse possible

    - by Piet
    Hi all. I was wondering if one can do the following: We have: X is a product of N-primes, thus I assume unique. C is a constant. We can assure that C is a number that is part of the N-primes or not. Whichever will work best. Thus: X mod C = Z We have Z and C and we know that X was a product of N-primes, where N is restricted lets say first 100 primes. Is there anyway we can get back X?

    Read the article

  • Delphi component or library to display mathematical expressions

    - by Svein Bringsli
    I'm looking for a simple component that displays mathematical expressions in Delphi. When I started out I thought it would be easy to find something on the net, but it turns out it was harder than anticipated. There are lots and lots of components that will parse mathematical expressions, but few (none?) that will display them. Ideally I would like a component as simple as a TLabel, where I could set the caption to some expression and it would be displayed correctly, but some sort of library that let's me draw expressions to a canvas would also be sufficient for my needs. Update: I'm not talking about plotting graphs of functions or something like that. I want to display (for instance) (X^2+3)/X like this:

    Read the article

  • Mapping Hilbert values to 3D points

    - by Alexander Gladysh
    I have a set of Hilbert values (length from the start of the Hilbert curve to the given point). What is the best way to convert these values to 3D points? Original Hilbert curve was not in 3D, so I guess I have to pick by myself the Hilbert curve rank I need. I do have total curve length though (that is, the maximum value in the set). Perhaps there is an existing implementation? Some library that would allow me to work with Hilbert curve / values? Language does not matter much.

    Read the article

  • Animation with Initial Velocity

    - by abustin
    I've been trying to solve this problem for a number of days now but I must be missing something. Known Variables: vi = Initial Velocity t = Animation Duration d = Distance The function I'm trying to create: D(t) = the current distance for a given time Using this information I want to be able to create a smooth animation curve with varying velocity (ease-in/ease-out). The animation must be able ease-in from an initial velocity. The animation must be exactly t seconds and must be travel exactly d units. The curve should lean towards the average velocity with acceleration occurring at the beginning and the end portions of the curve. I'm open to extra configuration variables. The best I've been able to come up with is something that doesn't factor in the initial velocity. I'm hoping someone smarter can help me out. ;) Thank you! p.s. I'm working with an ECMAScript variant

    Read the article

  • Fibonacci sequence subroutine returning one digit too high...PERL

    - by beProactive
    #!/usr/bin/perl -w use strict; sub fib { my($num) = @_; #give $num to input array return(1) if ($num<=1); #termination condition return($num = &fib($num-1) + &fib($num-2)); #should return sum of first "n" terms in the fibonacci sequence } print &fib(7)."\n"; #should output 20 This subroutine should be outputting a summation of the first "x" amount of terms, as specified by the argument to the sub. However, it's one too high. Does this have something to do with the recursion? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • How to implement Horner's scheme for multivariate polynomials?

    - by gsreynolds
    Background I need to solve polynomials in multiple variables using Horner's scheme in Fortran90/95. The main reason for doing this is the increased efficiency and accuracy that occurs when using Horner's scheme to evaluate polynomials. I currently have an implementation of Horner's scheme for univariate/single variable polynomials. However, developing a function to evaluate multivariate polynomials using Horner's scheme is proving to be beyond me. An example bivariate polynomial would be: 12x^2y^2+8x^2y+6xy^2+4xy+2x+2y which would factorised to x(x(y(12y+8))+y(6y+4)+2)+2y and then evaluated for particular values of x & y. Research I've done my research and found a number of papers such as: staff.ustc.edu.cn/~xinmao/ISSAC05/pages/bulletins/articles/147/hornercorrected.pdf citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.40.8637&rep=rep1&type=pdf www.is.titech.ac.jp/~kojima/articles/B-433.pdf Problem However, I'm not a mathematician or computer scientist, so I'm having trouble with the mathematics used to convey the algorithms and ideas. As far as I can tell the basic strategy is to turn a multivariate polynomial into separate univariate polynomials and compute it that way. Can anyone help me? If anyone could help me turn the algorithms into pseudo-code that I can implement into Fortran myself, I would be very grateful.

    Read the article

  • Calculating Length Based on Sensor Data

    - by BSchlinker
    I've got an IR sensor which writes its current information to a token which I then interpret in a C# application. That's all good -- no problems there, heres my code: SetLabelText(tokens [1],label_sensorValue); sensorreading = Int32.Parse(tokens[0]); sensordistance = (mathfunctionhere); Great. So the further away the IR sensor is from an object, the lower the sensor reading (as less light is reflected back and received by the sensor). My problem is in interpreting that length. I can go ahead and get lets say "110" as a value when an object is 5 inches away, and then "70" as a value when an object is 6 inches away. Now I want to be able to calculate the distance of an object using these constants for any length. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Unique keys for Sphinx along three vectors instead of two

    - by Brendon Muir
    I'm trying to implement thinking-sphinx across multiple 'sites' hosted under a single rails application. I'm working with the developer of thinking-sphinx to sort through the finer details and am making good progress, but I need help with a maths problem: Usually the formula for making a unique ID in a thinking-sphinx search index is to take the id, multiply it by the total number of models that are searchable, and add the number of the currently indexed model: id * total_models + current_model This works well, but now I also through an entity_id into the mix, so there are three vextors for making this ID unique. Could someone help me figure out the equation to gaurantee that the id's will never collide using these three variables: id, total_models, total_entities The entity ID is an integer. I thought of: id * (total_models + total_entities) + (current_model + current_entity) but that results in collisions. Any help would be greatly appreciated :)

    Read the article

  • Counting problem: possible sudoko tables?

    - by Sorush Rabiee
    Hi, I'm working on a sudoko solver. my method is using a game tree and explore possible permutations for each set of digits by DFS Algorithm. in order to analyzing problem, i want to know what is the count of possible valid and invalid sudoko tables? - a 9*9 table that have 9 one, 9 two, ... , 9 nine. (this isn't exact duplicate by this question) my solution is: 1- First select 9 cells for 1s: (*) 2- and like (1) for other digits (each time, 9 cells will be deleted from remaining available cells): C(81-9,9) , C(81-9*2,9) .... = 3- finally multiply the result by 9! (permutation of 123456789 in (*)) this is not equal to accepted answer of this question but problems are equivalent. what did i do wrong?

    Read the article

  • Divide and conquer method to compute roots [SOLVED]

    - by hellsoul153
    Hello, Knowing that we can use Divide-and-Conquer algorithm to compute large exponents, for exemple 2 exp 100 = 2 exp(50) * 2 exp(50), which is quite more efficient, is this method efficient using roots ? For exemple 2 exp (1/100) = (2 exp(1/50)) exp(1/50) ? In other words, I'm wondering if (n exp(1/x)) is more efficient to (n exp(1/y)) for x < y and where x and y are integers.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70  | Next Page >